Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Darwish uses Newman’s “pro-Israel” contributions against her
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Darwish uses Newman’s “pro-Israel” contributions against her

Thursday, Feb 6, 2020

* You can click the pics to see the full mailers, but two of Rush Darwish’s pieces in the 3rd Congressional District Democratic primary have contained this reference to candidate Marie Newman…

I gotta say, this made me uncomfortable, particularly since the hit was coupled with a slam on Rahm Emanuel, who is Jewish.

* So, I asked the Darwish campaign why the pro-Israel thing was worthy of inclusion. The response…

From our Baseline Survey, conducted late October 2019

    If your next Representative in Congress could only have one of the following traits, which is more important to you?

    29% A Congressperson who is being supported by Pro-Israel PACs and whose foreign policy reflects this support.

    71% A Congressperson whose foreign policy will reflect the views of his or her constituents, keeping in mind that the 3rd District has the largest Palestinian-American community in the United States.

From our Tracking Survey, conducted January 15- 20, 2020:

    Marie Newman claims to be progressive, but political insiders like the former head of Rahm Emanuel’s SuperPAC are raising big money for her. J Street PAC members have also raised nearly $100,000 for Newman. That’s why the majority of Marie Newman’s donors are wealthy elites from outside the 3rd District.

    More likely to vote for Dan Lipinski: 24%
    More likely to vote for Marie Newman: 12%
    More likely to vote for Rush Darwish: 33%
    Doesn’t impact my view: 31%

I reached out three different ways to the Newman campaign and haven’t yet heard back.

Your thoughts on this tactic?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Chuck - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:02 pm:

    Love that the 71% number comes as an answer to a classic push poll question.

    This is pretty disgusting.

  2. - DarkDante - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:03 pm:

    Palatable or not, Rush has obviously identified his base, and is swinging for it.

  3. - Precinct Captain - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:03 pm:

    Wouldn’t it be more effective to paint these donations as coming from just DC insiders? At the same time, how many Palestinian Americans are voting the 3rd CD Dem primary?

  4. - JB13 - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:08 pm:

    Well, I suppose if there are points to be awarded for being honest about your bigotry, then, we’ve got a winner

  5. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:09 pm:

    == Your thoughts on this tactic?==

    Probably a good idea. BDS a far-left idea, and since Darwish is trying to run to the left of Newman in a Dem primary in a solidly blue district, it can’t hurt.

  6. - Unionman - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:11 pm:

    Does he know that J-Street is about as left leaning as they come when it comes to Pro-Israel lobbying groups. They side with the Palestinians more often than the Israelis when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict. It would be different story if she was receiving money from AIPAC.

  7. - Moderate Mike - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:11 pm:

    Actually, Lester Holt’s Mustache, Darwish is definitely not to the left of Newman on almost any other issue. He supports Buttigieg-style healthcare plan, Newman supports M4A. Same thing on guns, immigration, etc.

  8. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:12 pm:

    If… religious bigotry is polling better than what you could positively stand for… while denouncing hatred like this…

    … maybe folks just don’t like you.

    Another prime example, thank YOU for telling me exactly who you are. Appreciate that.

  9. - JM - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:12 pm:

    Democrat party choking to death on its own anti-semitism.

  10. - 44th - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:12 pm:

    Pro Israel PAC is bad in and of itself is what he is saying. Terrible.

  11. - Former NorthShore - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:15 pm:

    Very disappointed to see the continued politicization of what used to be bipartisan support for Israel. J Street is a progressive organization, and it is quite a statement on the far-left that they are attacking that organization

    I can also clearly see where this can quickly devolve to antisemitic attacks, which would be particularly unfortunate given who is running on the GOP side in this race

  12. - JoanP - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:15 pm:

    My thoughts? It’s really offensive. It’s a blatant appeal to anti-Semitism.

  13. - Dotnonymous - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:17 pm:

    Not palatable…ever…totally disgusting…all ways.

  14. - 'Goose - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:18 pm:

    44th- In the 3rd District Democratic Primary, with voters there, Pro-Israel PAC IS BAD. It ain’t the 44th Ward down there buddy.

  15. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:26 pm:

    He is against politicians accepting donations from supporters of America’s oldest and strongest democratic ally in the Middle East. Good to know.

  16. - Sue - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:28 pm:

    Hardly surprising- in recent polls the percentages of folks supportive of Israel is appallingly low. Then you have several high profile Dems like Omar and Talib who have frequently made statements condemning Israel. The New Democratic Party is far from the party of either Truman or Jack Kennedy. Actually it’s closer to the Party of Jeremy Corbin. It’s surprising that the vast majority of Jewish Americans still support the Democratic Party - Sanders has been highly critical of Israel and his campaign manager is a Palestinian who himself has a history of negative comments toward Israel.

  17. - Roman - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:30 pm:

    == particularly since the hit was coupled with a slam on Rahm Emanuel, who is Jewish. ==

    That’s the rub, right there. It is, of course, possible to strenuously oppose Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies and Trump’s embrace of them and not be an anti-Semite. But when you pull Rahm into the debate? That’s beyond a dog whistle.

  18. - 'Goose - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:31 pm:

    Sue, exactly

  19. - Demoralized - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:32 pm:

    ==is appallingly low==

    Why is it appalling to not support Israel? Depending on how you are conveying that non-support I wouldn’t find it appalling at all if someone didn’t support Israel.

  20. - Ron Burgundy - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:32 pm:

    He supports BDS because his ethnic community does. However, it is not a winning strategy for the district overall, as evidenced by his dismal poll numbers. On other issues he has tried to position himself as the happy medium between Lipinski to his right and Newman to his left. Not here.

  21. - Demoralized - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:36 pm:

    To continue my thought . . .

    I do, however, find this tactic to be appalling. What would be even more appalling would be if the electorate agrees with the tactic.

  22. - Chef Jamal - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:40 pm:

    So I’m Arab-American. Marie Newman supported BDS until she decided it wasn’t convenient for her anymore (about halfway through 2018). I don’t agree with Darwish’s language here but the point is is that he’s consistent in saying Israel oppresses Palestinians, which it does. What’s more important, the reality that Palestinians live in every day or the fact that Darwish’s rhetoric is not as careful as it could be?

  23. - PeoriaDem - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 4:55 pm:

    “It’s surprising that the vast majority of Jewish Americans still support the Democratic Party - Sanders has been highly critical of Israel and his campaign manager is a Palestinian who himself has a history of negative comments toward Israel.”

    Sanders is Jewish, so I don’t think you can credibly call him a anti-Semite. As for his campaign manager, I can’t possibly imagine why any Palestinian would make “negative comments towards Israel”.

    I would love to see how many Irish American politicians were lauded for their support of the Irish Republican movement in the 80’s and what those same politicians say about Palestine.

  24. - Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 5:11 pm:

    I believe the applicable term here is “coded.”

  25. - Ron Burgundy - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 5:16 pm:

    Misspelled Lipinski in the first mailer. For me the content of the two is too similar.

  26. - low level - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 5:22 pm:

    Darwish will finish 3rd. Voters in that district could care less about most foreign policy issues

  27. - Last Bull Moose - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 5:40 pm:

    I prefer that we leave the fights and feuds of the Old World in the Old Word. The reality is that some of them spill into our domestic politics. Objecting to who funds an opponent seems fair.

  28. - Oak Parker - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 6:13 pm:

    There is a large Arab community in that District, but even if Rush Darwish gets 90% of their votes, that’s nowhere near enough to win.

  29. - Ron Burgundy - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 6:24 pm:

    –There is a large Arab community in that District, but even if Rush Darwish gets 90% of their votes, that’s nowhere near enough to win.–

    Right. Most recent census data from 2018 puts the figure at about 4%. Have to win by addition. The figure for people of Polish descent, for example was 4x higher.

  30. - Bruce - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 9:16 pm:

    Sure he is not fronting for Art Jones? Does Newman counter and say he gets funding from Hamas? Really sad.

    We need roads and bridges not ideology.

  31. - ArchPundit - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 9:24 pm:

    ===Hardly surprising- in recent polls the percentages of folks supportive of Israel is appallingly low.

    But what does that mean? It’s meaningless claptrap if the idea of supporting Israel is supporting the current government which is looking to annex large parts of the West Bank.

    How do you get to a 2-state solution then?

    Search for New Yorker Settlement map and tell me how you create a 2 state solution without significant removal of illegal and legal settlements?

    I 100 percent support the State of Israel and it’s existence, but not if it is going to become an apartheid state which is what the current Israeli government is headed towards.

    I don’t support BDS as of right now, but if the Palestinian population has no opportunity for full political rights how does anyone not support pressure for democratic rights?

    All that said, using this attack with Rahm is wrong and this is an anti-Semitic attack given that context.

  32. - ArchPundit - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 9:37 pm:

    ===he New Democratic Party is far from the party of either Truman or Jack Kennedy.

    Uh huh. This is a problematic view of both men’s view of Israel as uncritical. Truman recognized Israel, but had serious concerns about the impact of partition. JFK fought with Ben Gurion over their effort to nuclearize.

    Ronald Reagan was furious about the Osirik raid and had a fairly mixed record on support for Israel. GWB ran towards a more moderate position over Gore on support for Israel.

    The US long was a decent neutral arbiter for negotiations and that now has been completely lost. That was a bipartisan position that had Republicans pushing for moderation.

  33. - ArchPundit - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 9:40 pm:

    —-Darwish’s rhetoric is not as careful as it could be?

    Or they are the same fight for dignity and respect for everyone regardless of their religion or nationality. Using Rahm as a coded way to attack is simply wrong. You can attack Rahm on perfectly good grounds separate from any discussion of Israel.

  34. - Chef Jamal - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 10:25 pm:

    ArchPundit - The attack on Rahm is not Israel related, it’s about the fact that Rahm’s people are supporting Marie Newman. The attack on Marie Newman about Israel is separate from the Rahm attack - hence the separate bullet points…

  35. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:00 pm:

    === The attack on Marie Newman about Israel is separate from the Rahm attack===

    Please. They’re right next to each other.

  36. - ArchPundit - Friday, Feb 7, 20 @ 12:40 am:

    The two points read as if they are one point. If you want to say Darwish didn’t mean it that way, I can buy that, but for me to buy it, I need some sense that the campaign gets why it’s problematic. I can live with a mistake that is acknowledged.

  37. - Basic Facts - Tuesday, Feb 11, 20 @ 1:50 pm:

    Just to clear up the comments here:

    Israel is an apartheid state, based on historic and current colonization of Palestine and the Palestinian people. If you claim to believe in justice and human rights, then you cannot exclude the rights of Palestinians. Period.

TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Pritzker thanks Abbott Labs - "Our rate of rise is looking less and less exponential" - Praises local groups for pitching in - Shoutout to #SpritzersWithPritzker - Dr. Ezike: "If you think you don't have a case in your zip code that's probably not actually the case" - Pritzker defends pending minimum wage hike - Still no date for IDES fix - Could come back in the fall - More testing in African-American areas - Curve not bending down yet - Will be posting PPE contracts online - Following Gov. Baker's lead on contact tracing - Dr. Ezike outlines DHS DD center readiness - Addresses federal halt to funding drive-through testing - "I think everybody needs to think seriously about canceling large summer events" - Plans to pursue workshare program
* 1,344 new cases, 66 additional deaths
* Ted E. Leverenz
* COVID-19 roundup
* Worst case scenario: "Illinois could lose more than $28 billion between calendar years 2020 and 2023"
* Today's heroes: Tony and Lisa Yuscius
* Question of the day
* The testing situation
* Still no word on when gig workers can access Illinois unemployment insurance
* *** UPDATED x1 *** National stockpile runs dry as feds stop supporting drive-through sites
* 6.6 million new jobless claims
* Open thread
* *** UPDATED x1 - 50 at Shapiro, 29 at Ludeman *** Several Murray Developmental Center residents, 1 staff test positive
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...










Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller