* Crain’s on a lawsuit filed in Kankakee County to stop the Gotion plan…
Chinese battery maker Gotion announced a year ago that it would convert a vacant Kmart distribution center into a $2 billion factory that would eventually employ 2,600 people. It was a signature victory in Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s plan to put Illinois at the center of the move to electric vehicles.
But the plant immediately sparked opposition from some residents and politicians, including former gubernatorial candidate Jeanne Ives, who questioned whether Gotion has ties to the Communist Party of China. A similar backlash occurred over the company’s plan to build a factory near Grand Rapids, Mich.
After the plant was approved by the Manteno Village Board, a group called Concerned Citizens of Manteno filed the lawsuit. Among other things, the group claims the village violated its own rules in allowing the project, says the plant will use toxic chemicals that are not allowed under local zoning provisions, and worries that truck traffic will cause health problems to residents and decrease the value of nearby homes.
Kankakee Circuit Court Judge Lindsay Parkhurst ruled in favor of the village to dismiss several counts because the suit, as she put it, is convoluted and “reads like a novel or a thesis” that did not properly state claims with specific facts showing violations of law or injury by plaintiffs.
* More from Judge Lindsay Parkhurst via the Kankakee Daily Journal…
In summary of her decision, Parkhurst wrote “The complaint is unanswerable because it does not set out separate causes of action for each defendant, is convoluted, contains surplusage, contains excessive and unnecessary verbiage and allegations, and is not clear and concise. The complaint reads like a novel or thesis rather than a well [pleaded] complaint with specific short, concise allegations that can be admitted or denied.”
Judge Parkhurst, a former Republican state legislator, did leave the door open to file an amended lawsuit, but that new complaint will have to look totally different than the one originally filed…
“The court cautions such amended count must allege specific fact to support allegations the rezoning caused a special damage and was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable and bore no substantial relation to public health, safety, or general welfare or in some other way violated Citizens’ constitutional rights. These cannot be mere general conclusions of law or fact. The count must allege specific and ultimate fact to support the allegations.” […]
“If you’re going to allege that Gotion is violating federal laws, you’re going to have to cite those laws,” she said. “Then that might be an issue for removal of the federal court, but you’re going to have to tighten up your pleadings. If I get another complaint like the one I got, it’s going to be dismissed right away.”
The lawsuit is here. The judge’s ruling is here.
- Huh? - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 1:37 pm:
Do’h
- Norseman - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 2:25 pm:
LOL. Got to love when a politician gets a judicial smack down for their use of the legal system for political stunts. I wish there was a way of fining pols - in office or not - for the defendant’s expenses of spurious lawsuits. Also, reimburse taxpayers for the abusive use of public monies.
- Macon Bakin - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 3:08 pm:
Illinoisan tax dollars should not be funneled into a Chinese company accused of forced labor and CCP collaboration
- TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 3:37 pm:
It took awhile to finally find it, but the first big “I don’t understand what I’m talking about” part shows up on page 16 when the plaintiffs very clearly misunderstand what a closed-loop industrial system is. Doing so in the most ADHD way possible by putting details in both parenthesis and quotation marks.
–
Gotion claimed that 300,000 gallons of water a day might be needed from local water
utility Aqua (despite being a “closed loop system”)
–
Closed loop describes a feedback mechanism where output of a system is automatically used to adjust performance of the input without a requirement for manual intervention. It doesn’t mean all the water is forever always self-contained as the complaint implies.
This then becomes the source of a later complaint that any evaporated water would be carried over the town by the prevailing winds.
And yes, it absolutely reads like a badly written romance novel.
- don the legend - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 3:46 pm:
==must allege specific fact to support allegations … and was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable and bore no substantial relation to… These cannot be mere general conclusions of law or fact. ….must allege specific and ultimate fact to support the allegations.” […]
Sounds like a speech at a MAGA rally.
- Pundent - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 4:15 pm:
=Illinoisan tax dollars should not be funneled into a Chinese company accused of forced labor and CCP collaboration=
That’s a nice GOP sound bite with no actual proof to support it. But setting that aside it’s also a political statement not a matter for the court to decide.
- Dotnonymous x - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 5:02 pm:
I’ve read hundreds of legal decisions…this is among the worst judicial rebukes I’ve ever yet seen.
Concerned Citizens of Manteno should run to the nearest burn unit…Ouch!
- The Ford Lawyer - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 5:42 pm:
I knew Lindsay long ago, before she was a legislator or a judge. At that time, she was just a very practical, studious lawyer who wanted to get things right. Looks like she still is.
- Frida's boss - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 7:02 pm:
More clickbait lawsuits and veiled language to get press involved. Not actual real law work or attorney work just ginning up people.
- low level - Tuesday, Oct 1, 24 @ 7:24 pm:
==Illinoisan tax dollars should not be funneled into a Chinese company accused of forced labor and CCP collaboration==
Thank you for your statement. We are now more stupid for having read such nonsense.