Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Narrow US Supreme Court decision should have no impact on Illinois’ foster care program
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Narrow US Supreme Court decision should have no impact on Illinois’ foster care program

Tuesday, Jun 22, 2021

* Capitol News Illinois

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision could reignite a 10-year-old controversy in Illinois over whether faith-based charities can be prohibited from contracting with the state for foster care and adoption services on the grounds that they refuse to work with unmarried or same-sex couples.

In a 9-0 decision Thursday, the nation’s high court ruled against the city of Philadelphia, which had refused to renew a contract for foster care services with Catholic Social Services, arguing that the church-based agency’s refusal to place children in the homes of unmarried and same-sex couples violated a non-discrimination clause in the agency’s contract with the city.

Illinois went through a similar controversy in 2011, shortly after the state legalized civil unions among same-sex couples, when the Department of Children and Family Services refused to renew a contract with Catholic Charities of Illinois over a similar policy.

At that time, however, a circuit court judge in Sangamon County sided with the state and dismissed a lawsuit brought by Catholic Charities.

“For us here in Illinois, had this decision been on the books when the state of Illinois did what it did back in 2011, the Catholic Charities would have been continuing in foster care,” said Peter Breen, vice president and general counsel for the Chicago-based Thomas More Society, which intervened in the case.

* The big difference between Philadelphia and Illinois is discretion, as the article eventually states. From the opinion

No matter the level of deference we extend to the City, the inclusion of a formal system of entirely discretionary exceptions in section 3.21 renders the contractual non-discrimination requirement not generally applicable

* From the Illinois ACLU…

The short answer is it will have no impact here. The Court’s narrow ruling says only that Philadelphia’s treatment of Catholic Social Services (CSS) violated the agency’s constitutional rights because the City allowed exceptions to its non-discrimination policy for other organizations — but not to CSS.

As opposed to what state courts were being asked to approve in Illinois a decade ago, the Supreme Court did not recognize a general constitutional right to discriminate based on religious beliefs. This decision does not authorize discrimination in foster care or in other taxpayer-funded government programs such as homeless shelters, disaster relief programs and health care.

We know that LGBTQ children in DCFS care already are not getting the support and services they need, as was made clear in a recent Auditor General Report. Allowing discrimination in the placement of these children will only make the problem worse. In fact, DCFS should do more to protect youth in care from insidious discrimination.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Holding Back - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 11:01 am:

    There has been a huge quality deficit with children’s care when Catholic Charities was shut out.

  2. - Shibboleth - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 11:12 am:

    I was incredibly glad to see the court release a narrow ruling. No city or state should be forced to give taxpayer money to an organization that is discriminatory. Couples with parents of the same gender are no less qualified to adopt simply because they aren’t heterosexual and I am disappointed whenever my tax dollars go to organizations that say otherwise.

    Kids need loving families, not just heterosexual Christian families.

  3. - Decaturland - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 11:15 am:

    Read Justice Alito’s concurrence. Excellent.

  4. - Nuke The Whales - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 11:38 am:

    ==There has been a huge quality deficit with children’s care when Catholic Charities was shut out.==

    Catholic Charities shut themselves out when they decided to prioritize an otherwise ignored section of the Bible over the welfare of children and dignity of its LGBT+ parishioners.

  5. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 11:45 am:

    ==Read Justice Alito’s concurrence. Excellent.==

    Not sure I would call it excellent. He basically wants to allow religious organizations to be able to do whatever they want regardless of how it might discriminate. Basically no laws against religion no matter what.

  6. - Chicagonk - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 12:16 pm:

    CSS is an amazing organization - It’s the state’s loss that they shut them out.

  7. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 12:17 pm:

    ==that they shut them out==

    They didn’t shut them out. That was a choice made by Catholic Charities when they refused to abide by the same contract everyone else has to abide by.

  8. - Yep - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 12:33 pm:

    9-0 decision is narrow?

  9. - Shibboleth - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 12:44 pm:

    ==9-0 decision is narrow==

    Narrow in scope of the ruling, not a narrow vote.

    The justices could have ruled on the larger issue, but chose to focus on the specific case. Thus, narrow.

  10. - Cumberland Dem - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 12:53 pm:

    How so “Holding Out”?

  11. - cermak_rd - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 1:03 pm:

    I believe the Lutheran Family Services organization does a good job. And since they agree with all the rules ahead of time no one has to ask themselves if they need to go to a different place and the children don’t have to be presorted either. Having all providers agree to the same rules just makes the logistics a lot easier.

    Of course if you were to replay what happened 10 years ago now it might turn out differently. Different Ordinary.

  12. - A Guy - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 1:45 pm:

    == the same contract everyone else has to abide by===

    Demo, my friend, there were very few ‘everyone else’s’ in those days. Not many more now. Of course same sex parents can be great parents and hetero parents can be lousy. At Catholic Charities, they were uniquely qualified to place those children in the best places at the most important times. No sane person would argue with that. They were remarkable social workers, who did a public service at a very low price. It was never about the money for them. Same with Lutheran Family Services, who were much smaller in terms of size. The kids didn’t win in that situation. Honestly, no one did.

  13. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 1:48 pm:

    ===They were remarkable social workers, who did a public service at a very low price. It was never about the money for them.===

    When anyone says it’s not about the money… it’s about the money.

  14. - Chicagonk - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 2:20 pm:

    To those thinking other organizations have easily filled in the gap left behind by CSS, the reality is they have not. My sister was adopted through CSS and the structure and support provided by the organization for both the birth mother and my parents wouldn’t have existed without dedicated social workers at CSS. I do not agree with the Catholic Church’s stance on homosexuality and hopefully one day they change their stance. The state certainly has the right not to work with CSS, but it’s unfortunate it got to this point.

  15. - anon2 - Tuesday, Jun 22, 21 @ 3:29 pm:

    The narrow ruling does not affect Illinois, but the direction of the SCOTUS in such cases suggests it eventually might.

  16. - A Guy - Wednesday, Jun 23, 21 @ 9:06 am:

    ==When anyone says it’s not about the money… it’s about the money.==

    It’s never about the money with Catholic Charities or Lutheran Family Services, goof. Except when it comes to donating more to the good causes they operate.

  17. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Jun 23, 21 @ 9:16 am:

    === Except when it comes to donating===

    So it is about the money. If it wasn’t, following the teachings of loving one another would be a great deal easier, and no need to worry about contracts.

TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for a week
* Weekly COVID-19 update: The trend is not our friend
* Rate Pritzker's three new TV ads
* Question of the day
* Tinfoil hats crushed in Kane County
* Another year, another federal "strike force" for Chicago
* Kind of odd
* Unclear on the concept
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Pritzker campaign manager Quentin Fulks to take over Sen. Warnock's re-election bid, replaced here by Mike Ollen
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller