* Capitol City Now…
One of the big bills expected to run during the just-concluded lame duck session, the regulation of hemp derivatives such as delta-8, did not even get called in the House.
The sponsor, State Rep. Kam Buckner (D-Chicago), says he is hopeful to nail it down this year. Gov. JB Pritzker criticized opponents for killing a bill meant to protect children. But Buckner says it’s just not that simple.
“It’s a complex issue. It’s a public health issue, it’s a public safety issue, it’s an economic development issue, it’s a regulatory issue,” said Buckner as the 103rd General Assembly adjourned. “When you talk about all four of those big areas, they take some conversation. This isn’t the first time we have had that conversation. I think the first delta-8 bill was filed three years ago.”
* Brownfield Ag News…
The president of the Illinois Healthy Alternatives Association says a proposal in the General Assembly would decimate the state’s hemp industry.
Justin Ward says the bill, which seeks to ban the sale of products like HHC and Delta 8 outside of licensed cannabis dispensaries, would put many hemp farmers out of business.
“It would absolutely wipe out the entire hemp industry here in Illinois.” He says, “It would make 95% of the products currently available on the market, and widely popular among Illinois consumers, illegal. This would be hugely detrimental to farms like ourselves, potentially putting us out of business.” […]
Neither bill was called in the lame duck session, but Ward, who’s also co-founder of Stoney Branch Farms in Rushville, says he expects the issue to re-surface in the spring legislative session.
* Rep. Suzanne Ness introduced HB1146 last week…
Amends the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act. Provides that, beginning 18 months after the amendatory Act’s effective date, (1) no store or food service business shall provide or sell a single-use plastic carryout bag to a customer and (2) no grocery store shall provide or sell a single-use paper carryout bag to a customer. Preempts home rule powers. Contains other provisions. Effective immediately.
* Crain’s…
The new session of the Illinois General Assembly is likely to consider further regulation of the health industry’s middlemen for prescription drugs, including a sweeping bill regulating rebates, audits, steering customers toward preferred pharmacies, and specialty drug issues.
House Bill 1159, introduced by state Rep. Thaddeus Jones, D-South Holland, would increase the state’s regulation of pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, that work with self-insured employer plans as well as health insurance providers.
The bill, similar to one Jones introduced last session, would amend the Illinois Insurance Code to forbid PBMs from limiting access to prescriptions or steering patients to certain pharmacies, specifically by “unreasonably designating the covered prescription drugs as a specialty drug,” the bill’s synopsis said.
It also would make PBMs remit 100% of any drug company rebates or fees to the health benefit plan sponsor, consumer or employer and forbid a PBM from paying a reimbursement less than the national average drug acquisition cost, plus a professional dispensing fee.
* HB1178 filed by Rep. Rita Mayfield…
Amends the Juvenile Court Act of 1987. Provides that a minor found to be guilty may be committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice if the minor is at least 14 (rather than 13) years and under 20 years of age, provided that the commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice shall be made only if the minor was found guilty of a felony offense or first degree murder. Provides that when a minor of the age of at least 14 (rather than 13) years is adjudged delinquent for the offense of first degree murder, the court shall declare the minor a ward of the court and order the minor committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice until the minor’s 21st birthday, without the possibility of aftercare release, furlough, or nonemergency authorized absence for a period of 5 years from the date the minor was committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice. Amends the Juvenile Court Act of 1987. Provides that on or after July 1, 2026 and before July 1, 2027, any minor 12 years of age or older arrested pursuant to the Act if there is probable cause to believe that the minor is a delinquent minor and that secure custody is a matter of immediate and urgent necessity, in light of a serious threat to the physical safety of a person or persons in the community or in order to secure the presence of the minor at the next hearing, as evidenced by a demonstrable record of willful failure to appear at a scheduled court hearing within the past 12 months, may be kept or detained in an authorized detention facility. Provides that on or after July 1, 2027, minors age 12 years of age and under 13 years of age and charged with first degree murder, aggravated criminal sexual assault, aggravated battery in which a firearm was used in the offense, or aggravated vehicular hijacking, may be kept or detained in an authorized detention facility. Provides that no minor under 13 (rather than under 12) years of age shall be detained in a county jail or a municipal lockup for more than 6 hours. Provides that instead of detention, minors under the age of 13 who are in conflict with the law may be held accountable through a petition under the Minors Requiring Authoritative Intervention Article of the Act, or may be held accountable through a community mediation program.
* Rep. Maurice West filed HB1272…
Creates the Wholesale Prescription Drug Importation Program Act. Requires the Department of Public Health to establish the Wholesale Prescription Drug Importation Program. Provides that the Department shall implement the program by: contracting with one or more prescription drug wholesalers and Canadian suppliers to import prescription drugs and provide prescription drug cost savings to consumers in this State; developing a registration process for health benefit plan issuers, health care providers, and pharmacies to obtain and dispense prescription drugs imported under the program; developing a list of prescription drugs, including the prices of those drugs, that meet certain requirements set forth under the Act and publishing the list on the Department’s website; establishing an outreach and marketing plan to generate program awareness; ensuring the program and the prescription drug wholesalers that contract with this State comply with certain federal tracking, tracing, verification, and identification requirements; and other actions. Sets forth eligibility criteria for prescription drugs that may be imported into the State under the program. Contains provisions concerning anticompetitive behavior monitoring; program funding; program expansion; audit procedures; annual reporting requirements; the adoption of rules to implement the Act; and federal waiver or authorization requirements. Effective July 1, 2025.
* Crain’s…
State Rep. Will Guzzardi, D-Chicago, has introduced a bill to divest the University of Illinois System from investments in fossil fuels.
The bill, which was introduced earlier this week, calls on the university system’s board of trustees to “not invest” the assets of any endowment fund in investments tied to any fossil fuel company. […]
Guzzardi, who introduced a similar bill last year that died in committee, told Crain’s the bill is part of an effort by students at the university system who have been demanding their leaders take action on divestment in fossil fuels and address their climate concerns. […]
In an emailed statement, an Illinois system spokesperson said, “The University of Illinois System, the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the U of I Foundation value and demonstrate sustainable practices and innovation across our multiple missions, to help achieve the goal of a carbon-neutral economy. We employ a comprehensive strategy to discover, develop and implement solutions that reduce our carbon footprint and that can be shared across our nation and around the world.”
* Shaw Media columnist Scott Holland…
Everything old is new again, an axiom that feels especially true in the early days of a legislative session.
Consider House Bill 1089, from state Rep. Maurice West, D-Rockford, which would create the Illinois Container Fee and Deposit Act and, more directly, add an extra dime to the purchase price of beverage cans and bottles. Consumers could return the empties for a full refund, and 75% of unclaimed deposit money would go to the state Environmental Protection Agency while the rest is prorated amongst distributors based on sales.
If that sounds familiar, that’s because of the connections to Senate Bill 85 from January 2023. That proposal went through several revisions, collected sponsors and bounced between the Executive and Assignments committees before stalling out in late June. Last January I shared a piece from Marissa Heffernan at the trade publication Resource Recycling (tinyurl.com/ILbottlebill) which remains relevant for its exploration of factors like landfill fees, municipal expenses, litter abatement and input from recycling facilities.
The topic drew quality reader feedback, including from those familiar with similar programs in Iowa and Michigan and others who, like me, considered container redemption our first job, whether it was glass bottles in East Texas in the 1960s or feeding the aluminum can machine at Jewel in the 1980s until it spit out enough coins to buy a pack of baseball cards.
- Google Is Your Friend - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 9:24 am:
==It’s a public health issue, it’s a public safety issue, it’s an economic development issue, it’s a regulatory issue==
Sounds like the governor was his own worst enemy by pulling the Nixon/Reagan drug warrior line instead.
- Top hat - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 9:29 am:
It’s time for the Governor’s office to get involved in the PBM issue. The pbms are truly middlemen and gonads no value to patient care or cost containment. They negotiate rebates with manufacturers then pocket the savings. Then they deny payments to pharmacists to profit even more. Ask yourself, is there a pharmacy in your neighborhood that has closed? The PBMs are forcing our pharmacies to close. The governor needs to wake up and take real action before it’s too late.
- RNUG - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 10:17 am:
Banning plastic bags I’m fine with.
But they shouldn’t ban paper. Brown paper bags should be ok. Unlike plastic, paper easily biodegrades. And they paper companies use tree farms they actively manage and replant.
- RNUG - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 10:20 am:
== “not invest” the assets of any endowment fund in investments tied to any fossil fuel company ==
The goal of investing is to maximize returns. Limiting investments to certain sectors does not always allow that.
I’m ok if you want to make that a second tier decision point, all other factors being equal.
- Steve - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 10:21 am:
“from investments in fossil fuels.”
What a great way to underperform the S&P 500. Fossil fuels aren’t going away anytime soon. Just ask China and India.
- Oldgrumpyguy - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 10:58 am:
I am all for eliminating single use plastic bags but keep the paper. Without them bags become another expense put on those that are already struggling just to buy groceries.
- Chicagonk - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 11:00 am:
There has to be a reasonable middle ground on the Delta 8 issue. Part of the issue I see is that it is so difficult to get a dispensary license. Michigan has a law that would be a good model law for Illinois requiring licensing and testing, but it is a lot easier to open a dispensary in Michigan than Illinois. I would imagine the hemp industry will be skeptical of any effort to add licensing.
- Donnie Elgin - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 11:00 am:
= single use plastic bags=
My dog provides a second use for the bags I bring home.
- TheInvisibleMan - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 11:30 am:
“The goal of investing is to maximize returns.”
That’s certainly ‘a’ goal of investing. It it by no means the only goal of investing.
Sometimes the goal is financial stability to minimize swings in performance. That comes with a lower total return, but a more stable year to year result. This is often a strategy used when stable cash flow is more important than total return.
Sometimes the goal is profit over everything, and an Enron predictably pops out of that. CALPERS from 25 years ago is a good example of why someone would want to makes rules about where and how to invest which may limit total returns in the short-term.
Sometimes the goal is to use capital to push forward a certain social or philosophical goal. In these situations gains are measured by more than just total dollar gains. This is the world where educational endowments typically exist.
Endowment funds are not expected to have the same profile as growth funds. In fact endowment funds regularly have restrictions within them prohibiting how the money can be invested, which will lower the maximum possible return. You would be hard pressed to find an endowment fund using a investment strategy of maximum growth. Investment is not the goal, providing for the goal of the non-profit controlling the endowment is the goal. Endowment funds operating under UPMIFA(of which the state of Illinois is one) generally use a drawdown of 4%-5% per year to support operations, while expecting an average return of 7%-8% to allow for the long term availability of the fund for future generations. That default position of many endowment funds is already lower than the long term ~9% return of the S&P.
Investing has many goals. As this is an educational endowment fund, I doubt their goals are the same as the finance-bros with all the financial sophistication of ‘chart goes up’.
- H-W - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 11:33 am:
I am sorry, but if creating laws that prevent minors from consuming intoxicating hemp products without a medical order is going to destroy an industry, then then industry was built upon shaky grounds to begin with.
I am not opposed to hemp, at all. But I am opposed to children having unbridled access to intoxicating products without a medical order or express parental permission.
And I make the same argument against Kratom. Regulated it, or prevent it. Recreational use of Kratom can kill, and has already done so. Manufacturers of recreational drugs and alcohol and cigarettes have a moral obligation to protect children and to prevent abuse.
- Merica - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 11:49 am:
I am (a Millenial) and an occasional cannabis user of both flower and edibles. I have no financial or economic personal interest in the issue. This past NYE i went to a party, and ate what i thought was an edible, it had packaging that looked
like a typical cannabis edible. anyway, it worked, that wasn’t the problem, the problem was it didn’t stop working. i was high/bedridden for 4 days straight. totally incapacitated. i later found out it was a delta 8/9 whatever type of product. Anyway, whether it is regulated, or not, be careful with that stuff. it really messed me up
- Rich Miller - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 12:09 pm:
===the problem was it didn’t stop working===
One of the major benefits of legalization is package labeling. You don’t have to trust your dealer or some rando employee at a run-down gas station.
- Rabid - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 12:32 pm:
Hemp with a chemical added for human consumption is not an industry. It’s Frankenstein weed
- Rabid - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 12:32 pm:
Hemp with a chemical added for human consumption is not an industry. It’s Frankenstein weed
- Mason County - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 1:21 pm:
RNUG has made two comments. He beat me to it. Both summarize my opinion.
- Anonymous - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 4:55 pm:
You know, when the whole hemp thing first started, it was about making another product for a farmer to raise besides corn and beans that would help with crop rotation, as well as provide a good source of organic fiber for making clothing, concrete,and other items and the oil was just a home health remedy with no cannabinoids in it. Indeed, there was much hoopla at the time about proving the hemp was not containing any mind altering properties because the pot growers and cops were concerned. I back hemp production under that description but now it seems people seeking easy money are end- running around the original premise and making an out and out competing product versus the controlled pot sales. I don’t like it because it’s dodging the taxes that should be paid on it, it’s unfair competition against the pot growers that had to go through all the hoops we made. The gas station stuff is not regulated or standardized or vetted for safety and efficacy. Either make them follow the same rules as the pot growers or ban it outright because this limbo situation is not good.
- Give Us Barabbas - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 4:55 pm:
Anonymous just now was me, sorry.
- Leslie K - Monday, Jan 13, 25 @ 9:05 pm:
===One of the major benefits of legalization is package labeling. You don’t have to trust your dealer or some rando employee at a run-down gas station.===
This. Exactly this.