Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Mar 19, 2019

* Illinois News Network on a bill to hike the tax on vaping products to make it equal to tobacco products

Danne Reinke, from the Smoke Free Alternatives Coalition of Illinois, testified in opposition to the bill Tuesday. He said the measure would tax vaping products at 36 percent. He said consumers can use vaping products to help quit smoking cigarettes.

A spokesman for the Illinois Department of Revenue said: “E-cigarettes and vapor products are currently assessed the general merchandise rate of 6.25 percent.”

“It’s bad public policy,” Reinke said. “[Vaping is] the leading cessation product.”

State Sen. Toi Hutchinson, D-Olympia Fields, also had concerns about the measure.

“My biggest problem is taxing it as something it’s not,” Hutchinson said. “At its core, they’re not tobacco products. To tax them as something they’re not, it misses the opportunity. I’m not opposed to taxation, but we need to tax it as it actually is.”

Link said he’s open to continued conversation about the issue, but said there are real concerns.

“We have an epidemic going on,” Link said. “In our schools, we’re having a total epidemic with it. We’ve got to look at this in a different manner.”

“I’ve seen plenty of people who do stop smoking with vape products, but I also know we have a fear of the rising use among kids, so it’s complicated and I get that, but they’re not tobacco products so it’s hard for me to make that jump,” Hutchinson said.

* The Question: Should vaping products be taxed at the same level as tobacco products? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please…


panel management

- Posted by Rich Miller        

36 Comments
  1. - downstateR - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 3:51 pm:

    Maybe I’m ignorant, and I’ll admit I don’t have children, but how excited should I get? It’s not tobacco, it’s not smoke. It shouldn’t be taxed as a tobacco product.


  2. - intern - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 3:52 pm:

    From what I understand, they are less dangerous, so it doesn’t seem sensible to apply the same sin taxes on them.


  3. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 3:53 pm:

    I voted yes because revenue


  4. - NoGifts - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 3:56 pm:

    Nope, I agree with downstateR. Not tobacco, and better for people than tobacco.


  5. - Captain Obvious - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 3:57 pm:

    I say yes to the higher tax. Vaping is only a slightly less harmful and disgusting habit than smoking tobacco. For most it appears to be a substitute for tobacco rather than a cessation
    method.


  6. - Last Bull Moose - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 3:58 pm:

    Vaping seems equally though differently dangerous as cigarettes. Tax them the same.


  7. - anon2 - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:01 pm:

    There is substantial evidence that e-cigarette use increases risk of ever using combustible tobacco cigarettes among youth and young adults, according to the National Academy of Sciences. In short, e-cigs have a gateway effect to smoking cigarettes.

    Moreover, rather than stimulating smokers to switch from conventional cigarettes to less dangerous e-cigarettes or quitting altogether, e-cigarettes are reducing smoking cessation rates and expanding the nicotine market by attracting youth. Tax it.


  8. - Earnest - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:04 pm:

    I voted yes for my usual reason: the state needs revenue and I appreciate any elected officials who will put their name on either taxes or specific cuts. I do see them more as gateways to cigarettes rather than off-ramps.


  9. - City Zen - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:05 pm:

    No.

    What’s the intended result? Is tax the perceived barrier of entry? Are vaping products more or less expensive than cigarettes? If, after tax, vaping products costs the same as cigarettes, will more people choose smoking?


  10. - Perrid - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:09 pm:

    Voted no. I think it should be lower than cigs but higher than general merchandise. It is less harmful than smoking but it’s still nicotine. It’s not good for you. Like Hutchinson said, tax it for what it is, which is not harmless but also not as poisonous as most tobacco products.


  11. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:11 pm:

    Vaping and tobacco have the exact same purpose- a delivery system for nicotine.

    As such, the tax should be equal, otherwise the government is picking winners and losers


  12. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:12 pm:

    I voted yes because of revenue and because it is not the only specialty product taxed at a higher rate. I understand Sen. Hutchinson’s point that vaping is not as harmful as cigarettes, but when has the health effects of any product determined how it is taxed or regulated? Marijuana would already be legal otherwise.


  13. - Al - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:13 pm:

    Vaping taxes should be double tobacco. The scam is that it is about helping adults air smoking. They advertise to children and have bubble gum flavors. Tax it liberally.


  14. - NeverPoliticallyCorrect - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:13 pm:

    Yes because it is intended to replace the cigarette so why not.


  15. - Timmeh - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:15 pm:

    It’s less of a public health risk, but it still gets people addicted to nicotine and makes it more likely they’ll start smoking too. Tax it at a lesser rate.


  16. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:18 pm:

    Voted Yes.

    Taxing vaping and cigarette the same makes the most sense.

    “Simple”


  17. - lakeside - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:19 pm:

    =He said consumers can use vaping products to help quit smoking cigarettes.==

    Consumers can also use vaping products to help start smoking cigarettes. Tax em the same.


  18. - I Miss Bentohs - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:21 pm:

    Are beer and vodka taxed as alcohol?
    Then tax nicotine delivery equally too.


  19. - XonXoff - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:35 pm:

    Voted no on principle. Tax it for what it is but don’t just make stuff up. I stopped smoking 6 years ago by vaping. I’ve made my own e-juice since I started. Still vape occasionally but haven’t used nicotine in my juice for several years. So it’s not smoke, it’s vapor, and there’s no nicotine or tobacco involved anywhere in the process (for me). I’m basically vaping a safer equivalent of the air freshener my wife sometimes runs in our hallway. They needed to make vaping “into” smoking for easier taxation purposes.


  20. - Brudda - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:36 pm:

    Voted no. From what I interpret, this includes the vape juice even without nicotine. I believe this needs more “specific vagueness”, if that makes any sense at all.


  21. - Reserved - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:41 pm:

    Voted no solely on the “same level” qualifier. I would bump up the tobacco rates and tax vape products at the current tobacco rates. If Illinois can manage different tax rates for alcohol, we can do the same with nicotine.


  22. - ChrisB - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:53 pm:

    Yep. To paraphrase a popular cliche, if it smokes like tobacco, and looks like tobacco…

    Also, the cessation excuse is a red herring. Multiple studies show that all smoking cessation aides are no more effective than cold turkey.


  23. - JS Mill - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 4:58 pm:

    I vote “yes”

    =Vaping seems equally though differently dangerous as cigarettes. Tax them the same.=

    This all day.

    It is also pretty much a nicotine delivery system as other have said.

    Plus they are marketing right at kids and, if you have not noticed, they are offering a lot of special deals for a cheap device with a box of the pods. Kinda like a drug dealer where the first one is free.


  24. - Bothanspy - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 5:03 pm:

    Is a nicotine patch taxed as tobacco? How about nicotine gum? They are marketed as cessation products but they also are nicotine delivery systems.
    That being said, if you were to propose a tax on nicotine itself, then I think the tobacco taxing model is a good model to follow.


  25. - XonXoff - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 5:16 pm:

    – Yep. To paraphrase a popular cliche, if it smokes like tobacco, and looks like tobacco… –

    Nope. It doesn’t smoke like tobacco, nor does it look like tobacco… Not even a little bit. One is a solid and the other a liquid, for starters.

    Studies be damned, I quit smoking by vaping. That was six years ago and I’m glad I did.


  26. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 5:42 pm:

    The FDA classifies e-cigarettes as tobacco products. If e-cigarette companies truly wanted to be a tobacco cessation device, the manufacturers would apply to be an FDA cessation device. They have not applied because their main goal isn’t to help people quit- there main function is to addict the next generation of tobacco users.


  27. - Way South of I-80 - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 5:54 pm:

    The Surgeon General and the FDA have said that youth e-cigarette use is at epidemic levels creating a public health crisis. Yes - tax them at the same rate as other tobacco products. During recent floor debate Leader Durkin said his daughter had told him e-cigarette use in school was out of control.


  28. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 6:03 pm:

    Cigarettes are a nicotine delivery system that is based on smoke.
    Chewing tobacco is a nicotine delivery system.
    So is a nicotine patch or gum.
    Vaping is another nicotine delivery system that may or may not be considered as objectionable as cigarette smoke.

    Vape fluids come in nicotine and non-nicotine versions, but most people buy the nicotine-containing ones.

    I’d say, tax the nicotine, regardless of the delivery format, and if people want to truly use vaping as a way to wean off smoking, you can cut them and the vape stores a break and not tax the non-nicotine products. Seems pretty simple to me: contains nicotine? It gets the same tax as cigs, cigars, chew, gum, patches, etc. No nicotine? It’s not my business, long as you don’t waft that stuff in my face.


  29. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 6:05 pm:

    Nicotine is an addictive chemical, but iflt is the other chemicals in cigarettes that cause cancer. I don’t want to discourage people from using a device that will improve their health, which a lot of the rhetoric around e-cigs does, but I am still fine with taxing e-cigs.


  30. - Kayak - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 6:55 pm:

    I voted no but to clarify: Vaping products (Nicotineless) NO. Nicotine containing products YES


  31. - ChicagoVinny - Tuesday, Mar 19, 19 @ 9:20 pm:

    I voted yes as a former smoker who used vaping to transition off of nicotine (nicotine free for 6 months, cigarette free for 3.5 years).

    I’m supportive of vaping for nicotine cessation, but I worry about the uptick in nicotine use by teenagers due to vaping. I think a sin tax is warranted - nicotine is still addictive, and a tax will reduce usage.


  32. - charles in charge - Wednesday, Mar 20, 19 @ 12:44 am:

    Toi is right: a tax on vaping products may be appropriate, but there’s no reason why it should necessarily be equivalent to the tax on tobacco.


  33. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 20, 19 @ 2:18 am:

    Vaping is like tobacco regarding how addictive it is.


  34. - A guy - Wednesday, Mar 20, 19 @ 8:55 am:

    How would we tax the nicotine gum or patch? Does coffee and caffeine (in soda too) lend itself to specialized taxation?
    The answer is no. I’m with Toi. Regulate it how you want, but tax it for what it is, not what anyone compares it to.


  35. - Lynn S. - Wednesday, Mar 20, 19 @ 11:54 am:

    Yes.

    Both are nicotine delivery systems. There was something that came out recently, where someone tested vaping pods and found that many of them had as much nicotine as a pack of cigarettes.

    And if vaping isn’t about hooking kids on nicotine, why all the candy and fruit flavors? Why are all the tobacco companies trying to buy up all the vaping companies?

    When folks age 19 and less start buying nicotine patches and gum at the same rate they seek cigarettes and Juuls, I’ll support taxing the gum and patches the same as cigarettes.


  36. - bedhead 50 - Wednesday, Mar 20, 19 @ 1:09 pm:

    I voted yes.

    Would it be too much to amend the tax law to include vaping products and/or tobacco like products?


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* About 18 percent of public employee retirees move out of state
* Today's number: 30 years
* That is so Illinois
* AFSCME members ratify new state contract
* Everything you ever wanted to know about Kelly Cassidy
* A missed opportunity
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller