Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker signs redistricting map bills
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker signs redistricting map bills

Friday, Jun 4, 2021

* Press release…

After reviewing the General Assembly’s proposed maps to ensure they align with the landmark Voting Rights Act, Governor JB Pritzker signed three new maps that reflect Illinois’ diversity. The maps outline new districts for the General Assembly, Illinois Supreme Court and Cook County Board of Review and preserve minority representation in Illinois’ government in accordance with the federal Voting Rights Act.

“Illinois’ strength is in our diversity, and these maps help to ensure that communities that have been left out and left behind have fair representation in our government,” said Governor JB Pritzker. “These district boundaries align with both the federal and state Voting Rights Acts, which help to ensure our diverse communities have electoral power and fair representation.”

A landmark achievement of the civil rights movement, the Voting Rights Act prohibits practices and procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color or membership in a protected language minority group. Building on and strengthening that consequential law, the Illinois Voting Rights Act of 2011 ensures redistricting plans are crafted in a way that preserves clusters of minority voters if they are of size or cohesion to exert collective electoral power. The maps signed into law today meet those requirements to adequately preserve minority representation and reflect the diversity of our state.

The district boundaries also account for population changes in the state, particularly in the regions that saw the most population loss as recorded by U.S. Census’ American Community Survey. In addition, the General Assembly held more than 50 public hearings statewide.

Detailed summaries of each individual House and Senate district, including communities of interest, geographic descriptions, and demographic data were adopted by both the Illinois House of Representatives and the Illinois Senate and are contained in House Resolution 359 and Senate Resolution 326 respectively.

The General Assembly Redistricting Act of 2021 (HB 2777), the Judicial Districts Act of 2021 (SB 642) and the Cook County Board of Review Redistricting Act of 2021 (SB 2661) take effect immediately.

Pretty certain this post will be updated.

…Adding… Speaker Welch…

“Today was a win for the people of this great state. With Governor Pritzker’s signature, people of Illinois can be confident in a legislative map that is reflective of the diversity that we see in every corner of our state. Not only does this map adhere to state and federal laws, but it is a product of more than 50 public hearings where citizens came to tell us what their communities look like to them. We also have new Illinois Supreme Court boundaries for the first time in more than half a century that accounts for population change and demographic shifts, as well as a new map for the Cook County Board of Review ensuring more equal representation for taxpayers in those districts. I am so proud of Leader Lisa Hernandez, D-Cicero, and the rest of the Redistricting Committee, who worked tirelessly to make sure that Illinois remains a model for the nation for minority representation.”

* Sen. Jason Barickman (R-Bloomington)…

“When JB Pritzker was a candidate for Governor, he made a lot of promises. He told us he was different, that he was a reformer, and that he would veto any map drawn by lawmakers. Today he broke his promise to voters and joins the all-too-long list of Illinois politicians who promise one thing and then do another.”

“The people of Illinois deserve a fair, transparent process that allows them to choose their representatives in Government. Pritzker turned his back on them and chose instead to use his signature to further enshrine the broken status quo of politicians picking their voters.”

…Adding… I’m hearing this as well. Greg Hinz

I’m told by a source close to him that Pritzker advanced his timetable because the maps had become entangled in another hot issue: the terms of an energy deal that will satisfy green groups while keeping open Exelon nuclear plants without socking taxpayers with the costs of excessive subsidies.

Somebody tried to play games, so he signed the map bill to get that off the table.

* SGOP Leader McConchie…

“Today, Gov. Pritzker affirmed to all Illinois families why they can’t trust him to run the state,” said Illinois Senate Republican Leader Dan McConchie (R-Hawthorn Woods).

“By signing this map, created using flawed data and drawn by political insiders, the governor broke the promise he made to the people of Illinois. He also proved that he cares more about keeping power for his political friends than fair elections where the people of Illinois can pick their elected officials, instead of politicians picking their voters. He proved today that he’s just another old-school, tax-raising politician who cannot be trusted.”

* Rep. Ryan Spain…

“As a member of the House Redistricting Committee, we repeatedly heard from government reform advocates to use US census data and that they would require two weeks to provide adequate public review of the new map to see if it meets Voting Rights Act compliance. This is why Governor Pritzker broke his promise after only one week; before Democrats’ lies could be exposed as the deception Democrats intended to perpetrate all along. Through bad data, fake transparency and false urgency, Pritzker, Welch, and other Democrats pulled the wool over voter eyes. They assume they can get away with it because this is Illinois. The next election must be a referendum on whether voters will openly permit their own politicians to lie to them.”

* ILGOP Chair Don Tracy…

Governor Pritzker lied to the people of Illinois when he pledged to veto a politician-drawn map. Governor Pritzker promised to take politicians out of the mapmaking process and hand it over to an independent commission that would be required to follow the Voting Rights Act and protect minority representation. Instead, he let politicians pick their own voters, split up numerous communities of interest, and use faulty data all in an effort to rig the system for those already in power. Pritzker didn’t keep his word and cannot be trusted.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - IL13Residenr - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:11 pm:

    Would this hurt Pritzker next year? He essentially broke a promise he made to voters…

  2. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:13 pm:

    ===He essentially broke a promise===

    Nothing essentially about it. Flat-out broke his promise.

    Whether it’ll mean anything is another story.

  3. - Huh? - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:17 pm:

    Fair is in the eye of the beholder.

  4. - Northsider - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:17 pm:

    I think it’ll matter to some voters, but not enough to make a difference.

    How often has redistricting come up in conversations I’ve had over the last 12-18 months? Bupkis.

  5. - Proud Sucker - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:22 pm:

    He will pivot to the “fair map” part of the promise ignoring the independent commission part. Reporter:
    Governor, you promised to veto a legislative drawn map. Pritzker: The map meets the VRA, therefore it is fair, so I signed it.

  6. - thunderspirit - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:23 pm:

    I can’t disagree that it’s a broken promise, full stop. There’s no spinning it otherwise.

    To echo Rich’s thoughts: I’m also not convinced it will matter, though.

  7. - west wing - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:24 pm:

    The fact that the General Assembly moved the primary back to allow congressional mapmakers to use the new Census data is the elephant in the room: why didn’t state lawmakers do the same.

  8. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:25 pm:

    ===why didn’t state lawmakers do the same===

    Read the Illinois Constitution. It’s no mystery. It’s been in all the papers.

  9. - DuPage Dad - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:29 pm:

    This is a calculated promise to break. I continually get the sense that voters either feel that maps are generally unfair, or they don’t care, and there are no points to be won by dragging this particular policy item along, only lost. There are far more points to be won/lost in things like energy.

  10. - Curious citizen - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:30 pm:

    Pritzker’s handing of COVID-19 and legal weed will be the things most voters remember from his first term and will dictate whether he gets a second one. Nobody except politicians and the media cares about redistricting.

  11. - SaulGoodman - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:42 pm:

    **Pritzker’s handing of COVID-19 and legal weed**

    I would argue that very, very few voters will vote based on how Pritzker handled cannabis.

  12. - Unionman - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:46 pm:

    By signing it quickly, it gives extra time to wind its way through the courts. At least that was responsible.

  13. - Telly - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:49 pm:

    Energy, budget…you name it. It’s hard for a governor to get what he wants without signing the legislators’ map. They care about that map a thousand times more than any other issue. It’s just that time of the decade.

  14. - 62656 - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 12:58 pm:

    I’ve emailed my Republican state rep about this, but didn’t get a reply so will post here. Why not seek an agreement with state(s) where Republicans have the gov-sen-house trifecta totaling near 17 U.S. reps into a multistate bipartisan no-gerrymandering agreement?

  15. - @misterjayem - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:00 pm:

    I don’t believe that anyone who otherwise would have voted for Pritzker in the next election will change that vote based on his signing these maps.

    Some voters will be unhappy — some will be very unhappy — but I don’t believe it will move the needle.

    – MrJM

  16. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:02 pm:

    ===Why not seek===

    Horse, barn door, etc.

  17. - Tommydanger - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:11 pm:

    “The next election must be a referendum on whether voters will openly permit their own politicians to lie to them.”

    Its only really a lie if you believe its a lie. There are a whole bunch of lies out there masquerading as the truth.

  18. - JoanP - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:15 pm:

    = I would argue that very, very few voters will vote based on how Pritzker handled cannabis. =

    As long as he doesn’t bogart the joint . . .

  19. - NIU Grad - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:17 pm:

    I’m waiting to see if any of his potential GOP opponents respond, or if they’re still stumbling around trying to find their keys. Without a “voice of the opposition” outside of the legislative leaders, he might not be too worried.

  20. - phocion - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:18 pm:

    If the economy is sound, Biden is not completely unpopular, crime isn’t perceived to be out of control, and no major administration scandals happen, Pritzker should win re-election. He broke a promise signing this, but voters pay attention to only the above stuff when deciding.

  21. - Chuck - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:22 pm:

    In 4 weeks, voters won’t remember this. In 18 months… heh.

  22. - Mr. Hand - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 1:57 pm:

    I would not be so dismissive of the impact. This alone is not going to flip the election, but this with a multitude of other things could have larger impact. COVID, Weed, La Salle, failed fair tax and now broken promises. All of this and more will play into the calculus for voters.

    I do believe it was a missed opportunity to be bipartisan and do something the majority of voters want. 18 months is a while away, but Pritzker could use a few more wins.

  23. - Manchester - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 2:19 pm:

    “The next election must be a referendum on whether voters will openly permit their own politicians to lie to them.” Meh, that ship sailed a long time ago. Most voters know that politicians lie to them every time they speak. There are some that don’t but they are pretty sparse.

  24. - Frank talks - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 2:23 pm:

    Do.voters really care? Did they care when Pate did it? Did it matter when Madigan did it? The voters may have an issue but there are so many more issues that they care about than a legislative map. Guns, prolife vs pro choice, equity, crime, education funding, equality, etc etc. All of those issues, whether for or against, are the ones voters key in on during an election.

  25. - lake county democrat - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 2:53 pm:

    What MrJM said. I mean, even I’m going to be voting for Pritzker and I hate these maps and the way he lied about it.

  26. - Louis G Atsaves - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 3:01 pm:

    So he signed the remap bills in a public ceremony with a huge crowd of smiling faces behind him, all celebrating the fact that Illinois is now a model of extreme gerrymandering and partisanship?

    Or did he sign them behind closed doors? I can’t find any photos of this esteemed event.

  27. - anon2 - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 3:04 pm:

    Is the new rule that any pol who flips on a pre-election promise should henceforth be ineligible for re-election? Presumably the rule should i apply to both parties.

    Lots of Republican pols have changed their minds. Tom Cross was for a ten-year limit on the House GOP leader until he wasn’t. Take Sen. Lindsay Graham for another example. Then there’s Trump. He was going to pay off the national debt. Instead he grew it by more than $6 trillion. George Ryan favored the death penalty all his career until the very end when he changed his mind. Jim Edgar campaigned as pro-death penalty against Netsch. But when a woman was next in line to be executed, Edgar commuted her sentence, though her guilt was not in doubt. The fact is that pols in both parties go back on some of their campaign promises. Voters will ultimately decide if the particular change matters.

  28. - 47th and Lake Park - Friday, Jun 4, 21 @ 3:20 pm:

    If Pritzker really wants to reform redistricting, he will do it in Spring 2022, long before anyone’s ox needs to be gored again. And then he can run on that. Odds of this happening? Pretty low, since goo-goos seems to have a short time horizon. Maybe let’s wait for 2031 and complain about it again!

TrackBack URI

This is not Facebook, so uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.

* FEC punts DPI issue to next meeting
* Rodney Davis spokesperson says decision on bid for governor "dependent on redistricting"
* Sen. Rachelle Crowe among three recommended for US Attorney by Durbin and Duckworth
* Remember: Fossil Fuel Companies Prefer The Status Quo, Don’t Want An Energy Bill To Pass
* Open thread
* Congressional Black Caucus PAC weighs in for DPI Chair Robin Kelly with FEC
* Fitch moves Illinois from negative to positive outlook
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller