Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Appellate Court again rules against Mautino’s campaign committee
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Appellate Court again rules against Mautino’s campaign committee

Wednesday, Aug 21, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Derek Barichello at Shaw Media

Two years after an initial elections complaint, an Appellate Court ruled Monday former state Rep. Frank Mautino’s campaign committee further violated election codes.

The ruling stated the committee’s expenses at a bank and at a Spring Valley gas station for gas and repairs of personal vehicles were violations.

Election code states gas and repairs of personal vehicles should be reimbursed through mileage reporting, and should not exceed fair market value. Between 1999 and 2015, the campaign committee reported $225,109.19 in expenditures to a Spring Valley gas station for gas and vehicle repairs.

“Now it’s clear to any candidate in Illinois the way to handle vehicle expenses is through mileage, you can’t just fill up people’s gas tanks,” said Jeffrey Schwab, an attorney at the Liberty Justice Center, representing Streator resident David Cooke, who brought forward the appeal.

The appellate court said the Board of Elections must now consider further fines. The now-defunct committee was fined $5,000 in May 2017 by the Illinois Board of Elections for failing to produce records. The fine has not been paid, as the committee has disbanded.

* Madison-St. Clair Record

Justice James Knecht wrote that evidence clearly established the committee made expenditures to a third party for gas and repairs in violation of the code.

“The board’s decision to the contrary is clearly erroneous,” Knecht wrote. “The record is not clear as to the reasoning of the four members who voted against finding a violation.” […]

Last year, Fourth District judges remanded the complaint for the board to issue rulings on Cooke’s claims.

They directed the board to amend its reconsideration order to show Mautino’s committee violated code on accounting and reporting. […]

Four Republicans [on the State Board of Elections] voted to find violations and four Democrats voted against it.

[David Cooke of Streator, who filed the complaint against Mautino] appealed again and prevailed again.

* From the opinion

As a final matter, we recognize some members of the Board who voted against finding violations of section 9-8.10(a)(9) suggested they did so because they concluded any violation was not “knowingly” committed. On appeal, Cooke contends the evidence established the Committee committed knowing violations and the Board’s decision to the contrary is clearly erroneous. Neither the Committee nor the Board addresses Cooke’s argument. We need not address Cooke’s argument. Section 9-8.10(b) provides: “The Board may levy a fine on any person who knowingly makes expenditures in violation of [section 9-8.10] ***.” 10 ILCS 5/9- 8.10(b) (West 2014). The Board, quoting section 9-8.10(b), asserts, “If a section 9-8.10 violation is found, section 9-8.10(b) states that the Board ‘may levy a fine on any person who knowingly’ made improper expenditures.” The Board’s assertion supposes the determination of whether a person knowingly made expenditures in violation of section 9-8.10 is a determination concerning the imposition of fines that is made only after a determination of whether a violation occurred. The Committee does not address the Board’s interpretation of section 9-8.10(b). Absent any argument to the contrary, we agree with the Board’s interpretation. Having now concluded the evidence established violations of section 9-8.10(a)(2) and (a)(9), the Board on remand can address whether the violations were knowingly committed in considering the matter of fines under section 9-8.10(b).

That could be Mautino’s out.


  1. - Colin O'Scopy - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 12:12 pm:

    I think the state auditor should investigate. Uh, never mind.

  2. - My New Handle - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 12:13 pm:

    Good to know the Speaker supported Mautino for Auditor General. Madigan seems so hands on, except when he is hands off. Have the Dems, and Illinois, really been better off with him at the helm of the House and the DP. It would be a bumpy ride on the bus that keeps running over people thrown under it.

  3. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 12:25 pm:

    ===That could be Mautino’s out.===

    A legal opinion by an Appellate Court is a “good” out.

    The twittering of one @GrantWehrli… it will be delicious to its insanity, I’m hoping.

  4. - Lucky Pierre - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 12:30 pm:

    Use to court order to Garnish his pay to pay the fine, just like any other working stiff would have to do.

    Great example for Illinois residents to follow from our Auditor General

    It’s ok to Ignore Court rulings because you are above the law and one of the Speaker’s favorites.

  5. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 12:37 pm:

    And right on time…

    @GrantWehrli - Our state fiscal watchdog can’t even keep his own books clean. His removal as Auditor General is long past due. He was never qualified and one can only wonder what he is hiding.

    If you aren’t checking out, and laughing at, @GrantWehrli, you’re probably doing twitter wrong, lol

  6. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 1:31 pm:

    What kind of a court is this that would allow a person to disband a committee while it is under investagation??? we need a total revamp of the rules for what is allowed as expense and how it must be reported. Maybe the should start with the IRS rules.

  7. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 1:55 pm:

    ===What kind of a court is this that would allow a person to disband a committee while it is under investagation???===

    Never happened.

    The committee was dissolved (in December 2015) before the complaint was filed (in January or February 2016). As Auditor General, Mautino, by law, could not have a campaign committee after his December 2015 appointment nor could he reconstitute it.

    I do not think the complaint would have been filed while the committee existed because the committee would have had the records to either refute the claims or amend its filings to meet whatever standard was established.

  8. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 2:00 pm:

    ==It’s ok to Ignore Court rulings==

    I agree that nobody should be able to ignore court rulings. I didn’t see your outrage however when your hero Governor did that very same thing. You really need to pick a lane and stay in it for once instead of swerving around whenever it suits your arguments.

  9. - Adam - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 3:00 pm:

    The court found that Mautino committed clear violations. How does that give him an out?
    Does the plaintiff have to now prove they were “knowing” violations in order to seek a fine?

  10. - Justacitizen - Wednesday, Aug 21, 19 @ 10:50 pm:

    ===Two years after an initial elections complaint, an Appellate Court ruled Monday former state Rep. Frank Mautino’s campaign committee further violated election codes.===

    Wasn’t there a delay tactic Mautino was using to ensure he got vested in the general assembly retirement system?

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Caption contest!
* Study: One out of nine Illinois prisoners were sentenced for illegal possession of a firearm
* Your feel-good story of the day
* Pritzker: Supreme Court ruling protecting mifepristone access is a “small victory” in the fight to protect women’s rights
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller