Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » ILGOP stirs up remap questions
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
ILGOP stirs up remap questions

Wednesday, May 1, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller

* ILGOP press release from April 23rd…

“Supporters of fair maps should be concerned that they must now rely on Pritzker’s personal determination of what’s ‘fair’ rather than a concrete pledge to veto gerrymandered legislative maps and enact independent redistricting reform. Pritzker walking back his fair map pledge is unfortunate, yet unsurprising. Voters always knew Pritzker had the support of Speaker Madigan, but now we know why. Pritzker is flip-flopping on fair maps so he can protect Madigan’s grip on power for another decade, overriding the will of Illinois voters. What will Pritzker’s next flip-flop be?” - Illinois Republican Party Spokesman Aaron DeGroot

In an interview yesterday with the State Journal-Register, Governor J.B. Pritzker seemed to walk back a pledge to veto legislative redistricting maps drawn with political considerations. Pritzker said, “I would veto a map that I thought was an unfair one.”

“Unfair” is a far cry from Pritzker’s concrete pledge in 2018 to veto gerrymandered maps drawn by elected officials with political considerations.

Last year, Pritzker told Capitol Fax’s Rich Miller he would veto a map that was drawn “in any way” by legislators, political leaders, or their staffs. At the time, Miller asked gubernatorial candidates:

    “Will you pledge as governor to veto any state legislative redistricting map proposal that is in any way drafted or created by legislators, political party leaders and/or their staffs or allies? The exception, of course, would be the final official draft by LRB.”

Pritzker replied:

    “Yes, I will pledge to veto. We should amend the constitution to create an independent commission to draw legislative maps, but in the meantime, I would urge Democrats and Republicans to agree to an independent commission to handle creating a new legislative map…”

A bipartisan, bicameral coalition of lawmakers in the General Assembly support fair maps. The only people standing in the way of redistricting reform are Mike Madigan, John Cullerton, and now, J.B. Pritzker. It only took Pritzker 100 days in office to flip-flop on fair maps and side with Speaker Madigan over the people of Illinois.

* An eerily similar SJ-R editorial from three days later

Thumbs Down: To Gov. J.B. Pritzker for walking back his support for a fair legislative map drawing process.

The maps that determine districts for the General Assembly and Congress are redrawn every decade after the decennial census, which is next scheduled to happen in 2020. Many — including this editorial board — want an independent commission to draw the map, removing legislators from the process.

In March 2018, Rich Miller of the Capitol Fax political blog asked the gubernatorial candidates the following: “Will you pledge as governor to veto any state legislative redistricting map proposal that is in any way drafted or created by legislators, political party leaders and/or their staffs or allies? The exception, of course, would be the final official draft by LRB.”

Then-candidate Pritzker replied: “Yes, I will pledge to veto. We should amend the constitution to create an independent commission to draw legislative maps, but in the meantime, I would urge Democrats and Republicans to agree to an independent commission to handle creating a new legislative map. That designated body should reflect the gender, racial, and geographic diversity of the state and look to preserve the Voting Rights Act decisions to ensure racial and language minorities are fully represented in the electoral process.”

That was a strong answer. But as he marked 100 days as governor, Pritzker’s tune changed.

“Certainly I continue to believe that maps should be drawn fairly,” Pritzker told the SJ-R earlier this week. “I would veto a map that I thought was an unfair one.” But he said there are “a lot of priorities that I’ve moved forward with. … Suffice to say drawing the map fairly in congressional and legislative races is important.”

There is no doubt that the drawing of legislative maps needs to be done in a more fair manner. That only happens if lawmakers are removed from the process. Pritzker has said he wants to bring forth a different Illinois. Throwing his support behind a fair map-making process would be a good start.

* Change Illinois put out a press release today headlined “Is Pritzker back-tracking on fair maps?” The group excerpted the SJ-R editorial and ended with this

Contact your state legislators and Gov. Pritzker to demand they support reform today and call a vote for the Fair Maps Amendment.

I didn’t post the ILGOP press release because I checked in with a Pritzker spokesperson who told me the governor has not changed his position at all from his answer to me last year. He was apparently just using shorthand.

Inquiries from the SJ-R editorial board and Change Illinois would likely have elicited the same response.

       

18 Comments
  1. - lake county democrat - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:05 pm:

    His “shorthand” gets a failing grade - there’s a universe of difference between “I’ll veto a politically drawn map” (a pretty objective standard) vs. “I’ll veto an ‘unfair’ map.” Of course, if the Democrats keep their supermajorities, a veto will just be kabuki anyway, which is why they should put it to the voters. Come to think of it, weren’t they just saying the other day how important it is to let voters vote on changes to the state constitution, or did I just imagine that?


  2. - Fax Machine - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:12 pm:

    Trying to wrest the re-map away from the General Assembly would require both houses to pass an amendment with 3/5 majorities (if it made the ballot voters would approve it with over 70%).

    Trying to get enough Democratic members revolt to make that happen would require literally all of his political capital and likely would still not work. It’s better to spend his time and energy on things that can get done.

    Right now the veto threat is the only thing he has to make sure the maps are fair so that’s what he’s using. If voters think he doesn’t live up to his promise, they can hold him accountable in the 2022 election if they care enough about it.


  3. - anon2 - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:15 pm:

    == the governor has not changed his position at all ==

    If JB sticks to his original position, will the state GOP withdraw their attack and thank him?

    == weren’t they just saying the other day how important it is to let voters vote on changes to the state constitution? ==

    Weren’t Republicans just saying the other day that they oppose letting voters vote on whether to adopt a graduated income tax?


  4. - JB13 - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:18 pm:

    “Pritzker spokesperson who told me the governor has not changed his position at all from his answer to me last year. He was apparently just using shorthand.”

    Ah. The colloquial sense of the words. Got it.


  5. - SIUEalum - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:20 pm:

    When Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina, Utah, Texas, and other GOP-led states start drawing ‘fair maps’, so should we. Until then, turnabout is fair play and Illinois should offset some of the rampant GOP gerrymandering in other states.


  6. - Just Me 2 - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:30 pm:

    I’m calling BS on J.B.’s spokesperson. Pledging to veto a map that was drawn by legislators, and saying he will sign a map he thought was fair, are two different things.


  7. - Just Me 2 - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:33 pm:

    SIUEalum - Ah, the “they’re corrupt, so we should be equally corrupt to balance it out” excuse. Classy. I wonder what you would say if you lived in one of those states.


  8. - Captain Obvious - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:45 pm:

    Come on, who really believed he had any intention of vetoing any map drawn with political intentions? And who really believes that such a map is even possible? When you win the election, you get to have it your way to the extent allowed by case law. The Dems would be foolish to squander a golden opportunity to hamstring the GOP for the next ten years, and they are not going to.


  9. - Concerned Dem - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:47 pm:

    Any “Fair Map” Legislation should include fair maps for county, city and other local government entities too. Republican duplicity on this issue isn’t confined to being ok with gerrymandering Congress, it’s wide spread at the local level too but you never hear a peep from them about changing that.


  10. - anon2 - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 1:51 pm:

    The Republican position on gerrymandering is directly related to whether they are in a red or blue state. There is no general principle of fairness in this regard that all Republicans subscribe to.


  11. - SIUEalum - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:05 pm:

    Just me 2 - I’ve lived in two states I named and I thought that gerrymandering was BS then just as I do now, Illinois included. But, it’s not a problem that one state can fix. I hope the Dems draw a blatantly partisan map. I hope that the GOP appeals it to the US Supreme Court. I hope that the Supreme Court puts a stop to this mess and takes politics out of the equation.


  12. - SilenceDoGood - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:06 pm:

    The ILGOP would be doing the same exact thing if they had the opportunity. Has anyone ask DeGroot what his thoughts are on other GOP state doing the same exact thing?


  13. - Chicagonk - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:23 pm:

    The census website has some interesting data on population by district. The average congressional district in 2022 will have 750,000 people. Currently only the 14th is close to that number. Every downstate district averages out to 695,000 people. My wild guess is for the US House, assuming we lose only 1 seat in Congress, Kinzinger’s district is the one that gets squeezed.


  14. - TominChicago - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:34 pm:

    lakecountydem What constitutes a “politically unfair map” is inherently in the eye of the beholder.


  15. - Chap09 - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:40 pm:

    Rich, you are better than the headline you offer here. The story here is not the IL GOP stirring something up, but J.B. walking back a campaign promise.


  16. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:41 pm:

    ===but J.B. walking back===

    He didn’t as far as I can tell. I followed up, unlike everyone else.


  17. - DeseDemDose - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 2:54 pm:

    After the Rauner years anything said by Republicans, maybe until doomsday in Illinois is filed under “they got a F’IN problem category”.


  18. - Raid - Wednesday, May 1, 19 @ 4:11 pm:

    Fair maps, fair taxes, fairly simple


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes (Updated)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller