* I went over this report with subscribers early today. Crain’s…
Northern Illinois will soon transition from being a net exporter to a net importer of electricity and faces potential power shortages in the next several years.
A new report prepared by several state agencies highlights the challenges facing energy customers in Illinois as the state transitions away from fossil-fuel power plants at the same time that demand for power is skyrocketing because of data centers and other large users of electricity.
With demand for power in the area served by Commonwealth Edison projected to increase 24% between 2025 and 2030, Northern Illinois will begin to import power from the PJM regional grid starting in 2030, according to the report out today from the Illinois Power Agency, Illinois Commerce Commission and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. […]
But one thing is clear: Power prices, which have increased sharply in the past two years, are going to keep rising. The report projects spending on power across ComEd’s territory will nearly double from $2.1 billion annually to $3.9 billion by 2030.
A bill passed during veto session, which the governor has said he’ll sign, will allow the government to ease pollution reduction mandates in the face of looming power shortages.
You can find the full report here.
* Sun-Times…
The report suggests natural gas plants could be built in the state to help bridge the power needs until cleaner sources of electricity, such as solar and wind, are constructed. One state lawmaker said it will likely delay the closing of some dirtier, more polluting gas plants that are supposed to shut down in the next several years under the 2021 law.
“The upshot is the energy transition in Illinois is likely to be more gradual and more reliant on natural gas plants than previously thought,” said state Sen. Bill Cunningham, a Democrat from Beverly.
Cunningham has been a point person in Springfield on clean energy legislation.
“We tried to expect the unexpected,” he added. “The unexpected turned out to be data centers.” […]
In a statement, a Pritzker spokesperson said the “state set up a deliberate process to address findings from this resource adequacy study,” and said the governor will sign the most recent energy legislation passed in October.
The report says that data centers are the “primary driver” behind increased electricity demand. As subscribers know, there’s lots more in that report, so click here. Subscribers also have access to reactions to the report which aren’t mentioned in either of the above stories, so click here for that.
* Meanwhile, Amazon is trying to defend its data center energy usage with a weird claim…
Amazon pays for its own electricity costs—these expenses aren’t added to the bills of local residents or businesses.
Nobody, but nobody is saying that.
…Adding… From the governor’s office…
“The new state resource adequacy report confirms what we have known: rising demand and changes in generation, both in Illinois and across the region, are reshaping the energy landscape. Illinois is prepared, with a strong grid and remains an energy exporter today that continues to deliver reliable power for working families and businesses.
Under Governor Pritzker’s leadership, the state has acted proactively through the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) and the Clean and Reliable Grid Affordability Act (CRGA) — which he intends to sign — to strengthen planning, manage reliability risks, and lower energy costs for working families. Thanks to CEJA, Illinois not only saved our nuclear reactors but also expanded our renewable energy portfolio, resulting in 7,369 MW more power than Illinois would have had without these policies, and another 7,456 MW underdevelopment. CRGA builds on this by adding 3,000 MW of battery storage to the state’s resource mix. At the regional level, the Governor is actively pushing PJM to address rising capacity costs and ensure the grid remains reliable and lower costs for all Illinois working families and businesses.
With two strong laws, the state set up a deliberate process to address findings from this resource adequacy study and ensure Illinois continues to lead the country in delivering a clean, reliable, affordable energy future for all.”
12 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
* CNBC…
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday issuing a single regulation framework for artificial intelligence, undermining the power of individual states.
“To win, United States AI companies must be free to innovate without cumbersome regulation,” the order says. “But excessive State regulation thwarts this imperative.”
The Trump administration, with the aid of AI and crypto czar David Sacks, has been pursuing a path that would allow federal rules to preempt state regulations on AI, a move meant to keep big Democratic-led states like California and New York from exerting their control over the growing industry.
Sacks and fellow tech investor and podcaster Chamath Palihapitiya stood beside Trump during the signing in the Oval Office. He was also joined by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
* From the AI EO…
Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to sustain and enhance the United States’ global AI dominance through a minimally burdensome national policy framework for AI.
Sec. 3. AI Litigation Task Force. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General shall establish an AI Litigation Task Force (Task Force) whose sole responsibility shall be to challenge State AI laws inconsistent with the policy set forth in section 2 of this order, including on grounds that such laws unconstitutionally regulate interstate commerce, are preempted by existing Federal regulations, or are otherwise unlawful in the Attorney General’s judgment, including, if appropriate, those laws identified pursuant to section 4 of this order. The Task Force shall consult from time to time with the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto, the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, and the Assistant to the President and Counsel to the President regarding the emergence of specific State AI laws that warrant challenge. […]
Sec. 5. Restrictions on State Funding. (a) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce, through the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information, shall issue a Policy Notice specifying the conditions under which States may be eligible for remaining funding under the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program that was saved through my Administration’s “Benefit of the Bargain” reforms, consistent with 47 U.S.C. 1702(e)-(f). That Policy Notice must provide that States with onerous AI laws identified pursuant to section 4 of this order are ineligible for non-deployment funds, to the maximum extent allowed by Federal law.
* But…
“An executive order doesn’t/can’t preempt state legislative action,” posted Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on X Monday in response to Trump’s Truth Social post announcing the upcoming order, “Congress could, theoretically, preempt states through legislation.” DeSantis has recently proposed a series of AI-related measures.
John Bergmayer, the legal director of the nonprofit advocacy group Public Knowledge, agreed. “They’re trying to find a way to bypass Congress with these various theories in the executive order. Legally, I don’t think they work very well.”
In a post on X on Tuesday, Sacks suggested that the federal government can override state AI laws because it has the power to regulate interstate commerce.
Bergmayer disagreed, “States are, in fact, allowed to regulate interstate commerce. They do it all the time. And the Supreme Court just recently said it was fine.”
Bergmayer cited a 2023 Supreme Court decision where the court supported California’s power to regulate its pork industry even though the regulations affected farmers in other states.
* NBC 5 Chicago…
A series of new Illinois laws set to take effect in 2026 will impact workers’ rights, including limiting the use of artificial intelligence.
An amendment to the Illinois Human Rights Act, which will take effect on January 1, will prohibit employment discrimination that utilizes artificial intelligence to consider factors like race or ZIP codes when making hiring decisions.
The bill also covers other protected classes including gender, religion and sexual orientation, according to the legislation.
According to the text of the legislation, the bill also prohibits AI using race, ZIP codes or other factors when determining acceptance or rejection of credit applications in the state of Illinois.
* Other Illinois AI news…
* 2024: Mayer Brown | Illinois Passes Artificial Intelligence (AI) Law Regulating Employment Use Cases: Based on the latest legislative developments, Illinois’s AI law underscores that use of AI in the employment context carries higher risks. Employers that are considering using AI for recruiting or other human resources-related decisions should consider conducting a bias audit on their AI systems and/or conducting sufficient diligence on the AI vendor providing such a tool. Those assessments should look at whether AI tools disproportionately impact certain groups—such as those of a certain race, gender, or age. Employers should document their analysis in an AI-impact assessment, keep records of any formal audits conducted on the AI system, and continuously monitor the AI system once it is used in the real world in order to make adjustments if the AI system deviates. Finally, employers should be transparent about their use of AI through appropriate AI pre-use notices.
* 2025: Press Release | Gov Pritzker Signs Legislation Prohibiting AI Therapy in Illinois: The Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act prohibits anyone from using AI to provide mental health and therapeutic decision-making, while allowing the use of AI for administrative and supplementary support services for licensed behavioral health professionals. This will protect patients from unregulated and unqualified AI products, while also protecting the jobs of Illinois’ thousands of qualified behavioral health providers. This will also protect vulnerable children amid the rising concerns over AI chatbot use in youth mental health services.
* Today: JDSupra | Sneak Peek: Illinois AI Workplace Notice Rulemaking is Coming – What to Expect + Your 5-Step Action Plan: As Illinois employers that use AI in employment decisions ready themselves for the new anti-discrimination, notice, and record-keeping requirements starting January 1, the Illinois Department of Human Rights is in the process of drafting the long-anticipated rules for compliance. Indeed, the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR) recently met with stakeholders to propose rules to implement the new law. How will this big change impact your workplace? Here’s what you need to know about the state’s new employment-related AI law, the proposed rule, and the five steps you can take now to prepare.
* And a response from Rep. Dan Didech, who has sponsored some AI-related bills…
Many aspects of AI regulation should be addressed at the federal level, but this week’s executive order takes the wrong approach. By threatening to withhold statutorily guaranteed federal funds, it unlawfully punishes states that have acted responsibly in the absence of federal leadership.
States like Illinois have enacted targeted, commonsense guardrails to protect children, prevent discrimination, and ensure transparency when AI is used to make consequential decisions affecting people’s lives. These measures respond to real and documented harms and do not impede innovation or competitiveness.
The executive order also reflects a troubling pattern of the federal administration attempting to strong-arm private companies into advancing the president’s political agenda. Its directive to target state laws based on vague notions of “truthful outputs” risks being used to chill dissent, pressure AI developers, and coerce American companies into echoing government propaganda.
Illinois will not be bullied into abandoning its responsibility to protect its residents. Some aspects of AI policy are appropriately addressed through a uniform federal framework, while others reasonably reflect state-level judgment based on local needs and circumstances. Any federal approach should respect that balance, support innovation, and prioritize public safety over partisan interests.
…Adding… Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid…
“Once again, Donald Trump is trampling on our Constitutional separation of powers, while writing a blank check to corporations. This order prioritizes the interests of Big Tech over protecting consumers, ignoring broad bipartisan concerns about the social and ethical impacts of unfettered AI.
“I have been part of bipartisan efforts urging Congress not to preempt state regulation of AI. We have been successful, because it’s undeniable that AI can cause real harm to our residents through privacy invasions, algorithmic discrimination, deepfakes, and job losses.
“Genuine leadership on AI requires robust safeguards, democratic input, and accountability — not a federal fiat that effectively deregulates one of the most transformative and potentially harmful technologies of our time. We in Illinois will not be cowed into submission. We will continue to provide leadership on necessary AI regulation to protect consumers.”
7 Comments
|
* A December 8 press release from the Department of Homeland Security…
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested Luis Jesus Acosta Gutierrez, an illegal alien from Venezuela and suspected member of Tren de Aragua (TdA).
ICE officers attempted to conduct a vehicle stop, at which point Acosta resisted arrest by intentionally ramming an officer’s vehicle into a tree. Thankfully, the officer sustained no injuries.
Acosta then fled on foot and barricaded himself into an apartment of a person he did not know. The suspected gang member came out on the apartment’s balcony and officers tried to negotiate with him to leave the apartment. During this time, a large crowd of agitators formed and began throwing rocks and bottles at law enforcement officers. The local police department refused to protect ICE law enforcement officers.
All emphasis added.
* The Elgin Police Department released its own statement two days later…
The Elgin Police Department is continuing its investigations relating to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities occurring in the 1600 block of Maple Lane last Saturday, December 6.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a press release on Monday, December 8 about the ICE actions conducted in Elgin on Saturday. The press release alleges “rioters threw rocks and bottles” at ICE agents and that the Elgin Police Department “refused to help protect ICE law enforcement.”
The police department’s emergency communications center received over 50 calls relating to the incident. Callers reported on vehicles blocking the roadway, persons having been struck by pepper balls and persons being exposed to other chemical irritants. The police department has contacted each caller to ensure no other services or reports from the police department are needed.
Police reports have been created in response to eight incidents, and the investigations are continuing on each of those reports. Elgin police officers at the incident site determined that federal agents dispersed chemical irritants on some bystanders. Elgin police officers assisted Elgin firefighters in providing medical treatment for that exposure, and seven persons were treated and released on scene. The Elgin police department filed six police reports for persons stating they were either struck or had been exposed to chemical irritants.
The police department has been reviewing the body worn camera footage of the officers responding to the community calls for services, along with the numerous videos recording the incident that have been posted on public social media accounts.
Preliminary findings indicate the police department received five calls from subjects who identified themselves as federal agents. None of those agents reported rocks or bottles being thrown at them when making their calls. When Elgin police officers arrived on the incident site in response to these five calls, no federal agent said that rocks or bottles were being thrown at them to the responding Elgin police officers. A federal agent supervisor who was not at the incident site called the Elgin police department alleging bricks were being thrown at federal agents and that tires were being slashed. An Elgin police supervisor on the scene at the time of that call did not observe any such activity.
The police department has reviewed its body worn camera footage during the time when federal agents were leaving the incident area. The footage shows that some federal agents, while walking to their vehicles, were simultaneously deploying what appears to be crowd control munitions. The footage also showed other federal agents simply driving away in their vehicles. Footage from one body-worn camera shows a single instance in which what appears to be a plastic water container being thrown by a bystander at a federal agent’s vehicle. The water container strikes the rear window of the federal agent’s vehicle and bounces off as the vehicle is driving away.
The police department’s review of videos posted on social media accounts shows an in- stance in which a bystander picks up what appears to be a snowball from the ground and then throws it at a federal agent’s vehicle.
Hat tip: Daily Herald.
…Adding… Tribune…
A Tribune search of local court systems did not locate criminal matters matching Acosta Gutierrez’s name. Records, though, show that Acosta Gutierrez paid a fine for a 2023 traffic violation for driving without a license and the matter was closed in April 2024, according to McHenry County court. […]
The saga began in Elgin shortly after 9 a.m. Saturday in the 1600 block of West Highland Avenue. Acosta Gutierrez had been driving to a mechanic to get work done on his car, said Robert Held, an attorney and activist assisting Acosta with the case.
What happened next is in dispute.
Federal authorities said ICE was attempting a vehicle stop, and that Acosta Gutierrez rammed an officer’s vehicle into a tree. Held said it was an agent who rammed Acosta Gutierrez’s vehicle. […]
When asked about evidence of Acosta Gutierrez’s alleged affiliation to the Tren de Aragua gang, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist group as of this year, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said, “DHS intelligence assessments go well beyond just gang affiliate tattoos and social media.”
“We are confident in our law enforcement’s intelligence, and we aren’t going to share intelligence reports and undermine national security every time a gang member denies he is one. That would be insane,” McLaughlin said.
18 Comments
|
* This post will likely be updated. Press release…
Governor Pritzker Signs Bill Expanding End-of-Life Options for Terminally Ill Patients
Illinois becomes 12th state to enact legislation to provide terminally ill patients with autonomy, dignity and peace at the end of their lives
CHICAGO – Today, Governor Pritzker signed the Medical Aid in Dying bill (SB 1950), a law that will provide qualified terminally ill patients with the option to seek medication to peacefully end their lives on their own terms in consultation with physicians.
To ensure the highest safeguards for patients, the law is effective in September of 2026, which affords participating health care providers and the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) significant lead time to implement stringent processes and protections as outlined in the law.
Also known as “Deb’s Law,” the bill honors Deb Robertson, a lifelong Illinois resident living with a rare terminal illness who has strongly advocated for the bill and shed light on the impacts on families and individuals struggling with terminal illness as they seek dignity and autonomy to peacefully end their lives on their terms.
“I have been deeply impacted by the stories of Illinoisans or their loved ones that have suffered from a devastating terminal illness, and I have been moved by their dedication to standing up for freedom and choice at the end of life in the midst of personal heartbreak,” said Governor JB Pritzker. “Today, Illinois honors their strength and courage by enacting legislation that enables patients faced with debilitating terminal illnesses to make a decision, in consultation with a doctor, that helps them avoid unnecessary pain and suffering at the end of their lives. This legislation will be thoughtfully implemented so that physicians can consult patients on making deeply personal decisions with authority, autonomy, and empathy.”
The legislation expands compassionate end of life options in a manner that establishes clear processes, guidelines, and protocols. Several safeguards are in place to ensure robust patient protection for Illinois residents. No physician, health care provider, or pharmacist is required to participate in the option. The law makes it a felony to coerce anyone to request the medication or to forge a request. Adult patients (18 or older) requesting end-of-life medication must:
• Have a terminal illness that will result in death within six months (as determined by two physicians).
• Be informed by their physician about all of their end-of-life care options, including comfort care, hospice, palliative care, and pain control.
• Have the mental capacity, confirmed by their physician, to make medical decisions.
• Make written and oral requests in order to receive the aid-in-dying medication, among other requirements. The request can only be made by the patient, not by the patient’s surrogate decision-maker, health care proxy, health care agent, attorney-in-fact for healthcare, guardian, nor via advance care directive.
Lawmakers and the Governor have heard numerous personal stories from families and individuals who have faced harrowing circumstances as they near the ends of their lives. Some were enduring unbearable pain, even travelling thousands of miles to seek medical aid-in-dying in other states and countries while sick. They also heard from families who spoke of the pain of seeing their loved one experience prolonged suffering that they were desperate and powerless to end.
“With this law, we are strengthening our commitment to compassionate care for every patient, bodily autonomy for every person, and basic human dignity at every stage of life,” said House Majority Leader Robyn Gabel (D-Evanston).
“Both of my parents died of cancer. I’ll never forget the helpless feeling of watching them suffer when there was nothing I could do to help them,” said Senate Assistant Majority Leader Linda Holmes (D-Aurora). “I believe every adult patient of sound mind should have this as one more option in their end of life care in the event their suffering becomes unbearable.”
“I want to thank Governor Pritzker for signing this measure into law – giving the full range of end-of-life options for Illinois residents,” said Deb Robertson, a retired Lombard social worker who worked to pass the Deb’s Law. “Today, I know the end for me could be near. But I’m pleased to have been able to play some role in ensuring that terminally ill Illinoisans have access to medical aid in dying.”
“As someone who is disabled, disability justice has always meant having the right to determine how I live,” said Beth Langen, a longtime disability rights advocate from Springfield who testified in support of Deb’s Law. “We know that disability is not terminal. And like anyone else, I may face a terminal illness in the future that will make death imminent. If I do, I want my right to self-determination to include the final days of my life.”
“My son, Andrew, died peacefully utilizing the option of medical aid in dying in California, where he lived,” said Suzy Flack, a former Naperville resident who testified in support of Deb’s Law. “Most of our family members were able to travel to be with him, but his grandmother couldn’t travel to California because of her age. She never got to see Drew for a final goodbye. No other family in Illinois will experience that hardship.”
“Deb’s Law adds medical aid in dying care to the full range of health options that Illinois residents can choose and safely access as a result of a deep commitment from our state’s leaders,” said Khadine Bennett, Advocacy and Intergovernmental Affairs Director at the ACLU of Illinois. “Terminally ill individuals living in Illinois will no longer have to agonize about spending their remaining days fearful of a painful death because the full range of end-of-life care options were not available in our state. We thank Governor Pritzker for listening to the people directly impacted by this issue and applaud his continued commitment to ensuring that Illinois continues to be a place where our residents are allowed to make the most vital, personal decisions throughout their lives without government interference.”
“We applaud Governor Pritzker for signing this compassionate legislation, honoring the 71% of Americans who support the option of medical aid in dying for their fellow Illinoisans facing their last months, weeks, or days with a terminal illness,” said Kevin Díaz, President/CEO for Compassion & Choices and Compassion & Choices Action Network. “Thanks to Governor Pritzker’s thoughtful leadership in signing Deb’s Law today, Illinois will become the first state in the Midwest to authorize medical aid in dying, joining the growing number of U.S. jurisdictions that have committed to law their dedication to patient-driven healthcare at all stages of life.”
“Today, Illinois affirms the dignity and autonomy of individuals confronting the final stages of a terminal illness” said Illinois Department of Public Health Director Dr. Sameer Vohra. “IDPH is committed to implementing this new law with the highest ethical standards, transparency, and care, supported by strong safeguards and detailed reporting systems that protect patients and guide providers.”
“Abundant research has shown that strong safeguards like the ones in this bill not only protect the patient, but also improve end-of-life care,” said Dr. Cynthia Chatterjee, Psychiatrist and Physician, and member of the Illinois State Medical Society who testified in support of Deb’s Law. “With these safeguards, patients who meet all the requirements will be able to end terrible suffering from a terminal illness and experience an easy, comfortable death.”
“In signing this law, Gov. Pritzker has given those who are at the end of their life freedom from the fear of enduring unrelenting, needless suffering, and replaced it with the chance to experience death as the final sacred moment of their being,” said Episcopalian minister Reverand Judith Doran from Chicago.
PROCESS TO RECIEVE MEDICAL AID IN DYING MEDICATION
• Patients who meet eligibility criteria must make several oral and written requests in order to receive medical aid in dying medication.
• The written request must be signed by the requesting patient and witnessed by at least two individuals who attest that the patient has the mental capacity to make this decision, is making it voluntarily, and is not being coerced or doing so under duress.
• Patients who qualify must be able to self-administer the medication.
Patients who qualify and receive medication have the right to withdraw their request at any time or choose not to ingest it. The death certificates of those who take end-of-life medication under the bill will attribute their cause of death to the underlying terminal disease. The option to prescribe aid in dying will be available on September 12, 2026, when the Medical Aid in Dying bill goes into effect.
REQUIREMENTS FOR PHYSICANS
• Attending physicians must provide informed consent regarding all appropriate end-of-life care options, not just medical aid-in-dying.
• They must provide an in-person examination to determine whether the patient has an illness that will result in death within six months. Two doctors must concur.
• As part of the process, the physician must also confirm that the individual has the mental capacity to make the decision to pursue medical aid-in-dying. If there are any questions about fitness, the patient will be referred to a licensed mental health professional. If the mental health professional determines that the patient does not have mental capacity, the patient will not qualify for medical aid-in-dying.
• If a patient elects the end-of-life option as outlined in the Act, physicians must submit information within 60 days after the patient’s death to the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) regarding the patient, their diagnosis, notice that requirements under the Act were completed, and notice that medication has been prescribed pursuant to the Act. This information is to be considered confidential, privileged, and not discoverable in any civil, criminal, administrative, or other proceeding.
Health care professionals are not under any duty to participate in the provision of aid-in-dying and are not subject to criminal or civil liability for participating or refusing to provide aid-in-dying care to a patient in good faith compliance with the Act.
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS AND ENTITIES
Health care entities can also prohibit their staff from practicing aid-in-dying care while working for the organization. The Act also requires that an insurance plan, including Medicaid, cannot deny or alter benefits to a patient with a terminal disease based on the availability of aid-in-dying care, their request for medication pursuant to this Act, or the absence of a request. It does not require coverage of this care either by private insurers or Medicaid.
*** UPDATE *** Let’s use this app for our updates…
32 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|