Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Former Legislative Inspector General says report of “serious wrongdoing” was “squashed” by the Legislative Ethics Commission
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Former Legislative Inspector General says report of “serious wrongdoing” was “squashed” by the Legislative Ethics Commission

Thursday, Feb 6, 2020

* From the prepared remarks delivered at today’s Joint Commission on Ethics and Lobbying Reform hearing in Springfield. Emphasis added by me…

My name is Julie Porter. I am an attorney at Salvatore Prescott Porter & Porter. From November 2017 through February 28, 2019, I served as the Acting Legislative Inspector General for Illinois. I entered the office with optimism, intending to serve the public by conducting independent, thorough investigations into alleged wrongdoing by state legislators, and—should I conclude that wrongdoing occurred— by reporting my findings to the public. That is not what happened, though. Although I completed dozens of investigations without incident, in some significant matters, when I did find wrongdoing and sought to publish it, state legislators charged with serving on the Legislative Ethics Commission blocked me.

Specifically, the Legislative Ethics Commission refused to publish one of my founded summary reports. There was also a second founded summary report that I requested to be published before my term ended. My successor chose not to press publication with the Legislative Ethics Commission; it was obvious, I suspect, that the Legislative Ethics Commission would bury it, just like it buried my other report on a similar topic. I wrote about these events in an Op-Ed that was published in the Chicago Tribune in April 2019, after leaving my role as Acting Legislative Inspector General.

Since then, there has been an additional shocking development. Both the Legislative Inspector General and the Legislative Ethics Commission are required to publish quarterly reports, identifying certain statistics regarding new and pending matters. The reports are mostly just numbers, but a careful observer will note that my final report to the Illinois General Assembly, dated February 28, 2019, disclosed that since the date of my previous report, one action had been filed with the Legislative Ethics Commission and was pending before the Legislative Ethics Commission. That was unusual. It was the first time in my tenure that I had requested, pursuant to the Illinois State Officials and Employees Ethics Act, 5 ILCS 430/25-50, that the Attorney General file a formal complaint before the Legislative Ethics Commission (the only type of matter that could be “pending” before the Legislative Ethics Commission).

What happened to that matter? I cannot tell you, both because I left office while it was still pending, and because of my confidentiality obligations under 5 ILCS 430/25-90. What I can point out to you, though, based on public reports, is that although that matter remained pending throughout the second and third quarters of 2019, the Legislative Inspector General’s third quarter 2019 report, dated October 15, 2019, indicated that the matter was no longer pending before the Legislative Ethics Commission. The Legislative Ethics Commission’s report for the same period, also dated October 15, 2019, states that the Commission “did not agree to publish” another founded summary report, which I can only conclude—based on this public information—was the formal complaint that I had caused the Attorney General to bring before the Commission.

Because I am bound to confidentiality, I cannot share with you what this investigation was or detail for you the many hours spent to get to the bottom of what I concluded was serious wrongdoing, warranting a founded summary report and even a formal complaint brought by the Attorney General. But my report and the Attorney General’s complaint should not be secret. They remain so only because the Legislative Ethics Commission squashed them so that the public could not see what the supposedly independent Inspector General determined to be wrongdoing by a sitting legislator.

The Illinois State Officials and Employees Ethics Act, 5 ILCS 430/1, is the statute that governs both the Legislative Inspector General and the Legislative Ethics Commission. The statute has fundamental flaws that undermine any true effort to have an independent watchdog with real authority to investigate and expose misconduct.

Although there are many places that the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act could and should be tweaked, I wish to highlight one key deficiency: the Legislative Inspector General cannot be independent, and having a Legislative Inspector General is a waste of resources, if a Legislative Ethics Commission staffed by legislators—all appointed by the House and Senate leaders—presides over her investigations and has the power to kill them. That is precisely the system we have now in Illinois: the fox is guarding the henhouse. And the problems are not just hypothetical; over the past year, the Legislative Ethics Commission has used its authority under this statute to undermine the Legislative Inspector General’s work in critical ways.

To address this core defect, I recommend at least the following changes to the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act:

    (1) If there is going to be a Legislative Ethics Commission, it should not be staffed by legislators appointed by the House and Senate leaders. 5 ILCS 430/25-5 should be amended to require a more diverse body, including or exclusively non-legislators, that is not beholden to legislative leadership.

    (2) Section 5 ILCS 430/25-50(f) should be deleted. The Legislative Ethics Commission should not have the power unilaterally to rule on the “sufficiency” of a complaint advanced by the Legislative Inspective General, reviewed by the Attorney General, and filed by the Attorney General. The term “sufficiency” is not defined, and the statute identifies no factors relevant to judging sufficiency. As written, the Legislative Ethics Commission could find a complaint insufficient simply because they regard it as politically embarrassing. There is also no process for the Attorney General or the Legislative Inspector General to appeal an arbitrary or unsound judgment by the Legislative Ethics Commission, making this provision all the more problematic.

    (3) Section 5 ILCS 430/25-52 should be amended so that the power to publish a founded summary report lies solely with the Legislative Inspector General—not with the Legislative Ethics Commission. The Legislative Ethics Commission has shown that it cannot be trusted to publish founded summary reports. Because the Commission’s deliberations are confidential, and I am bound by that confidentiality, I cannot reveal the reasons for my deep concerns about the way the Commission is wielding this power. All I can say is that allowing the Commission the power to hide a Legislative Inspector General’s findings of misconduct from public view, when the Legislative Inspector General is urging that such findings be public, renders the Legislative Inspector General position almost entirely pointless.

I am not aware of any other Inspector General in Illinois who is required to jump through the hoops and be subject to the control that Illinois legislators have bestowed upon the Legislative Ethics Commission. All one needs to do is pick up a newspaper to see how important it is to have a truly independent and empowered Legislative Inspector General in Illinois. I call upon this Joint Commission to take this issue seriously and begin the process of bringing true independence to the LIG role.

Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter.

Tina Sfondeles has more background here.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

16 Comments
  1. - Will Caskey - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:13 am:

    This would be a lot easier to follow if she laid out what she reported instead of making me navigate the trib’s awful website


  2. - JB13 - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:17 am:

    If only there were someone in Springfield powerful enough to do something about this.

    Oh, well. Moving on.


  3. - Merica - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:19 am:

    This is not surprising. These “ethics” bodies only look for the small stuff and ignore the big stuff. The supervisors have high powered connections with the people they are charged with regulating. It’s akin to Boeing employees inspecting their own safety procedures (instead of the FAA).

    The OEIG does this too,

    Look at OEIG case no 15-02180. In that case Emil Jone’s grandson was hired as a ghost employee for CMS. The OEIG report ignores the familial relationship between Emil “Alvarez” Jones and Emil Jones.

    Look at OEIG case no. 17-00626 (the Barney’s warehouse lease). In that report the OEIG ignores the fact that Pacific Management was the entity that negotiated the Barney’s lease with the State, and sent hundreds of emails to state employees. The report fails to mention Pacific Management once.


  4. - Blue Dog Dem - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:24 am:

    Huh? Maybe I am an uneducated buffy afterall.


  5. - Matt Vernau - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:26 am:

    The former Inspector General should have resigned under protest at the first block and not waited around for the following series of delays.


  6. - Streator Curmudgeon - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:28 am:

    This kind of “fox guarding the henhouse” news in Illinois is not surprising, but it certainly is depressing.


  7. - 17% Solution - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:28 am:

    So let me get this straight. Ms. Porter submitted one report no date mentioned except it was between Nov 2017 and Feb, 2019. She can’t tell us what is is about.
    The day she left she filed a second report asking about the first report. Because of her frustration she wants IL Statutes to change.
    And?


  8. - Lucky Pierre - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 11:38 am:

    I am truly shocked there is gambling in Casablanca

    https://giphy.com/gifs/film-humphrey-bogart-casablanca-Qjf12eSG7eypG


  9. - Nagidam - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 12:21 pm:

    So there seems to be a report out there that was quashed that accused a sitting legislator of some type of bad behavior enough that the Attorney General should get involved. I think I got that right. The dates given in the article indicate the legislator was in office between November 2017 and February 2019. This would indicate the report is not about Jack Franks but another legislator as Franks left after his County Board Chairman’s election in 2016.


  10. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 12:27 pm:

    == And?==

    And, what? What exactly do you want her to do here? If you believe that legislators should be able to block the public from seeing reports about their own wrongdoing, then by all means argue for that, but she can only do so much given the restraints put on her by the legislature.


  11. - 17% Solution - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 12:32 pm:

    No LHM, and where do we go from here?


  12. - Billy Sunday - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 12:34 pm:

    She is simply abiding by the law due to the ‘independent’ commission calling the shots.

    Commission: “We didn’t see notin’ …carry on, news reporter..”


  13. - Precinct Captain - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 12:42 pm:

    What other state does this in a way that the former LIG would like Illinois to emulate?


  14. - Responsa - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 12:43 pm:

    At least the former Inspector General should be able to sleep at night knowing she tried. From this story it appears quite a few others who stood in her way should not be able to sleep soundly at night if they have any conscience.


  15. - LTSW - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 1:10 pm:

    If this was DC someone would have leaked the report. Wonder if the US Attorney managed to get a copy?


  16. - Lou Grant - Thursday, Feb 6, 20 @ 2:39 pm:

    I guess my question regarding her testimony is “What if the victim does not want the report to be made public?”

    It sure seems like based on what’s been said, implied and left unsaid that the victim in this case did not want it made public. Without assurances that a complaint can be made confidentially, it could have a chilling effect on reporting.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day
* 707 new cases, 25 additional deaths, 3.0 percent positivity rate
* State brings in $52 million in 6 months from cannabis sales
* Pritzker talks about reopening schools, bars and restaurants, what could prompt a tightening, bowling lawsuit, executive orders, traveler quarantine, the growing cases among young people and his graduated income tax spending
* Caption contest!
* It's only July, but Chicago vote by mail applications already break record
* Schools eye reopenings
* *** UPDATED x1 *** State swats down one lawsuit as two more are filed
* Everyone has their own priorities
* Lots of hopes pinned on new IDES director
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller