Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rauner denies being “disingenuous” about tax hike
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rauner denies being “disingenuous” about tax hike

Tuesday, Jun 5, 2018

* Yesterday

REPORTER: “You just signed a budget that spends the money from the tax increase that you opposed. Over the summer we’re moving into a campaign season. Are you going to out there on the campaign trail and tell people that you object to this tax increase that you’re approving the spending on?”

RAUNER: “Absolutely.”

REPORTER: “Isn’t that disingenuous?”

RAUNER: “Not at all. If we introduced – if we passed a budget that I introduced, the spending plan that I introduced we could begin to rollback that tax hike and we would be running a $1.5 billion surplus in this coming year and we could – “

REPORTER: [INAUDIBLE]

RAUNER: “This is bipartisan compromise, this is a compromise. It’s not perfect, none of us got everything that we were looking for. This budget does not pay down bills so I was very frustrated. It did not pass the comprehensive pension reform that the Senate Democrats passed last year, we need to do that. It did not get regulatory relief for businesses, and workers comp and other regulations so we can grow more jobs. And most importantly, or I should say maybe very importantly it did not get the mandate relief on our schools, our schools need mandate relief and we need mandate relief on our local government so we can consolidate governments more effectively and efficiently and bring down our tax burden. These are the changes we will continue to strive to make, but this budget for the first time in many years even prior to me being Governor is balanced, through some hard work and some great efforts we will have it balanced and it stops some excessive spending that would have otherwise happened. And it’s a good step in the right direction.”

Notice he didn’t answer the question.

* Another exchange

I’ll add one other point that I think is salient, if we had passed the budget that I had introduced in February – that I had proposed in February – and then just used the rest of the assumptions and programs that are in this budget we would be running about a $1.5 billion surplus in the coming fiscal year. We could use that for a tax reduction, we could use that to invest more in infrastructure, and we could use that to pay down bills.

OK, now that’s disingenuous. He talks like $1.5 billion is a huge amount of money that can easily be divvied up for a tax cut, infrastructure and paying off bills. The bill backlog alone will be more than $7 billion at the end of the fiscal year.

A $1.5 billion tax cut would reduce the income rate by 0.375 percentage points. So, instead of a 4.95 personal rate, we’d have a 4.575 rate. Great news! The exodus will surely end! But since much of what they used to “balance” the budget are one-time revenue sources, including borrowing $800 million from special funds for two years and selling the Thompson Center, we’d be in an even worse hole.

Divide it up three ways and you’d trim the backlog by a mere $500 million, reduce the income tax rate by 0.125 points to 4.825 and have a half a bil left over for capital - and you’d still have a $6.6 billion backlog with even less state money to address it.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

28 Comments
  1. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 1:52 pm:

    ===”disingenuous”===

    Interesting word choice. Synonyms for that word include:

    insincere
    dishonest
    untruthful
    false
    deceitful
    duplicitous
    lying
    mendacious
    hypocritical


  2. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 1:52 pm:

    With his signature, Bruce Rauner validated and certified his disingenuous statement that the 32% tax increase isn’t needed, as the budget signed by Rauner requires that 32% tax increase to balance.

    Bruce Rauner failed to get reforms, in part, because his “give” of signing a tax increase was in of itself disingenuous too, as a give can’t be something that is 100% required.

    Rauner is a phony. It’s disingenuous to a fault, but that’s Rauner’s three plus years in a nutshell.


  3. - Sir Reel - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 1:55 pm:

    Billions in unpaid bills, no infrastructure funding for years, pension debt in the stratosphere … yes, let’s cut taxes. We have another stable genius.


  4. - Chris Widger - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 1:58 pm:

    ==We have another stable genius.==

    Marching orders for the PritzkerBots today, and this week, this month, and this year–Rauner is Trump, Trump is Rauner, eliminate nuance.


  5. - Juice - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:01 pm:

    “begin to rollback that tax hike and we would be running a $1.5 billion surplus”

    I mean, that’s just a lie. His proposal was $500 million to pay bills and a $1 billion tax cut. It wasn’t both.


  6. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:04 pm:

    The Governor has the ability to manage the budget. He doesn’t have to spend something just because it was appropriated. He just can’t seem to grasp the concept of governing.


  7. - JS Mill - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:07 pm:

    What the governor seems to be saying, of course with out actually saying it, is that we will need more revenue next year.


  8. - Birdseed - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:08 pm:

    Which question wasn’t answered?


  9. - DuPage Bard - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:11 pm:

    Disingenuous is such a great word. A reporter can’t really say aren’t you a liar? So this fits the bill rather nicely.


  10. - Streator Curmudgeon - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:12 pm:

    [INAUDIBLE]


  11. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:13 pm:

    ===eliminate nuance===

    lol

    Yeah, you would never do that.


  12. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:13 pm:

    47, put me down for deceitful.


  13. - Try-4-Truth - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:22 pm:

    ====== Marching orders for the PritzkerBots today, and this week, this month, and this year–Rauner is Trump, Trump is Rauner, eliminate nuance. =====

    Yeah, because…. Madigan.

    See, that’s how it feels.


  14. - illini - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:23 pm:

    Unfortunately, for most Illinois voters who might possibly read of this exchange, the irony, outright denials, the lack of candor and distortion of the facts will be lost on many who will determine his fate.

    Am I right?


  15. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:25 pm:

    Demoralized 204. Bingo


  16. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:27 pm:

    Disengenuous?

    You mean like JB and the Speaker saying they are going to pass a progressive income tax to magically solve all of Illinois problems, even though it was fell 10 votes short in the House a few weeks back.

    And that JB and the Speaker were all about the wealthy paying their fair share despite the off shore accounts and the removed plumbing and the fact that the Speaker clients are all “miilionaires and billionaires” who hire him so they do not have to pay their fair share.

    They aren’t phonies right OW?

    Governor Rauner has always supported revenue with reform because he does not think just raising taxes will fix Illinois.


  17. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:36 pm:

    ==Marching orders for the PritzkerBots today, and this week, this month, and this year–Rauner is Trump, Trump is Rauner, eliminate nuance==

    Sir Reel using the trump term “stable genius” about Bruce isnt all that different than you taking a term Rich Miller coined and turning it around to say “PritzkerBot”. Talk about eliminating nuance


  18. - I Miss Bentohs - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:54 pm:

    I vote for “mendacious”

    I also like it starts with an M and has three syllables


  19. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:56 pm:

    ==Disengenuous?==

    I could see where that could be a question. Disingenous implies one is pretending. I’m not sure the Governor is pretending when he says false things. I think he actually believes the nonsense he says.


  20. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 2:58 pm:

    disingenuous

    “not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.”

    https://www.google.com/search?q=disingenuous


  21. - Anon0091 - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 3:07 pm:

    “Governor Rauner has always supported revenue with reform because he does not think just raising taxes will fix Illinois.”

    No he hasn’t. Rauner has always wanted others to pass the revenue and then be able to verbally abuse them for their vote. He’s a political coward. But of course he never introduced a balanced budget anyway.


  22. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 3:14 pm:

    ===…with reform…===

    A required element can’t be held as a “give”

    Bruce Rauber proves that, signing a budget, validating and certifying that 32% tax increase is required to balance a budget.

    Rauner signing the budget blows up your whole argument. The tax increase was 100% necessary. Without it, Bruce woulda signed a budget lacking more revenue, lol

    ===You mean like JB and the Speaker saying they are going to pass a progressive income tax to magically solve all of Illinois problems, even though it was fell 10 votes short in the House a few weeks back.===

    Now it sounds like a campaign promise, not unlike Rauber saying term limits or fair maps.

    Yeah, about that 10 votes shy, that’s how legislation passage works. You fall short, it fails. Good on you to see the process.

    ===They aren’t phonies right===

    Weee talking about the Governor, the disingenuous way Rauner thinks his signature and the validating the tax increase isn’t ridiculous.

    So you agree it’s ridiculous? That’s what it sounds like.


  23. - walker - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 3:36 pm:

    Nuance, schmuance.

    In three years, we have never heard our Governor Rauner state an accurate fiscal number. I have given up on that expectation. He cannot possibly be that unaware.


  24. - Flapdoodle - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 4:01 pm:

    OW,
    With respect and out of genuine curiosity, do you sometimes deliberately type Rauber instead of Rauner? A German-English dictionary will tell you why I ask. Again, with respect and genuine curiosity.


  25. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 4:03 pm:

    Typo.

    If it is a bad form or an off-color meaning, I have been wrong in these typos.

    I’ll need to see what you are referring to, and be much more careful in the future.


  26. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 4:15 pm:

    Flap doodle…..”B” is next to “N”…..simple mistake.


  27. - JoanP - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 4:20 pm:

    =Notice he didn’t answer the question.=

    What else is new? I don’t think he could answer a question to save his life (or his governorship).


  28. - XDNR - Tuesday, Jun 5, 18 @ 6:38 pm:

    Delirious or mentally confused.

    ===LP-Governor Rauner has always supported revenue with reform because he does not think just raising taxes will fix Illinois.===

    Rauner’s turn around agenda estimated at 1.4% or $500 million. Rauner’s crisis creates opportunity bill backlog estimated at $7 billion.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Downstate newspapers appear to be picking the lesser of two evils
* Caption contest!
* Plaintiffs holding press conference today
* Maybe have a long chat with the governor about this?
* Pritzker campaign touts party-building money
* Learn from this, please
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller