Graduated income tax amendment passes 73-44-1
Monday, May 27, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Rep. Andre Thapedi (D-Chicago) did not vote (he voted earlier in the day, but did not vote on a bill immediately after the “fair tax” rollcall). Otherwise, all HDems voted for it. Here’s the roll call…
Reps. Yingling and Carroll, who had resisted voting for the measure, both voted for it today.
* The governor is holding a press conference. Check the live coverage post for updates…
What: Gov. Pritzker and lawmakers to speak about the Fair Tax constitutional amendment.
Where: Illinois State Capitol, Governor’s Office, Springfield
When: After the House vote has concluded.
The matter will be sent to the voters next year. Scott Kennedy has more on how that’ll work. Click here.
I will put react on our live coverage post.
107 Comments  
|
Heads up!
Monday, May 27, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The House Democrats have all their members in town today and appear to be teeing up SJRCA1, the graduated income tax constitutional amendment, for a vote this afternoon. Party caucusing will end at about 12:45 or so. Keep an eye on our live coverage post for moment-by-moment updates.
Meanwhile, the leaders will meet at 3:15 this afternoon.
Comments Off
|
Blowback
Monday, May 27, 2019 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Former state Rep. Jerry Costello II, D-Smithton, was the first Democrat in the Illinois House of Representatives to declare his opposition to Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s progressive income tax constitutional amendment earlier this year. He represented the 116th House District, in the southwest corner of the state.
New polling shows Costello’s successor would be wise to follow in his footsteps. State Rep. Nathan Reitz, D-Steeleville, could face significant backlash at the ballot box for voting “yes” on SJRCA 1, regardless of his vote on any income tax rates lawmakers eventually set.
Just 22% of likely voters in his district favor Pritzker’s proposal to put a progressive income tax constitutional amendment on the ballot while 57% oppose it, including 44% who “strongly oppose” the measure. And by a more than 2-to-1 margin (41% less likely versus 18% more likely), voters are less likely to vote for a state representative who voted in favor of the governor’s proposed constitutional amendment. Independents are less likely by a wide, 26-point margin (summary memo, topline, crosstabs).
This echoes district-level polling from March that showed strong opposition to Pritzker’s progressive income tax in nearby House districts 111 and 112, which are held by state Reps. Monica Bristow, D-Alton, and Katie Stuart, D-Edwardsville.
And it’s not just Southern Illinois.
New polling in House District 61 – held by freshman state Rep. Joyce Mason, D-Gurnee – shows likely voters by a 14-point margin would be less likely to vote for a state representative who helped to put Pritzker’s progressive income tax on the ballot (topline, crosstabs). Independents are less likely by 14 points (38% versus 24%), Republicans are less likely by 51 points (60% versus 9%), and Democrats are only more likely by 16 points (17% versus 33%).
Methodology: Fabrizio, Lee & Associates conducted a districtwide survey of 300 likely 2020 general election voters from May 19-20 in Illinois House District 116 and May 22-23 in House District 61 on behalf of Illinois Policy. N=300 likely voters, 40% cell phone users per district. The margin of error at the 95% confidence interval for 300 voters is ±5.66%.
Comments Off
|
Memorial Day roundup
Monday, May 27, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* It’s a holiday and comments will likely be slow today, so I decided to combine several topics into one roundup post…
* Gov. J.B. Pritzker vowed to ‘think big’ as a candidate, but is his agenda too big? Lawmakers will decide this week: Heading into the weekend, an optimistic Pritzker told reporters that many of his proposals were lined up and ready for a final vote. “There’s a lot of support for them and I’m looking forward to seeing some success over the next week,” he said. In that very first “think big” campaign ad for Pritzker from May 2017, it ended with an announcer saying of the Democrat: “Getting things done.” The next week may decide the veracity of that claim.
* Suburban Democrats key to pot legalization passage but some are breaking ranks: The Daily Herald reached out to 24 suburban Democrats. Twelve responded, and of those, eight or 67% were uncommitted or disagreed with the current version of the legalization policy. “I have concerns regarding the expungement language, and I don’t support allowing homegrown plants,” said Assistant Majority Leader Rep. Fred Crespo of Hoffman Estates. “Additionally, I’m also concerned about how difficult it would be for law enforcement to determine if someone is driving under the influence.” Illinoisans cultivating their own weed also was a deal-breaker for Sen. Laura Murphy of Des Plaines.
* Task force to study ways to reduce property taxes in Illinois as House prepares for progressive tax vote: “I think it’s the intent of the caucuses to try to work toward a summer task force to deal with property tax relief,” Zalewski said. Pritzker’s proposal includes property tax credits, but with local governments reporting more of their share of property tax revenue going into pensions, state Rep. Margo McDermed, R-Mokena, said the only way to address property taxes is to deal with the state’s pension crisis.
* Negotiations continue on gambling expansion bill: [Rep. Bob Rita] also said sports betting by itself may not have enough support to pass the legislature. “People want casinos in their regions,” he said. “If we go forward with just sports betting, where does that leave what we’ve been working on all these years? We’re looking for money. This is a way of putting additional money to the state.”
* Will latest changes make sports betting bill — and casinos — a winning wager?: New language regarding the sports betting measure was distributed on Thursday, and Zalewski, D-Riverside, on Friday said he doesn’t believe the matter is dead. The changes — which have not yet been filed in an amendment — would allow riverboats to operate a sportsbook immediately and would allow them to operate online betting 18 months after the bill is signed. It would do the same for horseracing tracks. “It’s also not as much as prohibiting, but just simply again, we’re going to give Illinois casinos a leg up before we go to an online platform,” said Zalewski, who is also the chair of the House Revenue and Finance Committee. Within that 18-month period, those wanting to make a bet on sports would have to physically enter a casino, instead of what they can currently do as FanDuel and DraftKings customers: take out their phone and make a bet. It would also allow sports facilities with seating over 20,000 to be able to apply for a license to operate a sports book at the facility within a five-block radius.
* Craft Brewers Fighting Construction Tax: The proposal would increase the state beer tax by 4.6 cents per gallon. Brewers claim that could cost them $70 million a year. Danielle D’Alessandro, executive director of the Illinois Craft Brewers Guild, said more than half of what customers pay for their six-pack or pint already goes to the government. That includes federal, state and local taxes. “Many may not realize it, but taxes are the most expensive ingredient in beer,” she said. “Not hops or barley or water. Taxes.”
* Illinois lawmakers have 5 days left, 5 big issues to settle: Critics fear that while revenue would be enough for “horizontal” road and bridge work, proposed sources for “vertical” projects including schools, recreational facilities and sewer plants are insufficient. And the unpopularity of the taxes, such as on ride-share trips and cable, satellite and video streaming services, make approval dicey. A key Senate Republican advises reviving a proposal to expand casino gambling to shore up financing.
* Durkin: State budget should take priority in discussions: Our votes mean something, particularly when it comes to some of these big ticket items. We’d like to be part of the budget, but if they don’t need us, if they don’t want our participation or our recommendations, then they’re free to do it on their own. But when it comes to issues that are of other, higher importance, at least these big ticket items, I don’t think that they want to do this strictly on their own and that became very clear yesterday on capital that they need Republican votes. We do have value in this process. We’re in the minority but our votes count. We’ll be willing participants in every proposal as long as we believe we’re given a fair shot and we’re being treated equally, but we’re not going to be undermined. This has got to be a two-way street.
* Child Welfare Caseworkers Ask For ‘Emergency Funding’: Child welfare workers are calling on Illinois lawmakers to better fund private services. That comes after Governor J.B. Pritzker announced plans to overhaul the Department of Children and Family Services’ Intact Family Services unit, which supports families after they’ve been investigated for abuse or neglect. The private organizations that provide those services are asking for $30.7 million in “emergency funding” to address what they call a workforce crisis. Andrea Durbin, CEO of the Illinois Collaboration on Youth, said nearly half of private caseworkers leave the industry due to low pay and high demand.
12 Comments
|
RHA appears back on track
Monday, May 27, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
An Illinois House committee on Sunday night voted 12-7 in support of an amendment to an abortion rights bill, advancing a controversial measure that had been stalled for months.
The bill, which is being sponsored by Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Chicago Democrat, finally appeared poised to move forward last week, after a lengthy discussion by the House Democratic Caucus. Sunday’s vote came hours after the measure was sent to the House Appropriations Committee.
There has been a renewed sense of urgency behind the measure after several states passed restrictive abortion laws, and concerns that court cases slated to be decided after the General Assembly adjourns could result in injunctions being lifted on some pieces of the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975, Cassidy said. […]
The bill repeals the state’s current abortion law and replaces it with a new law that removes measures involving spousal consent, waiting periods, criminal penalties for physicians who perform abortions and other restrictions on facilities where abortions are performed. The amendment to the bill that was filed on Sunday seeks to clarify the definitions of viability and health, which Cassidy said were developed through discussions with colleagues.
* Capitol News Illinois…
One [amendment, Emily Werth, an attorney with the Illinois chapter of the American Civil Liberty Union] said, makes “explicitly clear” a health care provider who has a moral, ethical or religious objection to abortions do not have to participate in performing one. The Reproductive Health Act would repeal several statutes in existing law that refuse to take part in such procedures, leaving one law, the Health Care Right of Conscience Act in place. […]
The newly-filed act also clarifies a contentious point among opponents — that the Reproductive Health Act requires private insurance companies regulated by the state to cover abortion procedures if they also cover pregnancy-related benefits. It now allows for cost-sharing provisions, such as copayments, so long as they do not exceed those that apply to pregnancy-related coverage.
Finally, Werth said, the bill clarifies that physician assistants and advanced practice registered nurses can only “provide abortion care that is otherwise consistent with what is within their scope of practice and their professional licensing act.” […]
“The opponents to the bill have really focused, unfortunately, on later abortion, which is rare — but they have focused in on that and have been saying some things that are frankly, at best misleading and at worst completely untrue about the legislation,” said Brigid Leahy, senior director for public policy for Planned Parenthood of Illinois. “We have added in clarifying language [on viability] that basically clarifies what is happening right now in Illinois, what the standard is right now and what it has been for many, many years.”
* Illinois Public Radio…
Sponsoring state Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Democrat from Chicago, said it’s about trusting women and their doctors to make the best choice for their health and lifestyle.
“My abortion was medically necessary,” Cassidy told her colleagues. “It saved my life. It preserved my fertility. It allowed for the creation of my family, my children, who are my world.”
Hannah Meisel was live-tweeting the bill’s progress last night. Click here for that.
* Things did become contentious…
While objecting to bill, several Republicans also took issue with the way the amendment was brought to committee, saying it prevented opponents from being able to testify against the legislation.
Rep. Tom Demmer, R-Dixon, objected that the hearing notice was posted online only an hour in advance.
“No one from my district could have made it here to testify on this bill with one hour’s notice,” Demmer said. “I imagine that’s true of many of my constituents.”
Rep. Terri Bryant, R-Murphysboro, said SB 25 was “hijacked” to make sure the bill was heard on Sunday night of a holiday weekend.
″(It’s) what I would consider secrecy,” she said. “It was rushed. … I’m disappointed that it’s been handled this way.”
* Illinois’ Catholic bishops…
During the past week, we have watched supporters of the misnamed “Reproductive Health Act” propel the legislation into the end-of-session rush. The introduced version of the bill dramatically rewrites current abortion law, going further than Roe v. Wade in stripping human rights and dignity from the unborn child with this single statement: “A fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus does not have independent rights under the laws of this State.” The fundamental premise of the bill is flawed, and no amendment or tweak to the language will change the fact that it is designed to rob the vulnerable life in the womb of any trace of human dignity and value.
On Memorial Day, there will be five days left in the legislative session set to end on May 31. Major issues that will require bipartisan cooperation and unity among lawmakers remain, such as passing a balanced budget for the health, education and safety of Illinois residents and crafting a statewide construction plan with unresolved funding. Conversations on these matters need to take place in an atmosphere of comity and civility, and any talk of abortion will only sow more divisiveness and disharmony in today’s polarized political climate.
We ask that lawmakers set aside consideration of the “Reproductive Health Act,” especially since no final form of the bill has been published, vetted through hearings or fully discussed.
* Planned Parenthood…
Statement from Jennifer Welch, President and CEO, Planned Parenthood of Illinois
”I am grateful to Chairwoman Robyn Gabel for calling the Reproductive Health Care Act to a vote in the Human Services Appropriations. The time for recognizing abortion as health care in Illinois is long overdue. We’re looking forward to the bill moving quickly through committee to a full vote in the General Assembly and off to the Governor’s desk for his signature.”
* Mayor Lightfoot…
I applaud the legislators who voted yes tonight on the passage of the Reproductive Health Act. With the onslaught of attacks against reproductive rights happening all across the country, we must act to double down on protections here in Illinois. The time is now to ensure that we preserve access to safe, legal abortion in our state. We won’t go backwards. The full General Assembly must act swiftly to pass the RHA.
* Related…
* ‘Just seems cruel’: 800-mile trip to end severely troubled pregnancy illustrates divide on abortion laws
28 Comments
|
More details on that threatening letter
Monday, May 27, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
As the state Legislature’s spring session nears its end, I want to take a moment to look back on one of the scariest times of the year with the hope that one of you might recognize something and help bring a deranged person to justice.
You may have seen a brief news story about it, but several state legislators reported receiving an identical mailer in late April with the headline: “Dead People Can’t Collect Fat Pensions.” The envelopes were postmarked in Champaign, but that’s a central collection point so the letters could’ve been mailed from anywhere in the region.
The letter contained both a long list of grievances about the state’s troubled pension system and numerous death threats. ”Don’t bother about new gun laws,” the letter writer stated, “from arson to strangulation, there are more effective means available.”
”You may think you can extract more money from us,” the writer warned. ”We would advise you to think again. Over 40,000 cowards unwilling to push back have left the state annually over the last 5 years, leaving behind the determined, the courageous — and most importantly — those with nothing left to lose.”
”Time is short. The list is long. After the first one, the rest are free,” the writer concluded.
The writer threatened mass assassinations for pretty much everyone who receives a state government pension, including survivors and heirs.
To avoid this fate, the author demanded in the form letter that the pension actuarial tables be changed and the state’s constitution be amended to remove the pension protection clause before instituting a graduated income tax. The writer also demanded unspecified “cap$ and clawback$ for outrageous$ pension payout$” and local government consolidation. He or she also demanded the end of pension double-dipping and “playing salary games at career’s end to max out your take.”
Whoever wrote that letter is obviously more informed about state government than most average citizens.
While the content of the mass mailer was identical, whoever sent it took some time to make almost every one distinct.
One way the author individualized the letters was by using a different return address for almost all of them. The envelope sent to House Speaker Michael Madigan, for instance, used a return address for Gov. JB Pritzker. The Illinois Education Association’s letter had the same return address, which was for Pritzker’s personal business office in Chicago. The letter sent to a Champaign public radio station was ostensibly from the late Dawn Clark Netsch, the first woman elected to a statewide office in Illinois. All the return addresses were printed on labels and not hand-written.
However, most of the return addresses appear to have been researched on the Illinois State Board of Elections’ website. Several legislators told me that the names and return addresses on letters sent to them were of campaign contributors who can be found with an online search.
Some return addresses and names were of political action committees. The letter addressed to a prominent gun control proponent, for instance, had a return address of a gun control political action committee which had contributed to his campaign last year.
Other letters were ostensibly from specific individuals, including a prominent retired Chicago business executive, a legislator’s mother, a legislator’s relative and the husband of a state representative’s senator. All were campaign contributors.
In other words, whoever sent this letter doesn’t appear to be just some random crank with a handy mailing list. That person or persons put some real time and effort into this. And that almost bothers me more than the letter itself.
A state senator who received one of the mailers said the postage stamp on the envelope chilled him to the bone. The sender used a John Lennon stamp. The former Beatle was murdered in 1980.
The letter writer had threatened all pension plan participants with being killed and cryptically asked recipients if they were “sure” that some accidental deaths on the highways were truly accidents or “the conscious decisions of people with nothing left to lose to ‘take one with me?’”
And that leads us to the most egregious example of how truly sick this person is. The return address on the letter mailed to a Rockford-area legislator made it appear that it came from Brooke Jones-Story, an Illinois State Trooper who was killed by another motorist during a traffic stop in March near Rockford. Jones-Story was one of three troopers killed by motorists in the first three months of 2019.
If you have any information at all, please call the Illinois State Police or the FBI.
8 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
* Cook County Assessor Fritz Kaegi has been pushing legislation this spring to obtain tax and other data from property owners, including building occupancy, income, expenses and tenant incentives. The data would not be used for individual assessments, but to create averages. Kaegi has said this is a crucial first step to reforming the assessment process.
The proposal sailed through the Senate but was held up by House Revenue Committee Chairman Mike Zalewski, who wanted some changes. The Chicago Tribune editorial board inaccurately blasted Rep. Zalewski weeks ago for moving the proposal into a subcommittee in order to kill it. Zalewski said he supported the concept, but needed to work out some details. He was true to his word.
* From Scott Smith, Kaegi’s Chief Communications Officer…
Rich:
Attached is a list of changes that have been made to SB 1379, the data modernization bill, as a result of negotiations. Our office has the following statement:
“After two weeks of meetings with stakeholders, we believe SB 1379 is now a stronger bill. Negotiations have resolved concerns about the bill’s language.
“Chairman Zalewski, Assistant Majority Leader Davis and all the participants deserve credit for their work to move this important piece of legislative property tax reform forward. We remain confident of its passage by May 31st.”
Scott
* Dot points…
• Reduced the penalty to 0.025% (from 0.05%) of a property’s market value, and reduced the cap to $10,000 (previously $100,000)
• Expanded confidentiality provisions by preventing the data from being disclosed in court, and requiring robust industry standards in how the data is compiled and anonymized
• Bolstered data security measures by requiring compliance with federal information security standards
• Requires detailed annual report to the General Assembly by Assessor offices
• Institutes a rule-making process requiring posting & comment period prior to enforcement
• Tax forms do not need to be submitted, rather the data on such forms
• Changes the threshold from 100,000 Assessed Value to 500,000 market value
• Excluded all properties in Article 10 of the Code, as well as hospitals
• Added that a tenant should pay a prorated penalty based on their rentable area of a property
• Specified that we will only use compiled data (market averages) for assessment purposes; CCAO also
will publish methodology by which data was compiled for use & publication.
• Authorizes the ability to appeal the penalty to court if denied by CCAO
• Incorporates additional definitions of income and expense suggested by stakeholders
• Removed reference to unique property types (hotels & motels, parking lots, long-term care facilities)
• Further clarified the definition of owner-occupied
• Accepted changes to definition of “taxpayer”
• Notice was already required, but specified that it must be sent 60 days in advance
• Amended language in attestation clause
Click here and scroll down for a list of the types of properties excluded from the legislation under Article 10 of the state’s Property Tax Code.
*** UPDATE 1 *** Robb Karr with the Illinois Retail Merchants Association called to say there’s only a deal on the way the language is now written. “There is no deal on the policy,” Karr said.
Asked if his and other groups would be lobbying against the bill, Karr said, “I suspect, I do not know, but I suspect many will do that.”
*** UPDATE 2 *** Mark Denzler with the IMA…
Rich
There is no “deal” with Assessor Kaegi.
The business community (IMA, IRMA, Chamber, TFI, BOMA, Chicagoland Chamber) were VERY CLEAR on Friday afternoon that we are not supportive or even neutral.
We went through discussions to tighten up his language so that the bill did what he claimed it was supposed to do.
This has been a constant source of irritation over the last three months where he and/or his staff have intimated that we were OK with the bill.
Thanks
Mark
*** UPDATE 3 *** Michael Cornicelli, the Executive VP of the Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago…
BOMA/Chicago echos the sentiments expressed by IMA and IRMA. The recent discussions technically improved a terribly drafted bill (e.g., as passed by the Senate, building owners and their tenants were broadly required to submit “income and expense data” well beyond rent and related expenses, under a financial penalty four times greater than for Class X felony murder). BOMA candidly was disappointed that the Assessor’s office would not entertain discussion beyond the four corners of its original bill draft, even while acknowledging the legitimacy of unaddressed concerns over the assessment process. Presently BOMA is engaging its internal process to confirm whether our opposition still stands. We are disappointed that the Assessor jumped the gun here.
*** UPDATE 4 *** Michael Reever, SVP Chicagoland Chamber…
The Chicagoland Chamber would also like to express that no deal has been reached. It is disingenuous of the Assessor to say that there is. This is a consistent practice of the Assessor, including past statements by he and his office of misrepresenting the position of the Chamber after two explicit conversations not to do so throughout this year. We are disappointed that the Assessor would again misrepresent our position for political purposes, as we continue to work in good faith. The Assessor should be transparent about where stakeholders are on his bill.
*** UPDATE = 5 *** Kaegi’s Scott Smith…
Rich, as Robb said, we have an agreement on language in the bill - and nothing more. We understand some groups are still philosophically opposed to the bill.
* Related…
* Audit Recommends Ways To Overhaul Cook County Property Tax System
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|
