It’s still a pipe dream
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Greg Hinz…
Cook County Assessor Joe Berrios is weighing in on a dispute over a key element of Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s proposed 2016 budget, and while City Hall is trying to pump up the news, it is, in fact, quite mixed for the mayor.
In a phone interview today, Berrios said that “personally, I believe” it is technically possible to reprogram aging county computers to implement the expanded homestead exemption that Emanuel wants. “This is the 21st century,” even if the county’s mainframe computer is programmed in the outmoded COBOL language, he said.
Mayoral aides applauded that, because yesterday, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle said a technical tweak is not possible, and County Treasurer Maria Pappas said it “might” be possible only if outside computer experts came up with what could be an expensive solution.
However, Berrios added a lot of strings that definitely qualified his backing for the mayor’s position.
For one, any reprogramming or other technical computer fix would have to be in place before the end of the year, “probably by around Dec. 1,” Berrios said. Any delay beyond that could postpone the issuance of next year’s tax bills, forcing local governments to borrow money to tide them over. “I’m not going to be responsible for that.” Berrios said.
Everybody who thinks that the General Assembly will pass this bill and the governor will sign it into law in advance of that December 1st date, please raise your hands.
If the mayor wants this done, he’s gonna have to figure out a way to break the Springfield gridlock.
Good luck with that, dude.
23 Comments
|
More like this, please
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Riopell…
As the most powerful politicians in the land feud over Illinois’ budget — now for more than 100 days — a suburban mayor has set a summit next week to try to save his city’s nonprofits that the state isn’t paying.
Elgin Mayor David Kaptain says Illinois Comptroller Leslie Munger is planning to attend a meeting Tuesday aimed at finding out more about how Elgin agencies are suffering and whether the city can provide bridge loans to help them keep operating.
The move seems to be a relatively unique in Illinois, but Kaptain says the problems aren’t.
“I think a lot of larger cities are having the same problems,” Kaptain said. “It’s more than the city of Elgin.”
14 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Ottawa Times…
Many lawmakers in this part of Illinois were originally appointed to their offices and later won election in their own right. State Sen. Sue Rezin, R-Morris, was appointed in 2010 after Gary Dahl resigned, saying he wanted to spend more time with his family and trucking business.
John Anthony, R-Plainfield, was appointed as a state representative in 2013 after his predecessor, Pam Roth, announced her resignation because she was moving to Texas as the result of her husband’s transfer.
Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, was appointed in 2008 after Todd Sieben became an ethanol lobbyist.
In 2013, Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Freeport, was chosen to replace Jim Sacia, who resigned.
Mautino himself was appointed in 1991 after his father, Richard Mautino, died.
They missed one. Rep. Roth was appointed to the House after then-Representative-elect Sue Rezin was appointed to the Senate.
* The Question: Should Illinois hold special elections when vacancies occur instead of appointments - perhaps depending on how much time is left in the terms? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
polls
And, yes, I know there are rules about holding state Senate elections after vacancies happen, but there are still interim appointments. This question is about abolishing most appointments in favor of quick special elections.
50 Comments
|
The Kasich lesson
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
ENDORSEMENT: ILLINOIS SENATE REPUBLICAN LEADER CHRISTINE RADOGNO HEADS KASICH FOR AMERICA’S ILLINOIS TEAM
Leader Radogno to serve as Illinois State Chairman
Dan Cronin, Dave Syverson, Ed Sullivan, Ron Sandack, Tom Demmer, David Harris, Randy Frese, Jim Schultz, Pat Brady and Sean Morrison to serve as State Co-Chairs
Team includes seven sitting IL legislators, the former Chairman of the Illinois Republican Party, three county party chairmen
Today the Kasich for America campaign announced that Illinois State Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno will chair the Illinois presidential campaign for Ohio Governor John Kasich. In all, eighteen officeholders and party officials announced their endorsement of Kasich today, including seven current state legislators, the former Chairman of the Illinois Republican Party, three county party chairmen, and current and former public officials from across the state. […]
Said Leader Radogno, “As governor, John Kasich took over a state that was dying. Before he took office, Ohio had lost more than 350,000 private sector jobs, faced an $8 billion projected budget hole, and businesses were fleeing to other states. In four short years, he helped turn his state around, and under his watch, Ohio has created 347,000 private sector jobs, amassed a $2 billion surplus, and by cutting taxes by more than $5 billion, Ohio became business-friendly again. As a leader in a state very similar to Ohio, I understand the significance of his accomplishments. Kasich’s record of success serves as a model for other Midwestern states, and it is little wonder that 62% of Ohioans approve of the job he’s doing.”
* Let’s look at some Kasich history via an October, 2011 story in the very conservative National Review…
Kasich’s reforms, like Gov. Scott Walker’s in Wisconsin, have rattled government workers, who for decades have enjoyed cushy retirement and health-care benefits. Senate Bill 5 “is all about fairness,” asking state employees to contribute 10 percent of their salaries toward their guaranteed pensions and pay 15 percent of their health-care costs, Kasich says.
The bill also outlaws public-sector strikes, bans binding arbitration, and gives cities and school boards bargaining flexibility. Schoolteachers will be given merit pay, not guaranteed automatic pay increases. Ohio’s 360,000 government workers, like their peers in Wisconsin, have revolted. Thousands of them stormed the capitol when the legislation was passed by the GOP-controlled legislature in March — a sea of bright union T-shirts.
Those winter rallies were only the beginning. Once Kasich signed the bill, progressives pounced. Activists canvassed the state, petitioning for repeal. We Are Ohio, a potpourri of lefty-types, led the months-long campaign. According to state law, if 230,000 signatures were collected and certified by the secretary of state, a referendum would be triggered. By mid-July, over 1.3 million Ohioans had signed. Senate Bill 5 was suspended. And “Issue 2,” a question of whether to keep the legislation, was added to the ballot.
Senate Bill 5’s midsummer stall was a blow to Kasich. His approval rating at the time, according to a Quinnipiac University poll, sunk to 35 percent. Still, Kasich was buoyed that same month by the passage of his budget, which closed the state’s $8 billion budget gap without raising taxes. But Kasich knew that beyond the budget, his entire economic agenda remained jeopardized by “Issue 2.”And with Quinnipiac’s July survey showing 56 percent of Ohioans favoring repeal, disaster loomed.
A month later, Kasich threw a curveball to the unions, which have long portrayed him as the bogeyman of Ohio politics. In a press conference at the capitol, he softened his approach and invited union leaders to “come to the table” and “talk” about potential “ways to reach an agreement.” Sensing Kasich’s political vulnerability, union brass ignored the offer, telling Republicans almost immediately that full repeal of Senate Bill 5 would be a prerequisite to any negotiations. Kasich, undeterred, decided to make his case across the state.
* The unpopular Kasich got his clock cleaned…
Ohio voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected the law limiting the bargaining abilities of more than 350,000 teachers, firefighters, police officers and other public workers. More than 61 percent voted against the measure promoted by Republican Gov. John Kasich. Turnout was the highest ever for an off-year election in Ohio and poll numbers show voters rejected the law by wide margins in nearly every part of the state.
* So, what did Kasich do? Well, for one, he wised up and extended an olive branch to the trade unions…
Standing with a crowd of carpenters to accept their endorsement, Ohio Governor John Kasich acknowledged that it wasn’t easy for union members to back a Republican.
“But we’ve gotten to know each other over time,” Kasich said in Columbus, two weeks before winning re-election in November [of 2014]. “For too long, there’s been a disconnect between people like me and organized labor.” […]
After the repudiation of the Ohio law, he said that “the people have spoken” and took a less confrontational approach. His support for development initiatives, including $1.5 billion in debt backed by Ohio Turnpike tolls for infrastructure, won some union support for his re-election.
Those initiatives will mean billions in wages and benefits in coming years, said Matthew Szollosi, executive director of the 91,000-member Affiliated Construction Trades Ohio union.
“He’s listened,” Szollosi said. “He’s learned a lot about us. Our leaders have learned a lot about him. And I think the relationship has grown close.”
Resentment remains over the bargaining law: The Ohio AFL-CIO backed Kasich’s Democratic opponent last year. Yet Szollosi’s group gave the governor’s campaign the maximum $12,156 in 2013, and Kasich also won the endorsement of engineers and carpenters unions, as well as the Ohio Laborers’ District Council.
And people wonder why I’ve been shaking my head at Gov. Rauner’s refusal to propose a capital bill.
Sheesh, man, this ain’t rocket science.
* Kasich is still not exactly a friend to public employee unions…
However, just before this Memorial Day weekend, the Governor issued an executive order stripping away union rights from nearly 10,000 independent home health-care and in-home child-care workers. The move undoes a law implemented by former Democratic Governor Ted Strickland that extended the ability to bargain with the state to those overlooked and underpaid sectors. Unions that used to represent those workers in Ohio, including the AFSCME and the SEIU are calling it a “war on caregivers,” warning that it will discourage people from pursuing those careers.
Somewhat ironically, Kasich credited the success of the President’s Affordable Care Act — which he opposes and wants repealed — as part of his rationale for repealing those union rights. He said would have repealed his predecessor’s law earlier, but held off out of concern that those independent workers would lose the health insurance provided by their unions. But “since that time,” he wrote, “health insurance has become widely available through other means, such as the federal health insurance exchanges.”
But keep in mind that the trade unions are historically more conservative than public employee unions, and smart, moderate Republicans try to work with those unions.
Gov. Rauner has so far refused to do this.
I suppose you could say that Rauner learned a little when he stopped calling for so-called “right-to-work” laws, but he’s still demanding that collective bargaining rights should be gutted and he wants repeal of the state’s prevailing wage laws.
* “Right-to-work” is popular if you word polling questions just so, as a recent poll of southern Illinoisans by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute shows…
Some states have passed right-to-work or open shop laws that say workers have the right to hold their jobs in a unionized workplace, whether they join the labor union or not. If you were asked to vote on such a law, would you vote for it or against it? (If undecided the interviewer probed “which way are you leaning?”)
Response
Percent (n=401)
Vote for 53.4%
Lean for 2.0%
Lean against 1.7%
Vote against 36.2%
Undecided (not read) 3.5%
Other/don’t know (not read) 3.2%
Meh.
The point is, Rauner withdrew it for good reason. It wasn’t going to pass and it probably wouldn’t have been backed by the public once it was explained.
Now if he would only take more steps in that direction.
* Oh, and by the way, the Tribune had a little brief on another one of Kasich’s Illinois backers today…
DuPage County Board Chairman Dan Cronin reported a $25,000 contribution from the national fund of the plumbers/pipefitters union.
Cronin leads his county so well because he is so inclusive. Same for Kasich in Ohio.
* For crying out loud, learn, man. Instead of constantly beating on all the unions, how about focusing on obtainable, doable reforms, and focus like a laser on solving this budget mess? Kasich did that and he eliminated his state’s deficit.
73 Comments
|
The Getty model?
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Riopell…
In remarks [last] week, Gov. Bruce Rauner publicly raised the idea that the outcome of Illinois not having a budget could be even more severe.
“Universities and community colleges will not receive state funding, causing some to wonder whether they will be open for the second semester. Outrageous. Should not happen,” Rauner said.
Sigh.
He’s such a helpless victim.
* But, at least in the suburbs, it’s not true…
No local community colleges are talking publicly about drastic action, and how individual colleges will fare as the state budget impasse drags on could “vary widely,” Berry said. Community colleges get a large share of their income from property taxes, and suburban districts tend to have higher property values than colleges elsewhere in the state. So the effects might be less serious in the suburbs.
Oakton Community College spokesman Paul Palian said he doesn’t know of any class-cutting plans, but he said schools are “preparing to tighten our belts even further.”
* Wordslinger has been saying in comments for months that the governor is using a “hostage-taking” model. For instance…
The governor feels entitled to certain things he can’t achieve through traditional and conventional means (public support, legislative majorities, in this case), so he takes hostages and threatens great harm to them unless his demands are met.
In an attempt to demonstrate purity of motives and avoid a backlash of public opinion, some hostages are released (K-12, public employee salaries).
In hostage situations we’re all familiar with from the past, the released are usually those who could be perceived as innocent - poor women, children, the old, sick or infirm.
Universities and colleges aren’t quite on the list yet, although some will most certainly be harmed in the coming months.
* James Krohe recently wrote a particularly gruesome take on the same subject…
Rauner basically kidnapped state government last November, and, determined to show he means businesses, started cutting off his prisoners’ ears and fingers and sending them to the General Assembly with his ransom notes.
But kidnapping only works if the threat of death alarms more people than the victim.
The museum closing stirred a furor in Springfield, and to a lesser extent in Fulton County, but outside these places the shutdown has had less impact than would closing a fish census station.
Rauner finds himself in the situation of the Italian thugs who kidnapped oil heir J. Paul Getty III in 1964; they demanded $17 million from his family but his rich grandfather thought the kid was worth only $2.2 million. In the end, the gang got paid only $2.9 million, and that only because dad took out a loan.
* That brings us to House Speaker Madigan’s spokesman Steve Brown, who told the Illinois Policy Institute’s news service this week that his party doesn’t trust the governor to make a budget deal…
“The Governor is ultimately the person who spends the money regardless of the legislative actions, so there would have to be some ironclad understandings of how that money is gonna be spent.”
Apparently, the idea here is to do what most did with the Illinois State Museum and simply ignore the hostages altogether until the ransom price is drastically reduced.
You gotta wonder how long that can last.
Your thoughts?
86 Comments
|
Gridlock spreads
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Rauner on the sale of the Thompson Center…
The Republican governor, embroiled in a political dispute with the Democrat-led General Assembly, said his proposal was unrelated to what he has dubbed his “Turnaround Agenda” that includes seeking pro-business, union-weakening legislation in exchange for a state budget.
OK, well, it’s good to know that he won’t hold up a budget in exchange for legislative approval of the building sale.
* But the other party is another matter. Kurt Erickson writes about HB4313, which was introduced yesterday by House GOP Leader Jim Durkin regarding the proposed sale…
Durkin’s plan would apparently bypass a lengthy public hearing process imposed by the General Assembly to keep governors from moving too quickly in shutting down state facilities.
Durkin’s proposal calls for establishing a base price for the 16-story building through an appraisal process. It would then allow officials to either auction off the building for no less than the highest appraisal price or sell it through a sealed bidding process.
In the latter case, the proposal would allow the building to be sold for less than its appraised value. […]
Steve Brown, spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, said Rauner offered few details about the sale in an announcement Tuesday, including where current workers would be moved and how other services done at the building would be affected.
“That will all have to be examined,” Brown said. “I’m not sure rushing is a good idea. Usually when you rush things, that’s when you make mistakes.”
On the bright side, using Brownie’s logic, by January of next year we ought to get one incredibly fantastic state budget.
/snark
…Adding… Mayor Emanuel, however, supports the sale, saying it could add $20 million a year to tax coffers.
31 Comments
|
Credit Unions – Individual service, united in focus
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
As locally-owned not-for-profit financial cooperatives, credit unions hold a strong belief in giving back to their communities. Twenty-three chapters across Illinois unite 303 credit unions and are integral to fulfilling the financial need for nearly three million consumer members.
The Rockford Area Chapter alone serves 11 credit unions and their 88,000 members in a four county area. Similar to other credit union chapters, Rockford strongly believes in supporting their communities and collaborates on a year-round marketing campaign to facilitate making a difference.
With October designated as National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, the chapter’s latest community effort will be to sponsor the 4th Annual Pink Party/Bra Auction. This event raises money for Pink Heals of Winnebago County, a local non-profit organization that helps families dealing with cancer. All of the money donated to Pink Heals will stay local, just like credit unions. The chapter’s sponsorship can also be seen in a Rockford firefighter calendar sale, with 100 percent of the proceeds donated to Pink Heals.
Giving back to their members, causes and the communities they serve – this is the credit union difference.
Comments Off
|
Rethinking George
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Former Gov. George Ryan spoke recently to Waukegan Township’s Coalition to Reduce Recidivism…
Ryan was given standing ovations at both the start and end of his speech, during which he focused primarily on his transformation from a death-penalty advocate to an opponent who first imposed a moratorium on executions and then commuted all capital punishment sentences in the state before the end of his term. […]
“I want to make this very clear: Gov. Ryan, we miss you,” [State Sen. Terry Link, a Waukegan Democrat] said, drawing applause. “(Ryan) knew how to get something done that would affect every person in this room and every person in the state of Illinois in a positive manner, and that’s what we lack in Springfield today.”
At one point, Ryan showed that he hadn’t lost the politician’s touch for engaging an audience when he remarked on an introduction that detailed his entire career.
“Thank you for that wonderful introduction,” he said. “You know more about me than the FBI.”
* Ryan’s hometown paper effused praise…
Now, there are those who will have no use for Ryan’s remarks, and their opposition is based on one of two factors, if not both.
Some will dismiss them because they believe anyone who commits a crime serious enough to draw a felony conviction should carry that label forever. And there are millions of ardent death penalty supporters out there, those who believe the punishment fits the crime.
Others will oppose Ryan’s beliefs because he is a convicted criminal himself, and as such, his message doesn’t carry as much weight as it would otherwise.
But, remember this. He served his debt to society, and amid the actions that got him sent to jail, he accomplished much to help this state. […]
Ultimately, those efforts [to reduce recidivism, abolish the death penalty, etc.] might get something done, which is more than you can say for what is happening in the state’s current political climate.
* A good friend of mine and I drove to Kankakee this summer to have lunch with the former governor. It was off the record, but I can tell you that he remembered almost everything negative I ever wrote about him. Even so, we talked for four hours.
I’ve always been torn about George Ryan, and vice versa. I was born in Kankakee. My family used his pharmacy on Court Street. I never knew him growing up, but my grandfather and his Kankakee mayor brother were pals (although I never knew Tom either). Because I was a K3 guy, George always treated me well. At the same time, because I was a K3 guy, I was supposed to be on “the team,” which I never was, and that irritated him to no end because I whacked him but good on many an occasion.
* But, it is undeniably true that he was the last governor who could actually get big things done on a consistent basis. Rod Blagojevich passed some major bills and so did Pat Quinn, as has our current governor (check out the amazing progress this year on criminal justice reform if you doubt me). But none of them had or has the deft touch of George Ryan. Part of that was because the Republicans controlled the Senate at the time (although Pate Philip and Ryan had many a go-around), but a lot of it was because he was a former House Speaker and knew how to pull the levers and the strings. His successors have had trouble even finding those levers and strings.
I remember sitting in Blagojevich’s office one day and he asked me what I thought of a major bill of his that was stuck in limbo. His chief Senate sponsor was a disaster and the bill was going down hard. I told him his only hope was to call President Bush and ask him to pardon George Ryan and then put him on the payroll because he was the only man on Earth who could pass that turkey.
* Yeah, he made some mistakes, both criminally and governmentally. But, man, could he ever get stuff done. And even if you disagree with what he did accomplish, you have to admit that he was a success in at least that regard.
I’ve often said over the years that if we could just elect a governor who was both competent and not in danger of going to prison this state could do great things.
I somehow managed to convince myself toward the end of last year’s campaign that Bruce Rauner could be that guy - that he had the skill set to be almost as good at governing as Ryan without the legal, um, downsides.
Instead, I’m still waiting.
75 Comments
|
* From the Simon Institute…
More than a third of southern Illinois voters (37.4 percent) say either they or someone in their immediate families have been affected by the current Illinois budget stalemate, according to a poll by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Another 56.6 percent said they have not been touched by it.
Among all southern Illinois voters, the largest group (10.0 percent) said they had experienced a job loss or threatened job loss from the budget impasse. The next largest group of responses were from those who said they had been affected by healthcare and health insurance cuts (3.7 percent). Also, there were 3.2 percent who said they had experienced social service cuts; 2.7 percent who said their city governments had experienced cuts; 2.5 percent who said they had experienced changes in child care costs or services, and 2.0 percent who said their impact had been through higher education cuts.
The remainder of the impacts of the budget conflict included a range of volunteered responses, which included impacts on the local economy (1.2 percent), cuts to utility assistance programs (1.0 percent), and mental health care (0.7 percent).
The poll of registered voters in 18 counties south of Interstate 64 was taken September 22-October 2. The survey was based on a random sample of 401 registered voters who responded to telephone interviews. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points. Thirty percent of the sample were cell phone users.
In the open-ended comments, respondents volunteered such specific answers as their family had to relocate because of loss of a state job, their health care had been adversely affected, respondent’s husband was on disability and now can’t get it, loss of meals for shut-ins, delayed payments on dental services, doctors want their payments up front now, proposed closing of the Hardin County Work Camp, and other generalized negative consequences.
“These responses show clearly that what’s happening—or not happening—in Springfield is having a direct impact on a lot of people’s lives in southern Illinois” noted John S. Jackson, a visiting professor at the Paul Simon Institute and one of the designers of this poll. “Decision-makers need to consider that their inaction is causing very specific harm, which people notice, and the negative effects are accelerating as time goes by” Jackson added.
But David Yepsen, director of the Institute, said “maybe one reason nothing’s happening in Springfield is that a lot of voters don’t feel the effect of this stalemate. Most people don’t work for a government. Most people don’t rely on safety net programs like day care or health care. If they did, perhaps the logjam would break because political leaders would be feeling more heat.”
“It’s also true some people might not feel it because the state is still spending money without a budget,” Yepsen said. “Schools, for example, did get an appropriation. Other spending is directed by court-orders.”
* The accompanying chart…
There’s more to this poll and we’ll get to it in a bit.
53 Comments
|
Lottery ends payouts over $600
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I told you this was coming last week. From a press release…
Due to the ongoing budget stalemate in Springfield, the Illinois Lottery is announcing a change in winner payment policy. All winners over $600 will experience a delay in payments. Previously, this policy only applied to those winnings over $25,000. Once a budget is passed in Springfield, all outstanding claims will be paid.
Since July 1, 2015, Illinois Lottery winners over $25,000 have experienced payment delays, since the Illinois Comptroller has not had the legal authority to disburse their winnings. Those players who have won under $25,000 have continued to receive their winnings, as they were paid at Illinois Lottery claim centers.
Beginning on October 15, 2015, the Illinois Lottery anticipates its check writing account will be exhausted, as there is no legal authority to replenish it with funds. Players who win $600 and below can continue to receive their winnings at any of the Lottery’s 8,000 retail locations statewide.
* More from the Tribune…
Two lottery winners whose payments were delayed last month filed a federal lawsuit against the Illinois Lottery, acting director B.R. Lane, its private management company Northstar Lottery Group and the Illinois Lottery Control Board. The suit is attempting to force the lottery to release prizes over $25,000 with interest and prevent the lottery from paying administrative and operational costs until winnings are released. The suit would prevent the sale of tickets for prizes over $25,000 until the money can be paid without delay.
“If I was the one selling raffle tickets and I didn’t pay, I would be sued or in jail or both,” Rhonda Rasche, one of the winners who filed the suit, previously told the Tribune.
Emphasis added because that seems to be a bit much.
41 Comments
|
Report: Dorothy Brown’s home raided by feds
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This has been a hot rumor for days…
FBI agents paid an early morning visit to the home of onetime mayoral candidate and longtime Circuit Court clerk Dorothy Brown, seizing her government-issued cell phone, sources told POLITICO.
The visit, which happened last week, is the clearest sign yet that a probe that initially scrutinized Brown’s husband, Benton Cook III, has expanded to include Brown herself.
One source said the phone seizure was intended to allow investigators to review text messages on the device.
Sources with knowledge of the investigation tell POLITICO that clerk office employees have received federal subpoenas from the Chicago U.S. attorney’s office.
Sources say one line of inquiry centers on Brown’s relationship with employees, their contributions to her political fund and whether those who donated were rewarded.
43 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|