Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Sports betting details
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Sports betting details

Thursday, May 9, 2019

* This is a very detailed, quote-filled account of yesterday’s House committee hearing on sports betting. I recommend you read the whole thing if you’re at all interested in this topic

It would likely be fair to say that the only people who left Wednesday’s Illinois sports betting hearing truly happy were representatives of the professional sports leagues. And even they wanted more.

Three hours before the subcommittee hearing was set to start, torch-bearer Mike Zalewski (D-District 23) filed two amendments — both with a 25 percent tax rate on operator gross sports wagering revenue, and one decidedly professional league-friendly. Zalewski’s proposed Amendment 2 not only limits the number of sports betting licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, it calls for a “royalty” to the professional leagues, mandates the purchase of official league data, and imposes a stunning $20 million licensing fee for online sportsbooks. Zalewski filed both as amendments to HB 1260, which appears will be the latest sports betting vehicle. The previous bill, HB 3308, wasn’t referenced.

Needless to say, stakeholders at the two-hour hearing pushed back hard while representatives from Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association attempted to convince the room that only if the leagues are cut into profits, will sports betting reach its potential in Illinois, the sixth most populous state in the U.S. […]

“The tax rate is extremely high,” said Tom Swoik, executive director of the Illinois Casino Gaming Association. “And we are opposed to being forced to do something with the leagues.” […]

Swoik also pointed out that two of Illinois’ key border states, Indiana and Iowa, were on the cusp of legalizing — Indiana’s governor signed sports betting into law Wednesday, possibly during the hearing — both with tax rates below 10 percent, much more reasonable licensing fees and no nod to the professional leagues. Yet lawmakers pushed him and Paul Gaynor of Midwest Entertainment to admit that Illinois’ bigger market would mitigate the proposed high cost of doing business.

“If we’re paying four or five times the taxes, our odds aren’t going to be as good,” Swoik said. Zalewski went on to say that he felt it was wise to start with higher, rather than lower tax rate, but Seoul reminded him that taxes on casino gaming has been changed multiple times.

* This one is also pretty good and includes dot-points of the proposed amendments

The professional sports leagues used to call their ask for a percentage of all bets placed on their games an integrity fee to be used to ensure the integrity of their games. They have long since changed the name to royalty.

At Wednesday’s hearing, they rebranded the royalty as a partnership that would give them a financial incentive to drive up the amount of money bet in Illinois. They also really like pie metaphors.

“I think there’s a lot we can do in terms of opening up the levers of marketing, helping consumers in Illinois understand what are legal sportsbooks versus illegal sportsbooks and encouraging them to bet legally,” said Bryan Seely of Major League Baseball. I think there’s a number of things we can do to try to grow the pie for everyone.”

Scott Kaufman-Ross, representing the NBA, warned that it’s better for all operators to be required to use official league data so that the league will have an incentive to grow revenue for everyone.

“If we were in a situation where we only had a partnership with one operator, then we’d only be incentivized to grow their revenue,” Kaufman-Ross said. “Having a royalty that applies to all sports betting in the state will incentivize the leagues to lean in and grow the pie for everyone.”

* Related…

* Pro leagues to get royalties under proposed Illinois sports betting measure

* Should sports gambling become legal in Illinois, will you be able to wager on Illini, Wildcats or Huskies? Don’t bet on it.

* Gambling expansion, sports betting on collision course as end of Illinois’ legislative session nears

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - wordslinger - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:02 am:

    –mandates the purchase of official league data, –

    That’s absurd; the government mandating purchase of information in the public domain?

    Looks like Jerry’s dog-and-pony show with Ozzie and Horace was quite effective.

  2. - Pick a Name - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:10 am:

    I have no idea why they don’t legalize online poker and join with other states that currently have it. Illinois desperately needs revenue and a source is right in front of their eyes.

  3. - AndyIllini - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:12 am:

    =I have no idea why they don’t legalize online poker and join with other states that currently have it.=

    It makes no sense.

    But if you ever take a step back and take a 30,000 foot view of all of Illinois’ gambling policies, none of it makes any sense.

  4. - Darcan - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:19 am:

    The casinos want to push out Draft Kings and Fan Duel because they know how this industry works.But Rivers wants to have a monopoly. How much money does Neil Blume need?

  5. - OneMan - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:25 am:

    It seems that when it comes to any sort of major gaming expansion the state views the revenue as the initial licesing fee.

    Also the law should say if you allow on prem sports betting in your town you have to allow video gaming as well.

    The vested intrests are right on this one, the fees are too damn high

  6. - Henry Francis - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:27 am:

    Man, these billionaires never stop trying to get a bigger slice of the American pie. How much has Jerry paid in rent to the state for building him that stadium?

    The DC teams, Nationals, wizards and capitals, are getting close to having sports books in their own stadiums.

  7. - A guy - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:30 am:

    == I recommend you read the whole thing if you’re at all interested in this topic…==

    I’m not. So I didn’t. But I appreciate your diligence in passing it along.

  8. - May soon be required - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:39 am:

    Too many hands in the pot don’t make the “juice” worth the squeeze.

  9. - Name/Nickname - May soon be required - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:40 am:

    I wonder what the hell Zalewski’s motivation is for this. Hmmm……..

  10. - City Zen - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:50 am:

    ==will you be able to wager on Illini==

    How about against?

  11. - NoGifts - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 10:56 am:

    Am I crazy? Aren’t we creating a conflict of interest where the league/owners have a stake in betting? Does this open the door to throwing games to increase interest or profits?

  12. - FormerILLobster - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 11:04 am:

    Of course the Leagues reference their requested percentage as a “Royalty” or a “Partnership”. This is necessary because of their “not for profit” status. Calling the cut a “Royalty” keeps it federally tax exempt from “Unrelated Business Income Tax”

  13. - foster brooks - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 11:26 am:

    why in the world would you let pro leagues in on this revenue? nobody else does it.

  14. - anon - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 11:27 am:

    How will the NBA/MLB increase the amount of money bet in Illinois in comparison to every other state that cut them out? Will they run ads that tell everyone not to bet in Indiana or Vegas?

  15. - Fav human - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 12:01 pm:

    What foster b. said. What official data do you need?? just the score??

  16. - Jose Abreu's Next Homerun - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 12:55 pm:

    What are the consequences for telling the sports leagues no?

  17. - how it works - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 1:11 pm:

    ==- Fav human - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 12:01 pm:

    What foster b. said. What official data do you need?? just the score??==

    You have to understand sports betting and how it works to understand the need for official league data and why league involvement will maximize state revenues. It’s not about final scores. It’s about in-play betting and that’s where the real money is made. If you’re using multiple data points, one outlet may make one call and the other outlet calls it differently. You need one, consistent arbiter of the plays and the entity that does that is the league. The states that dont require it dont have to worry because the main players are Fan Duel and Draft Kings, and they only use official league data. Here in Illinois, you have casinos that want to create their own sports books and platforms. If you want to be sure everyone is playing on the same field, you have to make sure they’re all using the same data.

  18. - Not for Nothing - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 1:46 pm:

    @Foster - Tennessee, that shining state on the hill that everyone says Illinois needs to be more like, just passed a bill with official league data. So, not nobody.

  19. - OneMan - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 2:20 pm:

    What foster b. said. What official data do you need?? just the score??

    Actually, you need more than the score at the end of the game. Over 20% of sports betting in Nevada takes place during the game. In-game betting action has been growing and that growth is expected to continue.

    A sportsbook will offer bets during the game with the odds shifting during a game based off of score, who is playing and who isn’t etc.
    There have been instances where player changes (or other things) have not been reflected in the data used by some sports books vs others leading to not only arbitrage opportunities (book one knows the kicker is hurt but not a different sportsbook) but questions about why odds are so different. Since the in-game odds are often set in part by algorithms you want your algorithm to have the correct data. There is some value in everyone working off of the same data when setting odds.

    Admittedly this is being driven by the leagues wanting revenue, but there is a bit of an integrity argument here. You wouldn’t want people selling stock who didn’t have the official current price of the stock, it’s a bit of the same thing.

  20. - wordslinger - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 2:41 pm:

    MLB has come quite a ways since Kenesaw Mountain Landis.

    Bowie Kuhn banned from baseball the retired Willie Mays and Mickey Mantle because they had meet-and-greet gigs at casinos (Peter Ueberroth later lifted them).

    You know Pete Rose has to be working this angle in another attempt to vacate his lifetime ban.

  21. - DuPage Moderate - Thursday, May 9, 19 @ 7:48 pm:

    Yeah, fade the Illini and pound Northwestern in Big Ten Football play. We could pay down the pension deficient with that weekly parlay.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* 982 new cases, 97 additional deaths
* Is anybody out there?
* Base revenues fell $341 million in May, but income tax plunge vastly slowed
* Some people will believe anything on social media
* Attempts to heal
* Black Caucus lays out some of its agenda
* Oberweis wants expanded mail-in ballot program
* Today's must-read
* Testing sites reopening
* *** UPDATED x2 *** Three House Black Caucus members call for special legislative session
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller