Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, Aug 10, 2018

* Rachel Droze

Gov. Bruce Rauner signed a bill Thursday afternoon requiring the default location for all new and vacant state positions to Springfield and Sangamon County.

Existing employees won’t be relocated.

A 2016 study estimated the action would bring roughly 400 jobs to the area. […]

This law takes effect immediately, meaning any new hires in state government will be calling the Springfield area home unless there’s a specific reason why they should be working in another location in Illinois.

* SJ-R

House Bill 4295 makes Springfield and Sangamon County the default location for employees of most state agencies. The director of Central Management Services would have to establish a geographic location for each state job and specify why positions located outside the capital city need to be there.

The legislative and judicial branches are exempt, as are the offices of the state’s constitutional officers and those employed directly by the governor’s office.

The legislation addresses longstanding suspicions by some that state positions are being systematically poached from Springfield for other parts of the state, fears exacerbated by the general decline in the total number of state jobs in the past few decades. […]

State jobs are scattered across all counties of the state, but the lion’s share are in Sangamon County and Cook County. While the latter — home to Chicago — has a significantly higher population, workforce studies have shown other state capitals having far more state jobs than their state’s largest city.

* The Question: Do you agree or disagree with this new law? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.

bike tracks

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - GOPgal - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:22 pm:

    I’m no particular fan of state workers, but I wouldn’t wish living in Springfield on my worst enemy. Oh the humanity.

  2. - Yup! - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:30 pm:

    Agree Springfield is the state capital. It is far more economical for the State to fill positions in Springfield vs Chicago with the cost of rent and everything else. The bills allows those jobs necessary for a region to stay, so departments can fulfill their mission.

  3. - Real - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:34 pm:

    I don’t agree with the law. Just because Springfield is the capital it doesn’t mean it should be the default location of state jobs. The state is Illinois… Not Springfield. As long as it’s based in Illinois and not being privatized to some other place there should be no problem. Its called state workers not Springfield workers.

  4. - Steward As Well.... - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:35 pm:

    Hey now. I believe pre capita in the State of Illinois the town still has more bars than any other. That should count for something.

    And of course living in Springfield I agree with the new law. Thumbs up!

  5. - Annonin' - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:36 pm:

    Hope the bill has some reportin’ requirements so GovJunk can ’splain his actions…it would be a first.

  6. - Precinct Captain - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:37 pm:


    The jobs should be based where the necessity is and it seems that to do an effective job, you might want to have a lot of the state jobs in the third largest metropolitan area of the nation, not in some failing backwater addicted to the government dole.

  7. - Macbeth - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:38 pm:

    Most of core DoIT is in Springfield.

    One issue that DoIT is constantly facing is the retention of talent. Literally, managers get hired and within six months are gone. I suspect this has to do with a typical “old school” mindset: open source bad, Microsoft and Oracle: good.

    But I’m betting that the Springfield location has a lot to do with it. To expect a sophisticated IT agency to flourish in … Springfield, Illinois? … is insanity.

    Chicago, yeah. Urbana? Sure.

  8. - Arsenal - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:39 pm:

    I agree with it. There are loads of good reasons to locate jobs outside of Springfield, but it appears the bill has a mechanism to address those factors.

  9. - FormerDSdirector - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:39 pm:

    Disagree. Bottom line is,like it or not, you gotta be where the clientele are and that’s ChicagoLand.

  10. - No no no - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:44 pm:

    Disagree, you won’t get talent to move to Springfield.

  11. - Last Bull Moose - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:44 pm:

    Disagree. It is generally cheaper to hire employees downstate, but Springfield is not the only option. For example, there is a more robust market for IT people in Bloomington.

    Yes, I know the state pays the same wages everywhere. But it does not get the same quality everywhere.

  12. - Real - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:45 pm:

    Literally, managers get hired and within six months are gone.

    -Where are they going after 6 minths? They transferring to a different location in state work or going to a private company?

  13. - Anon - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:47 pm:

    First and foremost, jobs should be based on where they are needed. While this doesn’t necessarily prevent that, it’s an arbitrary requirement.

  14. - Sarcastic One - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:47 pm:

    It’s one more piece of worthless legislation. You need offices around the state to address the needs of the citizens. Take DHS and Child Support as an example. Case workers need to be available to those citizens that need in person assistance due to language or literacy barriers. It’s just one more law on the books that doesn’t need to be there. Gov is looking to show her actually did something when he really hasn’t.

  15. - Real - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:50 pm:

    For example, there is a more robust market for IT people in Bloomington.

    -But it’s only a 1 hour commute to Springfield from Bloomington so it’s not like it’s too far.

  16. - A Jack - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 12:53 pm:

    I am neutral on the idea. There was a big fear of jobs moving to Chicago under Blagojevich, but that didn’t happen. I think the high cost of living in Chicago would price most state jobs out of the market.

    Some positions do need to be in Chicago due to the higher population density. Chicago needs positions like revenue auditor and child abuse investigators in that area because there are more people and businesses.

    In my position I could work anywhere, but I would hate living near Chicago because of the traffic, crime, miserable winters, and Cub fans.

  17. - Macbeth - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:07 pm:


    re: DoIT managers

    Gone — like, no longer working for the state.

    Essentially, DoIT is turning into one big “let’s put that CIO/assistant CIO/assistant for the assistant CIO/assistant assisting the assistant assistant CIO for all the different DoIT “verticals” (Education, Law Enforcement, etc, etc) on my resume” — and then let’s get the heck out of Dodge.

    I’m not saying it’s all Springfield — but it’s surely part of the equation.

    Interesting, though, the actual DoIT workers — the employees who work and don’t push paper and “attend meetings” stay put.

    Go figure.

  18. - Question - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:09 pm:

    I agree with the law. It doesn’t say that jobs have to be in spi. It says spi is default, and we have to justify taking the job out of the Capitol.

    We have economies of scale in Springfield, so if you can’t justify taking ppl out, then it makes sense to use those economies of scale to our financial advantage.

  19. - Earnest - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:16 pm:

    I voted “disagree.” It’s another hoop the state is making itself jump through, with time and energy better spent on effectively executing state functions.

  20. - Anonymous - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:17 pm:

    It’s going to be a lot harder to recruit BTIA types with this bill.

  21. - Arthur Andersen - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:24 pm:

    Disagree. The job needs to be where the work is, not an arbitrary location. Will the State Police have to push paper every time a Trooper in Southern IL retires to keep his/her replacement from going to Springfield?

    Seems like feel-good legislation for the home team that is unlikely to have much real impact.

  22. - Smitty Irving - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:30 pm:

    Agreed. While it is a given there will be jobs outside Springfield (prisons, DCFS investigators, ISP, etc.), if nothing else this will prevent moving jobs to avoid Veteran’s Preference. And it should end moving Rutan protected jobs out of Springfield to get the incumbent to quit so “the right person” can fill the vacancy.

  23. - A Manager In State Government - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:45 pm:

    Disagree. Locating staff near where their clients/grandees/collaborators are located saves the state money. I have staff in Springfield who have to travel to Chicago many times a month for site visits, meetings, inspections, etc. Even with the state rate for Chicago hotels, the travel costs are hefty, not to mention the time out of the office to travel. I have created new positions that are Chicago-based because when doing the analysis, it would save the state thousands of dollars in travel a year (each position). Arbitrarily making every position Springfield-based will cost taxpayers more, in the end.

  24. - revvedup - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 1:51 pm:

    Another useless law. Staff need to be where the NEED is, no matter the agency. Imagine the broken leases from forced relocations of offices, let alone the jump in lease costs as owners soak the State for its foolishness. Talent retention is a red herring; many people leave government employment once they find out how backwards the policy, procedure, and culture is in an agency.

  25. - Stones - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 2:35 pm:

    The vast majority of Illinois citizens live in Cook and the collar counties. No reason to give Springfield that designation. How would downstate feel if Chicago were the Capitol and the default location of all state jobs?

  26. - lakeside - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 2:39 pm:

    I voted against.

    There are efficiencies that come with locating a significant number of state jobs in the county with 40% of the population. You are also attracting a more diverse workforce - including diversity of ideas - when you are bringing together people from around the state to work together in agencies. The fine folks of Sangamon, while above average in both intelligence and beauty, don’t have a magic ball to tell them how programs will work on the ground in Cook, Jasper or Warren Counties.

    Lastly, there’s a warm place in my heart for Springfield, but I don’t want to and can’t live there for a variety of reasons. You lose folks who want to serve the state but for whom the location/relocating simply doesn’t work. Why take the step to enshrine that in law?

    Realistically, I’m sure this will have little impact, as you can make the default anything alongside a loose waiver system, which will undoubtedly occur. But still…

  27. - Bumblin stumblin rumblin - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 3:40 pm:

    Eh, Springfield isn’t that bad. Maybe not great, but I’ve never understood the absolute hatred it receives.

  28. - WhoKnew - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 3:58 pm:

    Have to agree on this one!

    Isn’t this bill just undoing some of Blago’s redesign?

    And hasn’t recent events proven it just as expensive to rent space in Springfield as it is in Chicago! /s

  29. - RNUG - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 4:02 pm:

    == To expect a sophisticated IT agency to flourish in … Springfield, Illinois? ==

    Seems to be a good sized software company on the west side of town that has florished in the global market …

  30. - Chito - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 4:36 pm:

    The lack of diversity in the state workforce will never be corrected if most new hires are to be concentrated in Sangamon county. I’m still amazed that the black and Latino caucuses didn’t raise a big stink about this.

  31. - bear3 - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 4:44 pm:

    Fresh start to see what you need and control again before you outsource Government with the online capability available today. Not politically correct but maybe fiscally responsible and alow for outsourcing dealing with agencies like Second of state, etc. Pay for a road test from a third party as an example for a fixed fee and not a state employee.

  32. - Nobody Sent - Friday, Aug 10, 18 @ 4:53 pm:

    But what if the micromanaging agency CEO in Chi-town wants his minions close to him so he can lord over them?

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* It's just a bill
* Question of the day
* Energy News: Local Governments To Miss Out On $222 Million in potential tax revenue
* White, rural and suburban enrollment plummets at WIU
* 40,686 K-12 students in Illinois not vaccinated for measles
* Circular firing squad escalates: Rep. McSweeney calls on Leader Durkin to resign
* Audit: Department of Insurance not examining troubled local pension funds
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Raoul turns up the heat on bus company
* New tollway director, ICC chair named
* Courts go back and forth over hospital closure
* *Yoink*
* Our sorry state
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...










Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller