Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Mayor Emanuel rejects the “Madigan question”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Mayor Emanuel rejects the “Madigan question”

Wednesday, Jun 13, 2018

* Bill Cameron

When asked about Speaker Mike Madigan and the Springfield sexual harassment scandal, Mayor Emanuel went-off on a reporter Tuesday afternoon at City Hall.

The question was whether the mayor’s concerned women voters won’t vote for Democrats because of the way Speaker Madigan has handled the #MeToo scandal in state politics. Rahm interrupted the reporter mid question.

“Guys! The news industry, the entertainment industry’s been affected! Politics been affected,” said Emanuel, “Every areas been affected because people are approaching questions they haven’t dealt with before and should have a long time ago. And if what you do in the discussion of it is say it’s about that person, then you’re putting up a wall and a blind and not dealing with it!”

* John Byrne

“Can I say, I a hundred percent reject the question, and I think that’s really a bad way to look at it,” Emanuel said when asked whether women voters in Illinois might be less inclined to vote for Democrats because of the harsh light cast on Madigan’s organizations.

“You’re not going to find a solution to a problem if you try to personalize it around one person,” the mayor continued.

He then compared the brewing situation in Springfield to the sexual harassment scandals that have engulfed media personalities, making an apparent reference to the revelations about CBS News anchor Charlie Rose that cost him his job with the network.

“And all due respect, I’m taking a question from a CBS reporter, you had a national reporter that had problems,” Emanuel said. “Do I say I don’t want CBS because you had a national problem? I think it’s really, and all due respect, really an antiquated, out of date way of thinking about it.”

* Fran Spielman

“If individuals want to make a decision about how they’re gonna vote because of one person, they’ll make that. But if you try to solve the problems — not the politics, but actually deal with the whole issue of sexual politics in the office, in the workplace or in any other situation, it is not to think about it as one person any more than you think about it as one industry.” […]

“The news industry has been affected. The entertainment industry has been affected. Politics has been affected. Every area has been affected because people are now … dealing with questions they haven’t dealt [with] before and should have — a long time ago. If what you do … is say that it’s about that person, then you’re putting up a wall … and not dealing with it,” the mayor said.

“To say … what are the political implications for women voters in the future — if they make that decision, okay. They have a right to. … But the real honest way to deal with the problem is not to think about the politics but to think about the solution and know that a lot of things that used to be a given no longer work. We’re in the middle of a major change — appropriately, long overdue — in every sector.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

25 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:37 am:

    Mayor Spin Doctor Gravitas at work.

    Who knew he was such a “problem solver?” His CPS administration doesn’t reflect that, nor does the 17.5% clearance rate for homicides.

    Perhaps he could turn his mad problem-solving skills to protecting children from predators and perverts in the public schools and solving murders. Those are kind of big deals, if “those people” matter.

    https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/murder-clearance-rate-in-chicago-hit-new-low-in-2017/


  2. - Perrid - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:39 am:

    I don’t know if that was the best way to verbalize the argument, but yes, saying everything is Madigan’s fault and everything would be better if he got the boot is both (mostly though not entirely) unfair and very unproductive. I might even say counterproductive. Changing a culture (I’m talking American culture, not IL or the Statehouse thought that’s true as well) is definitely a marathon, not a sprint, and so focusing on outing a guy who, again, has not himself even been accused of harassment does the movement no favors.

    This comment also might not be the best way to communicate my point but it’s where I am: I get angry mobs like to see blood but that is not where or how progress is made.


  3. - low level - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:40 am:

    Noted, certainly, but perhaps they may appreciate his firing men who had been with him for years as soon as charges were made.

    They may also contrast that with the # of charges against a certain Mr. Trump himself (not staff nor underlings) from
    dozens of women who say he harassed them and his onging denials and attempts to bury the issue.


  4. - @misterjayem - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:41 am:

    His would be a poor response from any politician.

    From one as seasoned as Rahm, it’s inexcusable.

    – MrJM


  5. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:45 am:

    nice try from Rahm, but I don’t think it works the same way in politics. Madigan had negative buzz before, so more to talk about . In other spillover news, one Senate race in Virginia and one Congressional race in Chicago have a Republican nominee who expresses white supremacist ideas and a Holocaust denier/Nazi sympathizer. the missouri “legitimate rape” candidacy rang around the nation. those two situations this year will also.


  6. - SSL - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:46 am:

    The reporter was baiting Rahm and got him to go off, which isn’t a surprise, but I like the way Rahm lobbed it right back at him with the CBS reference. I’m not a Rahm fan at all, but that was good.

    Politics, national media and entertainment involve incredible power and money, and many involved have no moral compass and are serial abusers. My boring life seems pretty good.


  7. - Chris Widger - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:48 am:

    Really tough. The CBS stuff is a pretty good analogy, but insisting on depersonalizing such a personal issue isn’t a winning line of rhetoric. If you’re in a position of power, you shouldn’t be saying “No, that’s not a productive solution” unless you’re describing what is an effective solution.


  8. - JoanP - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:48 am:

    I rarely say this about Emanuel, but he is absolutely right.

    As a commenter pointed out yesterday, the culture of sexual harassment in Springfield preceded Madigan by decades.

    It’s not just Madigan, and it’s not just Illlinois, and it’s not just the United States. And it’s not just politics.

    Anyone who thinks getting rid of Madigan is going to change that is kidding herself.


  9. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:48 am:

    When our president, who openly admitted sexual abuse, sets the example, it’s very bad. There are many allegations against Trump. If he sexually assaulted even one woman, how can it be fair for politicians of either political party and other political insiders to step down, like Sen. Sen. Franken, when Trump gets by unscathed?

    All must face consequences for sexual abuse and harassment.


  10. - Regular democrat - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:49 am:

    If he going this far to give madigan political cover then he must be running. My previous prediction seems to be incorrect. He needs madigans help in a big way


  11. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:52 am:

    === My previous prediction seems to be incorrect===

    Dude has been raising campaign money by the oil-tanker loads for months and dropping oppo on everybody and their mothers and this is what tipped you off?


  12. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:55 am:

    ===preceded Madigan by decades===

    And, until lately, what did he do to clean it up? It’s the same sort of argument the Raunerites make. “Illinois was a mess before Bruce was elected,” they always say. That’s true, but there’s no denying he made many things worse.


  13. - Whatever - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 9:55 am:

    Defensive much?


  14. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 10:05 am:

    –If he going this far to give madigan political cover then he must be running.–

    Huh? You thought he wasn’t?


  15. - A guy - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 10:10 am:

    Nothing to see here. Move along.
    It’s been his motto all along.


  16. - Regular democrat - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 10:38 am:

    I based my opinion on the possibility of himnot rumning again on the fact that his internal polling numbers are horrible for an incumbent. He has horribly mismanaged the board of ed from the executive suite to the custodians. Thirdly and most importantly his polling numbers are terrible amongst african americans. These aee very strong headwinds evem fot rahm. Just an opinion based on some real life facts.


  17. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 10:52 am:

    Rahm is half correct, half incorrect. Plenty of folks are focusing on individuals and missing the bigger societal picture. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t hold individuals responsible. Madigan has been running the show in the House and with Illinois’ Dems for a very long time. He absolutely bears responsibility for the culture that has operated under his watch. But to Rahm’s point, blaming and removing Madigan will not fix this, and focusing on Madigan alone would delay resolving #metoo and a number of other issues.


  18. - Kyle Hillman - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 11:15 am:

    “You’re not going to find a solution to a problem if you try to personalize it around one person,” the mayor continued.

    The Mayor is in the middle of several brewing scandals after two terms which show very little success.

    There is a laundry list of issues the Mayor can be blamed for in Chicago - his tirade was less about Speaker Madigan and more about his own problems.

    “You’re not going to find a solution to a problem if you try to personalize it around one person,” the mayor continued.

    I get as the Mayor you want people to think that - but as a voter we elect people to make things better. And elections are all about personalizing issues around one person.


  19. - wondering - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 11:49 am:

    On this one, I agree with Rahm. Seems like we have a drop of Madigan blood in the water and we have a feeding frenzy. Loved the Charlie Rose angle, should have mentioned Trump.


  20. - DaleyMail - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 12:50 pm:

    @wondering

    But did you notice that the Emanuel Brothers loved being on with Charlie Rose when he gushed over them?

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pdmFhgjNO1s

    Or when he laid his little egg that he wanted to be Mayor of Chicago?


  21. - JB13 - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 12:57 pm:

    So… we shouldn’t expect the iron-fisted leader of a state party that claims to stand for women to actually do something to stand for individual women being harassed by his guys on his watch? Because someone else out there did something bad? That sure sounded better in your head, I’m thinking.


  22. - 47th Ward - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 1:01 pm:

    ===–If he going this far to give madigan political cover then he must be running.-===

    And he wants a Chicago casino approved in the veto session. Lol.


  23. - Truthseeker - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 2:03 pm:

    The difference, of course, is that Charlie Rose is a diminimous example in the context of Madigan’s organizational importance. Try on Edward R. Murrow or Walter Cronkite for size if you are jumping into that pool Mr. Mayor.


  24. - wondering - Wednesday, Jun 13, 18 @ 4:10 pm:

    Calling it for what it is, the reporter tried to jack pot Rahm about Madigan. Rahm gave as good as he got. Rahm is not Madigan’s keeper. It was doubke inferental. Rahm guilty by assocation to Madigans guilt by association.


  25. - PDJT - Thursday, Jun 14, 18 @ 8:42 am:

    He made some good points.

    If we concentrate on one man (not even one accused of anything), then we divert the focus from the problem.

    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. The Republican hammer is, “Madigan bad.” So:
    - property taxes are high, Madigan bad. (even though, proper state level funding actually reduces the need to raise property taxes)
    - population leaving Illinois, Madigan bad.
    - sexual harassment in state government, Madigan bad.

    I’m not saying there aren’t things Madigan can do, or should have done. But what is more important is, what is he willing to do now.

    That is, if your goal is to solve the problem.
    If your goal is to leverage the problem for maximum political gain, then keep hammering away.
    But remember, if the goal is to leverage the problem for maximum political gain, there is no incentive to actually solve the problem.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Downstate newspapers appear to be picking the lesser of two evils
* Caption contest!
* Plaintiffs holding press conference today
* Maybe have a long chat with the governor about this?
* Pritzker campaign touts party-building money
* Learn from this, please
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller