Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** FERC move could cost Illinois ratepayers $864 million a year
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** FERC move could cost Illinois ratepayers $864 million a year

Thursday, Dec 19, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Green Tech Media

After more than a year of delay, the two-Republican majority at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has told mid-Atlantic grid operator PJM how it must revamp its $10 billion-per-year capacity market. And at first glance, it could be even more harmful to state-subsidized renewable energy than previously imagined.

Thursday’s order would force almost all future state-subsidized resources in PJM’s 11-state territory to use a “minimum offer price rule,” or MOPR, that would limit how low they can bid. Because almost all state subsidies and incentives are for zero marginal-cost clean energy, this would create an artificial floor that masks their true cost-effectiveness — and effectively forces them out of the market — against existing coal, nuclear and gas-fired generation, critics say. […]

[FERC Chairman Neil Chatterjee], a former senior aide to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky), defended Thursday’s order as an attempt to “level the playing field” for all resources amidst a rising tide of state incentives for clean energy that are “suppressing prices in capacity markets.”

Except there’s no evidence that this is happening, but they’re intent on propping up coal-fired generators.

So, how does this impact Illinois?

* The cost projections in this press release are based on a study which can be found here. From the Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition…

A federal ruling today will increase Illinois power bills by $864 million – believed to be the largest electricity increase in state history – unless the General Assembly takes immediate action to offset the controversial ruling by two federal regulators appointed by President Trump.

In a 2-1 ruling earlier today, two of the Trump-appointed members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) adopted a policy that will force people in Illinois and other states to pay extra for electricity generated from coal and other dirty sources not needed to serve local demand for power.

To avoid Illinois electricity consumers paying more for unnecessary generation, the Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition urged state lawmakers to pass the Clean Energy Jobs Act (CEJA), sponsored by Rep. Ann Williams and Sen. Cristina Castro. The legislation would give the state more control of its energy future, avoid the $864 million in higher bills for customers and instead secure lower bills for them.

“The impact of this ruling on ComEd customers would be nothing short of devastating, but the General Assembly has the power to prevent it from happening,” said David Kolata, executive director of the Citizens Utility Board and Coalition member. “Illinois lawmakers must take action before their constituents are hit with jarring increases in power bills.”

A new analysis, “Consumer Impacts of FERC Interference with State Policies,” by Michael Goggin and Rob Gramlich of the consulting firm Grid Strategies, estimates that FERC’s decision could raise costs for consumers across the power grid by up to $5.7 billion a year. Northern Illinois would be one of the hardest hit areas: Electric customers here could pay up to $864 million a year extra.

The FERC decision comes amid an ongoing campaign by the Trump administration to prop up coal-fired power plants struggling to compete in the electricity market. Fossil fuel generators have been pushing for such a change for more than a year, as it becomes more difficult for their outdated plants to compete in the face of more modern technology, like solar and wind farms, and state policies that promote cleaner forms of energy.

Specifically, FERC’s ruling applies to PJM, an organization that manages the power grid and plans for long-term electricity needs—especially when demand is highest. The nation’s largest grid operator, PJM covers a vast territory that includes northern Illinois and all or parts of a dozen other states. PJM assembles this long-term power supply – known as “capacity” – from electricity generators that participate in a competitive auction that it conducts. Illinois customers pay for these capacity costs through the supply charge on their electric bills.

The new rules approved by FERC will change auction rules in a way that rewards polluters that generate power from coal- and gas-fired plants, giving them the license to charge inflated prices and then foist the added costs on customers in northern Illinois and throughout PJM’s territory.

As a result of the FERC decision, electric customers across the Chicago region and most of northern Illinois are facing an imminent increase in the amount they pay to reserve enough power – known as the “capacity price” – to meet projected future demand for electricity. FERC’s action also undermines the state’s 2016 passage of the Future Energy Jobs Act that promotes clean energy goals and consumer savings through increased investments in energy efficiency and zero-carbon emissions sources, such as wind, solar, and nuclear power.

To shield electric customers from the higher bills, the Clean Energy Jobs Act would authorize the state to assume the responsibility for managing its capacity needs. Instead of Illinois relying on PJM’s capacity auction, a state agency, the Illinois Power Agency (IPA), would be put in charge of running Illinois’ own capacity auction.

The IPA already manages the power purchases of the state’s biggest electric utilities, and part of its mission is to protect consumers from unnecessary increases in their supply costs. The agency is better positioned to run Illinois’ capacity auction and ensure that northern Illinois consumers save money while the state’s clean energy goals are advanced.

Capacity market reform is one part of the Clean Energy Jobs Act, the most comprehensive and consumer-friendly energy bill in Springfield. The legislation also:

    Aims for a carbon-free power sector by 2030, and provides financial and other assistance to communities and workers impacted by coal plant retirements;
    Moves Illinois towards 100% renewable energy by 2050, attracting $39 billion in clean energy development;
    Develops transportation electrification to give Illinoisans access to cleaner and more affordable forms of transportation;
    Expands energy efficiency programs that have already cut utility bills by billions of dollars;
    Sparks business development, workforce training and jobs so all Illinois residents can benefit from the clean energy economy.

* From the Environmental Defense Fund…

Because of this decision by federal regulators, Illinois consumers will be forced to pay more than $864 million in higher energy bills, and all of us will be forced to breathe dirtier air. It underscores the urgent need for members of the Illinois General Assembly and Gov. Pritzker to take swift action on the Clean Energy Jobs Act, which will lower bills for consumers, create jobs and empower Illinois to take control of its energy future. Rather than be stuck with an obsolete system imposed by out-of-state decision-makers, it’s time for to Illinois set its own course by developing an energy mix that prioritizes carbon-free resources and puts money back in the pockets of consumers.

Other groups, however, aren’t so sure about CEJA, including a group made up mostly of clean energy generators. The Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition is mostly activists. Exelon/ComEd was also supportive because it has all those nuke plants.

*** UPDATE *** Path to 100…

While FERC’s order may have an impact on renewable energy and for consumers, we need to make sure that Illinois’ doesn’t rush to enact policies that could make the situation worse.

The renewable energy industry in Illinois is focused on the immediate funding crisis facing the state’s renewable portfolio standard. Passing the Path to 100 Act will allow renewable energy to continue growing while we evaluate potential action on capacity markets.

The FERC order has not been published yet and it’s impossible to estimate its impact on consumers. In the coming months, PJM will respond to FERC’s order. At that time, the state can begin the process of carefully considering proposals that would fundamentally reshape Illinois’ energy market. Any proposals for Illinois must include a plan to maximize capacity from all of Illinois’ diverse renewable energy sources and provide financeable solutions for a deregulated market.

       

22 Comments
  1. - Ok - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 2:49 pm:

    I think the renewable generators are a bit more split. Some see this order as a direct challenge to building more projects. Other see the nuclear plants as the main obstacle to building more renewables because of grid congestion. Others don’t care about all the other stuff in CEJA because they just want to expand the solar programs that have run out of money.


  2. - SW - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:00 pm:

    This description of the rule is a pretty opaque. Persons writing the article do not really say what the order does and the purpose. Only that it helps base load plants, These are the plants that are necessary when all the wind stops and sun goes down. These base plants should be on all the time providing cheap energy, not acting as peakers for subsidized wind and solar.


  3. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:02 pm:

    In a statement, FERC said the order would protect the competitiveness of PJM Interconnection’s capacity market, which pays generation providers to keep their power plants available for service to maintain system reliability.


  4. - Blue Dog Dem - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:12 pm:

    Grid Stategies is a biased consulting firm. IMO


  5. - Chicagonk - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:13 pm:

    Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition is backed by ComEd. Take their numbers with a big grain of salt.


  6. - Ok - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:14 pm:

    FERC is essentially saying that when states are building all these renewables, that it suppresses prices in the capacity market. Which means: prices are too low for the coal and gas generators.

    So, they took action to raise prices.

    The problem is that people - homes and businesses - pay those prices. Its part of our electric bill. So they are forcing us to pay more because they felt that the market wasn’t providing enough money to the power plant owners. And then effectively excluding new renewable resources from the market by resetting their bids to an artificially higher price (and same with nuclear).

    The word they used today was that the capacity market is supposed to provide the “missing money” for the traditional power plants to operate that the regular energy market doesn’t provide.

    I think most people are saying: That’s not actually “missing”…


  7. - Chicagonk - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:17 pm:

    I should clarify and say that their interests align and that the group has a lot of dark money at their disposal. I just don’t trust any energy related numbers from Springfield these days.


  8. - Working night and day... - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:31 pm:

    The Coalition seems to be ignoring the following from the Independent Market Monitor (the group that monitors the PJM markets to ensure transparency and competitiveness):

    1. The Monitor called conclusions of the study cited by the study used by the Coalition “broad and incorrect” (https://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/Market_Messages/Messages/IMM_Response_to_Grid_Strategies_Report_201909217.pdf)

    2. The Monitor estimates that the capacity market changes demanded by the Coalition and Exelon would add hundreds of millions of dollars in annual costs for ComEd ratepayers (https://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/Reports/2019/IMM_Potential_Impacts_of_the_Creation_of_a_ComEd_FRR_20191218.pdf).

    I think that the findings of the Market Monitor are far more credible than the claims of the Coalition.


  9. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 3:46 pm:

    subsidized resources always have a cost


  10. - Anon - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 4:03 pm:

    All of these actions by FERC were foreseeable when Illinois and other states (New Jersey, I think, in the PJM) decided to affect the markets by subsidizing certain producers. You can’t put your thumb on the scale and then complain when someone else does the same.


  11. - A - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 4:05 pm:

    Anon- heard of climate change?


  12. - Sue - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 4:21 pm:

    One of the only things Illinois has going for it both for residents and businesses is reasonable energy prices. Let’s hope our Dem pols don’t screw that up but I guess hope springs eternal


  13. - Blue Dog Dem - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 4:22 pm:

    A. How is your solar array doing these days.


  14. - don the legend - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 4:34 pm:

    Relax. Mark, Rush and Sean say global warming is a hoax.


  15. - nadia - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 5:01 pm:

    Given the unknown outcome of the investigations, it will be interesting to see how Exelon does in CEJA.


  16. - MyTwoCents - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 5:25 pm:

    Frankly, I’m always skeptical when a former aide to a coal state Senator votes to help coal burning power plants.


  17. - The Long Ball - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 10:08 pm:

    Working night and day … I don’t know anyone could trust your numbers given your dark and shady track record.


  18. - The Long Ball - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 10:23 pm:

    PJM works for Illinois not the other way around. If PJM continues to push policies and revamp rules to mitigate the path Illinois has chosen to go down, maybe it’s time PJM is removed from the equation. Seems pretty simple. It’s awful ironic that the Path to 100s mouthpiece comments on who’s numbers we should believe, when it was his very own numbers that turned out to be bogus during the last campaign.


  19. - Chicago Cynic - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 11:07 pm:

    The Long Ball, you have no idea what you’re talking about. PJM doesn’t work for Illinois. Also, I don’t understand why you say you don’t trust the numbers from Working Night and Day, but they aren’t his/her numbers. They are the numbers of the INDEPENDENT Market Monitor. The IMM has no bias and no side. Their job is to perform analysis and be an independent validator of information in the PJM grid. And their analysis shows that the study cited by the “Clean Jobs” folks study is completely bogus.


  20. - The Long Ball - Thursday, Dec 19, 19 @ 11:44 pm:

    PJM manages a portion of Illinois’s grid, at the request of Illinois not the other way around - clearly PJM is doing the work here. Illinois could leave PJM and mange capacity on its own or go to MISO. The point being if Illinois doesn’t like how PJM is stifling it’s clean energy programs it can choose to leave. Seems to me you are wrong.


  21. - The Long Ball - Friday, Dec 20, 19 @ 12:00 am:

    The IMM’s numbers weren’t being disputed - it was the person it was coming from, someone bogus.


  22. - logic not emotion - Friday, Dec 20, 19 @ 8:25 am:

    How does the cost of solar / wind energy compare without the taxpayer subsidies?

    Are foreign energy companies the main benefactors of the wind / solar subsidies?

    Are 9 of the top 10 solar panel producers in America still foreign owned?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon briefing
* Things that make you go 'Hmm'
* Did Dan Proft’s independent expenditure PAC illegally coordinate with Bailey's campaign? The case will go before the Illinois Elections Board next week
* PJM's massive fail
* $117.7B In Economic Activity: Illinois Hospitals Are Essential To Communities And Families
* It’s just a bill
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes (Updated)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller