|
Quentin Fulks open thread
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2026 - Posted by Rich Miller * A whole lot of commenters here second-guessed Quentin Fulks the past several months. As you know, Q ran Pritzker’s super PAC supporting Juliana Stratton’s congressional bid. I understood the doubters because Quentin previously ran Pritzker’s failed graduated income tax constitutional amendment, so people naturally had their reservations. Lots of folks complained (myself included) that his spending started way too late for Stratton (which was a major complaint with the CA back in the day) and that Raja was so far ahead Q’s ads would never let her catch up. Those comments were likely in the hundreds. Well, LG Stratton not only caught up, but she won * Also, the legacy media journalists who bought into the prospect that Pritzker would fail in this race and are now covering for their sources is so fascinating and amusing. From the Wall St. Journal…
Hilarious. * As I’ve been saying for months, Raja’s support was likely a mile wide and an inch thick. December polls mean nothing in mid March when the real spending starts. For example, once a Black candidate and her allies start spending money, Black votes can change…
There was indeed a massive shift. Politics 101. Totally predictable. * I was talking to Christian Mitchell last night about all the Q hate from some of y’all here. And it occurred to me that maybe we should have a post where people could clear the air. It might be interesting to hear from Q’s detractors about what they think now. Have at it.
|
|
Realtors poll: Crime plummets as top Chicago issue while housing-related cost concerns soar
Monday, Mar 2, 2026 - Posted by Rich Miller * Crain’s…
* From the 2026 poll…
* “We conducted a similar poll back in 2022 and the results were almost the exact opposite,” said a spokesperson for the Illinois Realtors, adding, “But that was before the housing inventory slump and rising interest rates.” From the older, 2022 poll…
* Let’s look at reactions to possible solutions from the more recent poll…
* More…
* From an accompanying document…
* The methodology is a bit different…
The reason I mention this is because some questions and follow-up questions were apparently only asked by phone. It’s why I only included Favor and Oppose but not “strongly” either way. But go read the whole thing for yourself.
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








