Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » How impeachment led to more bipartisanship in the Illinois Senate
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
How impeachment led to more bipartisanship in the Illinois Senate

Tuesday, Dec 10, 2019

* I forgot about this anniversary while blogging yesterday, but tweeted it out last night…


* Let’s go back to Dan Vock’s interview of Senate President John Cullerton

Blagojevich swore Cullerton in as Senate president on Jan. 14, 2009, and, almost immediately, the Senate began preparing for the governor’s impeachment trial. Even though Blagojevich was a Democrat, he could count on little support from his fellow Democrats in the legislature during the impeachment. The House approved charges against him on a 117-1 vote, with the only dissent coming from Blagojevich’s sister-in-law. Two weeks later, the Senate voted unanimously to remove Blagojevich from office. Cullerton called it a “shameful low” in Illinois’ history.

“I personally voted to remove Mr. Blagojevich, the former governor, from office today for three reasons,” Cullerton said after the vote. “He has demonstrated a clear inability to govern. He has shown disdain for the laws and the processes of the state. And he has deliberately and pathologically abused his power without regard for the people he was elected to serve.”

Cullerton now says the impeachment trial also set a tone of bipartisan cooperation in the chamber. Both he and Radogno, the Senate Republican leader, had just assumed the top spots in their caucuses when the trial began. Illinois had not had an impeachment trial since the days of Abraham Lincoln, so the staffs had to work together to develop the procedures for how to handle the governor’s trial. […]

But it also helped that both caucus leaders were new, Radogno says. “There had been a bitter, unproductive relationship between previous leaders,” she says. “We said, point blank, we’re not going to perpetuate that kind of dysfunction. It’s not good for the institution… We did try to conduct matters in a way that was obviously partisan, but at least respectful.”

Discuss.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

8 Comments
  1. - Juvenal - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 11:48 am:

    Blagojevich was also a hyper-partisan, like Rauner and Trump. Some level of partisanship is normal, and there will always be partisan issues. But hyper-partisanship makes it impossible to get big things done.

    Daniels was also a hyperpartisan, as was Madigan before him. Two years under Daniels thumb on the receiving end made Madigan realize that was no way to govern.


  2. - NIU Grad - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 11:49 am:

    The Cullerton/Radogno dynamic seemed like a good model to follow for caucus relationships.


  3. - Southern Illinois Mayor - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 11:49 am:

    Real leaders put substance and respect for the bodies they serve before party.


  4. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 11:58 am:

    === The Cullerton/Radogno dynamic seemed like a good model to follow for caucus relationships.===

    Concur. I’d also say those seemingly concerned about current leaders working towards a strong working relationship have no idea, and no standing in trying their own hand at leadership as well.

    While I don’t disagree at all with all above, in the great work and answers got by Daniel Vock, or the comments, I do think the following was a factor;

    Blagojevich was the first (Rauner tried too) to scheme out a “Governor’s Caucus” approach, bipartisan, but the hitch was it was uber-partisan to the governor. It’s not that all sides were “working together”, it was a governor driving a wedge between both caucuses aimed solely at an agenda the governor wanted.

    While Rod never had the means to do it, and Rauner was wholly despised by his agenda wants, the difference really was Rod became “unlikable” and isolated, then he became, literally, isolated, even from his own office and its workings.

    I felt it was easier for ALL to rally and do the right and just thing with Rod, as Rod alienated the caucuses, then the institutions, and it became obvious his crimes were driving all those issues too.

    As I said, this is in conjunction, not taking away from anything above.


  5. - Roman - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 11:59 am:

    Politicians and pundits talk a lot about bipartisanship, but rarely actually do anything about it. Cullerton and Radogno did a heck of a lot more than just talk. They really stuck their necks out with their Grand Bargain effort — and organized labor and Rauner tried to cut their heads off.

    They really never got the credit they both deserved. Springfield is a lesser place without them.


  6. - Quibbler - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 12:00 pm:

    == But hyper-partisanship makes it impossible to get big things done. ==

    The last 25 years of American politics makes it clear that hyper-partisanship is the *only* way to get big things done. It’s why nothing major has gotten through Congress since the fleeting Dem majorities of 09-10 that passed Obamacare. And Illinois Dems were only able to push through anything resembling a progressive agenda in the past session by ousting the “moderate” GOP governor and securing super-majorities in both houses of the legislature. That’s why the question in the OP is the wrong one. Even if impeachment did foster bipartisanship, who cares?


  7. - lincoln's beard - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 1:17 pm:

    bipartisanship is bad, it makes politics too clubby and obscures that real differences should exist between the parties. when you’ve got a lot of “bipartisanship” going on, it’s a field day for lobbyists, and you get a bunch of do-nothing bills, and giveaways to special interests, but you don’t get actual policy results for the working people of Illinois. Actual politics has opposed interests and winners and losers.


  8. - Just Me 2 - Tuesday, Dec 10, 19 @ 1:35 pm:

    Cullerton has also showed disdain for the political process by manipulating his resignation so that party bosses pick his replacement instead of having a primary election.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* IDPH admits some testing problems at several state sites
* Pritzker's most recent demand of Madigan: Answer the questions
* Asked and answered
* 1,941 new cases, 21 additional deaths, 3.9 percent positivity rate - 11 counties at warning level
* Question of the day
* Pritzker sounds the warning in Peoria, La Salle counties
* Rep. Pizer calls on Madigan to resign his leadership roles, ties reasoning to Fair Tax
* All but three regulated utilities agree to extend disconnection moratorium
* What's the holdup, HFS?
* Putting Rep. Ford into context
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Madigan claims "feedback is positive" from members, says "I have no plans to resign"
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller