Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Sen. DeWitte says “nevermind” on full SAFE-T Act repeal
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Sen. DeWitte says “nevermind” on full SAFE-T Act repeal

Thursday, Sep 22, 2022 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Sept. 9 press release

With the implementation of no-cash bail and other controversial elements of the SAFE-T Act set to take effect across Illinois in less than four months, State Senator Donald DeWitte (R-St. Charles) is calling for a full repeal of the Act so that legislators can iron out significant issues that will place Illinoisans’ safety at risk and place unaffordable burdens on the court system. He is also offering a petition that Illinois residents can sign to urge the repeal.

* Center Square last week

Saying Illinoisans’ safety will be at risk, an Illinois senator is calling for a full repeal of the Safety, Accountability and Fairness Equity Today Act, or SAFE-T Act.

State Sen. Don DeWitte, R-St. Charles, also is providing a petition online where Illinois residents can urge the repeal.

Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed the bill into law last year, which will abolish cash bail on Jan. 1, making Illinois the first state in the country to do so. Pritzker has celebrated the legislation as one that supports police departments with funds and equipment such as body cameras, and that the elimination of cash bail will prevent low-level criminals from sitting in jail for months.

* Kankakee Daily Journal editorial from yesterday

We side with Rowe and Glasgow, as the SAFE-T Act isn’t good for the safety and well being of every Illinoisan.

State Sen. Don DeWitte, R-St.Charles, has an online petition where Illinois residents can support the repeal of the SAFE-T Act.

* Daily Herald

Though the petition calls for repealing the act, DeWitte said he doesn’t support “full-blown repeal and elimination.” He says he wants lawmakers to work together to address the concerns raised about the legislation.

I like Sen. DeWitte, but it’s difficult to see how he is now interested in negotiating in good faith.

…Adding… Like I said…


       

18 Comments »
  1. - Just Another Anon - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 8:59 am:

    Well, since its been clear Sen. Sims et al have no desire to negotiate in good faith, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Red meat for both bases.


  2. - Bruce( no not him) - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:05 am:

    ===Though the petition calls for repealing the act, DeWitte said he doesn’t support “full-blown repeal and elimination.” ===
    “Sign my petition. I don’t want what it wants, but sign it anyway. Thanks” /S


  3. - Blue Dog - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:05 am:

    The longer this stays in the headlines the better off for ILGOP.


  4. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:07 am:

    ===et al===

    … and yet both Pritzker and Raoul have said, very recently, that there needs to be, if I can paraphrase, a revisit and/or clarifying.

    Opening a door to such a discussion is not an “et al” kind of inclusion you think.

    I do think, and I’ve stated first I have real questions, and I’ve also said clarity to after implementing is important.

    I am not a legislator, governor or attorney general, and waiting upon thoughts to the “after” for those folks is “disappointing” and not forward thinking to what was passed and signed back when real time thoughts would hand mattered


  5. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:08 am:

    === Sims et al have no desire to negotiate in good faith===

    From what I gather, they have been talking for months.


  6. - Arsenal - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:10 am:

    ==The longer this stays in the headlines the better off for ILGOP. ==

    Sorta, but not in a very meaningful way. “Crime” isn’t moving the needle as much as people thought it would, and any time you start getting into the weeds of legislation, peoples’ eyes glaze over.


  7. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:13 am:

    ===for ILGOP. ===

    Ask Irvin how that worked out.


  8. - Amalia - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:16 am:

    I’ve been wondering about whether crime moves the needle. the commercials are ubiquitous. But they are irritating. Think it will move the needle somewhat but not as much as the fear mongering team thinks. Unless…. If there is some big incident, then maybe somewhat more. Pritzker’s commentary that super bad guys could get out if they just had the money should be emphasized more.


  9. - Just Me 2 - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:41 am:

    The petition is just a way to later ask for money. Great fundraising exercise. Brilliant.


  10. - ArchPundit - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 9:50 am:

    ==But the new law takes away the ability of prosecutors and judges to detain people whom they judge pose a threat.

    That’s from the Kankakee editorial and it’s just false. Prosecutors can offer evidence of a person posing a threat and judge can decide someone is a threat and instead of just making it a high bail amount, a true threat doesn’t get out period.


  11. - Arsenal - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 10:04 am:

    ==Think it will move the needle somewhat but not as much as the fear mongering team thinks.==

    Yeah, I think that’s basically right, and that they’ll move the needle only about as much as negative ad campaign focused on, say, inflation, would. Negative ads, by and large, work.

    But I also think ILGOP only has so many options and none of them are great, so crime might be the best card in a bad hand.


  12. - Chicagonk - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 10:23 am:

    @ArchPundit - So the law adds more work for prosecutors and judges with no funding to support it? CCSAO is dealing with significant turnover and staff shortages. Courts are backlogged still from covid. Meanwhile the Pritzker administration expects that come January 1st, the current system will be able to deal with all the new mandates in the law.


  13. - Da big bad wolf - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 10:52 am:

    === So the law adds more work for prosecutors and judges with no funding to support it? ===
    Work they should be doing now.
    Or are you OK with murderers paying bail and walking like they can do now?


  14. - ArchPundit - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 10:55 am:

    === So the law adds more work for prosecutors and judges with no funding to support it? CCSAO is dealing with significant turnover and staff shortages.

    Then ask for more money. It was passed in 2021 so this shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone with nearly a two year warning. It’s also not clear that there is that much more work. I’m told on one hand that poor people can be released on their own recognizance and then on the other hand that requiring demonstration of threat is a huge unfunded mandate. This only makes sense if you think that a large majority of charged individuals are a specific threat. By any reasonable logic, it should be the case that state’s attorneys can now focus on those who are serious threats instead of trying to figure out bail for everyone.


  15. - Big Dipper - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 11:46 am:

    People aren’t leaving CCSAO because of the budget or the workload. It’s because they have lost faith in the leadership. Can’t blame that on the Safe-T Act.


  16. - Michelle Flaherty - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 1:23 pm:

    Is this a DeWitt fetcher petition?


  17. - Chicagonk - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 3:07 pm:

    @BigDipper - You are right, but ASA salaries are way below market and the workload demands are higher than ever.


  18. - Amalia - Thursday, Sep 22, 22 @ 8:43 pm:

    Big Dipper is spot on. Safe-T act looming has zero to do with folks leaving the CCSAO. the stories from that place due to I’m Foxx and her management are awful. Salaries were always way below market and workload demands not only always high but people worked hard because they believed in the leadership. Yes haters, including with Anita Alvarez. Law enforcement has it hard everywhere but the trial experience in the CCSAO is like none elsewhere.


TrackBack URI

This is not Facebook, so uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.



* Question of the day
* Asked the umpteenth time about specific changes to the SAFE-T Act, Pritzker says Sen. Bennett's proposal is "a pretty good bill"
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - A few campaign items
* Live coverage
* Debate coverage roundup
* Proft paper, or not?
* Great mystery solved, kinda
* Today's quotable
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Debate open thread
* Gannett confirms it's printing Proft's papers
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller