Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Madigan corruption trial roundup: Jury views undercover videos
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Madigan corruption trial roundup: Jury views undercover videos

Thursday, Nov 7, 2024 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* Sun-Times

Federal jurors Wednesday heard Michael J. Madigan’s allies talking on secret FBI recordings about an “old-fashioned patronage system,” the need to keep Madigan “happy” in Springfield and how it’s unwise to “put anything in writing” because “all that can do is hurt ya.”

All told, prosecutors spent their day playing more than a dozen recordings in the corruption trial of Madigan, Illinois’ former longtime House speaker. Former ComEd executive Fidel Marquez, who wore a wire for the FBI in 2019, continued to occupy the witness stand.

Jurors saw their first undercover video recordings since testimony began. Included were some of the most prominent recordings from 2023’s ComEd bribery trial, and Marquez’s testimony mirrored the comments he delivered then.

Jurors saw grainy video of Madigan ally Michael McClain meeting inside Saputo’s restaurant, a well-known Springfield haunt where “Higher and Higher” by Jackie Wilson could be heard in the background. They also saw then-City Club President Jay Doherty hold up four fingers to signal that former 13th Ward Ald. Frank Olivo was being paid $4,000 a month by ComEd.

* Capitol News Illinois

Earlier in their conversation, McClain affirmed Marquez’s concern that Dominguez may view Doherty’s contract through the lens of his former job as a federal prosecutor and start asking questions. In that case, McClain said, Marquez should explain how valuable the subcontractors were to Madigan’s political organization, adding that the arrangement was a “favor.”

McClain also explained that by using Doherty’s contract to pay the Madigan allies, ComEd had insulation from any federal tax investigation “if the IRS ever comes in and says, ‘Who are these guys and what do they do?’”

“It’s Doherty’s contract, so Doherty’s the one that has to – has to prove that,” he said.

McClain then offered to talk to Dominguez himself. After initially declining the help because the matter was internal to ComEd and McClain’s involvement might be seen as “inappropriate,” Marquez invited McClain to a meeting with Dominguez and Hooker in early March 2019.

* Courthouse News

In another February 2019 meeting Marquez recorded with McClain and Hooker, Marquez floated the possibility that Dominguez, a former federal prosecutor, would reject the arrangement ComEd reached with Doherty and Madigan’s Chicago associates.

Hooker warned that Madigan — whom Marquez referred to as “our friend” in the video — may not be so supportive of the energy company’s work in Springfield if that was the case.

“You’re not going to do it? You’re not going to do something for me, I don’t have to do anything for you,” Hooker imagined the then-speaker might think.

As it turned out, the worry was unfounded. Marquez and McClain spoke with Dominguez in early March 2019, and when Marquez breached the issue, Dominguez was amenable to maintaining the arrangement with Doherty and the Chicago subcontractors. He said lobbyists often seem like they’re doing nothing until “the magic moment,” and agreed with Marquez that in that moment they may be worth “a hundred times” what they’re being paid.

* Tribune

The meeting recorded by Marquez in Doherty’s downtown office took place a little over a month after he’d agreed to cooperate with the FBI. As a pretense for the discussion, Marquez said he needed guidance on what to tell incoming ComEd CEO Joseph Dominguez about the off-the-books subcontractor arrangement.

Doherty, who on the video appears pink-faced and jovial, explained to Marquez repeatedly that the subcontractors — who included precinct captains Ray Nice and Ed Moody and former 23rd Ward Ald. Michael Zalewski — did basically nothing. He rarely even communicated with them, he said.

“They keep their mouth shut,” he said. “But do they, do they do anything for me on a day-to-day basis? No.”

But, Doherty said, it was important to keep the arrangement going in order to maintain good relations with Madigan, Doherty said on the video.

“To keep Mike Madigan happy, I think it’s worth it,” he said. “I don’t think I’d tinker with that.”

       

13 Comments »
  1. - Um, no - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:12 am:

    This whole thing is a mob movie. Who plays “Don” Madigan in the feature film?


  2. - Anyone Remember - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:23 am:

    “… old-fashioned patronage system .. .”

    IF Madigan is guilty because of that, why did Fitzgerald let Fawell skate? Why didn’t he go after the Sangamon County GOP, whose Chairman was one of Ryan’s departmental heads?


  3. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:29 am:

    The video and audio will definitely leave a mark on MJM. They speak for themselves—there is no need for the Feds to create a narrative. Plain-spoken corruption is obvious, and the MJM legal team can’t really impeach the voracity of the video and audio.


  4. - low level - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:33 am:

    ==Why didn’t he go after the Sangamon County GOP==

    Or DuPage and Pate.


  5. - Flyin'Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:34 am:

    “old-fashioned patronage system”

    Yeah, I remember those.

    Winchester, Dunn, and Luechtefeld had smaller, but highly successful franchises here in Southern Illinois.


  6. - Anyone Remember - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:37 am:

    “Or DuPage and Pate.”

    Fair point. However, many of “patronage crimes” were committed in the Howlett Building. The Citizens For Ryan PC using SOS Personnel records was there, not Cook or DuPage …


  7. - Amalia - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 10:48 am:

    why not go after certain people? well, for example, Topinka was a fbi source for years, per a sun times article. so who knows who else was.


  8. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 11:09 am:

    ===Who plays “Don” Madigan in the feature film?===

    William H. Macy.


  9. - Excitable Boy - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 11:31 am:

    - IF Madigan is guilty because of that, why did Fitzgerald let Fawell skate? -

    Madigan isn’t on trial for patronage, he’s on trial for accepting bribes in exchange for legislative support. Why is this so hard for many of you to understand?


  10. - low level - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 12:50 pm:

    ==he’s on trial for accepting bribes in exchange for legislative support.==

    Its a little more complicated then that, because at no time is the government alleging Madigan took anything in exchange for helping pass legislation.


  11. - Barrister's Lectern - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 1:05 pm:

    === Madigan isn’t on trial for patronage, he’s on trial for accepting bribes in exchange for legislative support. Why is this so hard for many of you to understand? ===

    The feds are alleging that the patronage = bribes.


  12. - low level - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 1:58 pm:

    ==The feds are alleging that the patronage = bribes==

    Exactly. I don’t see why that is so difficult for Excitable Boy and others to understand.


  13. - Jimmy 87 - Thursday, Nov 7, 24 @ 2:08 pm:

    ===Why is this so hard for many of you to understand?===

    For me, it’s that none of the testimony thus far has directly or even indirectly - shown that Madigan wanted or asked that Nice, Moody, Ald. Zalewski or anyone else for that matter be added to the Com Ed lobbyist list.

    The Union Leauge Club meeting with Hooker actually refutes this idea, he talks about hiring friends of Madigan as being his idea. He says, “I was the one — me and McClain was — I was the one that created it,” Hooker said on the recording. “And I had to explain it to Frank.”

    Lookk, you can call it a “bribe”, or you can call it “patronage,” but where is the evidence that Madigan - quoting from the statue here - “demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to receive or accept anything of value” in return for being “influenced in the performance of any official act?

    I’m not sure having a bunch of lobbyist talking about ways to keep the Speaker of the House happy meets that threshold unless the feds can show that Madigan - even indirectly - knew or asked for any of this.


TrackBack URI

Uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.



* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded
* Whatever happened, the city has a $40 million budget hole it didn't disclose until now
* Manar gives state agencies budget guidance: Cut, cut, cut
* Roundup: Ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis testifies in Madigan corruption trial
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller