Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Fight continues over aircraft maintenance tax forgiveness plan
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Fight continues over aircraft maintenance tax forgiveness plan

Tuesday, Nov 12, 2019

* Cole Lauterbach at the Center Square

Illinois lawmakers face a political test of wills this week when they are expected to be asked to vote for an otherwise popular bill that Gov. J.B. Pritzker has vowed to veto.

Should it be enacted, private jet maintenance companies in Illinois would be forgiven sales tax tabs from the last five years and would have an exemption extended to 2024. It passed nearly unanimously in the House in October, but faces an uncertain fate in the Senate now that Pritzker has pledged to veto it.

“This bill would forgive $50 million of taxes that are owed by people who are in this private jet industry,” he said last week. “I just don’t think it’s right, given the state of our finances in the state of Illinois.”

He was responding to a question regarding a WCIA Channel 3 report that labeled the companies as “luxury jet manufacturers” getting a tax break. Other than Chicago-based Boeing, Illinois is not home to any private jet manufacturers. The legislation would affect aviation facilities whose mechanics perform routine maintenance on smaller jets to meet government standards. […]

The issue arose when companies learned that an exemption was allowed to sunset along with many others in 2014. Industry representatives estimate the amount of owed tax revenue to be nearly $50 million and would require the companies to pay about $8 million annually over the next four years.

Many companies said they were unaware that the exemption had been allowed to expire. They didn’t charge their clients and facing tax bills that supporters say could put the local aviation companies at a disadvantage to other states that offer the same exemption.

Even Illinois’ own agencies were, as of March of this year, under the impression that the tax exemption was still in place. The Legislative Research Unit’s 2019 Tax Handbook said companies that offer “(m)aterials and components incorporated into or upon an aircraft as part of its modification, completion, repair, or maintenance” are completely exempt from Illinois’ occupational sales tax.

That quote from LRU’s handbook is correct. But nobody in their right mind would rely solely on LRU for their tax obligations. And LRU is the only agency listed, so it’s likely not “agencies.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Anon - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 9:55 am:

    Did IDOR have any instruction on the changed law, even an instruction to their auditors to look for this tax?

  2. - Thomas Paine - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 10:15 am:

    It has been reported that atleast some of these companies have been audited by the Illinois Department of Revenue since the tax change, and the auditors didn’t tell them/were unaware of the change in the tax code.

    That, to me, seems pretty compelling if it is true.

    It is a very expensive mistake for the department; what they ought to do is ask for companies to assist them by providing customer names, and the department of revenue can go after the customers. After all, it is they that were supposed to be remitting the tax.

  3. - Amalia - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 10:30 am:

    where are these companies located?

  4. - OneMan - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 10:40 am:


    I can tell you we have multiple entities that perform small jet maintenance (including avionics) at the Aurora municipal airport (which is surrounded by Sugar Grove. Chicago Executive Airport has some in Wheeling, the DuPage airport in West Chicago. The airport in Savoy (outside of Champaign), Galesburg (not sure if they do jets or just multi-engine prop aircraft). I am sure there are others.

  5. - The Edge - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 10:55 am:

    Sounds like a consequence of the hollowing of state government. You’d think a computer program could of caught this when tax returns were filed.

  6. - Sue - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 10:57 am:

    If JB is so concerned with State Finances - Why the tier 2 giveaway on his Pension consolidation plan. God only knows the cost of enhancing tier 2 benefits because there has been no actuarial study.

  7. - Responsa - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 11:10 am:

    I am with Thomas Paine. Is there no way Illinois can also go after the companies who *should* have been billed for taxes by the maintenance company? As part of a compromise settlement perhaps? There seems to be a real question of whether the new tax was adequately notified and advertised and followed up. Mistakes were made at several levels. It’s hard to believe the maintenance companies should solely bear the brunt and perhaps be driven out of business when there seems to be so much fault and mis-management all around with respect to this.

  8. - R A T - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 11:24 am:

    Sue, I am confused by your post. What did JB do for Tier 2?

  9. - Sue - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 11:27 am:

    To obtain the police union support - the consolidation bill will include an enhancement to tier 2 benefits as was posted on Cap Fax friday

  10. - Poster #56 - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 11:41 am:

    Rich people will just fly their aircraft to other states to get maintenance. Illinois companies will go out of business, workers will lose jobs and government will lose the taxes they currently pay. Good plan.

  11. - C Ball - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 11:44 am:

    How was this discovered? From the prior reports it sounds like the companies might have discovered the lapse themselves, but I have not seen a definitive account.

  12. - SAP - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 11:45 am:

    Right around 1994 or 1995, the GA passed legislation that put an automatic 5-year sunset on new tax exemptions, deductions, and credits. Now, people generally draft around it by exempting their exemption from the sunset, but every once in a while, one gets by like this.

  13. - JS Mill - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 12:32 pm:

    = Illinois companies will go out of business, workers will lose jobs and government will lose the taxes they currently pay. Good plan.=

    That same philosophy (paranoia) can be applied to all business and every resident.

    Taking it a step farther- no taxes for everyone but lots of services and all for free.

    Good plan.

  14. - Donnie Elgin - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 12:36 pm:

    JB is using political capital (veto threat) to call out one industries sales tax exemption when there are many others. Good luck with that.

  15. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 12:42 pm:

    === Rich people will just fly their aircraft to other states to get maintenance. Illinois companies will go out of business, workers will lose jobs and government will lose the taxes they currently pay. Good plan.===

    … and yet Chicago is the number one, again, city for foreign investments in North America.


  16. - bo - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 12:49 pm:

    ~~Rich people will just fly their aircraft to other states to get maintenance.~~

    Some possibly. But I find it very difficult to imagine that a Cessna owner is going to fly a few hundred miles to get work done. Figure out how to get back home and then do it again in reverse when the plane is finished over sales tax.

  17. - Anon - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 1:21 pm:

    There are two separate issues here. One is whether to have an exemption going forward. The second is whether to waive taxes retroactively. I’ve yet to see any indication that anyone - from the state legislature, LRU, IDOR, or affected industries - was even aware the exemption had lapsed. Given the clear harm in trying to collect that tax now (let alone the penalties), the waiver seems appropriate.

  18. - Blue Dog Dem - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 1:30 pm:

    The mission statement of DCEO says it all. I have lobbied for the end of this waste of taxpayer money for years. This failing only reinforces my opinion.

  19. - Pundent - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 1:36 pm:

    =Rich people will just fly their aircraft to other states to get maintenance.=

    This sounds like the arguments raised around the gas tax. But the cost of flying your plane to another state makes about as much sense as driving 30 miles round trip to save a nickel a gallon on gas.

  20. - sulla - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 2:01 pm:

    Communities that have municipal or regional airports with leases to FBOs are going to be the real losers here. Despite the fact that their line of business is making repairs to “luxury private jets”, these FBOs are not swimming in cash and having to pay back millions in uncollected sales taxes is going to kill a number of them.

    …Which means a lot of small airports around the state are going to be stuck with empty hangar space for lease. I’m guessing that is why the House bill had such huge support - this is pretty bad for everyone involved.

  21. - Amalia - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 2:24 pm:

    @OneMan, thank you.

  22. - Blue Dog Dem - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 3:02 pm:

    Maybe jb can find middle ground.

  23. - Last Bull Moose - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 4:36 pm:

    Excise taxes on businesses that compete directly with companies not subject to the tax are almost always bad ideas. They generate little or no revenue because the business moves. To use the gas station analogy, it is as if the gas stations are on opposite sides of the street. No cost to consumers to avoid the tax.

    Companies that fly to several states will schedule maintenance where it is cheapest, if they can do so without causing other problems with their operations.

  24. - Pelonski - Tuesday, Nov 12, 19 @ 6:31 pm:

    A little known fact is that the “sunset provision” was originally known as the “ensuring future campaign contributions provision”. It was changed to be politically correct. The people who made that change are the ones that should pay the tax. If they had kept the original name, these companies would have known to get out the checkbook before their exemption expired. /s

  25. - Supplemental Info - Wednesday, Nov 13, 19 @ 1:36 am:

    @Amalia - The largest are Cahokia, East Alton, Springfield, Quad Cities/Milan, & Savoy/Champaign. Then you have Peoria, West Chicago, Bloomington, Sugar Grove/Aurora, Wheeling, & Rockford.

    @Responsa - Not really. It is a wide range of work for a variety of situations and each could easily be fight - which would likely ruin relationships with regular customers. We’re talking about overhauls on planes pre/post sale, regular maintenance/repair, international work, leased aircraft, equipment upgrades to comply with new FAA requirements… it just isn’t feasible.

    @Poster #56 - Not even “fly to other states,” the vast majority of the work is from out of state. They simply won’t land here. Even if they love their particular repair company, say West Star Aviation, there is another (tax exempt) West Star 100 miles over. When you’re going 500 mph, that’s about 15 minutes.

    @C Ball - It was discovered during an audit in July. Initial reaction was that this had to be some mistake on the auditor’s part. There was an industry conference call a week or so later. After doing some research and realizing this was likely true, a meeting was requested with Dept of Revenue. Dept of Commerce was notified next, then legislator outreach…

    @JS Mill - This IS different. Only applies to Class IV maintenance and repair shops (all metal airframe, over 12,500 lbs). With only a couple exceptions, nearly every state with large Class IV competitor is exempt. These planes are made to fly across the country. They will simply schedule their maintenance at the other end of flight. Also, they pay many other taxes. In East Alton, they’ve gone from 150 to 500 since the exemption passed. The Quad Cities has gone from 175 to 275. There are 400 employees in Cahokia, 300 in Springfield, 150 in Savoy… that’s a lot of payroll tax that the state is collecting, and it’s a problem if the hangars are empty.

    @Oswego - There’s A LOT of aircraft maintenance and repair in Chicago as well - but this particular lapse didn’t include commercial airlines. Those airliners are all covered under separate sections… this is only for general aviation (part 145 shops).

    @bo - Cessna’s are Class III (less than 12,500 lbs). For Class IV, think of the MD-11, Airbus A320, and Sikorsky S-70 helicopters.

    @Anon - And followed up with legislators in subsequent years to verify things were still in place. The original bill sponsor even worked with the industry to introduce legislation to expand the exemption, not knowing it had already lapsed - making the bill invalid. (99th GA - SB1280)

    @Pundent - Mostly covered above. Only thing I’ll add is that in the 2009 bill, engines were not included (still taxed). Since that time, the engine work in Illinois DID dry up. Springfield had a healthy engine shop, but it was shut down. Today it’s cheaper to take the engines off the planes and ship them out of state. (The bills for some engine work is in the millions.)

    @Rich - The case was being made that “the industry should have known, and therefore must pay.” I don’t believe it was ever the intent of these companies to “blame” others, but instead illustrate the situation they found themselves in. That their financial advisors had it wrong (Bloomberg Tax, and other national tax databases were incorrect), the national association’s tax guide was incorrect, the Statehouse missed the fact they were attempting to amend an already expired exemption in 2015, and yes, the COGFA tax guidebook for legislators had it incorrect. It isn’t that there is a hunt for a scapegoat, just acknowledgement that this is an unusual situation.

  26. - Blue Dog Dem - Wednesday, Nov 13, 19 @ 7:44 am:

    Nice info

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Audit finds cybersecurity issues at IDES
* Schools prepare to reopen
* "I can't breathe" happens at Illinois schools, too
* Rivian raises another $2.5 billion
* Question of the day
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller