Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » It’s just a bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
It’s just a bill

Friday, Sep 17, 2021

* Rep. Chris Miller (R-Oakland) has no co-sponsors yet on his new bill

Creates the Stop Social Media Censorship Act. Provides that the owner or operator of a social media website that censors or deletes a user’s religious or political speech is subject to a private right of action by certain social media website users in this State. Authorizes the recovery of actual damages, statutory damages, and punitive damages. Provides for the award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Prohibits a social media website from using alleged hate speech as a defense. Authorizes the Attorney General to bring an action on behalf of social media website users. Defines terms. Effective July 1, 2021.

Emphasis added. The relevant passage

A social media website may not use the social media website user’s alleged hate speech as a basis for justification or defense of the social media website’s actions at trial.

So, website owners could be forced to pay damages if they deleted commenters who used the n-word? Yeah. Hard, hard, hard pass on that one, dude.

This appears to be stock language that’s being introduced in other states.

* Meanwhile, Rep. Kelly Cassidy’s TExAS Act has picked up 14 co-sponsors and is starting to get noticed by some TikTokers…


My kinda petty #illinois #democrat #politics #texasact #leftist #liberal

♬ Shivers - Ed Sheeran


#illinois #texasact #iunderstoodtheassignment #fyp #AEJeansHaveFun

♬ The Assignment - Tay Money

* From Hannah Meisel’s story that’s linked and referenced above

Ralph Rivera of Illinois Right to Life Action didn’t find Cassidy’s bill very funny, though he did say he would be on board for legalizing bounties for rapists. Otherwise, he speculated some of the broader strokes in the bill might be found unconstitutional.

“We’re talking about human life,” Rivera said. “It’s not silly. Taking a serious matter and trying to be flippant…she could’ve just stated that and not filed a bill.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Skeptic - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:21 am:

    Freedom from Government Overreach for me, none for thee.

  2. - wayward - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:35 am:

    Chris Miller still driving around with that Three Presenters decal on his truck?

  3. - H-W - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:39 am:

    ALEC language?

  4. - Morty - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:40 am:

    ALEC written?

  5. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:41 am:

    In essence…

    It’s the legislative way of the continued weaponization of social media under the guise of “a legal right”?

    That’s, um, an *odd* way to freedom.

  6. - Morty - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:42 am:

    I have no idea how that turned into HW, but 11:39 was me

  7. - Morty - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:43 am:

    Never mind, I typed it at the same time as HW :)

  8. - 47th Ward - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:43 am:

    ===This appears to be stock language that’s being introduced in other states===

    Seems to be a pattern for Republican state legislators. Whether it’s ALEC or whatever fringe group wants to use social media for hate speech, this stuff generally starts off in a policy lab somewhere and ends up being introduced in state houses all over the country.

    It’s as if the Republican legislators have outsourced their brains and consciences to the special interest groups that pay for their services. This could be world’s second oldest profession.

  9. - walker - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:52 am:

    Weaponizing civil actions seems to be the latest thing. Leave no stone unhurled.

  10. - H-W - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:52 am:

    =It’s as if the Republican legislators have outsourced their brains=


  11. - ChrisB - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:57 am:

    So wait, a user presumably violates the private company’s terms of service, gets deleted, and the company has to pay damages?

    Yeah, no. This is a terrible idea.

  12. - JS Mill - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 11:59 am:

    So Chris Miller wants more regulations of business and a heavy government hand on private enterprise?

    I guess when you are a socialist used to government handouts you are like that.

  13. - vern - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:00 pm:

    So, I understand that the far right’s true position is “freedom for me, rule of law for everyone else.” I know the Constitution is something they see as a useful rhetorical tool in service of that goal, not as actual words creating rights for everyone. But as long as they’re still paying lip service, we may as well accept those terms and interrogate laws like Rep Miller’s on Constitutional grounds.

    I’m genuinely curious to know what Rep Miller’s understanding of the 1st Amendment is. Clearly he thinks social companies can be forced to host and broadcast speech even if the company thinks it’s offensive, harmful, or just bad for business. My guess is that he thinks schools shouldn’t be able to mandate masks. My guess is that he thinks airlines and concert venues shouldn’t be able to mandate vaccines.

    But the law isn’t determined solely by discrete situations; we rely on precedent and analogy make the law logical and consistent. So how far would Rep Miller extend these principles?

    - If a school can’t ban masks, can they ban spaghetti straps, sagging pants, or hoods?

    - If a social media company can’t delete unwelcome hate speech from its servers, can a synagogue erase hate speech graffiti from its walls?

    - If, as Madison Cawthorn said, there’s an “unrestricted” right to air travel (, can airlines still charge for tickets?

    If Chris Miller’s response to these questions is “because I said so,” that’s his right, but if he agrees that the Constitution is still the law of the land, he should think hard about questions like these. The Constitution isn’t a wordless monument or magical incantation. It’s a non-negotiable framework to ensure our laws make sense. Luckily for Chris Miller, it can’t ensure his ideas make sense.

  14. - Franklin - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:09 pm:

    Virtues have been signaled

  15. - Suburban Mom - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:10 pm:

    Luv 2 watch the GOP lose all concept of the sanctity of contracts.

    (It’d be really funny, though, if they got one of these passed in a small-population state, and the big social media companies just decided to shut off service to that state, like a bunch of pretty big US websites did to Europe when GDPR came in and they weren’t ready, counting on user outcry as leverage.)

  16. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:18 pm:

    It should be noted Durkin wouldn’t mind… Afghanistan… being a campaign issue… and I guess Durkin thinks the Texas abortion bill won’t be?

    House Republicans stood up against the Illinois abortion bill, while on the floor…

  17. - Pot calling kettle - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:20 pm:

    If Rep. Miller’s bill were to pass, we could all post a lot more colorful things on this blog. Including (and especially) about Rep. Miller and the destructive things he’s doing. (And, we might be able to use -banned punctuation- and all caps to emphasize our points.) That’s what he wants, right? :-P

  18. - Commisar Gritty - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:24 pm:

    Really though, I try to remind myself that there are Republicans in both Illinois chambers that, while we may have some disagreements on policy, are genuinely there because they wsnt to serve their community. Chris and Mary Miller stand in stark contract to that belief.

  19. - Pundent - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:33 pm:

    Top tip for the GOP. Maybe it’s as easy as not cultivating votes from, and cowering to, wackpots.

    Samantha Bee summed it up nicely the other day when she said that the GOP was terrified of “the hate-filled, conspiracy-loving base they cultivated.” Adding, “but you know it’s their (banned word) problem not ours.”

  20. - Perrid - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 12:49 pm:

    Maybe a lawyer can help me out, but can’t victims of crime already sue perpetrators in civil court? Most of the time it wouldn’t be worth it, right now. As for unwanted pregnancies, it kinda sounds like she’s basically just changing how child support works? When it starts, who gets paid, how much, etc. The bill seems like it changes both of those ideas quite a bit, couches it in language that thumbs its nose at Texas, but neither idea seems completely new.

  21. - Leslie K - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 1:20 pm:

    No please. Just no.

    And @Perrid–I haven’t read the language of the various bills yet, but my impression from the coverage is that this approach gives anyone and his horse standing in court. Not just victims. (ready to be corrected…)

  22. - Rich Miller - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 1:20 pm:

    ===but my impression from the coverage===

    The bill is linked.

  23. - Roadrager - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 1:37 pm:

    Rep. Miller introduces the “Don’t Deplatform My Wife Act of 2021.”

  24. - PublicServant - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 1:45 pm:

    === Stop Social Media Censorship Act. ===

    LOL. GOP virtue-signaling. DOA.

  25. - Ron Burgundy - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 1:54 pm:

    The first words of the opinion on a suit challenging Miller’s bill if it became law would be something like - “The Act before us is unconstitutional. Let me count the ways.”

  26. - Perrid - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 2:25 pm:

    Leslie, thanks for that, that was something I was overlooking, that absolutely anyone could sue. I even read it, it just didn’t register as a difference in my mind for some reason.

    Also, same as with Texas’ SB 8, I would hope that this languages is too broad and vague to actually stand up under scrutiny, but we’ll see.

  27. - zatoichi - Friday, Sep 17, 21 @ 2:27 pm:

    I would like to request a bill where state politicians developing inane ideas or stealing inane ideas from other states are subject to a private right of action by citizens in this State. It would authorize the recovery of actual damages, statutory damages, and punitive damages from those politicians. Provides for the award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* COVID-19 roundup
* Chicago Sky open thread
* *** UPDATED x1 *** More remap stuff
* There's always something more that can be done about big problems like armed violence
* Pritzker spent more than $7 million on advertising in third quarter
* Harvard's former Motorola plant appears to have been transferred from one alleged internatioinal money-launderer to another
* PNA repeal back on the front burner
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password
* Saturday remap update: Bobby Rush blasts new map; Chris Christie and Mike Pompeo to attack Illinois map; Map called 'dummymander' by DC pundit; Head fake?
* Friday evening updates: New maps aren't as Dem as earlier portrayed; Lipinski eyes comeback on first draft maps; Vaccinated Catanzara muzzled by judge
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller