Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » AG Raoul: Rep. Bailey’s latest legal filing “an ongoing bad-faith effort to abuse the judicial process for political gain”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
AG Raoul: Rep. Bailey’s latest legal filing “an ongoing bad-faith effort to abuse the judicial process for political gain”

Friday, Aug 7, 2020

* Filed by the attorney general in Clay County late yesterday

It has been more than a month since Plaintiff Darren Bailey received precisely what his pleadings sought—a declaration by this Court that the Governor’s authority to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic under the Illinois Emergency Management Agency Act, 20 ILCS 3305 et seq. (“Emergency Management Act”) ceased to exist as of April 8. Order ¶ 3 (July 2, 2020) (“July 2 Order”). But even as Bailey championed this lawsuit as “freeing business and the people of Illinois” from “one-person rule” and a “tyrannical government,” in the real world nothing changed. The Court’s nonfinal, interlocutory order granting Bailey’s request for declaratory relief does not prevent the Governor from continuing to exercise his powers under the Emergency Management Act to protect the people of this State from the Covid-19 pandemic.

Public rhetoric notwithstanding, Bailey has made every effort to prevent this Court from issuing either an injunction that would bar the Governor from exercising Emergency Management Act powers, July 2 Order ¶ 5 (granting motion to withdraw request for injunction), or a final judgment that would resolve the parties’ dispute in this Court once and for all, Response to Defendants [sic] Motion to Dismiss ¶¶ 3–11 (July 22, 2020) (“July 22 Response”). The July 2 Order is neither final nor enforceable because it involves fewer than all issues and does not include “a finding that there is no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal.” Reed v. City of Belleville, 13 Ill. App. 3d 1093, 1094 (5th Dist. 1973).

For his latest effort to keep this case in this Court and abuse the judicial process for political gain, Bailey now moves to add an additional count disputing whether a disaster currently exists in Clay County within the meaning of the Emergency Management Act. There is no reason why the Court should entertain the matter. This Court already determined that the Governor’s authority under the Emergency Management Act is limited to 30 days per disaster— regardless of whether a Covid-19 disaster continues to exist in Clay County (or anywhere else in the State). Bailey’s current motion to add a new count is just another maneuver to thwart appellate review of the Court’s ruling. The proposed additional count is also defective as a matter of law and fails to plead sufficient facts to state a cause of action. The motion to add it should be denied.

* More

The Court should deny Bailey’s motion to add an additional count for four independent reasons:

First, Bailey’s proposed additional count fails to state a cause of action because the Emergency Management Act does not require the Governor to make disaster determinations on a county-by-county basis.

Second, Bailey’s proposed additional count fails to state a cause of action because he does not plead facts sufficient to show that there is currently no “public health emergency” in Clay County.

Third, Bailey lacks standing to pursue his proposed additional count because a decision in his favor will not redress his claimed injury. This is because Bailey fails to challenge an independent basis for the Governor’s authority to exercise emergency powers—the existence of an “epidemic” in Clay County.

Fourth, Bailey’s proposed additional count is untimely and, in the context of his many other gambits designed to delay the conclusion of these proceedings, reflects an ongoing bad-faith effort to abuse the judicial process for political gain.

* Brutal

According to Bailey, the fact that no one has yet to die in Clay County from Covid-19, and only 9 people to date have contracted it, means there is, in his opinion, no “high probability” that “a large number of deaths” will occur—and likewise no “high probability” of “widespread exposure” to a virus “that poses a significant risk of future harm to a large number of people.”

Bailey’s argument reduces to the proposition that an event has no probability of occurring until it has occurred. Or to put it another way, a highly contagious and deadly virus has no probability of causing widespread harm until it does. This reasoning is stunningly illogical, and the Court should not accept it. […]

Ordinarily, a litigant who had convinced a court to rule in his favor on the merits of his case would take immediate action to effectuate that result. Here, Bailey did the opposite. He resisted every effort to dismiss his one outstanding count and transform the Court’s interlocutory order into a final judgment. July 22 Response ¶¶ 3–11. To this day, the July 2 Order binds no one and has no legal effect because Bailey apparently prefers it to remain a meaningless piece of paper—in stark distinction to the far-reaching consequences he ascribes to it in the public eye.

Bailey’s proposed additional count is designed to further his strategy to drag out this case without an appealable order. Bailey intends for this Court not to resolve his dispute but rather to amplify it. This is an abuse of the judicial process.

…Adding… Rep. Darren Bailey speaking live on Facebook yesterday

Its no surprise that our numbers even as the governor suggested yesterday in southern Illinois are increasing you know per capita, per our population. I personally still do not feel threatened by those numbers and statistics. When we see we’re testing, tests are up and so obviously so are potential positive results. What is good is that I am hearing, I have heard so far nothing but success – trying to get some doctors online eventually – regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine and the z pack process. Several area hospitals, doctors, are prescribing that and its working. I have friends who have tested positive. I have people who I have known whose family members are in the hospital. I’ve talked anyone I can get in contact with and that I can talk to locally and just kind of understand and hear and so far the people that I’ve talked to would not have changed anything. The one gentleman the we’re praying for, that is in the hospital, an older man, he had the choice to make whether or not to be in and out. And he just simply didn’t want to live as restricted because we don’t know when this is going to end if it is ever going to end. […]

But regarding the older gentleman that’s in St. Louis in ICU, the family, it just, it is what it is.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

21 Comments
  1. - All this - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 10:49 am:

    Where does Bailey get the money for all those lawyers and court costs? Is his farm growing marijuana now?


  2. - Ron Burgundy - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 10:51 am:

    -Where does Bailey get the money for all those lawyers and court costs?-

    I wouldn’t assume they are charging for the work, and are doing it for the publicity.


  3. - Pundent - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 10:56 am:

    If political gain is what Bailey is after, maybe he should be working with the minority leader to advance legislation clarifying the Governor’s EO powers? Using the courts for this purpose and constantly amending complaints isn’t resolving anything other than keeping his name in the headlines at the expense of the ILGOP. And if the ILGOP does agree with Bailey they should have the courage to move the ball legislatively.


  4. - JS Mill - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:01 am:

    =“a large number of deaths” will occur=

    160,000 plus deaths isn’t a “large” number? Or it isn’t because it hasn’t happened in his micro-world?

    The guy is a (banned word).


  5. - Donnie Elgin - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:06 am:

    “I wouldn’t assume they are charging for the work, and are doing it for the publicity”

    They are doing it for the public good.


  6. - don the legend - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:09 am:

    ==They are doing it for the public good.==

    What exactly are they doing that’s for the public good?


  7. - TheInvisibleMan - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:11 am:

    This is exactly the point in time which will determine if only Bailey and DeVore alone, or them plus the judge in clay county, will be receiving sanctions from the state supreme court.

    It is clear as day what Bailey is doing, and this latest amended complaint shows he has run out of gas. It shouldn’t even be in question that his amended complaint should be dismissed, but I question the clarity of the judge in clay county to recognize a career ending decision when he sees it.


  8. - Mr. Green Genes - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:16 am:

    == What exactly are they doing that’s for the public good?==
    I’m pretty sure that was snark.


  9. - Shytown - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:20 am:

    “It is what it is.” Bailey has a reckless disregard for life and the well-being of his residents. I can’t believe I share a state with folks who put him in office.


  10. - don the legend - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:36 am:

    No snark at all. What public good is accomplished by Bailey and his filings?


  11. - West Side the Best Side - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:37 am:

    “It is what it is.” Where have we heard that before?


  12. - Fixer - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:37 am:

    The party that advocates being pro life and states’ rights new motto: “It is what it is.”


  13. - Skeptic - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:39 am:

    “It is what it is.” Trump said it, so it must be good. Playing to the base.


  14. - anotheretiree - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 11:56 am:

    Clay County is up to 18 cases, even Scott County now has 13. The virus is hunting him. Foolish to tempt karma…


  15. - Pot calling kettle - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 12:13 pm:

    Bailey’s argument is this: “No one I care about has gotten sick (or died), so the virus is not a problem.”

    How can this guy claim to represent the people and be “pro-life”?


  16. - Pot calling kettle - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 12:37 pm:

    Bailey needs publicity to get contributions.

    According to his second quarter report, Bailey has loaned his campaign almost $100K over the past 3 years. He began the quarter with less than $1000 cash on hand. He brought in almost $46K (all itemized donations are after May 1), and spent $17K. So, this has been a windfall, but he clearly needs more $$$ just to break even.


  17. - Club J - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 1:14 pm:

    I’m not sure what Bailey and DeVore think they are going to get out of all this in the end. Now DeVore has his sights set on JCAR. He has his followers emailing all the members telling them how unlawful the Governor is about this new mask rule. I’m not sure how the members of JCAR will take it hearing from Mr. Clay County himself.


  18. - The Old Man - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 1:17 pm:

    Bailey’s money??, check his federal farm subsidies list, we are all paying his legal bills. Could he really be a part of the old Barnum and Bailey Circus Company??? Would not mind Clay county being exempt if all their residence would promise NOT to travel or interact with the rest of Illinois.


  19. - Pundent - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 1:45 pm:

    =How can this guy claim to represent the people=

    He doesn’t.

    =I personally still do not feel threatened by those numbers and statistics.=

    He’s making it quite clear that none of this bothers him. Maybe you do. Maybe you’ve been sick, lost a loved one, worried about whether or not you might contract the virus. Darren Bailey doesn’t personally feel that way. And he’s going to be guided by what he feels. It is what it is.


  20. - Mrsfloyddog - Friday, Aug 7, 20 @ 2:48 pm:

    Strong Ivan Drago vibes from Beetle’s final quote.


  21. - Claribel Amigon - Monday, Aug 10, 20 @ 9:52 pm:

    will be back


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* House investigative committee coverage roundup
* Question of the day
* Hang in there, Maggie!
* Pritzker to sit down with stakeholders after uproar over cannabis lottery process
* Rep. Mason claims she received a "rather threatening note" on her car
* Federal judge rules against Cook County GOP lawsuit to block new vote by mail program
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition and some campaign updates
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller