Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee

Thursday, Dec 13, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* John Greenfield at StreetsBlog Chicago has a post up about the Pritzker transition’s Restoring Illinois Infrastructure Committee….

However, conspicuously absent from the committee are any dedicated pedestrian and bike advocacy organizations. ([Metropolitan Planning Council] does frequently voice support for better walking and biking conditions, but it has a broader mission of “shaping a more equitable, sustainable and prosperous greater Chicago region.”)

According to a source, the Active Transportation Alliance — the region’s leading walking, biking, and transit advocacy organization – directly asked Pritzker’s organization to be included in the committee, and was recommended by others to the governor-elect. Two Active Trans reps served on Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel’s transition team in 2011. Moreover, current Active Trans director Ron Burke served as associate director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency from 2003-2008, so he has plenty of state government experience. […]

However, a couple of possibilities come to mind. Organized labor was a key source of support for Pritzker’s campaign, and there are plenty of entities that benefit from road-building projects represented on the committee. After current governor Bruce Rauner proposed widening multiple Chicagoland expressways to create more capacity for driving, Active Trans called for a moratorium on expressway expansion. That likely irritated some figures in the road-building lobby.

Active Trans has also been pushing for $50 million a year in state transportation funds to be earmarked for walking and biking projects, with a focus on improving conditions in lower-income communities. 27 Chicago CEOs sent a letter to Rauner and Pritzker asking them to commit to making the state Bike Walk Fund a reality, and multiple Chicago community organizations have voiced support for the idea.

While $50 million would only represent about 2 percent of the Illinois transportation budget, very little state money is currently used for walking and biking infrastructure. So it’s likely some labor, construction, and highway engineering folks would be loathe to see any funds diverted from road building.

* I reached out to the Pritzker transition team…

The Restoring Illinois’ Infrastructure committee represents a wide range of interests and is considering every mode of transportation, including biker and pedestrian concerns. There are a number of critical voices and stakeholders on this subject matter and while all could not be included on this committee, we are soliciting feedback from the public and other organizations on the transition website. As JB transitions into office, he will continue bringing stakeholders to the table to shape his policy agenda and improve the lives of Illinoisans.

* And there’s this…


       

29 Comments
  1. - Roman - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 10:51 am:

    Putting hundreds of members on your transition teams can boomerang — create the opposite effect you’re hoping to achieve. The individuals or groups left off the transition teams feel extra slighted.

    If there was only a dozen or so people on the team, the folks left off wouldn’t feel excluded.

    You can’t make everyone happy.


  2. - NotRich - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 10:51 am:

    Not one dime for bike paths.. the City of Chicago has created a safety hazard with all their bike paths downtown.. I constantly see bikers go thru red lights and then flip off drivers who had the right of way. If bikers want consideration, then they must pay up.. A bike registration fee and the ability to receive a traffic violation also needs to be part of the plan..Also, drive on the south side of chicago and you will see MILES of bike lanes painted that haven’t seen a cycler in 10 years..


  3. - Honeybear - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 10:52 am:

    Ugh…do we always have to blame labor in some way for every little fricking problem?
    How about we just acknowledge the oversight, add a bike person to the group and move on.
    It’s getting super irritating to have to take a hit for everything.


  4. - Humboldt - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 10:58 am:

    NotRich, do you want cars & trucks to pay their fare share? Because they aren’t, your costs are going to go way way up. Non-drivers are subsidizing drivers everywhere in this country. The bikers should already warrant consideration since they are paying for the roads they’re using and causing less use-damage to.


  5. - DuPage - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:03 am:

    ===Resist promoting driving?=== I don’t know, there are a lot of people that are not as young as they used to be. It’s fine to have bike and walking paths, but they should also accommodate cars.


  6. - Cheryl44 - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:06 am:

    NotRich, think of the gridlock that would occur if all of those rude, horrible people on bikes were driving cars. Think of the damage that would happen if they drove the way you say they ride their bikes.


  7. - A Jack - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:09 am:

    I love bike paths and use them regularly. But the priority here should be commercial transportation, not recreational transportation. After we improve our business climate, we can build more bike paths.


  8. - Just Me 2 - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:14 am:

    NotRich, you’ve proven the point for dedicated bike lanes that are separate from vehicles. Thank you very much.


  9. - Six Degrees of Separation - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:22 am:

    It’s a double-edged sword. Public transit and bike paths, like highways, are currently addicted to oil as a funding source. As we move to an electricity-based mobility mode, cars and trucks will be more environmentally friendly too. But a way to pay for all this stuff will continue to elude us, and become more contentious. Illinois was the first state in the US to mandate bike and pedestrian accommodations in road projects, and I don’t see that going away soon.


  10. - Blue Dog Dem - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:22 am:

    The mere mention that JB would be influenced by political donors/supporters irritates the heck out of me. This man cant be bought off. Hes a man of principle. You’ll see.


  11. - Louis G Atsaves - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:25 am:

    The group that has gridlocked downtown Chicago traffic now wants a seat at the table? Fewer lanes for automobiles, wiping out street parking, ever try to make a right turn next to a bike lane? Or drive on zig-zag lanes going south on Clark? Or drive south on Wells in a shared lane? Who engineered all those disasters? That should be the real discussion.


  12. - Bit - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:32 am:

    I don’t think anyone is arguing that bikes or mass transit are going to be the primary focus of infrastructure spending, but they should be included. Walkability, using bikes as transportation vs. just recreation, and mass transit are all important. The interstate system was a big leap forward in its day, we need to look forward to more than just cars.


  13. - Amalia - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:40 am:

    Look, people are not going to abandon cars. and making less room for them is creating bad traffic situations in some places. and it’s not just cars, but trucks delivering all those Amazon purchases that the bike crowd is ordering from home. how are they going to be delivered? drones? besides, most of the area in this state is road concerned. biking between locations means motorcycles as in roads.


  14. - Michelle Flaherty - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:51 am:

    Guess I was wrong.
    I thought everyone and their cousin had been put on a transition committee.

    My first thought would be that it must be a conspiracy.


  15. - Not It - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 11:59 am:

    To just ignore the biking community is unrealistic and a clear mistake by JB.


  16. - Amalia - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:02 pm:

    “resist promoting driving” maybe that is the reason. it’s not promoting driving to deal with the roads and bridges in need. it’s reality.


  17. - Honeybear - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:07 pm:

    Hey, how about you take Hardick Bhatt out and put in a walking/bike person.

    It’s a win/win

    That way the bike folks are appeased and all the current state workers will trust the recommendations that the transition team makes.

    No quarter for Raunerites.
    Remove Bhatt


  18. - Huh? - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:07 pm:

    The FHWA mandates that all modes of transportation are considered to qualify for federal funding, bikes included.

    As far as a seat at the table is considered, it irks me that IDOT and the FHWA were left out. Once the infrastructure ideas are put to paper, it will be left to them to try and implement the plans.


  19. - ANON - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:15 pm:

    Humboldt - Since gas tax supports most of the road projects, how do you say the bike and walking population are paying for it? They don’t pay the gas tax which is probably going to go up to pay for infrastructure improvements.


  20. - walker - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:19 pm:

    What Michelle Flaherty said.

    I have heard from all least 6 different advocacy groups who are frustrated that they are not on some transition team.


  21. - Honeybear - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:30 pm:

    Exactly Huh

    Again I’m going to squawk about no frontline or even departmental/agency representation on these transition teams.

    It’s disappointing. At my office I’m surrounded by folks with Masters degrees. One just got hers from Washington University in STL over the weekend. Plenty of doers in state government to choose from.
    Once again-top down management.
    Look at the German corporate board model. Now I’m not saying that half the board members need to be from the workers, but come on, you can sneak one on without even announcing it. Had you done so you wouldn’t have kept the Raunerite Bhatt.

    Connect to the regular folk Pritzker team

    If you’re not at the table
    You’re on the menu.


  22. - GA Watcher - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 12:49 pm:

    Can anyone think of any significant recommendations that have come out of transition committees in the past? It is an honor for organizations and individuals to be named to one certainly. Looks great on a resume’. However, I can’t recall anything truly substantive emerging from transitions in the past 20 years which had not already been championed by a candidate during his/her campaign.


  23. - Michelle Flaherty - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 1:13 pm:

    GA Watcher, I remember George Ryan’s transition teams and their recommendation reports getting so out of hand that reporters began openly mocking/challenging the new governor on them.

    Reporter: Governor Ryan, did you read this report?

    Of course George was pretty good at giving it back: “Did you?”


  24. - Keyser Soze - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 1:20 pm:

    I was once appointed to a Governor’s transition team. Did I ask to be appointed? No. Was I paid to serve on the team? No. Was I honored to have been appointed? Yes. Would I have complained if I had not been appointed? No, that would have been dishonorable. Did I serve with pride? Yes. Did I lend my two cents to my group? Yes. In the bigger scheme of things, did it really matter? Probably not. I have learned things of this sort are often ceremonial, a pat on the back for one’s support. I hope that this answers some questions.


  25. - Blast from the past - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 2:06 pm:

    =Moreover, current Active Trans director Ron Burke served as associate director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency from 2003-2008, so he has plenty of state government experience. […]=

    Plenty of state government experience? Can anyone highlight his IEPA accomplishments?


  26. - Humboldt - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 2:20 pm:

    ANON - I’m saying that the Gas Tax, and other fees specifically for drivers, does not cover the cost of road maintenance. the balance then falls to the general population, made up of drivers & non-drivers.
    Here’s a link w/ some data, it’s a few years old but the general takeaway won’t have changed.
    https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/regulation/gas-tax-little-road-costs/


  27. - Father Ted - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 3:34 pm:

    I support bike interests being a part of infrastructure discussions, but there may be better partners out there than the ATA. In personal experience, they have a very narrow focus and can take a “you’re with us or against us” approach. They have been known to release statements and reports that are publicly critical of their partners. With that said, I doubt the group was intentionally left out.


  28. - Bogey Golfer - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 4:52 pm:

    This Capital Plan, from what I understand, is to prioritize fixing (reconstruction, repairing, replacing) existing infrastructure. With that, most existing bike trails may need to receive a seal coat and nothing more. What bike advocacy groups will push is new facilities.


  29. - Dupage Bard - Thursday, Dec 13, 18 @ 9:39 pm:

    I’m guessing the incoming Gov wasn’t holding the meeting at the Map Room or Heartland Cafe so what’s the point in inviting the bike crowd?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Madigan trial roundup: Solis faces first day of cross-examination
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller