Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Elections have consequences
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Elections have consequences

Monday, Nov 25, 2019

* Tribune editorial

Since then, union-heavy states have been enacting laws to weaken the impact of the Janus decision. Which state probably is next to have such a law? You guessed it. Illinois.

Lawmakers during the fall veto session sent to Gov. J.B. Pritzker legislation that would make it easier for unions to recruit members and harder for employees to know their rights under Janus. Public employers — mostly governments — would be required to provide the names, addresses and contact information of their employees, including personal email addresses and cellphone numbers on file, directly to union bargaining units.

The legislation also severely limits the ability of employers to inform their workers about the choice to join a union or not. […]

If Pritzker signs the bill, he will demonstrate once again who actually runs Illinois state government. It’s not his administration. It’s not the department heads. It’s the public employees unions who represent more than 90% of the state workforce. They already have the power. Governor, why give them more?

Always with the hyperbole. I don’t recall the editorial board getting upset when the Rauner administration slipped employees’ personal contact info to the Illinois Policy Institute.

Also, this bill was mostly just a codification of the contract that Gov. Pritzker’s administration negotiated with AFSCME. He ran as an unabashedly pro-union candidate. To call on him to flip-flop now is more than a bit disingenuous.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

20 Comments
  1. - Skeptic - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 9:53 am:

    “Tribune” and “Disingenuous” is a tautology.


  2. - Steve - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:03 am:

    What Rauner did wasn’t right. Two wrongs don’t make a right. If JB signs this law it probably will land in federal court based on privacy issues . It appears Alito and gang are looking to chip away at union rights.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:06 am:

    Great title for this post.

    It goes back to Rauner, who won with the help of 2 in 5 union households voting Rauner (to teach a lesson to Quinn, lol) to finding out what Raunerism is, then Janus and Rauner trying to insert himself, but was rejected by the courts, to Rauner losing by the worst margin in 100 years for a sitting Republican Governor, a margin that found less than 2 in 5 voting supported him.

    Pritzker was at all times the Labor candidate in the General Election, and unlike Raunerism, something sprung on everyone in that appearance in Decatur, it’s these moves by Pritzker that aren’t surprising at all.

    All the great work by Trib reporters is diluted and ruined by an editorial board lacking in honesty to even the most obvious things


  4. - Norseman - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:07 am:

    The motto on top of the Tribune Editorial page: “Disingenuous ‘R’ Us.”


  5. - Jocko - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:14 am:

    ==harder for employees to know their rights==

    I didn’t know freeloading was a ‘right’. Of all the adjectives used to describe Mark Janus, ‘freedom fighter’ is WAY down on my list. /S


  6. - Grandson of Man - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:18 am:

    Leave it to the hapless wealthy at the Trib editorial board to pretend they’re victimized by middle class workers. The old crocodile tears of the most privileged and wealthy. Their corporations got a massive tax giveaway, a 14% annual raise, that makes Chicago teachers’ and state workers’ COLA’s look much smaller in comparison. Cry a river of fake tears.

    “harder for employees to know their rights under Janus”

    Some kind of “right,” the right to be poorer.


  7. - City Zen - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:30 am:

    The bill has a fun Orwellian vibe to it.

    I can’t think of a situation where I didn’t regret giving a company my address, email, and phone number, so good luck. Let’s hope that AFSCME emails will make it past the state’s spam filter.


  8. - Honeybear - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:43 am:

    City Zen, honestly it was uncool to get stuff in the mail from IPI, to get fake survey calls probing us, to get emails from IPI funded groups trying to destroy our union.
    Seriously, it was bad.
    Be snarky all you want but you didn’t have to deal with it.


  9. - A Jack - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:44 am:

    The Tribune Editorial Board may wish they were unionized by the time the Alden Global hedge fund gets finished with them.


  10. - Demoralized - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 10:51 am:

    ==also severely limits the ability of employers to inform their workers about the choice to join a union or not.==

    That’s not the employer’s job. The employer shouldn’t be giving their opinion on union membership one way or the other.

    What the Tribune doesn’t understand is that this was a response to the Rauner years when the Governor saw it has his mission to destroy the unions.

    The point of this legislation and the language in the contract is to keep the union’s business just that - their business.

    Instead of having the vapors the Tribune should perhaps reflect on the fact that Governor Rauner lost the last election by a large margin. His anti-union zealotry was rejected. Get over it Tribune. Stop whining.


  11. - Lefty Lefty - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 11:10 am:

    All of us here likely understand the issues facing journalism these days. For this reason I subscribe to the Sun-Times, the Daily Herald, Block Club Chicago, and my local weekly among others. Every time I think about subscribing to the Tribune again, I’m reminded why I don’t.


  12. - Rabid - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 11:12 am:

    Don’t tronc understand herd mentality, turning on your coworker for cash


  13. - City Zen - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 11:24 am:

    ==I didn’t know freeloading was a ‘right’==

    The word “exclusive” comes up 93 times in the bill. This is your not-so subtle reminder as to why the union is perfectly content with those pesky freeloaders.


  14. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 11:52 am:

    == and harder for employees to know their rights under Janus.==
    So the Tribune is admitting it’s inadequate in informing people?


  15. - Grandson of Man - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 12:27 pm:

    If only I could only not be governed by Trump and Moscow Mitch because I don’t want them to exclusively represent me as POTUS and Senate Majority Leader. It’s too bad for me that I can’t “opt out” of their governance. It’s democracy, which is how exclusive bargaining representation works. Don’t like the union being the exclusive rep, or POTUS and other elected officials? Vote them out. Vote to decertify the union. Taking away exclusive representation without the will of the employees undermines democracy.


  16. - PublicServant - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 12:31 pm:

    Maybe Proft will hire Kristin after the Trib gets stripped.


  17. - Huh? - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 12:34 pm:

    Has there ever been a determination that the unions must represent the free loaders?


  18. - City Zen - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 1:02 pm:

    ==Don’t like the union being the exclusive rep, or POTUS and other elected officials? Vote them out. Vote to decertify the union.==

    Don’t like having to represent everyone? Drop your exclusive bargaining rights or self-de-certify and leave the market. Some other union will then swoop in and claim that lucrative exclusive bargaining deal you left behind.


  19. - Steve - Monday, Nov 25, 19 @ 2:25 pm:

    It’s understandable why some people wouldn’t want a union to have access to their personal information.

    VA blasts federal union for allowing ‘a culture of sexual harassment’ to thrive at highest levels

    https://tinyurl.com/raj8769


  20. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Tuesday, Nov 26, 19 @ 8:09 am:

    ==Has there ever been a determination that the unions must represent the free loaders? ==

    From the NRLB website: Your union has the duty to represent all employees - whether members of the union or not - fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination. This duty applies to virtually every action that a union may take in dealing with an employer as your representative, including collective bargaining, handling grievances, and operating exclusive hiring halls.
    https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/whats-law/employees/i-am-represented-union/right-fair-representation


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* "I’m in it to win it. Not for a show"
* AG Raoul task force raid finds more than $1 million in stolen goods
* The trend is definitely not our friend
* Downstate vs. Chicagoland
* Question of the day
* Itasca probed by feds over NIMBY vote
* Local pension fiefdoms still fighting for survival
* Meanwhile, in Crazytown
* Open thread
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller