Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Democratic leaders battling civil rights groups in court
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Democratic leaders battling civil rights groups in court

Monday, Dec 6, 2021

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column

One of the things that I most certainly did not have on my 2021 legislative Bingo card last January was that an Oak Park liberal Democratic Senate president and the state’s first Black House speaker would be fighting multiple legal claims that their new state legislative district maps deprive protected minorities of their constitutional rights.

And the ante was upped last month when both men went on record opposing an attempt by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc., Chicago Westside Branch NAACP and NAACP Chicago Southside to intervene in the redistricting case.

The brief was filed in U.S. District Court. The groups asked to intervene because, they claim, the reduction of Black-majority legislative districts in the new maps was unconstitutional.

The NAACP hoped to join lawsuits already filed by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund and the NAACP of East St. Louis that contend the maps were drawn in violation of the federal Voting Rights Act, which protects minority interests. Illinois Republicans have filed another lawsuit on the same grounds.

But attorneys for Senate President Don Harmon and House Speaker Chris Welch argued that amicus briefs at the trial level are highly unusual, the motion was untimely (“due to the necessary yet breakneck speed of this case, Defendants are already tasked with responding to three plaintiffs’ submissions and nine expert reports in a matter of twelve days”) and would prejudice the defendants’ case (“by seeking to inject new claims and new relief into the case at this late stage, the NAACP denied Defendants the opportunity to test their claims through motion practice and discovery.”)

You gotta do what you gotta do in cases like these. I’m not trying to imply anything nefarious here, and both leaders have firmly maintained their maps will withstand constitutional scrutiny, but you gotta admit it’s very weird and a little unsettling watching all of it play out.

Meanwhile, the NAACP’s own filing mentioned the group had earlier sent a letter to Gov. J.B. Pritzker “expressing concerns over the lack of engagement with the Black community in the redistricting process and the negative impact of S.B. 927 on Black representation in the Illinois General Assembly.”

A letter sent by the NAACP to Pritzker, dated Sept. 22nd, complained the map legislation was “developed in a top-down manner, with little opportunity for actual engagement from community-based groups such as the NAACP.”

The NAACP also complained in the letter that it wasn’t able to adequately assess the impact of the new maps without weeks of work because of the data’s format.

“In short, the process used by the state deprived residents of the opportunity to have their voices heard.”

The organization then asked the governor to delay any action on the remap plan until Oct. 19th.

“This will give the NAACP and other groups a chance to take part in the democratic process and to provide you with maps that we believe are fair and preserve the voting power of Black voters in the state legislature.”

Pritzker, who won the 2018 Democratic primary partly because of strong support in the Black community and who pledged during the campaign to veto a politically partisan redistricting bill, signed the remap legislation two days after the NAACP sent its letter, claiming the maps “align with the landmark Voting Rights Act and will help ensure Illinois’ diversity is reflected in the halls of government.”

Again, weird and unsettling.

Oh, and, by the way, the legal pushback from the two legislative leaders did indeed prevent the NAACP from having a major say in the outcome of the redistricting case.

The three-judge federal panel hearing the case ruled last week they would accept the groups’ proposed amicus brief “for limited purposes.”

The court will consider the insights offered by the civil rights groups “into the history of racially polarized voting in Illinois.”

But, more importantly, the panel decreed the judges won’t allow the organizations to assert any new claims or challenge any districts beyond those already under review by the court.

The judges explained the remap plan has been out there in the open since the end of August, all of the existing complaints were filed by the middle of October, and the litigants “have been proceeding at a greatly accelerated pace” ever since. “That process was fast approaching its conclusion by the time the [NAACP’s] motion was filed, and there is no time for a do-over,” the judges wrote.

So, the super-majority legislative Democrats dodged a potentially harmful legal bullet on timing grounds alone.

…Adding… Just noticed this media advisory…

WHAT: A Federal lawsuit that may decide the future voting rights of thousands of East St. Louis voters for the next decade hangs in the balance as a decision is expected this week. Civil rights groups will hold a news conference on Monday, December 6 to give an update on the lawsuit filed earlier this month in federal court challenging Illinois lawmakers and officials on a state redistricting map (SB 927) that blatantly dilutes the power of Black voters in the East St. Louis area. The case, which has been combined with two other cases also alleging statewide gerrymandering, is expected to be heard in a consolidated hearing by a three-judge panel in federal court sometime next week.

Teresa Haley, President, NAACP Illinois State Conference
Rod Wilson Interim Executive Director, United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations (UCCRO)
Faith-Based Leaders from East St. Louis
Residents Impacted by New District Lines from the current House District 114, and future House Districts 112 or 113 will address the impact that the new law will reduce their voting power.

Plaintiffs: NAACP and the United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations (UCCRO)
Legal Team: Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Cooley, LLP.

ONLINE: Lawsuit | November Legal Brief

3 p.m., Monday, Dec. 6, 2021
600-698 Illinois 15, East Saint Louis

WHY: The NAACP and the United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations (UCCRO) are challenging Illinois lawmakers in a federal lawsuit that is set to be heard this week for unlawfully drawing racially gerrymandered districts that crack apart the Black community of the East St. Louis area in order to secure the election of a white incumbent in a nearby district.

The lawsuit alleges that race played a decisive role in the redistricting of Illinois House District 114, where one-fifth of the Black voting-age population was moved out of the newly redrawn district and thousands of white voters were added to the district. This was done for the benefit of white Democratic incumbents in neighboring House Districts 112 and 113, while jeopardizing the prospects of the candidates of preference of Black voters in House District 114 — the only Black district in southern Illinois. The complaint alleges that this manipulation violates the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“By substantially increasing the number of white voters and breaking up the historically Black population of House District 114, the Illinois General Assembly has seriously diminished the voting power of the Black community in East St. Louis. They have taken away Black voters’ right to elect the candidate of their choice,” says Rod Wilson, Interim Executive Director, United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations (UCCRO) and former resident of East St. Louis.

The civil rights groups are filing the lawsuit on behalf of the East St. Louis Branch of the NAACP, the Illinois State Conference of the NAACP, and the United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations (UCCRO) against the Illinois State Board of Elections and its members, along with Speaker of the House, Christopher Welch, and President of the Senate, Don Harmon. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division.

The groups are seeking to freeze the redistricting plan and adopt a proposed revised map in order to protect voters’ rights — fixes that would cure the legal violations and keep the geographically compact and politically cohesive Black community of the East St. Louis area together.

…Adding… Related…

* Oral arguments to begin Tuesday in redistricting cases: On Thursday, though, attorneys for Harmon and Welch said they believed a full in-person hearing was needed, and the judges allowed that request.

* Race, Ethnicity and Partisan Politics Dominate State and City Redistricting Battles

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Donnie Elgin - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 9:17 am:

    Amongst the chaff, there is this bit of wheat

    “complained the map legislation was “developed in a top-down manner, with little opportunity for actual engagement from community-based groups such as the NAACP.”

  2. - Back to the Future - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 10:06 am:

    Good article.
    I am surprised other media outlets are not covering this story.
    The NAACP seems to have a legitimate complaint about the principles and the processes that were established and followed by the GA and Governor Pritzker in putting together these election districts.
    The effort by the defendants in this case to limit the involvement of a group like the NAACP is not healthy. IMHO Pritzker and the GA leaders should be encouraging groups like the NAACP to participate in process and not work to lock them out.

  3. - NonAFSCMEStateEmployeeFromChatham - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 10:24 am:

    If the NAACP and MALDEF win their suits in the East St. Louis and the Chicago Hispanic districts, respectively, wouldn’t the entire GA remap have to be redone statewide starting from scratch? Since the original maps looked like they tried to have no more than 1-2 person discrepancy between surrounding districts (per Dave’s Redistricting App).

  4. - Responsa - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 10:44 am:

    This is an informative article with details one doesn’t encounter elsewhere. Thank you. It’s a reminder that people in power always-always try to protect and expand their power.

  5. - Wut - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 11:17 am:

    @Nonafsme: no. Sounds like the judges have told the lawyers they’ll order from the bench what would need to be fixed.

  6. - Fav Human - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 11:51 am:

    I wonder if the NAACP didn’t do anything earlier because:

    1) Some one whispered in their ear their concerns would be taken care of

    2) They just assumed they would be taken care of

    But things like not filing in time, missing the chance to say something are often seen in rulings and appeals.

    I am sure the NAACP has top lawyers, so they know about that. I suspect they are in fact quite good about using that to their advantage.

    Which leads me to think it’s (1) or (2)

  7. - Sue - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:19 pm:

    Sorry to say if white legislators were holding back blacks the way blacks are thwarting Hispanics- the reaction would be a lot louder and Would be attracting a lot more media attention

  8. - Hahaha - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:26 pm:

    Where’s OW in the comments continuing his passionate crusade to make sure minority representation is secured with the new map? Bueller? Bueller?

  9. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:38 pm:


    - Hahaha -

    The rent check for living in your head was sent this week, look for it.

    To your phony concern, I’ve said from jump street, the courts, at this point, are going to dictate to how this map meets the VRA parameters.

    You conveniently ignore it wasn’t until of late the GOP submitted a map, as did MALDEF. Now we all know what those two groups see as “fair” in maps.

    I also didn’t say MALDEF, the NAACP, or any group Durant have the right to take the map to court, but I do find it odd and… well, it’s just odd… that Dems voted for this map, in a supermajority way, and I’m waiting to hear from legislators to side with those suing and changing how they felt about a map they voted for.


  10. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:38 pm:

    Wonder how the DOJ’s arguments against the Texas legislative map could overlap with these groups’ arguments against the IL map.

  11. - Hahaha - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:44 pm:

    to OW:

    “Questions?” Sure…

    Which map better represented the interests of minorities? The Democrats map as proposed, passed and signed by the Governor, or the remedy map proposed and presented in court by Republicans.

  12. - RNUG - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:46 pm:

    Reading through, it appears the NAACP was asleep at the switch.

    Don’t understand why they weren’t forcefully out early with their concerns. A letter to the Governor was never going to achieve their goals. Why weren’t they down in the trenches making sausage with the Legislative Leaders and the Legislature?

  13. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:46 pm:

    === Which map better represented the interests of minorities?===

    A court is going to decide if the map presented is legal.

    The example maps may be used to show deficiencies or different examples to one’s belief is better.

    Let’s see what a court says in the end.

  14. - Hahaha - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:47 pm:

    Also, Republicans didn’t submit a map because they maintained it shouldn’t be drawn by politicians. After being told to by the courts, Republican attorneys did just that and here we are. Not that hard to figure out.

  15. - Hahaha - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:49 pm:

    You didn’t answer the question OW, as I assumed you wouldn’t.

    So a map (Republicans) that draws more minority majority districts than the alternative map (Dems) doesn’t better represent minority interests? Curious from you - passionate defender of minorities.

  16. - Loop Lady - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:50 pm:

    Watching this with the utmost interest.
    Disenfranchisement anyone?

  17. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 12:59 pm:

    === You didn’t answer the question… as I assumed you wouldn’t.===

    Friend, that’s a dorm room question, as what is at play is the current map passed.

    If the GOP wanted to pass a map, they would’ve offered a map to be voted on. They didn’t.

  18. - David - Monday, Dec 6, 21 @ 8:06 pm:

    Response to Sue:

    YOU GOT THAT RIGHT, especially with what is happening with the City Redistricting. Glad that Latino leadership is demanding their fair share and being unapologetic about it. This is where the “equity and inclusion” discourse is put to the test - especially in light of the changing demographics in Chicago, Cook County and our State. Time for Latinos to get their fair share of representation not only in elected positions, but also in government.

  19. - Loop Lady - Tuesday, Dec 7, 21 @ 8:45 am:

    David, Sue and I totally agree…white male power structure is changing due to demographic change. Organize and be represented.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Question of the day
* Waffle House shooter's father faces up to three years in prison
* Campaign notebook
* COVID-19 update
* Another day, another lawsuit
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and a campaign roundup
* Secretary of state candidates take more potshots
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Will the revised Census numbers change anything?
* DCFS director held in contempt for 11th time
* It's time to try something besides simply reacting angrily to crises, Mayor Lightfoot
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller