Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rate Darren Bailey’s new TV ad
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rate Darren Bailey’s new TV ad

Tuesday, May 17, 2022 - Posted by Rich Miller

* This was recorded off a TV, so there are quality issues New and improved copy

* Transcription

You can tell a lot about someone based on their friends. Take Richard Irvin. The real Richard Irvin is a lifelong liberal Democrat. Irvin voted for Barack Obama in the Democratic primary for President. Irvin is so liberal that he’s been a strong supporter of Lori Lightfoot. And Irvin called JB Pritzker a ‘great leader’ and a ‘great friend.’ So, the next time you see Richard Irvin’s TV ads, remember, Richard Irvin is a lifelong liberal you just can’t trust.

The ad has been spotted on both cable and Chicago broadcast.

* Background from Tina Sfondeles

The $1.8 million ad buy set to begin across Illinois on Monday will mark the first TV commercials that Bailey has aired in the Chicago area.

“We’re turning up the heat,” DeBose said.

The latest contribution from Uihlein brings his contributions to Bailey’s campaign to more than $6 million. But that still pales in comparison to the competing largesse from hedge-fund billionaire Ken Griffin, who so far is bankrolling Irvin’s bid for governor to the tune of $45 million.

       

40 Comments
  1. - Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:22 am:

    B-as in Bailey’s best shot.

    As long as Griffin, I mean Irvin, wants to waffle on who he voted for this will stick.


  2. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:23 am:

    Excellent ad, simple and to the point. Rated A. Couldn’t disagree more politically with the Baileys and Profts of Illinois, but they’re being played by someone who will shape-shift at the command of handlers and funders, and political necessity. Could relate and empathize.


  3. - Bruce( no not him) - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:25 am:

    A
    But… We’ve seen some of your friends Darren. Sure you wanna bring friends up?


  4. - Henry Francis - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:28 am:

    Not only does it hit Irvin, but the Chicago audience is spared Bailey’s face and voice - smart.


  5. - walker - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:29 am:

    B+ Clear message. The graphics are attractive but might be distracting.


  6. - Arsenal - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:30 am:

    Pretty good, with the highest production values Bailey has managed yet, but we still need the “Vote *for* Bailey” ad.

    And the looming question is if there’s more coming. if Bailey goes dark again after the 1-2 weeks $2M gets ya, he’ll still lose.


  7. - Just Me 2 - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:34 am:

    Found it interesting his big ad is a negative one for Irvin and not one to introduce himself.


  8. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:36 am:

    As an actual liberal, I can’t take anyone seriously who refers to people who are middle of the road/leaning right as liberals. So the F is for making up stuff that isn’t true.


  9. - Socially DIstant watcher - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:37 am:

    Might be the best shot for the primary, but if it doesn’t work it June it’ll help Irvin in November.


  10. - fs - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:39 am:

    C, mainly because of the timing.

    A problem for Bailey with waiting so long to run these types of ads in Chicago is, Irvin has been running similar ads and mailers about him for months. The image of Bailey may be baked into voters minds already, and some of its impact of this ad might be mitigated by voters seeing both ads and thinking “they’re all saying the same thing about each other”


  11. - former cubs fan - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:40 am:

    Bailey goes straight to negative ads. This tells me that he doesn’t believe that he can drive his own numbers up, or that he doesn’t have the required funding to go dual track. He can only afford negatives meant to drive Irvin’s numbers down. Its going to be very negative for the next month and a half.


  12. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:46 am:

    B. The production could be better, but it gets his message across and speaks directly to the voters he has to mobilize to win.


  13. - DuPage - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:47 am:

    Irvin forces: Incoming mud fling. Prepare to counter-fling.


  14. - cover - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:48 am:

    = We’ve seen some of your friends Darren. Sure you wanna bring friends up? =

    Among GOP primary voters who might consider voting for Darren Bailey, those “friends” are probably seen in a positive light.


  15. - Downstate - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:49 am:

    “This tells me that he doesn’t believe that he can drive his own numbers up”
    “audience is spared Bailey’s face and voice - smart”

    Both comments are spot on. Let’s see if Irvin can win a two-front war against Bailey and the DGA.


  16. - Ron Burgundy - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:50 am:

    -This tells me that he doesn’t believe that he can drive his own numbers up, or that he doesn’t have the required funding to go dual track.-

    And/or he can’t figure out what to say about himself in the large media markets. Is he gonna run ads in Chicago talking about being a farmer from a town of 400 people wanting to run the state? That’s a tough sell even in a GOP primary up north.


  17. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:55 am:

    ===doesn’t have the required funding to go dual track===

    DGA is handling positive track for now. lol


  18. - Pundent - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:56 am:

    I would give it a B. While it points out why you wouldn’t want to vote for Irvin, it doesn’t give you a reason to vote for Bailey. It could just as easily be a Sullivan or Rabine ad. Bailey’s challenge is not only Irvin but distinguishing himself from the rest of the field. This ad doesn’t accomplish the later.


  19. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:57 am:

    D-

    I said previously that giving Bailey money did not guarantee he’d spend it wisely and this is proof of that. Everybody in this GOP primary is a secret liberal Democrat. Nothing in this ad distinguishes Bailey apart from the others.

    The Bailey people need to hammer Irvin on abortion and what distinguishes Irvin as a liberal and Bailey as the only choice for the Pro Life GOP voter. How is Irvin an untrustworthy liberal? Because we can’t trust him to protect life. That sort of messaging would both hurt Irvin and boost Bailey in the primary.

    Bailey has to expose Irvin’s squishiness on abortion if he hopes to beat him in the primary.

    This ad is like Bud Light saying, “no, we’re less filling and we taste great.”


  20. - TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:58 am:

    D

    Many in his audience were gushing just yesterday about how much integrity Bailey has for not running negative ads.

    I didn’t have the heart to break it to them that he hasn’t run any negative ads yet because he didn’t have any money up until… now.


  21. - Real - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 9:59 am:

    As Rich pointed out, the DGA hit ads on Bailey give republican primary voters a reason to vote for him.


  22. - Dysfunction Junction - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:00 am:

    =Might be the best shot for the primary, but if it doesn’t work it June it’ll help Irvin in November.=

    If Bailey gets the nod, all JB has to do for the general is broadcast Bailey’s regular Facebook Bible/MAGA soliloquies on all major Chicagoland news outlets. He’s seriously out of touch with 75% of the voters in the state.


  23. - Pundent - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:02 am:

    =Might be the best shot for the primary, but if it doesn’t work it June it’ll help Irvin in November.=

    Not so sure about that. Irvin could easily win the primary with 60-70% of Republican supporting someone else. He’ll need every one of those votes in November.


  24. - Baloneymous - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:04 am:

    ==DGA is handling positive track for now. lol==

    That actually made me laugh out loud.

    It’s a good ad, B+. Now let’s see if they do another poll in a week or two and if this along with the DGA ads made a dent.


  25. - Former Downstater - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:09 am:

    There’s actually a positive ad now also running in Chicago. Voiceover and on screen featuring his running mate.


  26. - Donnie Elgin - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:18 am:

    the ad is OK,but not great production value C+. I actually think it helps Irvin in primary and general. He will lose the purity test GOP voters - but that was a foregone conclusion. In the GOP circles I run in, the electability theme around Irvin is strong and growing. Showing he has the ability to work with Dems (which will be in the supermajority should he win) may be a positive for undecided GOP voters.


  27. - froganon - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:18 am:

    –Many in his audience were gushing just yesterday about how much integrity Bailey has for not running negative ads.–

    No problem for Bailey, all will be forgiven. Like all Trumplican candidates, there is no action or statement that can’t be explained away to the True Believers in the Cult of Trump.


  28. - vern - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:19 am:

    B+. Good ad, hits the right message. Only deduction is for the last line. Bailey still can’t give up his obsession with Irvin’s messaging. Sometimes you gotta pretend your opponent’s campaign doesn’t exist.


  29. - Real - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:22 am:

    They should of used a different picture of Irvin. Why use the one where he is smiling and not all the other ones where he looks unappealing.


  30. - TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:27 am:

    “should of”

    Should have

    Sorry. Pet peeve.


  31. - zatoichi - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:28 am:

    That guy is really bad so vote for me. Yeah, that’ll work.


  32. - Arsenal - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:31 am:

    ==That guy is really bad so vote for me. Yeah, that’ll work. ==

    It…often does?


  33. - Jocko - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:40 am:

    I’d give it a B+. Would’ve given it an A had he done the “I’m Darren Bailey, candidate for governor, and I approve this message.”


  34. - Langhorne - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:44 am:

    Is it too much to hope for the day when Irvin, Bailey, Sullivan, and Rabine each has to answer real questions from knowledgeable reporters?

    — how are you gonna get anything done when your party is in the super minority?
    — explain the steps and legal requirements required to get term limits on the ballot.
    —No handouts, what gets eliminated?
    —You do know that the governor will have no authority to commute Madigan’s sentence? If so, why do you keep advertising a lie?
    — Cut income taxes…have you met the education, and social services communities? What state services will you cut?
    —Cut property taxes… Have you met your local officials, and school officials? What do you cut?

    Minor rant, I know the answer, but I feel better for at least asking.


  35. - Honest Truth - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:56 am:

    Any real or peceived Lightfoot connection will prevent Irvin from picking up any votes in Chicago. She might be a non-factor in the suburbs. But she is an albatross in the city. JB has done a good job of keeping her at arms length.


  36. - Arsenal - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 10:57 am:

    ==I actually think it helps Irvin in primary and general.==

    Of course you do, but in reality being called a “lifelong liberal” will never help you in a Republican primary, and this ad will be long forgotten by the General.


  37. - JS Mill - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 12:44 pm:

    =In the GOP circles I run in=

    Good to know that you run in circles.

    =Showing he has the ability to work with Dems=

    All evidence to the contrary. He is attacking all of the Democratic sacred cows.


  38. - Streator Curmudgeon - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 2:43 pm:

    B.

    It pushes all those Republican hot buttons. Why, I can see angry old white men with mustaches banging their fist on the arm of their La-Z-Boys, swearing to send that tree-hugger Irvin back to Aurora instead of Springfield.

    It might not matter that Bailey is a crew-cut farmer from Podunk, IL who thinks he can do anything against a Democrat-majority legislature.

    If Bailey gets the Trump endorsement, he’s GOP gold.


  39. - Shytown - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 3:16 pm:

    Not a Bailey fan, but this ad is an A+.


  40. - The Dude - Tuesday, May 17, 22 @ 4:51 pm:

    C….I honestly believe that Baily’s campaign actually doesn’t know how to win.

    He is simply trying to get all of downstate Republicans but I would argue this ad helps Irvin in the suburbs.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Republicans denied TRO in bid to be appointed to ballot
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* It’s almost a law
* Credit Unions: A Smart Financial Choice for Illinois Consumers
* Was the CTU lobby day over-hyped?
* 'Re-renters' tax in the budget mix?
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Get The Facts On The Illinois Prescription Drug Board
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller