Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Jul 8, 2025 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* The Tribune’s Alice Yin


The Question: Should home rule units of government be allowed to enact progressive taxes on their own? Explain.

       

25 Comments »
  1. - curtis - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 11:26 am:

    Yes, the current options available to local governments are too regressive and broad based. Sales and property taxes are really only options. Cities should be permitted to enact progressive property taxation, income taxes, etc. Residents have direct say in these policies via their local elected officials. Progressive property taxation should be permitted.


  2. - Homebody - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 11:27 am:

    If you’re going to allow home rule units to pass taxes in general, then yes you should allow them to pass progressive taxes.


  3. - Excitable Boy - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 11:33 am:

    Yes, I’m always in favor of more democracy.


  4. - Sue - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 11:46 am:

    Oh yes-Can you see the campaign adds- Hi - I am JB Pritzker-the governor who signed the legislation allowing folks like Brandon Johnson to raise your taxes so he can spend even more on his social programs- vote for me to be your next president


  5. - yinn - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 11:55 am:

    ==Residents have direct say in these policies via their local elected officials.==

    Referendums are the direct say we need more often, and home rule kills referendum requirements.

    Illinois needs to reform home rule to curb current abuses. Until then, count me as a “no” for granting HR units additional taxation powers.


  6. - levivotedforjudy - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 11:55 am:

    Makes sense. If I was a legislator in Woodstock or Collinsville, why would I care if people in Edgewater or Lincoln Park paid a tax that didn’t impact my district.


  7. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:05 pm:

    Bold vision considering the only progressive taxation idea presented legally during his tenure already failed (Bring CHicago Home).

    But you can only squeeze Chad and Trixie so much.


  8. - JS Mill - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:12 pm:

    If we had consistently competent and responsible government then I would support the idea. We don’t have that so I am a “no”.


  9. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:15 pm:

    No, Illinois already has substantial home rule powers.

    This is not a serious comment by the Mayor. Even if he had such authority, he’d just try to make the Governor do it anyway.


  10. - slippery slope - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:29 pm:

    I was always under the impression that the Local Distributive Government Fund (the percentage of State Income Tax that is distributed directly to municipalities) was created when the income tax was formed, as a compromise so that local municipalities could not pass their own income tax. The State collects it and passes it back to the municipalities. In theory, this avoids folks from playing games with their residence address, and puts all of the cities on a level playing field. However the State has reduced that amount and kept it for themselves, and when the tax rate increased, there was no corresponding increase in payout to the LGDF. It may be time to eliminate the LGDF and reduce the State tax rate, and then allow the cities to pass their own tax.


  11. - ChicagoBars - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:30 pm:

    No. To echo the comment above, if specific proposals were done by referendum vote like Bring Chicago Home, that would be fine.

    But I’ve watched too many awful fiscal policy votes at Chicago City Hall to let the body anywhere near progressive tax creation authority too.


  12. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:56 pm:

    Sure. Everyone likes to compare us to our surrounding states. Indiana counties have their own local income tax rates. I’m sure you people that cheer for Illinois to be like other states should be perfectly find with local governments setting their own taxes.


  13. - Socially DIstant Watcher - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 12:56 pm:

    For home rule towns under a million people? Yes.

    /s


  14. - Steve - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 1:04 pm:

    No, progressive taxation is banned in the Illinois constition … as of now.


  15. - Perrid - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 1:06 pm:

    Sure. If Chicago decides they don’t like whatever tax scheme Brandon cooks up to give money to the CTU, they can vote him and their alderman out.


  16. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 1:19 pm:

    Yes, for several reasons. Republicans enacted severe federal cuts. Trump is fighting Democratic cities. The state won’t enact a progressive income tax, and downstate overwhelmingly supports massive handouts to the wealthiest. The city already taxes. Chicago is limited by things beyond its control. Just like the federal and state government, if the voters don’t like the policies, they can vote out their alderpeople and mayor.


  17. - West Sider - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 1:25 pm:

    I have huge respect for @chicagobars- but the business community spent enormous amounts of money dishonestly framing Bring Chicago Home. In a perfect world this is a problem solved by a state graduating income tax- but this is in no way a perfect world. So yes, Home-rule municipalities need better tools to solve their financial problems.


  18. - ChicagoBars - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:10 pm:

    Thanks for the kind words West Sider…but Governor Pritzker also spent enormous amounts of money trying (and failing) to pass a statewide progressive income tax.

    Yes, Citadel guy spent heavily too but the Pritzker political operation is skilled and couldn’t sell it. I think Chicago & Illinois voters have tax fatigue and deep distrust the new money would be spent wisely, and it doesn’t take a huge war chest to activate those citizen concerns.


  19. - mrp - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:18 pm:

    Yes, how else to pay for expensive consultant jargon like “a more enriched conversation”? /s


  20. - Who else - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:26 pm:

    If you’re going to get anyone to vote to give locals more taxing authority, it’s going to have to be tied to caps, freezes and reductions in current revenue raisers, specifically, property taxes.

    And if the state gives locals new authority to raise revenue, locals should be ready to see a reduction in LGDF. I think locals imagine the state will continue to carry their water by continuing to funnel money that would otherwise be GRF to locals via things like LGDF. I think if locals want the authority they should accept that the state won’t be enabling a double-dip.


  21. - Tim - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:31 pm:

    No. Certainly not with the people we have in office currently.


  22. - Excitable Boy - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:39 pm:

    - the Pritzker political operation is skilled and couldn’t sell it. -

    I agree in general but that campaign was a disaster from the get go. They let the opposition get way ahead of them and made the whole thing way too confusing for voters.


  23. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:50 pm:

    If municiaplities can enact progressive revenue streams without going through the state authority, then the same should be true for declaring bankruptcy.


  24. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 2:57 pm:

    === the Pritzker political operation is skilled and couldn’t sell it===

    The Fair Tax received 71 percent of the Chicago vote


  25. - Odysseus - Tuesday, Jul 8, 25 @ 3:24 pm:

    Generally, yes, I support home rule districts being able to tax very broadly.

    Having watched the MBJ administration fail so hard, Chicago is a very strong argument against.


TrackBack URI

Anonymous commenters, uncivil comments, rumor-mongering, disinformation and profanity of any kind will be deleted.

(required)

(not required)



* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* SB 328 Puts Illinois’s Economy At Risk
* Question of the day
* SB 328: Separating Lies From Truth
* Meta deal is Constellation’s blueprint for four Illinois nuclear plants
* Crowded 9th Congressional District race grows as Sen. Simmons joins the field (Updated)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller