Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
More Winnebago weirdness

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Rockford Register-Star

Winnebago County Coroner Bill Hintz does not plan to resign from office, so says his attorney.

Hintz, who was arrested last week on charges of forgery, theft, conspiracy to commit theft and official misconduct, appeared briefly in court Tuesday with his attorney, Mark Byrd.

Hintz was informed Judge Joe McGraw has been assigned to the case and was told his next court date is 9 a.m. Oct. 20.

Hintz declined to talk once outside the courtroom, but Byrd said his client is to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise, and he said the coroner has no intention of resigning from his post.

“Why would an innocent man leave a job that he loves?” Byrd said.

* Earlier

Winnebago County Board members are split on the call for Coroner Bill Hintz’s resignation after Hintz was charged Thursday with forgery, theft, conspiracy to commit theft and official misconduct.

Seven board members contacted by the Register Star said Hintz should step down immediately while four board members contend Hintz should be allowed to stay on the job pending the outcome of his criminal case.

Three County Board members said they are undecided. The remaining six board members were not immediately available for comment. […]

However, at least three County Board Republicans believe Hintz should be allowed to stay on the job while his case plays out in court.

“Innocent until proven guilty,” said Jim Webster, R-2. “Until it goes through the judicial system, we don’t know all of the facts of the case.”

  18 Comments      


The Metro East region has the highest positivity rate in the state, but its leaders remain stubbornly defiant

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* My most recent weekly syndicated newspaper column, which is from a week ago

When Gov. J.B. Pritzker announced the state COVID-19 “mitigation” plan for the Metro East on Aug. 16, he said it was done in conjunction “with local officials in the Metro East region and across the border in St. Louis.”

Last week, though, the governor admitted the cross-border arrangement to try to contain the virus’ spread was a “mistake.”

Man, was it ever.

Instead of sticking to the state’s original mitigation plan, which would’ve included things like reducing indoor restaurant capacity and shutting down all indoor bar service, Pritzker only ordered bars and restaurants to close at 11 p.m., which was in line with what St. Louis was planning at the time.

But the region’s test positivity rate has since continued to rise to, as I write this, just above 10%, by far the highest in Illinois.

Then, last week, Region 7, which includes Will and Kankakee counties, experienced 8-plus percent positivity rates three days in a row, which triggered automatic state mitigation.

According to a Belleville News-Democrat report, the Illinois Department of Public Health informed Metro East officials last Monday that their region’s state restrictions would be tightened to match those that were about to be imposed on Will and Kankakee, including a ban on indoor dining and drinking.

But the same Metro East Democratic legislators who demanded prematurely that Pritzker speed up the business reopening process way back on May 12 pitched a fit and Pritzker backed down.

The protesting Democrats did have a point, I suppose. Pritzker originally said the restrictions he put in place would last two weeks. The local politicians wanted the governor to stick to his word. And the governor’s own plan states that once a region meets the “resurgence criteria,” then a “tiered menu of mitigation options will be considered.” There are no actual hard and fast rules in his plan and those Metro East Democrats undoubtedly knew the loopholes going in.

But that meant Pritzker would be imposing significantly tighter restrictions on Will and Kankakee counties, even though the two counties have substantially lower positivity rates than the Metro East (8.4% vs. 10.4% as I write this).

And that set off Republican state Senators Sue Rezin and John Curran, who represent parts of Region 7. The two claimed the governor had “decided to place partisan politics above science.” The same rules should apply to all regions, they said, “and they should be based on science, not politics.”

It didn’t help that Pritzker failed to reach out to the two Republican legislators before making his announcement. So, they, too, had a valid point.

On a crass political level, the Metro East was instrumental to Pritzker’s 2018 Democratic primary win. It’s also a vitally important region for his “Fair Tax” proposal. Without the full and fervent cooperation of those powerful local political organizations, there’s no dispute that his tax plan will be in serious trouble.

The plain fact of the matter, however, is that Pritzker cannot on the one hand say he values science over politics and then on the other even appear to cave on political grounds.

There may have been sound reasons to try and equalize restrictions with St. Louis because the city is mere minutes away from everyone in the Metro East, which is small in comparison to the Missouri metro region. It’s not like the governor can close the bridges, after all. And, yes, Pritzker said he’d give the region two weeks. But he openly admitted last week that his actions clearly didn’t work. Sometimes, you just gotta bite the bullet.

That region is on the verge of getting totally out of control, if it isn’t already. Illinois can’t do anything about Missouri. Deal with Illinois.

Thankfully, Pritzker seemed chastened by the whole experience last week when pressed by a reporter. “I will readily admit that that was not a good idea,” he said. He should never, ever do this again.

And it’s long past time for those Metro East Democratic legislators who’ve been up in arms since May about the governor’s executive orders to loudly demand that their constituents finally take this pandemic seriously. There’s no excuse for this nonsense. The region is fast becoming a national hot spot, for crying out loud.

Several of those same legislators pushed hard to establish a large local contact tracing pilot program in St. Clair County. But experts have said contact tracing can be overwhelmed when the positivity rate is above 5%. It’s not a panacea. Do better. There is no easy way out of this.

You’d think those folks in the Metro East would start taking this thing seriously. They are not. In fact, they’re growing more militant.

* For instance

On behalf of the 650-member organizations and businesses of the RiverBend Growth Association, I write this letter to implore you to seek a better way to measure the positivity rate that has placed Region 4 back into resurgence mitigation. These efforts are affecting the local Riverbend economy, forcing the closure and/or severely limiting the capacities of our restaurant, bars and entertainment industries. Many owners, employees, and families are being unfairly placed in financial jeopardy.

    • Why are bars, restaurants and our entertainment industry being looked at with scrutiny, when the contact tracing does not point to these specific industries as a source of the problem?

    • Why are those incarcerated or living in nursing homes and assisted care facilities included in the totals when they are confined to their facilities and not a part of the community spread?

    • Why are the daily hospital admissions, due to COVID-19, not factored into your decision to allow these businesses to operate when that was such a focus back in March and April?

The RiverBend Growth Association and its members ask that you take these questions into account as we continue to try and move further in the right direction. By looking at the above, and not just restaurants, bars and the entertainment industry, we can help create a better sense of normalcy for our local businesses who are trying to plan for employee scheduling and inventory ordering.

We ask that you give these questions your consideration as you weigh your decision, on Sept. 16, to remove the current restrictions placed on our area.

In closing, it is extremely unfair to all of our local businesses that have been doing their part to serve their customers in a safe and comfortable environment to endure the economic hardship that this resurgence mitigation has placed them in when other businesses are allowed to operate freely. The RiverBend Growth Association will continue to promote Safely Shopping Local in the Riverbend.

* I asked the governor’s office to address those three questions…

• Why are bars, restaurants and our entertainment industry being looked at with scrutiny, when the contact tracing does not point to these specific industries as a source of the problem?

    1. Contact tracing does point to bars, restaurants and entertainment venues contributing to the spread of COVID-19.
    2. Contact tracing in the area has pointed to bars and social gatherings at various venues as major contributors of spread. In Madison County, 23 percent of the most recent outbreaks occurred in restaurants and bars. The same is true of 12.5 percent of East St. Louis’ East Side Health District’s traced outbreaks and 10.5 percent of those in St. Clair County. In each jurisdiction, outbreaks were also tied to critical infrastructure such as healthcare, as well as workplaces, group homes and office settings.
    3. As is highlighted in the weekly press release announcing the counties that are at warning level, which includes Madison County, some of the common factors for an increase in cases and outbreaks are associated with college parties, weddings, large gatherings, bars and clubs, long-term care facilities and other congregate settings, travel to neighboring states, and spread among members of the same household who are not isolating at home. Cases connected to schools are beginning to be reported. General transmission of the virus in the community is also increasing.
    4. Local public health officials are observing people not social distancing, gathering in large groups, and not using face coverings. In some counties, local law enforcement and states’ attorneys are not enforcing important mitigation measures like social distancing and the wearing of face coverings. Additionally, some people refuse to participate in contact tracing and are not providing information on close contacts or answering the phone. Individuals are also waiting to get tested believing their symptoms are allergies or some other cause.

• Why are those incarcerated or living in nursing homes and assisted care facilities included in the totals when they are confined to their facilities and not a part of the community spread?

    1. The notion that those with COVID-19 who live in congregate settings are not a part of community spread is not supported by science. People with COVID-19 who live in congregate settings interact with a variety of staff members who then interact with others in the community during the course of their life outside of work. Also, the assumption in this question is that congregate settings are leading to increased positivity rates for region 4. That again, is simply false. Those who live in congregate settings are counted because they are part of the community and they can contribute to the virus spreading in the community.
    2. Between August 23rd and 29th, the region saw 1,064 new cases, 25 of which (2.35%) were associated with long-term care facilities. In preliminary data from August 30th to September 5th, long-term care facilities were associated with 5 of 1230 cases, or 0.41%.

• Why are the daily hospital admissions, due to COVID-19, not factored into your decision to allow these businesses to operate when that was such a focus back in March and April?

    • Daily hospitalization admissions due to COVID-19 are factored into the mitigation plan outlined by the state as you can read here: https://coronavirus.illinois.gov/s/restore-illinois-mitigation-plan

    • There are two ways to trigger additional state level mitigation: Sustained increase in 7-day rolling average (7 out of 10 days) in the positivity rate AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Sustained 7-day increase in hospital admissions for a COVID-19 like illness; Reduction in hospital capacity threatening surge capabilities (ICU capacity or medical/surgical beds under 20%) OR Three consecutive days averaging greater than or equal to 8% positivity rate (7 day rolling)

    • Region 4 has triggered the 8 percent positivity rate, a rate that according to the public health experts is a warning sign that unless mitigations are in place to lower it, the rate of growth for the virus will be exponentially more difficult to manage.

* Related…

* Local lawmakers unhappy with Pritzker’s tougher virus rules

  32 Comments      


Unclear on the concept

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The president/CEO of the Illinois Press Association is very upset that the governor’s statewide mask-wearing publicity campaign did not purchase any newspaper ads

We’ve been told by the governor’s office that the goal is to reach a younger demographic, and that’s why print advertising in newspapers wasn’t part of the media mix.

Ironically, a study conducted by Civis that was used to guide the campaign showed that, with the exception of adults 65 and over, there is little difference in mask wearing. […]

We understand the value of broadcast advertising to the governor’s campaign. Just like newspapers, broadcast media have been there every step of the way to get the message out about COVID-19 and the state’s response. However, there were no reporters from Facebook or any other social-media platform at any of the governor’s news conferences.

If we missed them, we apologize.

In fact, it seems that the only fact-based reporting on social media is from credible news outlets like newspapers and broadcast outlets, and those didn’t cost the state anything! As a result, Mark Zuckerberg profits while Illinois newspapers continue to struggle with economic hardships exacerbated by the pandemic.

Newspapers have disseminated the critical messages, but when it was time to receive the much-needed support of a paid advertising campaign, newspapers weren’t included.

Of the more than 400 newspapers in Illinois, 307 have accounted for the nearly 3,000 times COVID-19 coverage has been published from Capitol News Illinois (CNI), an initiative supported by Illinois newspapers. The CNI team has reported on every one of the governor’s news conferences.

Man, was that ever a huge insult to all newspaper reporters, particularly those at Capitol News Illinois. “We’re carrying your water, so wet our beaks!”

I mean, imagine the uproar from newspaper editorial boards if Speaker Madigan sent this memo to ComEd: “I have disseminated the critical messages, but when it was time to receive the much-needed support for a paid advertising campaign, I wasn’t included.”

* And check out the super-rich irony here…


  16 Comments      


Question of the day

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The Sun-Times editorial board has been asking all legislative candidates this question

What grade — “A” to “F” — would you give Gov. J.B. Pritzker for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic? Please explain. What, if anything, should he have done differently?

* House Republican Leader Jim Durkin avoided giving Pritzker a grade

Being Governor in Illinois is a tough job on the best of days, and I do not envy the choices a governor has to make. However, we have seen Governor Pritzker put over a million Illinois residents out of work with the stroke of a pen without having a functional unemployment system. To this day, the IDES system is a complete disaster and it’s at the expense of those who are desperate to put food on the table for their families.

We all understand that we are living in unprecedented times, but the General Assembly is a co-equal branch of government and should be doing its job. The Governor continues to run state government via executive order over and over again. Myself and my colleagues from both sides of the aisle did not abdicate our constitutional responsibilities during this pandemic. Our governor cannot rule with unilateral authority.

* Freshman Democratic Rep. Diane Pappas also deferred..

I am grateful that our governor has chosen to listen to the advice of public health experts, scientists, doctors, and epidemiologists when making these very difficult decisions. I can appreciate that none of his decisions – whether I’ve agreed with them or not – have been easy, and that every possible solution and decision came with very real pros and cons. I think it’s clear when looking at Illinois’ data as compared to other states that didn’t rely on the science that we likely avoided an even greater crisis by focusing on medical science-based decision making rather than making the “easy” political decisions.

Unfortunately, what is in reality a very real public health crisis has been weaponized and used as a political tool across our nation. Rather than making decisions based on science and fact, our national response has been haphazard, confusing, and dismissive of the advice of the experts on the frontlines of this fight.

* Republican Rep. Mark Batinick (a Tier One target) was an early advocate for a mask-wearing mandate

Solid B. The Governor acted relatively quickly to halt the spread of the pandemic. Decisions made hastily aren’t usually perfect but in this instance there was definitely more good than bad. The Governor certainly listened to some of my suggestions. I was the first elected state official to push for the use of face coverings indoors. I started a local campaign and gave away PPE to help make that happen. He acknowledged my efforts publicly several times. Being a Republican pushing early for the use of masks also made it much easier for him to implement their use statewide. People forget that early in the Pandemic there was a lot of pushback against the face covering requirement. It is always helpful for significant policy decisions to have bi-partisan support. My initial conversations to him about this were the end of March with an open letter mid-April. The requirement was put in place at the beginning of May. I wish it has been put in place even sooner.

Big box stores were allowed to stay open and sell all of their items while small businesses selling the same items were not. Not only was this not fair it put more people in fewer places. That is harmful not helpful. The picking of winners and losers should not have been allowed. I have filed legislation to eliminate this practice.

But the issues at Illinois Department of Employment Security alone make it impossible to give him and “A”. The calls to my office for people waiting months to receive benefits during this difficult time was massive. That is completely unacceptable. There were also many calls to my office over fraudulent use of their names to receive benefits. People who didn’t deserve benefits were getting them while people who were desperate did not.

His Democratic opponent offered up no grade.

* GOP Rep. Amy Grant represents what used to be Jeanne Ives’ district

As a former teacher, I think I’ll answer this more in a pass/fail grading scale. The Governor passes, but not with flying colors. I watched the daily updates carefully for several weeks. His constant criticism of the federal response distrurbed me since I saw with my own eyes that a hospital was built at McCormick Place within days and the hospitals and facilities in my district were getting much needed supplies. I was truly grateful for all of the responses at all levels of government with the extreme pressure and uncertainty of the crisis. Being mapped into an area with all of Chicago and Cook County for advancing through the Governor’s phases struck me as particularly unfair considering the vast differences between cases in DuPage vs. Cook. That has been rectified, so I’m grateful for the more appropriate change. I wish the Governor nothing but good fortune in leading this effort. I do so hoping and praying that he will make appropriate decisions for appropriate areas going forward. I don’t wish to criticize anyone who’s truly trying their best to help.

Her Democratic opponent did not grade Pritzker.

* Appointed Republican Rep. Brad Stephens is another Tier One target

C. I was initially very supportive of the Governor’s response to Covid-19 and applauded him for moving decisively in an incredibly uncertain and unprecedented time. That said, as time went on I was frustrated with some inconsistencies in the reopening plan which created confusion and uncertainty over our path forward. Additionally the lack of organization and responsiveness from IDES has been unacceptable. Our district has been disproportionately impacted by this pandemic due to the high number of restaurant, hospitality, and gig economy workers. In late March I held a teletownhall for our residents with staff from IDES to help provide information on unemployment assistance and other services. Five months later my offices still receive calls and emails daily from constituents who are unable to get their deserved benefits or even a response from IDES - the State of Illinois must do better.

His Democratic opponent did not grade the governor.

* Republican Tim Ozinga is hoping to replace retiring GOP Rep. Margo McDermed

F — Governor Pritzker has moved the goal-posts on restrictions and requirements for all working-class individuals in the state. He condemned our elderly to a death sentence, keeping them locked down in COVID incubators, and was fine with Illinois’ economy going even further in the gutter. His only solution (it isn’t one) is a federal bailout. All the while, Pritzker has directed $55 million towards his efforts to pass a progressive tax that will hurt small businesses and working families even more. Governor Pritzker’s COVID regions put in place for his phases across the state were short-sided and indicative of his familiarity with the state of Illinois outside of Chicago.

His Democratic opponent gave the governor an “A.”

* The Question: What grade — “A” to “F” — would you give Gov. J.B. Pritzker for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please…


bike trails

  78 Comments      


1,392 new cases, 7 additional deaths, 1,504 in the hospital, 4.0 percent positivity rate

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Press release…

The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) today announced 1,392 new confirmed cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Illinois, including seven additional confirmed deaths.

    • Clinton County: 1 male 40s, 1 male 80s
    • Cook County: 1 male 30s
    • Jackson County: 1 male 40s
    • Montgomery County: 1 female 90s
    • Williamson County: 1 male 70s, 1 female 90s

Currently, IDPH is reporting a total of 252,353 cases, including 8,186 deaths, in 102 counties in Illinois. The age of cases ranges from younger than one to older than 100 years. The preliminary seven-day statewide positivity for cases as a percent of total test from September 1 – September 7 is 4.0%. Within the past 24 hours, laboratories have reported 31,363 specimens for a total of 4,478,710. As of last night, 1,504 people in Illinois were reported to be in the hospital with COVID-19. Of those, 343 patients were in the ICU and 133 patients with COVID-19 were on ventilators.

Following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, IDPH is now reporting separately both confirmed and probable cases and deaths on its website. Reporting probable cases will help show the potential burden of COVID-19 illness and efficacy of population-based non-pharmaceutical interventions. IDPH will update these data once a week.

*All data are provisional and will change. In order to rapidly report COVID-19 information to the public, data are being reported in real-time. Information is constantly being entered into an electronic system and the number of cases and deaths can change as additional information is gathered. For health questions about COVID-19, call the hotline at 1-800-889-3931 or email dph.sick@illinois.gov.

Hospitalizations are down a bit from a week ago. The Metro East region’s positivity rate is 9.8 percent. The Will/Kankakee County rate is down to 7.4 percent. The region that includes the Quad Cities and Peoria is 7.2 percent, down a bit from its recent peak.

  11 Comments      


Environmental protesters picket on Speaker Madigan’s property

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Del Vecchio is a freelance reporter…



A Madigan spokesperson had no comment.

The group has made some recent campaign endorsements. It’s mainly focused on the Green New Deal.

…Adding… Duncan Black recently made some very important points about activist dynamics

Here’s the way it’s supposed to work.

    1) Activists make “extreme” maximalist demands.
    2) Centrist politicians say whoa whoa this is a real issue, but those activists are a bit nuts, still here is a Common Sense Proposal That All Americans Can Agree On which addresses the problem in a good bipartisan fashion (blah blah blah cue West Wing theme).
    3) Activists keep making extreme demands.
    4) Centrist politicians say, “See how reasonable we are? We aren’t like those nutters, our proposals are Good! And Reasonable! And Common Sense! And that those crazy activists are still mad about it is proof that we aren’t just crazy weirdo lefties! See how mad they are!”

The point is that something can be achieved even as the politicians get cred for punching hippies. It’s a bit of kayfabe, but hopefully also a bit of win-win. Still it requires that the hippies remain mad! If the hippies are happy the show breaks down.

Now what happens is the “reasonable” proposals are made, the activists remain mad (as they are supposed to), and then people get mad at the activists for not being more grateful. That’s not how it works!

When activists, say, fight for $15, and then the politicians come back with, “well, that’s nuts, how about $12 in 3 years,” those politicians don’t get to run to their business donors and say, “see? we fought off the hippies for you,” if the hippies say, “wow, great, $12 in 3 years is good enough, thank you Mr. Politician.’

You see this a lot with the environmental groups as well.

  45 Comments      


Harmon’s formal response to federal subpoena shows he had basically no records to submit

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Tribune

Add Illinois Senate President Don Harmon’s office to the long list of organizations, politicians, lobbyists and others subpoenaed in a wide-ranging federal probe that has already led to a series of political corruption charges and convictions.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago demanded that Harmon’s office, which he took over early this year after the retirement of former Senate President John Cullerton, turn over all documents and communications related to a property at Cermak Road and Wentworth Avenue in Chinatown. The parcel is a state-owned parking lot long coveted by developers. […]

There’s no indication in the subpoena that Harmon is a target of a federal probe.

“Clearly there is an ongoing federal investigation related to Marty Sandoval’s legislative activities,” Harmon spokesman John Patterson said in a statement. “Our office has complied with requests for information.”

* Sun-Times

When the feds raided Sandoval’s offices last year, they sought records related to the law firm where Harmon used to work. The Oak Park Democrat stepped down from that firm after succeeding John Cullerton as Senate president in January.

Harmon, who has not been accused of any wrongdoing, has said Sandoval had a habit of keeping files on political opponents.

“Clearly there is an ongoing federal investigation related to Marty Sandoval’s legislative activities,” Harmon spokesman John Patterson said. “Our office has complied with requests for information.”

* From the subpoena

* As I told subscribers this morning, the two stories left out a very important item: Harmon’s complete response to the subpoena. Click here and scroll down to see it.

All you will see in Harmon’s response is the Senate Judiciary Committee’s packet of information about bills that were currently in the committee at the time, which included the legislation in question.

Oh, and by the way, the Chinatown parcel was not even in the Senate bill when it passed the committee, nor was it in the bill when the Senate sent the bill to the House, nor was it in the bill when the House sent it back to the Senate for concurrence.

So, unless you’re prepared to say that Don Harmon is flat-out defying a federal subpoena, there’s pretty much nothing to see here.

  8 Comments      


The House target list

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Politico has a good roundup today of the House Republican seats currently in play

Republican Rep. Allen Skillicorn recently toyed with stepping aside this election season — but he told Playbook over the weekend that he’s still in the race. His waffling about running has tripped up his momentum, making the 66th District seat ripe for Democratic challenger Suzanne Ness to pick off.

The rematch in the 54th District between Republican Rep. Tom Morrison and Democratic challenger Maggie Trevor is expected to go Democrat this time. Morrison only barely won in 2018. And Palatine is likely to support Joe Biden for president.

Republican Rep. Grant Wehrli faces Democratic challenger Janet Yang Rohr. Their 41st District encompasses Naperville, a suburb that shifted Democrat in 2018 — and saw Congresswoman Lauren Underwood defeat a longtime Republican.

Ditto Rep. Deanne Mazzochi, a 47th District Republican from DuPage County, which is also leaning Democrat. Mazzochi won by just over 1,500 votes in 2018 and this time the Democrat, Jennifer Zordani, has strong party backing.

Republican Rep. Brad Stephens is in a tight race against Dem challenger Michelle Darbro, an EMT and firefighter backed by Madigan. Stephens will do well in Rosemont (where he’s also the mayor) but he’ll get clobbered in the Chicago area that’s part of the 20th District.

Rep. Amy Grant is in jeopardy of losing her 42nd District seat to progressive Ken Mejia-Beal.

Democrats also think they can defeat Republican Reps. John Cabello, Steve Reick, Norine Hammond, and Dan Ugaste, though GOP insiders expect the races to hinge on whether their GOP-leaning districts back Trump this time around.

And Republicans hope to flip the 116th District: Republican David Friess, an attorney, vs. the recently appointed Dem Rep. Nathan Reitz; 111th District: Republican Amy Elik vs. Democratic Rep. Monica Bristow (Republicans lost by 356 votes to Bristow two years ago); and the 112th District that has Republican Lisa Ciampoli challenging Democratic Rep. Katie Stuart.

I think there are more, but that’ll do for now.

Thoughts?

  39 Comments      


Legislative Black Caucus unveils fall legislative agenda

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Press release from last week

Senate Majority Leader and Chair of the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus Kimberly A. Lightford (D-Maywood) joined colleagues at the Westside Justice Center on Tuesday to announce a plan to build a legislative agenda that addresses systemic racism in Illinois.

“We have an opportunity to leverage this moment to make sure other Black women, Black mothers and Black wives just like me can truly have peace, justice and hope for our future, knowing that our children and our grandchildren will not share the same kind of life experiences that everyone in my generation and generations before me have had to endure,” Lightford said.

Lightford and the ILBC plan to hold hearings on four pillars of policy to compose a legislative agenda to be brought forth during the fall veto session. The four pillars of policy are as follows:

    I. Criminal justice reform, violence reduction and police accountability
    II. Education and workforce development
    III. Economic access, equity and opportunity
    IV. Health care and human services

* WTTW

The caucus will hold a series of hearings in the months leading up to November’s post-election veto session – the first of which, focused on police accountability, was held Tuesday – so that definite proposals will be ready for the legislature to take up when it reconvenes Nov. 17-19 and Dec. 1-3, Lightford said.

Without concrete measures to evaluate, it’s impossible to gauge the probability of success and support Black lawmakers’ wish list will receive from their peers.

So far, the Democratic leaders who call the shots in the legislature are supportive, but vague on just what they’ll back.

* Illinois Senate President Don Harmon…

The Black Caucus is showing us the path to a better Illinois. I look forward to being an ally and helping win approval of needed reforms.

* Speaker Madigan…

“Like so many, I’ve been reflecting on the injustices our communities of color, especially within the Black community, have faced for generations and thinking about ways in which we can address these issues and ways we can do better in Illinois to improve the quality of life of Black America.

“We are at a turning point, and it’s past time to take action. We know there isn’t one single source that has contributed to issues of inequality in our country and our state. We must evaluate all of our institutions to finally bring about the change that will make a difference. We must revisit issues with our criminal justice system, policing tactics, education system, workforce and economic opportunities and access to healthcare, among others, to bring about equity in the lives of Black Illinoisans.

“I thank the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus (ILBC) for advancing these difficult but necessary discussions. I believe it’s time we build on the legislature’s past efforts to meaningfully explore the issues outlined in the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus’ Policy Agenda, and I will continue to work closely with the ILBC to support their efforts to end systemic racism throughout Illinois.

“Along with my staff, I have had many conversations with Black Caucus members, community leaders, other elected officials and residents across the state to understand the pain, concerns and ideas for moving forward. I am committed to working with everyone seeking changes to address those recommendations and enact policies that finally start to provide equal justice under the constitution.”

* WEEK

Rep. La Shawn Ford emphasized Black leaders have been fighting and struggling for years. However, their voices and efforts have gone unheard.

“We are now at a moment where our white colleagues that have been raised in white communities, that just didn’t understand what we were talking about, are now uncomfortable. They are so uncomfortable now that they are hearing all of the asks that they couldn’t hear before,” Ford said. “Now the question is, are they ready to act on what they are hearing? Are they ready to join in the effort to make Illinois healthy?”

Several caucus members note the state won’t move forward unless their concerns are addressed. They believe all people deserve the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

“I know that the Constitution that I love and hold so dear - when it was written - I was not the person it was written for, nor were my ancestors or people who look like me,” explained Sen. Elgie Sims (D-Chicago). “But the reality is that for myself, my ancestors, my children, and future generations, I am owed a debt.”

* Capitol News Illinois

State Senate Majority Leader and ILBC Chair Kimberly Lightford opened her remarks at the news conference by noting, “This is the moment that I have dreamed of, that I have prayed for, that I have worked towards my entire life.”

“This is a time when I stand on my parents’ shoulders, and their parents’ shoulders, and their parents’ shoulders and their parent’s shoulders,” she said. “We’re finally here … today as the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus, to present to you our agenda to end systemic racism that has oppressed our people for as long as we’ve ever known.” […]

While none of the pillars of the agenda have been filed as legislation yet, Lightford said bills would be ready for the fall legislative session.

“We will have our legislative initiatives prepared for the veto session and we do intend on taking up all of veto session to address them,” she said.

* Finke

It is still about three months and a presidential election away, but the veto session is shaping up to be a potentially busy time in Springfield.

This considering there were (and still are to some degree) people whispering that the veto session will be canceled. The basis of that is there are literally no vetoes for lawmakers to consider and with the coronavirus pandemic continuing, it will still be difficult to convene the General Assembly in a safe manner. There are also people pushing the idea that the Democratic leaders don’t want to convene with the questions hovering over House Speaker Michael Madigan and the federal investigation into Commonwealth Edison.

Counter that, though, with the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus saying last week that they fully expect the veto session to be dominated by their efforts to pass criminal justice and social justice reform legislation. They made it clear that they intend to move while there is a national focus on those issues. Or as Rep. Chris Welch, D-Hillside, said, “The Black agenda cannot wait.”

The Black Caucus is a significant force in the Democratic Caucus making it improbable they will be told to wait until later by the Democratic leaders.

* Scott Holland

These aren’t just Chicago issues; there are Black families throughout Illinois. It’s not just a youth mindset; the pillars focus on developing a solid labor force and working for equality of opportunity when it comes to starting businesses, getting loans and investing in property. Neither are they strictly Black issues; poverty knows no race, and Illinois has miles to go before it can be said all its young people have equal opportunities.

But if you shut down upon encountering phrases like “police accountability” and “systemic racism,” you’ll miss the big picture. We should listen to our neighbors when they tell us they’re hurting and fully engage with their ideas for solutions.

Yes, it is important to discuss how nonwhite communities are policed. But the people pushing for change know that’s only part of the equation.

Don’t miss the message — the entire message.

  9 Comments      


House investigative committee to hold first hearing this Thursday

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Background is here if you need it. My Crain’s Chicago Business column

Illinois House Republican Leader Jim Durkin made huge headlines recently when he filed a petition to commence formal disciplinary proceedings against House Speaker Michael Madigan.

Leader Durkin’s petition relied on information contained in ComEd’s “Deferred Prosecution Agreement” with the US Attorney’s office. The DPA claimed ComEd participated in a years-long scheme to essentially bribe Madigan into giving it favorable Statehouse treatment with jobs, contracts, internships and even a corporate board seat.

Speaker Madigan has denied all wrongdoing, and claimed Durkin’s rarely used maneuver was a “political stunt” in an election year to distract from Republican President Donald Trump’s spectacular unpopularity in Illinois.

Public opinion polling has consistently shown that Madigan is the most unpopular politician in Illinois – even more so than Trump, who lost Illinois by 17 points in 2016.

So, it’s natural that tying Madigan to his House Democratic incumbents and candidates has been the go-to move by Republicans for years. It appeared to work well only once, in 2016 when then-Gov. Bruce Rauner spent a fortune to bust Madigan’s chops and the House Speaker lost a net of four seats. The Madigan people blamed Trump’s huge popularity and Hillary Clinton’s unpopularity in Downstate districts for the setback.

Two of the three members Durkin appointed to the newly created investigative committee are in extremely difficult reelection battles. Both members, Reps. Grant Wehrli (R-Naperville) and Deanne Mazzochi (R-Elmhurst), have darkly warned voters about Madigan’s ties to their opponents. They’re not exactly bringing open minds to the proceedings.

“Every ad you see for her,” one of Rep. Wehrli’s recent campaign mailers claimed as an arrow pointed to a photo of his Democratic opponent Janet Yang Rohr, “is paid for by him,” as an arrow pointed to a pic of Madigan.

So, is Madigan right that this is all about politics? Well, the petition and subsequent committee hearings (if any) will help Leader Durkin’s political interests. As in the past, all of Durkin’s candidates have been using the Madigan issue in their races.

Durkin has also vowed to defeat Gov. JB Pritzker’s graduated income tax proposal at the ballot, and at least one of the groups opposing the tax change has already used the investigation into Madigan to ask voters not to trust the “corrupt politicians” with additional taxation power.

But, really, who cares?

Click here to read the rest before commenting, please.

* Meanwhile, this is from the WBEZ report

Republicans filed paperwork this past week to launch the investigation, which will be led by state Rep. Emanuel “Chris” Welch, D-Hillside. […]

“I have never seen the speaker engage in anything inappropriate,” Welch told WBEZ. “Every conversation I’ve had with him, every interaction I’ve had with him, he’s by the book.” […]

Welch said he could envision a scenario where the speaker might be willing to cooperate.

“This is going to be an opportunity for Speaker Madigan to receive due process and a fair hearing,” Welch said. “And if he’s called upon to participate, I’m sure he’ll participate.”

* Capitol News Illinois

A majority vote of the committee is needed to authorize charges, so at least one Democrat would be needed for this to occur. […]

But the rules do not specify what constitutes a chargeable offense, something Wehrli said the General Assembly needs to address.

“If you look at our rules, it’s basically ‘conduct unbecoming’ and things like that. It’s very vague and nebulous, which is once again another reason why we’ve been pushing for ethics reforms is to highlight and make it crystal clear what goes beyond the pale when it comes to ethics,” he said. “Ethics can be very personal to each individual, and we can each interpret them differently. But what we need to do is make sure that the public has set a standard for us to adhere to, which is why I think the ethics reform is probably one of the most pressing issues we can do in Springfield.” […]

The first hearing is scheduled for Thursday, Sept. 10 at 9 a.m.

* Finke

Retired University of Illinois-Springfield political scientist Kent Redfield said he’s not even sure what kind of case House Republicans will be able to make against Madigan. The U.S. Attorney’s office has said it is continuing to investigate political corruption issues. When news of the investigating committee surfaced, Durkin said the U.S. Attorney’s office was notified of it and that it will not interfere with the federal investigation.

Based on that, Redfield said he’s not sure where the House committee investigation is headed.

“It’s not clear to me what they are going to look at or who they’re going to talk to,” Redfield said. “The U.S Attorney doesn’t want the ComEd people answering questions and going on the records on things that might come up in some kind of trial.”

He said it is doubtful that any potential targets of the feds will want to testify to state lawmakers about things federal investigators may be interested in. Moreover, a defense attorney wouldn’t allow a client to put himself in jeopardy by testifying, he said.

  9 Comments      


Former ComEd VP charged, appears to be cooperating

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* WBEZ

Federal prosecutors late Friday filed one count of conspiracy to commit bribery against Commonwealth Edison’s former chief lobbyist, a one-time powerhouse in Springfield whom Speaker Michael Madigan invited as his personal guest to House inauguration festivities last year.

Named in the four-page federal filing was Fidel Marquez, ComEd’s former senior vice president of governmental and external affairs from 2012 until his abrupt and unexplained departure from the company last September.

The specific kind of court filing naming Marquez is indicative of a likely guilty plea and is a clear tightening of the federal probe into potential wrongdoing by the longest-serving House speaker in American history.

Documents obtained Friday by WBEZ through an open-records request to the speaker’s office showed that Madigan issued a personal invitation to Marquez to attend January 2019 House inauguration ceremonies as the speaker’s guest, underscoring the close personal relationship between the two.

* The document…


* Tribune

The Chicago Tribune reported last year that Marquez was a focus of the federal investigation, as is former ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, who abruptly retired last year. Pramaggiore has not been charged. A Pramaggiore spokesman has said that she “has done nothing wrong and any inference to the contrary is misguided and false.”

Prosecutors have said ComEd’s scheme began around 2011 — when key regulatory matters were before the Illinois House that Madigan controls — and continued through last year.

Many of the illegal payments allegedly were arranged by downstate lobbyist Michael McClain, a key confidant and adviser at the center of the probe, according to court records. McClain also has not been charged.

One example cited in ComEd’s deferred prosecution agreement involved a man identified as “Consultant 1,” who allegedly was speaking to a ComEd executive identified by the Tribune as Marquez. The consultant said he believed McClain had spoken to Madigan about the payments, saying the money was “to keep (Public Official A) happy (and) I think it’s worth it, because you’d hear otherwise,” prosecutors alleged.

* Sun-Times

ComEd spokeswoman Shannon Breymaier issued this statement Friday night: “We are not in a position to comment on specific matters related to this former ComEd executive or beyond what is in the statement of facts in ComEd’s deferred prosecution agreement.”

A spokeswoman for Madigan, asked to comment Friday night, sent an email with an earlier statement maintaining Madigan’s innocence in the ongoing case:

“The speaker has never helped someone find a job with the expectation that the person would not be asked to perform work by their employer, nor did he ever expect to provide anything to a prospective employer if it should choose to hire a person he recommended. He has never made a legislative decision with improper motives and has engaged in no wrongdoing here. Any claim to the contrary is unfounded.”

* Another WBEZ piece

“This is an unequivocal indication that Marquez is cooperating,” said Juliet Sorensen, a Northwestern University law professor and a former federal prosecutor who investigated corruption cases. […]

The feds’ deal with ComEd and the new case against Marquez are “signals by the U.S. attorney’s office that more is in the works,” Sorensen said.

“I expect that this is the tip of the iceberg,” she said. […]

In his final role at ComEd, Marquez helped win approval for massive state subsidies for nuclear power plants. The legislation, approved in 2016, was one of two landmark bills that greatly enhanced ComEd’s bottom line during the bribery scheme in Springfield, according to federal court records.

In a photo from a news conference that touted the measure’s passage, Marquez appears with three prominent Democratic lawmakers. Two of those three Springfield politicians — Martin Sandoval and Luis Arroyo — also got charged with corruption in the past year and have stepped down.

  11 Comments      


Open thread

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* How was your day off?

  15 Comments      


Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

  Comments Off      


*** LIVE COVERAGE ***

Tuesday, Sep 8, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Follow along with ScribbleLive


  Comments Off      


« NEWER POSTS PREVIOUS POSTS »
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* It’s just a bill
* National Democrats catching up to Pritzker on 'Freedom'
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller