Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Moody’s: Pension buyout plan is credit positive, poses “modest budget risk”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Moody’s: Pension buyout plan is credit positive, poses “modest budget risk”

Monday, Jun 11, 2018

* From Moody’s…

“Illinois’ pension buyout plan is credit positive, but reliance on savings poses modest budget risk.” The new Illinois budget allows for an approximately $440 million (or 5.2%) cut in pension contributions in the fiscal year starting July 1, largely by offering benefit buyouts to pension participants. The state’s buyout offer is credit positive because it will generate significant pension liability savings to the extent that employees accept the offer. Illinois’ $201 billion adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) in fiscal 2016 was the highest among all states relative to both revenue and gross domestic product in our most recent survey, and rising contribution requirements challenge the state’s budget. Options to reduce the liabilities through benefit reforms are limited by a constitutional public pension benefit protections clause.

The state’s new legislation aims to navigate around the constitutional constraint by using voluntary buyouts. First, the state will offer certain employees about to retire lump-sum payouts for forgoing guaranteed 3% compounding cost-of-living adjustments on their pensions. Second, the state will offer the vested pension participants who have left their pension-eligible jobs, but have yet to retire, a lump-sum buyout equal to 60% of their lifetime pension benefits on a present-value basis. To preserve pension plan assets, the state would finance the buyouts by issuing as much as $1 billion of bonds. The state also plans to shift certain pension costs to school districts and universities to the extent those entities grant salary increases above a specified level.

Actuaries for the State Employees’ Retirement System of Illinois (SERS), one of the largest of the five plans to which the state contributes, project that the plan will pay out roughly $1.6 billion in benefits to currently inactive, but vested, employees through 2046. The state’s projected saving in the coming fiscal year amounts to $443 million for all five of its major pension plans, but actual savings could fall short of the target if fewer participants than the state expects take the buyouts. The state’s forecast is based on assumed acceptance rates of 25% for retiring members and 22% for the vested but inactive participants. As a result, the state faces a risk that the plan will either increase its underfunding of pension contributions or add to a backlog of unpaid bills.

So, Moody’s doesn’t care that they’re taking out the savings for General Funds spending up front rather than leaving it in the pension systems? This seems kinda odd.

* I posed that question to Moody’s and got this response from Tom Aaron, one of the co-authors of today’s report…

We tend to view pension buyouts as positive because they produce net savings for sponsoring governments. Liability reductions in present value terms, to the extent buyouts are taken up, exceed the cost to the government making the offer.

* Meanwhile, Moody’s also took a look at the education funding reform plan in its second fiscal year…

“Illinois Schools’ second year of significantly higher state aid is credit positive.” The Illinois budget also provides a $350 million boost in school funding. The budget is credit positive for Illinois’ K-12 school districts because it increases funding consistent with last year’s change to the state aid formula. Public Act 100-0465 (PA 100-0465), passed last year, changed Illinois’ funding formula and set targets for significant increases in state funding. The legislation utilizes research-based elements to establish a unique “district adequacy target” for every school district based on student needs. School districts are categorized into four tiers. Tier 1 districts are most below adequacy and benefit most from any boost in state funding.

The fiscal 2018 and 2019 budgets increase formula-based funding by $350 million each year. Of the fiscal 2019 increase, $50 million is allocated to a new property tax relief program. The fiscal 2019 budget also provided another $50 million for early childhood education. Even with the two-year boost in funding, many districts will remain far below adequacy targets. State estimates indicate that it would require billions of dollars in new state funding to bring districts below adequacy to the target. Given Illinois’ financial challenges, it remains highly uncertain whether it can sustain annual funding increases. Illinois also has a history of delaying categorical grant payments to districts, and formula state aid was delayed last year as the legislature rewrote the formula.

Adding $350 million in K-12 spending every single year will be tough, particularly if the national economy hits the skids.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

12 Comments
  1. - City Zen - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 11:27 am:

    ==Adding $350 million in K-12 spending every single year will be tough==

    Indeed. If we adopt the CTBA’s graduated tax plan, every cent of the additional tax revenue generated will be eaten up by K-12 funding.


  2. - Arthur Andersen - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 11:52 am:

    “We tend to view pension buyouts as credit positive.”

    Oh. Even when the “savings” are booked up front and the buyouts are funded by borrowing more money instead of from the pot o’ savings? Splendid.


  3. - Rich Miller - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 11:56 am:

    AA, that’s what I thought. It’s so weird.


  4. - 47th Ward - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 12:03 pm:

    ===and the buyouts are funded by borrowing more money===

    Since they’ll get paid to rate the bonds for this borrowing, perhaps Moody’s meant “credit positive” for themselves?


  5. - DarkDante - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 12:42 pm:

    ==Even when the “savings” are booked up front and the buyouts are funded by borrowing more money==

    My understanding (note that I am also unsure about the math here) is that the savings incurred in the current fiscal year are $440M, such that we can expect to save as much each year into the future (and possible even more, considering the compounding effect of the the COLA). The fact that we are borrowing to pay for this should reduce its projected savings by the cost of borrowing, but I think Moody’s reasoning is relatively solid, as the state incurs savings in perpetuity (or at least for the remainder of all Tier 1 employee payouts), while the bonding is much more short term and recognizable. The savings is all financial, but, if the buyouts hit the 22-25% rate projected, significant.


  6. - RNUG - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 1:25 pm:

    == Actuaries for the State Employees’ Retirement System of Illinois (SERS), one of the largest of the five plans ==

    That statement is a bit misleading. TRS is about 50%, SERS and SURS are each about 24%,and GARS and JRS are rounding errors.

    Also, I had the same question both -AA- and Rich had …


  7. - Small Town Girl - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 1:38 pm:

    RNUG, do you think the fact that there are a lot of retirement aged employees who are awaiting being placed at their proper step will also hurt the numbers of employees who will take this option? I thought maybe for that reason, the money for the steps might be included in the budget.


  8. - Wondering - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 1:50 pm:

    Did they ever announce the discount rate and the life expectancy age they will be using to calculate the buyout amounts? They must know what they came with the 443 million in savings.


  9. - RNUG - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 5:37 pm:

    - Small Town Girl -

    Personally, I don’t think anyone should trade away the Tier 1 3% compounded AAI fo cash and the Tier 2 1.5% non-compounded AAI unless they are on their deathbed and have no survivors (spouse / minors) that would benefit from the pension.

    As to people waiting to retire, there are lots of reasons. I don’t know that waiting for the steps is a big issue. You would have to ask your retirement system, but I would expect them (worse case) have to recalculate your pension once the back pay was properly credited.


  10. - Arthur Andersen - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 6:51 pm:

    Wondering, the systems should be using the life expectancy tables contained in their actuarial assumptions unless they have reason to believe that this cohort is substantially different than the population as a whole. Discount rate, not sure, but again shouldn’t be different from regular rate.


  11. - Anonymous - Monday, Jun 11, 18 @ 9:46 pm:

    Does the 1.5 begin as soon as you retire
    Or is it delayed


  12. - Joe - Tuesday, Jun 12, 18 @ 12:10 pm:

    They should offer a buyout where the employees can but 5 years of time and age like they did years ago. This would get rid of some of the older high dollar employees for cheaper younger ones.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Downstate newspapers appear to be picking the lesser of two evils
* Caption contest!
* Plaintiffs holding press conference today
* Maybe have a long chat with the governor about this?
* Pritzker campaign touts party-building money
* Learn from this, please
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller