Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » State wants judge to review TRO on judicial redistricting law: “Respondents never sought this relief”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
State wants judge to review TRO on judicial redistricting law: “Respondents never sought this relief”

Friday, Jan 28, 2022

* Post-Dispatch earlier this week

Madison County State’s Attorney Tom Haine filed a lawsuit Friday in an attempt to block what he called a “dubious” new Illinois law that requires judicial elections to be decided by voters in new sub-circuits rather than countywide.

Illinois GOP leaders have called the new law a judicial “power grab” in the Metro East county where much of the nation’s lucrative asbestos litigation is filed but voters have lurched to the right in recent elections.

* Also from earlier this week

Madison County State’s Attorney Tom Haine announced today that a Sangamon County judge has granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) halting the implementation of the recently-enacted legislation creating new judicial subcircuits in Madison County.

The TRO was in response to a lawsuit Haine filed on January 21 on behalf of Madison County which challenges the constitutionality of the subcircuit legislation. Judge Ryan Cadagin of Illinois’ Seventh Judicial Circuit issued the ruling on January 24, 2022 after an in-person hearing in Springfield, and the text of the order was released today, January 25.

The four-page TRO prevents the Governor, the State Board of Elections, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court “from taking any steps to enforce or institute the Judicial Circuits Districting Act of 2022.” Specifically it orders the Clerk of Supreme Court to “recertify the original vacancies of the Honorable David Dugan and the Honorable Richard Tognarelli, as they were before the passing of the Act.” The order also mandates that “Any petitions collected on or between January 22 and January 24 for a sub-circuit election [for the above vacancies] shall be accepted by the State Board of Elections for the reinstated county wide residency election.” And it states that it “shall continue in full force and effect until the court conducts a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction.”

The preliminary injunction hearing is set for February 15.

* From the state’s petition for review today

First, the circuit court did not preserve the status quo of a duly enacted law taking effect but rather upended the status quo.

Second, the circuit court committed an error of law and abused its discretion when it entered an overly broad TRO that invalidates the Act not just in Madison County, where respondents sought the injunctive relief based on section 2f-13, but statewide. Respondents never sought this relief.

Third, the TRO improperly orders the Illinois Supreme Court Clerk to recertify two judicial vacancies in Madison County, which currently are allocated to a new judicial subcircuit created under the Act. But the Clerk has no such authority. Only the Chief Justice of the Illinois Supreme Court may make such certifications.

And it goes on. More here.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - SWIL_Voter - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 11:56 am:

    Haine wants all of Madison County’s judges coming from richer whiter Edwardsville as opposed to any of the more diverse parts of the county.

  2. - Chicagonk - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 12:22 pm:

    The law passed was one of the more cynical pieces of legislation I’ve seen.

  3. - Red Ketcher - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 12:42 pm:

    Read the Petition and Memorandum
    Sounds like valid reasons for Appellate Court to send it back to Sangamon County.
    Of course, Haine & Crew’s response not yet in
    But , if Betting right now it would be on the State.

  4. - Galway Bay - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 12:57 pm:

    I always thought the Mesothelioma commercial where they flash the cities where the “national” firm has offices. Edwardsville, Illinois always sticks out as an odd location until you realize it’s located in one of the most plaintiff friendly locations in the country. As counties down state go more R the trial bar got nervous that this jackpot of a county was shifting away from them. So you get a bill like this.

  5. - just the facts - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 1:51 pm:

    == The law passed was one of the more cynical pieces of legislation I’ve seen. ==

    Really curious why you think that. It’s similar to other laws passed by the General Assembly that sub circuit judicial circuits. There’s really nothing unique or different about this round of subcircuits. Many seem to not realize this is not such an extraordinary law and sub circuiting happens.

  6. - TheInvisibleMan - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 1:59 pm:

    This is getting interesting.

    I still don’t think the basis this is being argued, and the TRO was issued on, is a valid claim of constitutionality.

    may/shall language in the constitution(it’s may) combined with and/or qualifiers for each condition of the may/shall condition is bound to cause confusion. But no matter if it is may or shall as the primary condition, that condition will not impact the determination of the and/or secondary condition. It appears the argument made by the states attorney is erroneously assuming the second condition will be defined by the first, which it is also assuming is shall and not may.

    But again, I’m not a judge so my view is only worth the paper it isn’t printed on.

  7. - anon - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 2:12 pm:

    The GA didn’t have diversity in mind when it cut up Madison County–otherwise St. Clair would have been sub circuited. This is a total trial lawyer play

  8. - Sue - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 2:44 pm:

    Hey- I unfortunately have been there. Judges occasionally come up with rulings which neither party anticipated or requested. In and of itself that doesn’t afford a reversal.

  9. - TheInvisibleMan - Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 3:35 pm:

    Oh neat. I just read through the full ‘and it goes on’ link.

TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* A veritable cornucopia of new state laws
* Question of the day
* Campaign notebook
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Do we finally have the answer about whether Richard Irvin voted for Donald Trump?
* Because... Madigan!
* Reporting that got results
* Hopefully, the Thompson Center remodeling project will get rid of that "kind of creepy" vibe
* Local 150 endorses both Irvin and Pritzker in their primaries
* Let's be a bit more cautious out there
* Another look at the WGN poll
* Celebrate Illinois Statesmanship
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* * Comments now open * Late Friday news: Bailey gets $2.5 million from Uihlein; DGA blasts Irvin in second ad; ILGOP's Tracy on election fraud; Pritzker signs several bills
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller