Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** Spooking the markets
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** Spooking the markets

Tuesday, Jul 2, 2019

* I’d wager that this is just exactly the sort of overreaction that the plaintiffs may have been hoping for. Yet another misleading piece from Bloomberg

Joe Mysak, Bloomberg News’s foremost expert on the $3.8 trillion municipal-bond market, has a saying about Puerto Rico: It was technically “in” the market for state and local government debt, but not “of” it. That is to say, for a number of reasons, it has always been considered an outlier.

Indeed, munis are off to a blistering pace in 2019, with mutual and exchange-traded funds focused on the debt on track to pull in a record amount of cash this year. Investors are buying even though a closely watched gauge of relative value would suggest the bonds are a screaming sell. Never mind that at the start of the year, a federal oversight board argued that more than $6 billion of Puerto Rico’s general-obligation bonds should be declared null and void because issuing them in the first place breached the island’s constitutional debt limit. It’s just an outlier, after all.

Or is it?

John Tillman, the CEO of conservative think tank Illinois Policy Institute, and Warlander Asset Management’s Eric Cole, a protege of Appaloosa Management’s David Tepper, are teaming up in an effort to invalidate a whopping $14.3 billion of Illinois debt on the grounds that the state’s pension bond sale in 2003 and securities issued in 2017 to pay a backlog of unpaid bills were in fact deficit-financing transactions prohibited by the constitution.

Except, as we discussed yesterday, the Illinois Constitution does not explicitly or even implicitly bar this sort of borrowing.

* I mean, the constitutional passage in question is only 88 words long. Even people from New York can handle that

State debt for specific purposes may be incurred or the payment of State or other debt guaranteed in such amounts as may be provided either in a law passed by the vote of three-fifths of the members elected to each house of the General Assembly or in a law approved by a majority of the electors voting on the question at the next general election following passage. Any law providing for the incurring or guaranteeing of debt shall set forth the specific purposes and the manner of repayment.

That’s the specific passage referenced in Tillman’s legal filing. You tell me where it prevents bonding to pay off old bills because I sure as heck don’t see it.

*** UPDATE *** The markets were indeed spooked…

Bloomberg should be so proud.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 9:49 am:

    I don’t see it either. It’s bunk.

    The destructive IPI has been thwarted by the 2018 election and AFSCME, but it won’t give up. When you have your billionaire donors’ money to burn and are delusional ideologues this is what you do.

  2. - TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 9:51 am:

    what are the odds this becomes exhibit one in the future for a Vexatious litigation finding against the involved lawyers?

    I honestly think if IPI keeps on this path, that is where they will end up. Just another ruined career in their wake to them. But I’d be careful if I was a lawyer and was approached by them for a case.

  3. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 9:52 am:

    Time for the Governor’s office to talk to Bloomberg about their misinformation.

  4. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 10:02 am:

    John Tillman does not give a hoot about the State of Illinois. He is interested in tearing the state down. The more I think about his nonsense the more angry I become. Can we please stop referring to the Illinois Policy Institute as anything but a hack organization? Because that’s what Tillman and his organization is. Hacks.

  5. - Not a Billionaire - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 10:09 am:

    I would look into who was trading Illinois munis.

  6. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 10:12 am:

    Yesterday, the governor’s office had this response to Tillman.

    ===John Tillman and Bruce Rauner’s old buddies are back to playing dangerous games with our finances so they can keep up their quixotic quest to drive Illinois into bankruptcy.===

    I called it lazy, but let me clarify my thought to that;

    “quixotic quest to drive Illinois into bankruptcy.”

    On its face, yeah it answers the bell, but where I think, and still do, it’s lazy is the quixotic quest aspect needs that slamming, and hard, that the outcome is… an impossible dream.

    Why all this? The response itself leaves open the dream, an impossible one, but not the legal impossibility as complete.

    A rhetorical response to the “legal” actions with that request to the court, you get folks spooked.

    An impossible dream stifled isn’t a legal impossibility stomped.

    Now let’s see how this plays out.

  7. - SpfdNewb - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 10:19 am:

    SEC needs to get involved, this could be construed as insider trading. Especially if Tillman et al are profiting of the frivolous lawsuit.

  8. - Pundent - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 10:24 am:

    When an asset management fund attempts to invalidate a bond sale it’s not for the good of the state, it’s for the good of their pockets.

    Tilman’s idea of “governing” is manipulating public institutions to further his economic interests. Whether that’s stripping unions of their power or driving up bond yields. Any legitimate reporter would be asking the “why” behind any of his actions.

  9. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 10:39 am:

    Lawsuit for political purposes, but hey why not take a shot? They didn’t beat JB at the ballot box, and know they likely won’t beat him next time unless state finances are an even worse mess than they were when he took office. Tillman probably knows this filing won’t work, but if there’s even a chance he can damage the state economy - and by extension, Pritzker - it’ll be worth it in the long run. Right now he’s practically shut out of state government and no one really listens to him anymore, so Tillman has nothing to lose by filing this lawsuit.

  10. - 312 - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 11:02 am:

    Or, as we’ve seen on the national level… Why let the facts get in the way of a good argument? Proves that the IPI folks have been listening to Faux News.

  11. - Nonbeliever - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 11:05 am:

    Various groups of any political persuasion will try to litigate almost anything. Obviously this bogus attempt is just that- bogus.

    The usual trick is to judge shop and find one that you believe might agree with you.

  12. - Steve - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 11:09 am:

    Rich’s headline is quite relevant . I think the long run goal here is to make it difficult for Illinois to issue debt . That’s one way to limit spending.

  13. - Smitty Irving - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 11:14 am:

    Demoralized -
    Helps me reduce tension by calling them the Illinois Propaganda Institue.

  14. - Steve - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 11:18 am:

    This is what their strategy might be in the long run. The “San Diego” situation with the SEC .

  15. - Punent - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 12:24 pm:

    =I think the long run goal here is to make it difficult for Illinois to issue debt.=

    These guys seem more like opportunists to me. I don’t think limiting the state’s ability to issue debt does much for them. But if they can create further questions on the quality of that debt it serves to drive up the returns. It’s no different than the nonsensical comments on bankruptcy. And if it muddies the water enough to defeat the graduated impact tax all the better.

  16. - RNUG - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 12:41 pm:

    == I think the long run goal here is to make it difficult for Illinois to issue debt. ==

    No, just more expensive.

    Yesterday I asked why. Now that I have mulled on it overnight, I think it is all about hedging bets. A lot of economists think a downtown is coming, probably sooner than later. If that happens, as an investor it would be nice to be sitting on a bunch of guaranteed high interest Illinois bonds.

  17. - Anyone Remember - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 1:39 pm:

    Steve -
    Any proof what is in the CAFRs or bond prospectuses is incomplete / inaccurate / fraudulent?

  18. - Looking Down the Road - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 1:45 pm:

    IPI and the lawsuit aside, I believe that investors would be wise to seriously consider the downside risk of municipal bonds of financially challenged entities. “Full faith and credit” doesn’t seem to be impressing the courts when pensions on the line. Maybe that is the way it should be, but investors need to consider the risks. Especially for pension obligation bonds that shift the risk to the bondholders.

  19. - Stuntman Bob's Brother - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 2:07 pm:

    ==I think the long run goal here is to make it difficult for Illinois to issue debt . That’s one way to limit spending==

    If Governor Tax-Hike is successful on the progressive front in 2020, why in God’s name would the state “need” to acquire new debt without retiring older, more expensive debt going forward? If that’s not the case, then the Governor’s proposed rates are not adequate, as someone here (cough, cough) has pointed out numerous times. This needs to be IL’s last trip to the tax well for a long, long time.

  20. - RNUG - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 2:51 pm:

    The SEC really does need to examine all the buyers and sellers of IL bonds for ties to the the group’s behind the motion to file a lawsuit.

  21. - Al - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 2:56 pm:

    Price movement is good news for Citadel.

  22. - Pundent - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 2:58 pm:

    RNUG - Agreed. Obviously reporters seem to be oblivious as to why Tillman and Cole might do this. There’s no reason why the SEC needs to be.

  23. - Soccermom - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 3:49 pm:

    RNUG –You’re absolutely right. This is price manipulation.

  24. - sewer thoughts - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 4:16 pm:

    I mean…I am a buyer?

  25. - Morty - Tuesday, Jul 2, 19 @ 7:56 pm:

    “why in God’s name would the state “need” to acquire new debt without retiring older, more expensive debt going forward?“

    Because if the state’s credit outlook improves the state could refinance other debt at a better rate?

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Man arrested for threatening to shoot US Rep. Rodney Davis
* Pritzker talks about his $5 million contribution
* Pritzker selects Thompson Center sale project manager
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Multiple child abuse investigations underway at Gages Lake School
* “Well I'd certainly like to see you naked”
* Conspiracy theorist claims there's a state conspiracy against him
* Reps. Mark Batinick, Kelly Cassidy file bill to repeal ComEd's 2016 nuke plant subsidy
* Elections have consequences
* Oops
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker administration slaps down "rain tax" "controversy"
* Croke rolls out long list of endorsements
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller