Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » BGA study finds big problems with FOIA, OMA compliance
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
BGA study finds big problems with FOIA, OMA compliance

Thursday, Jan 10, 2019

* Better Government Association

The BGA looked at how the [the attorney general’s Public Access Counselor’s office — or PAC] ruled on 28,270 [Freedom of Information Act] and [Open Meetings Act] requests for review from April 6, 2010 to March 15, 2018. […]

Out of the top 5 public bodies that initially failed to respond to [FOIA] requests — and only responded after the PAC intervened — the Chicago Police Department ranked the highest with 672 requests that it did not respond to during this period. Additionally, there were 6 instances in which the Chicago Police Department did not respond even after PAC intervention during the time period we studied. In fact, the PAC issued a binding opinion as recently as December 31, 2018, based on CPD’s failure to respond to a request even after the PAC intervened. Based on a FOIA request we submitted to CPD recently, it does not appear that anyone at CPD was ever disciplined for these violations.

In our list of the top 5 offenders, the Illinois Department of Corrections ranked second with 519 FOIA violations — that is, they did not respond to 519 FOIA requests. The Illinois State Police ranked third with 200 violations, followed by Chicago Public Schools with 199 violations, and the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office with 162 violations. Overall, there were over 4,600 of these instances for all public bodies across the state during the time period we examined. […]

The BGA examined the frequency with which public bodies claimed a FOIA exemption that was found to be improper from April 6, 2010, to March 15, 2018. The PAC Office determined that public bodies had asserted incorrect exemptions 1,345 times — approximately 30 percent of the times in which the PAC issued a substantive determination on an exemption claim. […]

According to the PAC data, out of the top 14 public bodies that incorrectly applied exemptions to deny FOIA requests, the City of East St. Louis was in violation 100 percent of the time, the University of Illinois 63 percent of the time, the City of Joliet following closely at 58 percent of the time, the Illinois Department of Central Management Services and the Illinois Department of Transportation both 46 percent of the time, and the Chicago Police Department 43 percent of the time. […]

The BGA also looked at the PAC dataset for entries on the Open Meetings Act and determined the frequency with which public bodies violated OMA or did not violate OMA, according to PAC. […]

Between April 2010 and March 2018, the PAC Office reviewed 717 OMA requests and found that public bodies violated the Open Meetings Act approximately 42 percent of the time. There were 301 instances in which the PAC determined that the public bodies’ denial of open meeting records violated OMA and 416 instances in which PAC decided the public bodies’ actions were not in violation of OMA.

* From the attorney general’s PAC office

“Despite years of work to change the culture of secrecy in Illinois government, the BGA’s findings show that many government offices still routinely disregard their obligation to provide access to government records,” the statement read. “The role of the Public Access Counselor is to resolve open records disputes, and we devote thousands of hours to doing that every year. But, as these findings demonstrate, far too often, government offices are choosing to ignore the law and working to thwart the Public Access Counselor.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Anon - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 4:45 pm:

    I’ve submitted several FOIA requests that have been ignored by state agencies.

    Fun times.

  2. - Anon - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 5:53 pm:

    Well….thwart the PAC. That’s baloney. As someone who works with FOIA every day, no one is actively working to “thwart” the PAC. My guess is that it mostly deals with arcane submittal and tracking systems and lack of training. But, of course, it’s a conspiracy to the BGA. It should be better in terms of compliance, but taking the BGA perspective is insulting.

  3. - Amalia - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 6:09 pm:

    There are some entities that are noncompliant by design or attitude. then there is another problem…volume. I’d like someone to tally the number of times one person or one entity did a FOIA for one governmental unit. Not how many times the BGA was in action all over the place, but how many times one group or person requested from one source. Some people and entities are specializing in burying governmental units with requests for information. This takes up lots of time. Some of the requests are for analyzing and aggregating information in ways that the government does not do. I’m all for transparency, but with some groups and people, it seems like a game of stopping the business of transparency.

  4. - City Zen - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 6:59 pm:

    I’ve filed many FOIA requests with different levels of government with mostly good results. Most units are quite responsive, especially the pension funds. There have been a couple of instances with the state where the information provided didn’t match what I found myself, which makes me think they didn’t understand the request but were reluctant to ask for clarification. Plus, when my FOIA request revealed an entity in violation, no one on the other end seemed all to concerned to pursue the matter further.

    The thing to remember is these people on the other end of your FOIA request are human. Be clear and courteous. Also, if your request isn’t urgent, indicate as such so the agency can prioritize accordingly. Your pet project is not the center of anyone’s universe but your own.

  5. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 7:09 pm:

    It can be very hard for a FOIA officer to meet the statutory deadlines (2 weeks). When you consider that FOIA requests that take under about 15 hours to complete are not unduly burdensome under the law, it is easy to seek how a few requests will take up the FOIA officer’s time and create a backlog. Plus, in most operations the higher ups want to know and understand what goes out. Many requests are very complicated and can impact more people and entities than just the public body the request is directed towards. It all becomes complicated and time consuming pretty quickly.

  6. - Deadbeat Conservative - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 7:24 pm:

    =The thing to remember is these people on the other end of your FOIA request are human.=

    CZ humanizing public workers? CZ must be getting soft.

  7. - West Side the Best Side - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 10:01 pm:

    Maybe filing an FOIA under “Anon” might not be the best way to get info.

  8. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jan 10, 19 @ 11:11 pm:

    ===Some people and entities are specializing in burying governmental units with requests for information. This takes up lots of time.===

    You know, if they posted this information on their own, they wouldn’t be so “buried” with requests for the information they have. Publishing documents online is very simple and not at all labor intensive.

    == Some of the requests are for analyzing and aggregating information in ways that the government does not do==

    Then that’s a denial, and a public body is fully within its right to do that.

    The law is very clear that a FOIA can not be a request for data that does not exist. i.e. would need to be produced from an analysis of existing data. If the public body does not already have that data, by already producing it for themselves prior to being asked for it,
    they are not obligated to do it.

    Sounds like someone is upset that all those dirty plebs can ask for documentation about what someone is doing. Maybe people don’t trust you for some reason.

  9. - Just Observing - Friday, Jan 11, 19 @ 8:57 am:

    I have significant experience using the FOIA across hundreds of Illinois public bodies, and also making use of the PAC.

    1. Many public bodies are efficient and forthcoming in their responses.

    2. Many public bodies are just grossly ignorant of the FOIA and their obligations.

    3. Many public bodies are not ignorant of the FOIA but purposely try to obstruct and complicate FOIA requests.

    4. The PAC does wonderful work and is a good advocate for the citizen, but their process is overly bureaucratic and bogged-down by legal processes, and often they just don’t even follow-through and close up cases. I don’t know if its a staffing issue or what, but the PAC needs to move faster and in a more efficient way.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Question of the day
* Narrow US Supreme Court decision should have no impact on Illinois' foster care program
* It's just a bill
* Marjorie Taylor Greene heading to Eastern Bloc territory for fundraiser with Mary Miller
* Not exactly the A Team lining up against Sen. Duckworth
* Thousands of veterans won't be left out of Illinois vaccine lottery program after all
* "Outlier" Illinois trying to catch up with other states on equity-based higher ed funding
* Reeder: "We need to ask how to increase public safety and minimize police shootings"
* CPS alters its botched janitorial privatization plan
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller