Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, Sep 7, 2018

* The Chicago Tribune editorial board asks “Why is J.B. Pritzker ducking this debate?”

Fifteen weeks ago, we offered the first of our 11 invitations to the campaign of J.B. Pritzker. Would he join Gov. Bruce Rauner and other candidates for governor in a spirited discussion with the Tribune Editorial Board?

We would host and livestream the session because voters by the thousands find that useful. Rank-and-file Illinoisans submit questions, including smart ones that previously haven’t been asked. We put some of those questions to the candidates.

Representatives of Republican Bruce Rauner, Conservative Sam McCann and Libertarian Kash Jackson agreed to meet. But the Pritzker campaign was mysteriously silent.

Pritzker has agreed to three more structured debates. Why wouldn’t he want a less formal give-and-take like the Tribune debate that he joined, and seemed to enjoy, before the March 20 primary? Illinois is a big state; we wondered if he’d be hundreds of miles away from Chicago on Friday, Sept. 14, the date we had worked out with other campaigns. No, it turns out Pritzker will be here in Chicago, before our 11 a.m. session, at a City Club event a mile away.

* The Question: Your own proposed answer to the Tribune?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

54 Comments »
  1. - Anonymous - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:00 pm:

    Beacause the Chicago Tribune is a failing newspaper run by failures supporting a failed governor.


  2. - Joe M - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:00 pm:

    The Tribune Editorial Board is hardly neutral ground. They might as well have the debates at Rauner’s house if they are going to be at the Tribune.


  3. - slow down - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:01 pm:

    Because the Chicago Tribune editorial board is not nearly as important as it thinks it is, and has proven itself to be in the bag for Rauner without regard for Rauner’s actual performance as governor.


  4. - wordslinger - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:01 pm:

    Dear Tronclodytes,

    I’m just not into you.

    Don’t despair. I’m sure you’ll find some reactionary, willfully ignorant hysteric down the road to fill your days happily in search of grievances.

    Please don’t call me anymore.

    Love,

    JB


  5. - Keyrock - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:02 pm:

    Because Madigan?


  6. - DuPage Saint - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:02 pm:

    Because I am way ahead, you will never endorse me, I don’t need the agrivation and because I will win without you


  7. - Ducky LaMoore - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:02 pm:

    When you are way up in the polls, why would a candidate ever submit to questions from an editorial boards that has been pretty hardcore pro-Rauner regardless of the facts? There is zero reason to do so. Only downside. You did it to yourselves and you are not able to be seen as anything resembling a neutral forum.


  8. - Rabid - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:03 pm:

    Illegal blago tapes


  9. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:04 pm:

    “Thank you for the invitation. Like with all campaigns, invitations to forums and debates are sent, we look at those with great respect. Campaigns make decisions on where and when they are going to debate and we’ve decided our schedule of places, and forums. Thank you.”


  10. - Texas Red - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:04 pm:

    “a mile away”

    A miss is as good as a mile. JB is in a marathon not a mile sprint


  11. - A Jack - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:05 pm:

    Because they endorsed Kennedy who only won one county in the state of Illinois? So the Tribune editorial board is totally out of touch with the voters of Illinois.


  12. - Math(usually)Doesn’tLie - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:05 pm:

    “Would he join Gov. Bruce Rauner and other candidates for governor in a spirited distortion with the Tribune Editorial Board?” There — fixed it for ya.


  13. - Perrid - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:08 pm:

    As others have said, because everyone knows the Tribune is toxically conservative and, at least in my opinion, likely to throw relatively softballs to Rauner and hardballs to Pritzker. Maybe I’m wrong and they can control themselves more than I give them credit for, but I doubt it.

    To a large degree that shouldn’t matter, politicians should be willing and able to field tough questions, but if the question is why would he want to dodge this, there it is. The Tribune editorial board has shot themselves in the foot with their reputation.


  14. - Al - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:08 pm:

    Jeanne Ives


  15. - Stuntman Bob's Brother - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:10 pm:

    “Tribune: I decline due to your failure to agree not to ask me details regarding my proposed plan for progressive income tax rates during the debate”.


  16. - OneMan - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:15 pm:

    Because they might ask for details about what his tax plan will actually entail and how it will work and what happens until the state constitution is amended and what happens if amending it fails…

    But yeah stick with ‘the because it is the Trib’ reasoning…


  17. - Cubs in '16 - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:16 pm:

    “Rank-and-file Illinoisans submit questions, including smart ones…”

    JB will only participate in debates offering dumb questions. /s


  18. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:16 pm:

    At this point after the leaked tapes, and Pritzker’s Crew openly admitting they dunno if there are any more out there, it would be gross malpractice for Pritzker to attend.

    No way, no how.

    No.

    Plus… Pritzker ain’t gettin’ no endorsement.

    No way, no how.

    No.

    A waste of time for Pritzker.


  19. - Chicago Cynic - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:17 pm:

    Thanks Troncsters but your endorsement of Rauner has already leaked so why would I bother.


  20. - Chicago Cynic - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:19 pm:

    Golly, I really appreciate the invite but do I look like a pin cushion? Do I look like a punching bag? Do I look like an idiot? So yea, thanks for the invite. But no.


  21. - OneMan - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:19 pm:

    But yeah I am with Willy here, no win in this for Pritzker…

    I hope all this faith that the next billionaire without any elected experience is going to much better than the last one is well placed.


  22. - Henry Francis - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:19 pm:

    JB will send in his place Richard Goldberg for your sham debate. (Ask Bruce, he knows what this means)


  23. - Al - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:21 pm:

    I decline to show up at your sham interview which is nothing more than a set up to create Rauner attack advertisements. I remember what happened to Jeanne Ives.


  24. - Rabid - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:21 pm:

    Dont want to take time fom Bruce and Sam


  25. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:23 pm:

    Dear Tribune Edit Board,
    I’m sure you’ll be able to prop up Bruce Rauner just fine without me.
    You can dismiss with the formalities and just go ahead and endorse him.


  26. - NIU Grad - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:25 pm:

    I get where everyone is coming from in that he would have to answer some hard, if not biased questions from the Editorial Board, but I can’t say I respect this move. If you’re confident in yourself as a candidate, you go into tough environments and swing back at punches. If he can’t handle an unfriendly debate (or even a few press conferences…), how can anyone trust him to take on difficult decisions as Governor?


  27. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:26 pm:

    ===If he can’t handle an unfriendly debate (or even a few press conferences…), how can anyone trust him to take on difficult decisions as Governor?==

    Pritzker is doing 3.

    You think those will be cake walks?

    I doubt that.


  28. - kittty - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:28 pm:

    No reply. The Tribune is reliably pro-Rauner, arguably more so than any publication in IL other than the ultra right leaning and reactionary C-U News-Gazette, which is equally out of touch with its readership.


  29. - Real - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:28 pm:

    Because for the past 4 years the Tribune has been an extension of the Rauner campaign.


  30. - strawman - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:34 pm:

    ummm….because I don’t have to, that’s why.


  31. - Montrose - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:35 pm:

    “Because they might ask for details about what his tax plan will actually entail”

    Did JB get some commitment that the moderators won’t bring that up at the debates he has agreed to? I didn’t think so. If avoiding that question drove his decision making, he wouldn’t leave the house.


  32. - Pundent - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:35 pm:

    Pritzker is within his rights to say no to this invitation. Can’t really fault him given the treatment of the editorial board. If he is a no show and there are consequences as a result he’ll have to live with them. 5-10 years ago this might have been a big issue. With the lack of influence and circulation of newspapers these days I don’t know if it really matters.


  33. - Grandson of Man - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:35 pm:

    Dear Tribune editorial board,

    Are you still in Chicago? Why haven’t you relocated to Indiana, your economic paradise? If you need help leaving Illinois, I’ll be more than happy to help—financially, of course. Do I look like I’ve ever lifted a finger to do manual labor? But at least I don’t pretend I’m your working class neighbor, like Mr. Diva (our governor) and his many costume changes.


  34. - Smitty Irving - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:38 pm:

    “Because your Editorial Board includes a person who was so giddy at the prospect of having post-Katrina like powers used in Chicago she ‘metaphorically’ wished for the death of approximately 20 thousand Chicagoans.


  35. - A Jack - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:41 pm:

    Because if your viewership is anything like your readership, then it would be a waste of time debating in front of about five people.


  36. - VanillaMan - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:43 pm:

    We will happily take into consideration an appearance with you should JB’s schedule opens up and permits it.

    Sincerely


  37. - Moody's Blues - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:44 pm:

    Keep reading the editorial and we’re reminded,

    “You’d think that if any candidate for governor frets about a Tribune grilling, it’s Rauner. His editorial board debate here with fellow Republican Jeanne Ives was widely viewed as a disaster for him, and that primary race turned out to be much tighter than anyone anticipated.
    Yet Rauner will come to the Tribune, and Pritzker will not…. Even Rod Blagojevich, who grew so angry with Tribune editorials that he’s on FBI wiretaps trying to get our editorial board fired, had the moxie to show up and gamely answer every question.”


  38. - 47th Ward - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:47 pm:

    Dear Friend,

    Thank you for your recent invitation. J.B. is pleased and honored that you wish to include him in this event. However, previous commitments make it impossible for him to join you.

    Please accept our regrets and our sincere best wishes for a successful event.

    Sincerely,

    Scheduling Intern


  39. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:48 pm:

    @FakeStatehouseChick - I find myself wishing for a storm in this race for Governor — an unpredictable, haughty, devastating swirl of fury. A dramatic levee break. Geysers bursting through manhole covers. A sleeping campaign, forced onto the rooftops. #LevelHeaded


  40. - Bias - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:51 pm:

    Because the Tribune loves Rauner.


  41. - Lucky Pierre - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:51 pm:

    The “right wing” editorial page of the Chicago Tribune’s last Republican endorsement for President was in 2004.

    Governor Rauner was frequently on NPR for live call in shows, hardly his base.

    JB is already measuring the drapes and sees no need to reach out to independents and those who agree Mike Madigan is the reason Illinois politics is so dysfunctional.


  42. - don the legend - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 2:56 pm:

    “I’ll debate at the Tribune as long as Rauner debates at Local 150.”


  43. - yinn - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:01 pm:

    “Bite me.”


  44. - wordslinger - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:22 pm:

    –JB will send in his place Richard Goldberg for your sham debate.==

    Way good.

    –Sincerely,

    Scheduling Intern–

    Also way good.


  45. - DuPage Bard - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:27 pm:

    No matter what he says or what he does you aren’t endorsing him. Rauner could literally shoot someone on Michigan Avenue in front of old Tribune offices and Tronc wouldn’t endorse him.
    Jeanne ives crushed Bruce Rauner in their tribune debate. Absolutely demolished, Kass article was brutal at how inept the Governor looked compared to her. Yet the tribune already had it’s mind made up and went for Bruce.
    Why should anyone subject themselves to a group of “journalists” who think they are unbiased but we already have the proof from the primary.
    Trib deserves nothing


  46. - Cheryl44 - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:27 pm:

    Until they did themselves of Mass O see no reason to take them seriously.


  47. - Colin O'Scopy - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:34 pm:

    Pritzker’s real reason: When your opponent is self-immolating, it’s best to just get out of his way.


  48. - Arsenal - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:34 pm:

    Because any “less formal give-and-take” with Kash Jackson is probably going to devolve into a screaming match, especially if it’s moderated by the Trib.


  49. - western observeration - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:38 pm:

    ==JB will send in his place Richard Goldberg for your sham debate.==

    JB should invite Goldberg to be a special guest in first row at first televised debate.


  50. - Arsenal - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:40 pm:

    ==Governor Rauner was frequently on NPR for live call in shows, hardly his base.==

    Oh man, LP, I love that you picked this as an example, because let’s go into the way back machine and see how that ended…

    https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/gov-rauner-wages-war-on-wbez/


  51. - Steve - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 3:52 pm:

    “Thank you Chicago Tribune. I’m here to win an election. I have northern Illinois sewn up. Everyone knows Rauner’s record. This is an election on whether you want 4 more years of Rauner. I will win a majority of Tribune paying customers with or without your endorsement.”


  52. - Wensicia - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 4:21 pm:

    JB’s more likely to get an endorsement over Rauner from the Illinois Policy Institute, not the Tribune. Why bother?


  53. - allknowingmasterofraccoondom - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 4:44 pm:

    Just Do It.


  54. - Jefferson - Friday, Sep 7, 18 @ 4:49 pm:

    poor katrina.. now she can not interrupt any of the candidates while they talk. the trib is so yesterday.


TrackBack URI

Post your comment... And please take a half second to come up with a nickname. It makes following the posts easier for everyone... Thanks

In other words, do your best to be civilized and smart.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner vetoes second bill to address gender wage gap
* Munger moves to DCEO
* Preckwinkle mayoral announcement roundup
* Follow the money
* Empty threat? Or does somebody know something we don't?
* A couple of quick debate clips
* Supremes side with hospitals on property taxes
* Report: IEPA stonewalls AG until HGOP leader steps in
* A TIF primer
* Raoul's new ad blasts Harold over abortion rights
* Debate coverage roundup
* Question of the day
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller