Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker again talks about forcing lobbyists to disclose what they’re being paid
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker again talks about forcing lobbyists to disclose what they’re being paid

Thursday, Nov 7, 2019

* Tina Sfondeles asked Gov. Pritzker today about his ethics proposals in the coming week and during the spring session

“We ought to begin with some bills around transparency, making sure that we know what lobbyists are getting paid, making sure we know who lobbyists are representing, that there’s a common database perhaps so that people could look up all the contributions that are related to a specific company and lobbyists and legislators.”

Asked if an outright ban on state lawmakers being lobbyists in any capacity should be part of that package, Pritzker said he’s “absolutely committed to the idea that we have to look into [it].”

“You see that Rep. Arroyo was a lobbyist for other levels of government. I think that is challenging and problematic,” Pritzker said. “Once again I’m not sure we’ll be able to do the proper amount of investigation and hearings in the three legislative days that are left here this year. But that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t aim at getting the best and most comprehensive ethics reform package through that we can.” […]

[Sen. Don Harmon] said “…It’s long been a source of angst when other elected officials are lobbying the General Assembly, and I would presume that members of other bodies would feel the same way. A more clear standard of what is and isn’t lobbying is probably a good place to start that conversation.”


- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Kam's Floor - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 2:54 pm:


  2. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 2:56 pm:

    The only avenue that makes some sense to this is to require those *paying* to disclose the payment(s) *to* folks.

    The responsibility of those hiring, they will think who they want to disclose whom they are paying.

  3. - Nonsense - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 2:56 pm:

    Why do you need to know what lobbyists are getting paid? What does that have to do with elected officials taking bribes?

  4. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 2:58 pm:

    ===absolutely committed to the idea that we have to look into [it]===

    I am totally, 100% behind delaying consideration of the proposal.

  5. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 2:58 pm:

    Every lobbyist on the ILSOS directory receives unsolicited campaign donation requests from pretty much every legislator in Springfield multiple times per year. If we require lobbyists to disclose their compensation, all you’re doing it making it easier for legislators to extract more cash from a vulnerable group.

    I’m a registered lobbyist, but I ain’t no millionaire and my political contributions are strictly voluntary, but don’t think for a second that this disclosure won’t result in more inappropriate fundraising requests.

    I would greatly prefer a ban on lobbyists making donations at all. That would be doing me a favor. That’s the only scenario where I could be persuaded to support compensation disclosure.

  6. - Deflect. Rinse. Repeat. - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 2:59 pm:

    Gotta hand it to the Govs people. They took a situation where two elected officials were allegedly bribing and accepting a bribe and turned it into a fight against lobbyist. Genius.

  7. - Ginhouse Tommy - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:11 pm:

    I think JB means well but this might be a stretch.

  8. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:15 pm:

    ===If we require lobbyists to disclose their compensation, all you’re doing it making it easier for legislators to extract more cash from a vulnerable group.===

    You gotta hand it to the GA. Intentionally or unintentionally, they’re doing a great job of twisting Arroyo indictment into something they can benefit from.

    This seems like an argument to just ban elected officials from lobbying altogether.

  9. - Thomas Paine - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:17 pm:

    The solution to “The Arroyo Problem” is being sponsored by Durkin. Ban General assembly members and their household members from being contract lobbyists.

    I would apply that to all state and local government officials, whether elected or appointed.

    I would not apply it to “in house” lobbyists. Diana Rauner should not have been forced to give up her job just because her husband was elected. There was never any confusion nor any doubt about whom Mrs. Rauner was lobbying for at any given time. Just as there was never any question about any other elected official whose spouse was in government relations.

    The solution to the “ComEd Problem” such as it is is not for Mike Kasper to disclose how much he is being paid, but for ComEd to disclose how much it is spending on lobbying activities. Unless we are planning on having the Illinois Policy Institute open its books as well?

  10. - Deflect. Rinse. Repeat. - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:27 pm:

    — I would not apply it to “in house” lobbyists. Diana Rauner should not have been forced to give up her job —

    What? Huh? Are you saying contract lobbyists are unseemly but in house are somehow cleaner? That An outside lobbyist for the aclu should report but the in house ones don’t? IPI doesnt have to report what they pay their lobbyists?

    You can’t have it both ways. Everyone reports or no one reports.

  11. - Big Picture - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:28 pm:

    ==The solution to the “ComEd Problem” …[is] for ComEd to disclose how much it is spending on lobbying activities==

    Agreed. They should also disclose all advertising, PR, paid media, earned media, Foundation spending, PAC donations and other ways that they may influence an issue.

    That said, this would enhance the regulatory burden on small companies, not for profits, unions and other groups at the Capitol.

    This will be a hard nut to crack without getting 1st amendment attorneys involved.

  12. - PlsSenSorMe - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:28 pm:

    Does the definition of a lobbyist include the CEO of a state who doubles the pay of other high level government employees so they will have dual loyalties? Yeah, …I know–it comes out of his own pocket–he can afford it because he doesn’t have to pay Illinois tax on income stashed in the Caribbean.

  13. - Wow - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:28 pm:

    Legislators/elected officials in trouble.. JB’s response?? Don’t go after elected officials.. go after private citizens… priceless

  14. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:32 pm:

    === Diana Rauner should not have been forced to give up her job===


    That’s news to The Ounce.

  15. - Responsa - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:33 pm:

    “Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be lobsters.” Well, the song title is a little bit different but you get the general idea.

  16. - Snicarte Slim - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:34 pm:

    Agree with 47th Ward. If this is to becomes a requirement then a prohibition on political contributions by lobbyists should be a part of the package.

  17. - Wow - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:35 pm:

    DEFLECT: you can’t exempt in-house lobbyists. That creates an unconstitutional special class. Lawsuit waiting to happen

  18. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:35 pm:

    My point?

    The problem with examples like Mrs. Rauner is that this type of request… was not going to happen.

    Her position and brand was a choice and discussing before Bruce ran, we don’t even know if Bruce would’ve ran if that ban existed for Diana.

  19. - SteveB` - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:35 pm:

    Im am all for it

  20. - just curious - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:44 pm:

    This is a problem created by former and current legislators who are registered lobbyists. There are numerous individuals who must register as lobbyists, even though they work for a not-for-profit, so they can represent their membership. Most of those lobbyists do not donate to any legislator or political party. The dues pay for their salary. Go after those who are abusing the process.

  21. - Cheryl44 - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:47 pm:

    I don’t like it and I m not a lobster. I’m not even sure I even know any. I do like making corporations tell us how much they spend to influence polititans on all levels.

  22. - Legislator - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:47 pm:

    If lobsters have to report all their earned income then maybe we Legislators should also report all our earned income… Including any spouses (some of whom have politically connected employment). If it’s good for the goose…

  23. - Anonymous - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:52 pm:

    They should go after those plumbers who remove toilets for the avoidance of paying property taxes.

  24. - Point of Order - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 3:53 pm:

    === Diana Rauner should not have been forced to give up her job===

    Was Diana Rauner ever a registered lobbyist?

  25. - Joe Bidenopolous - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 4:07 pm:

    Totally agree with 47th again. It’s pretty ridiculous that legislators get caught with a hand in the cookie jar and they decide to take it to an entirely different group of people, but that’s pretty much peak Illinois.

    So, it looks like sometime in the near future I will be disclosing (at least some) of my income. But that roll call will come in handy when I decide who’s off the contribution list for the future

  26. - Centennial - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 4:08 pm:

    Serious question. Ignoring the fact this does nothing to prevent legislators from breaking the law — Did JB ever disclose exactly how much private money is supplementing the salaries of his own senior staff? Talk about good for the goose. Geez

  27. - {Sigh} - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 4:16 pm:

    Maybe lobbyists and state employees should swipe their badges as they enter the capitol? Also require adult visitors to swipe their state ID’s. If there is ever a disaster at the capitol, then there would be record of who was there.

  28. - austinman - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 5:28 pm:

    As a registered lobbyist, if I have to say how much I get paid I would prefer to being banned from making political contributions, because not all of us are making a ton of money, and I don’t want more legislators asking me for money just because they would now know how much I am making. But I am sure the high price lobbyist who are lawyers will figure out a way to skew the numbers.

  29. - Anonymous - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 5:40 pm:

    I love the comments about making “corporations” disclose. If that is the case, then we also need the same rules for unions, local units of government, universities, etc.

  30. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 6:15 pm:

    Banning lobbyists from making political contributions will run into some Citizen’s United trouble no doubt especially when lobbyists haven’t even committed the misdeeds that is sparking reform.

  31. - Centennial - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 6:24 pm:

    @ Annyonmous @5:40: ummmm … unions, local governments, and universities already have to publicly disclose salaries. Welcome to the party.

  32. - May Soon Be Required - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 7:17 pm:

    Because Cullerton, Sandoval, Arroyo, Link

  33. - Anon - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 9:11 pm:

    How about we have all office holders disclose the full salary paid to state employees, even if paid through a private entity.

  34. - Duff - Thursday, Nov 7, 19 @ 9:34 pm:

    If this goes through, then we have to worry about some of our
    less than scrupulous brethren scanning the lobbyist list looking to underbid and poach our clients. Bad idea.

  35. - Eire17 - Friday, Nov 8, 19 @ 5:54 am:

    Two crooked pols hook up—let’s not forget the payee has a tax fraud issue so if it’s not who some people say it is then we have yet another member of the senate in trouble—and I have to tell the world who pays me what? How does that fix the problem? I once had a client who primarily helped the poor. Guess what? I priced it at next to nothing as a way to give back. But another client who was charged much more might not see it that way. This makes no sense. But classic. Two crooks get together and it’s the lobbyists fault.

  36. - BoSox - Friday, Nov 8, 19 @ 7:30 am:

    We can’t forget to make sure high level state employees aren’t retained as “consultants” while publicly employed. That’s been a game for years.

TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Campaign updates
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Reader comments closed until Monday
* Pritzker defends "citizen legislature" concept
* Corruption roundup
* Scammers allegedly spoofing ISP phone numbers
* Question of the day
* Another Lincoln "artifact" called into question
* It's just a bill
* Another first in a newly legalized business
* *** UPDATED x1 *** More SoS glitch details emerge
* Senate President Harmon to leave his law firm after 15 years
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller