Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded

Friday, Nov 22, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Lake County News-Sun

A Lake County judge Friday dismissed all criminal counts against Waukegan City Clerk Janet Kilkelly, ruling that misleading grand jury testimony compromised indictments that alleged Kilkelly illegally waived fees to local businesses as part of a COVID-era relief effort.

Judge Patricia Fix said the flawed grand jury testimony from an Illinois State Police investigator resulted in due-process violations against Kilkelly, who had been charged in March with 10 counts of official misconduct and misapplication of funds.

“I would also like to thank the Waukegan residents who have always supported me, and who sent me their support and their well-wishes during this very difficult time,” she said in the statement. “As someone who has dedicated over 40 years of their life to the Waukegan community, I promise to continue serving and helping all Waukegan residents as their city clerk.”

Her attorneys, Donald Morrison, James Bertucci and Ricardo Meza, issued a joint statement that said in part, “We were always confident that Janet was 100% innocent of all charges and today’s ruling confirms that.”

Let’s drill down a bit.

* From Judge Patricia Fix’s ruling, with highlighting by me

At the grand jury proceeding on these charges, the [Lake County State’s Attorney’s office] offered testimony from only one witness, Illinois State Police Special Agent David Juergensen. Juergensen explained that under the Waukegan City Code of Ordinances, Sam Cunningham, Mayor of Waukegan from 2017 to 2021, also acted as the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. In this capacity, Mayor Cunningham had the authority to appoint one Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner.

Jurgensen then testified:

    Q: .. .in approximately 2017, did Mayor Cunningham appoint [Defendant] to serve as Deputy Liquor Control Commissioner?
    A: Mayor Cunningham did do that, yes.
    Q: And [Defendant] remained in that role through June of 2021?
    A: That is correct.
    Q: And in that role, she possessed final authority to issue and approve liquor and gaming licenses?
    A: She did.

This testimony was false. […]

in the hearing before this court, former Waukegan Mayor Sam Cunningham testified that he never appointed Defendant as Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner. Current Waukegan Mayor Ann Taylor also testified that she never appointed Defendant as Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner.

In his testimony before this court, Juergensen stated that Defendant never identified herself as Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner. Juergensen admitted that he assumed Defendant had been appointed as Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner. Juergensen testified that he never asked former Mayor Cunningham whether Cunningham appointed Defendant as Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner. Juergensen further informed the court that none of the documents he reviewed identified Defendant in that role.

You gotta be kidding me.

* Ah, but there’s more

Juergensen then testified that in his review of all the businesses who applied for the Covid credit relief, some were in good standing, but “the greatest majority were not in good standing.” […]

Based on Juergensen’s testimony the grand jury granted a true bill.

* Except, there was no definition of “good standing” in the ordinance

Glaringly, Juergensen informed this court that he had his own personal idea of what the term “in good standing” meant for an organization to receive the Covid credit. Further, that crucial, and potentially exculpatory witnesses were never interviewed by Juergenson to ascertain a definition of “in good standing”.

Further, former Mayor Sam Cunningham testified that he did not know what the term “in good standing” meant; although the purpose of the resolution was to reduce required fees for Waukegan businesses impacted by the pandemic.

Robert Long, an attorney who drafted Resolution No. 20-R-95 as Waukegan’s Corporation Counsel, admitted that he did not include a definition of “in good standing” in the resolution, but had intended to prevent businesses with serious infractions, such as building code violations and repeated police activity, from receiving the credit.

None of those businesses had any of those “serious infractions” Long mentioned.

Unreal.

* Back to Judge Fix

In this matter, so much misleading and false information was presented to the grand jury on material issues that the denial of due process is unequivocally clear. John Adam’s once famously stated “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” Perhaps even more pointedly Mark Twain stated, “Get your facts first”. Indeed, had ALL the facts been initially known and presented to the Grand Jury, there would likely have been a different outcome.

In conclusion, the court finds the State’s presentation of a wholly inaccurate definition of the role of Defendant as Deputy Local Liquor Control Commissioner, coupled with the witnesses unsubstantiated personal definition of the term “in good standing” to be false, misleading and material and as such, affected the grand jury deliberations in a way that caused prejudice, actual and substantial, and a complete denial of due process.

So, Kilkelly was indicted based on the imagination of the investigator who also served as the lone grand jury witness?

The Illinois State Police and the Lake County State’s Attorney need to answer for this.

       

11 Comments »
  1. - Roadrager - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 2:06 pm:

    Well, sounds like somebody’s getting a very stern talking-to and a suspension up to one day long.


  2. - Annonin' - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 2:08 pm:

    Illinois Judge named Fixed…that is a hoot


  3. - OneOpinion - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 2:30 pm:

    This sort of thing is why many have suspicious and even negative views about law enforcement.

    It’s unfortunate that the judicial process moves so slowly to give victims of false accusations their reputations and lives back. Lake County ought to pay her legal fees or offer some sort of compensation, and the wrongdoers should be appropriately punished — but don’t hold your breath.


  4. - Candy Dogood - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 2:44 pm:

    ===The Illinois State Police and the Lake County State’s Attorney need to answer for this. ===

    Understatement of the week.


  5. - Moe Berg - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 2:46 pm:

    Lawmakers should demand a review of all Juergensen’s work, in case this kind of shoddiness isn’t an anomaly, and also the supervisory structure that presumably he works within.


  6. - @misterjayem - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 2:54 pm:

    The sworn testimony of Illinois State Police Special Agent David Juergensen wasn’t “misleading.”

    It was false.

    It was baseless.

    It was untrue.

    Lake County News-Sun soft-pedaled the officer’s dishonesty.

    – MrJM


  7. - Bigtwich - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 3:07 pm:

    When she was charged with fifteen felony’s the news report included these quotes’

    “The public must be able to trust that those who work in public service will follow the law and use our tax dollars as intended,” Illinois State Police Director Brendan Kelly said last month.

    “The ISP Special Investigations Unit will continue working to ensure accountability at all levels of government,” Kelly said.

    Lake County State’s Attorney Eric Rinehart said that public officials “must be held to the highest standards.”

    Hope those statements are still true.


  8. - Barrister's Lectern - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 3:08 pm:

    I would expect this from a local PD, but not the Illinois State Police. They are usually better than this. They need to be better.


  9. - Robert Lincoln - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 3:18 pm:

    The obvious first question for them is, why did this ISP special agent begin this investigation and at whose request. At whose request did he provide false/ inaccurate testimony? What did Rinehart know, when did he know it, why did he choose to indict it AND why did he stand behind it in court after these facts came to light


  10. - NIU Grad - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 3:47 pm:

    So she was indicted for a crime that didn’t exist in a position that she did not really serve in?

    How did this case make it this far to begin with?


  11. - TJ - Friday, Nov 22, 24 @ 3:54 pm:

    I’m smelling a pretty slam dunk lawsuit against multiple parties here.


TrackBack URI

Uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.



* Federal appeals court stays Downstate federal judge's gun ruling (Updated)
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Illinois Supreme Court: Raw cannabis smell is enough to trigger warrantless automobile searches
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Carp-e Diem!
* Roundup: Jurors see Madigan’s list of recommended hires for Pritzker administration
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller