Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Illinois Supreme Court rules people can’t legally FOIA their FOID card info
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Illinois Supreme Court rules people can’t legally FOIA their FOID card info

Thursday, Nov 30, 2023 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From September

The [Illinois Supreme Court case] case stems from two people requesting public records regarding why their FOID cards, a state-issued identification required in Illinois to own or buy firearms and ammunition, were either revoked or suspended. The plaintiffs’ FOIA requests to Illinois State Police were denied. After challenges, the case made it to the Illinois Supreme Court on Tuesday.

Illinois State Police attorney Valerie Quinn said that they can’t release such personal information through FOIA and the proper way to request such information is through the Firearms Services Bureau.

“No one is trying to keep people’s personal applications and denial letters a secret from them but the Firearms Services Bureau needs to be able to verify that you are who you say you are before releasing copies of your confidential information,” Quinn said. […]

Representing the plaintiffs, attorney Thomas Maag said going through the FSB isn’t conducive.

“They don’t answer the telephone for hours at a time. They don’t answer emails for days and or weeks at a time,” Maag said. “I invite this court to go to their website and dial the telephone number and see how many hours it takes to get a person, if you even can.”

They’re not a third party seeking their own address or other personal information, Maag said.

* The Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling today, with Justice Joy Cunningham writing the opinion

The appellate court agreed with the trial court that the legislature’s use of the plural terms “names” and “people,” rather than the singular terms “name” and “person”, meant the exemption set forth in section 7.5(v) does not apply to a request for one’s own FOID card information. According to the appellate court, the term “people,” by its plain meaning, necessitates more than a single individual. To interpret section 7.5(v) as applying to a request for one’s own information, the court concluded, would render the term “people” meaningless. […]

The appellate court then rejected ISP’s argument that there is no way for it to verify that the FOIA requester is, in fact, the person whose information is being sought, finding it “unpersuasive as the individual’s written FOIA request, by necessity to identify the application and denial letter sought, should provide ISP with sufficient information to demonstrate that the requester was seeking his/her own information.” According to the appellate court, if the request is insufficient, additional verifying information could be required before release of the information. […]

ISP contends the appellate court erred in its interpretation of section 7.5(v). According to ISP, section 7.5(v) is a blanket exemption prohibiting the disclosure of all FOID card information under FOIA, and there is no exception for individuals who are seeking their own information. We agree. […]

In support of its interpretation of section 7.5(v), the appellate court emphasized that the statute uses the plural terms “names” and “people” and, therefore, must not exempt from disclosure an individual’s request for his or her own information. However, section 1.03 of the Statute on Statutes provides that “[w]ords importing the singular number may extend and be applied to several persons or things, and words importing the plural number may include the singular.” This is a well-settled principle of statutory construction. […]

Section 7(1)(b), in turn, states that “[p]rivate information” is exempt from disclosure [under FOIA] “unless disclosure is required by another provision of this Act, a State or federal law, or a court order.” Here, there is no dispute that no state or federal law or court order requires the disclosure of FOID card information. Accordingly, we conclude the appellate court erred in holding that an individual may consent to disclosure of his or her FOID card information under FOIA.

…Adding… Somebody just pointed something out to me via text…

I get it, they were FOIAing their own info. But I don’t think the FOIA law makes that distinction. Once you release something through FOIA it is a public record. I don’t think you can release it to one person and then say no to everyone else. That seems to be counter to what FOIA is about.

Yeah. Maag and the other courts seemed to have a profound misunderstanding about what FOIA is.

       

19 Comments
  1. - We've never had one before - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 10:18 am:

    Maag is right, you just cannot get through on the phone using the official channels. The only way in is if you know a guy, or gal.


  2. - Norseman - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 10:26 am:

    I always understood the interpretation of the terms to be the same as the Supremes unanimously concluded. It concerns me that the Circuit and District courts couldn’t get it right.

    The Statute on Statutes is always your friend when it comes to statutory interpretation.


  3. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 10:31 am:

    It might be good law - but it exposes the problem of letting unelected administrative agencies control access to vital information. I’m sure ISP will do nothing to fix the problem as they are not motivated now. Citizens are left With no viable way to address inefficiency- just take it.


  4. - jimbo - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 10:32 am:

    “see how many hours it takes to get a person, if you even can.”

    So basically like my health insurance, hospital billing, mobile provider, etc., etc.


  5. - Homebody - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 10:53 am:

    The statutory exception in 7.5(v) seems very explicit. No surprise that this is a unanimous decision.


  6. - Demoralized - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 10:53 am:

    ==but it exposes the problem of letting unelected administrative agencies control access to vital information.==

    Who would you like to be in control of information? Agencies have the records. You want agencies to turn over all of their documents to some individual elected to oversee them?


  7. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:01 am:

    ===Who would you like to be in control of information? ===

    Just standard word salad ugga bugga


  8. - Retired ISP D11 - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:01 am:

    The ISP FSB and the FOID operation is a mess. My FOID renewal process took forever and I am a retired ISP sworn officer in good standing. I was unable to contact anyone for help until talking to a current ISP officer who was able to help me contact the right person. If it was that hard for me, I can only imagine what a normal, law abiding citizen has to go through.


  9. - JS Mill - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:08 am:

    =it exposes the problem of letting unelected administrative agencies control access to vital information. I’m sure ISP will do nothing to fix the problem as they are not motivated now. Citizens are left With no viable way to address inefficiency- just take it.=

    So you want every position to be elected?

    The real work of government is not accomplished via elected officials. They create work, that is for sure. We absolutely need these “unelected” (seriously what a silly point) professionals to do the work. It is not their fault that they are understaffed.


  10. - Dog Lover - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:10 am:

    “Word salad ugga bugga” made me laugh. Thank you for that. It is so hard to speak to a human at places like those mentioned and there is so much bad news and seriousness everywhere, a laugh feels so good.


  11. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:13 am:

    ===seems very explicit===

    It is. This was a slam dunk case that went the wrong way twice.


  12. - Elmer Keith - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:19 am:

    I’m glad that it isn’t easy to get FOID info, as I wouldn’t want the general public to have access to firearm owner residence information.

    What worries me is who’s going to have access to registered “assault weapon” ownership info, when that takes effect in January. I wonder if the ISP will guard that registration info as zealously.


  13. - fs - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 11:31 am:

    ==I’m sure ISP will do nothing to fix the problem as they are not motivated now.==

    I might argue this puts more pressure on firearms services to move quicker. If foia were left as an option, they might’ve just pushed more responsibility on that (which would require more resources on that division).


  14. - Amalia - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 12:02 pm:

    so the side of the equation that is afraid information will be spilled is angry that information cannot be spilled. ok then.


  15. - We've never had one before - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 12:06 pm:

    >>>>I wonder if the ISP will guard that registration info as zealously.

    We’ll have to see. Waiting for John O’Connor (AP) to FOIA the PICA affidavits.


  16. - JS Mill - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 12:33 pm:

    =Just standard word salad ugga bugga=

    You just broke my brain Rich.


  17. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 1:11 pm:

    ===Maag is right, you just cannot get through===

    He may be right on that, but he’s obviously wrong on the law.


  18. - thisjustinagain - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 2:08 pm:

    To Rich’s “world salad ugga bugga”: “Not only was it authentic frontier gibberish….” :)
    To the post: “A right delayed is a right denied”, and actionable by the US Supreme Court. Time to apply this to ISP and Illinois failed CCL/FOID system, including the post-denial admin review process. If you don’t why you were denied, how can you mount an effective appeal??


  19. - unafraid - Thursday, Nov 30, 23 @ 2:28 pm:

    No doubt about it. People wanting this information will have a very difficult time. Purposeful? Make up your own mind, but I would certainly lean in that direction.

    I suggest contacting your local legislator and have then put pressure to get your information. This may take repeated times and a lot of effort for something that should be provided to our citizens.

    When you contact your legislator give them the background provided in this piece and have them work on solving the problem.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Roundup: Testimony focuses on ex-aides loyalty to Madigan
* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* Some not-great state flag redesign contest feedback from WGN
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker: Gia Biagi signals a “new era” at IDOT
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller