LIVE session coverage...
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
AFT backs pension compromise

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

* This didn’t get much play anywhere, but the American Federation of Teachers’ president sent out a statement yesterday backing the state unions’ pension reform proposal…

“Illinois has a chance to pass smart and fair pension reform legislation that was developed collaboratively with public employees, who were willing to accept cuts in their retirement benefits to ensure long-term stability of the state’s pension system and its commitment to its employees and retirees. Instead of focusing on blaming, scapegoating and trying to eviscerate public workers—as is the sport in so many states—there was a real effort in the Senate-passed measure to reach consensus with state workers and find a fair solution to fixing the pension system.

“Public employees, who care for the sick, teach our children, and keep bridges and roads safe, make pension contributions throughout their careers and deserve to have retirement security. This proposal guarantees that the state funds pensions and doesn’t walk away from its obligations to hard-working employees. The compromise achieved in Illinois shows that when people are willing to work together in good-faith negotiations, fair solutions are attainable. We hope the Illinois House passes this measure quickly, and it is signed into law.”

That statement is significant because it shows at least one international union is not trying to downplay a compromise effort at the state level. It could even turn out to be a template for other states that are debating the issue.

The newspaper editorial boards have generally been so quick to dismiss the union effort that they haven’t realized what a major step this really was. Unions here have always refused to go backward on pension benefits. The agreement shows that they now understand compromise is necessary and right.

The intense blowhard opposition truly disheartens those of us who have been publicly prodding the unions to come to the table. One of the few non-blowhard editorial pages, the State Journal-Register, wants a few more tweaks

Cullerton’s plan is the best hope for getting pension legislation to the governor this year and ensuring that education, public safety and health care are better funded. He and Madigan should explore ways to modify Cullerton’s plan to find more savings.

For example, it could be modified so that, like Madigan’s plan, it caps the salary upon which an employee can earn a pension. Another potential change could be to rework the funding schedule, as has been suggested by the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability.

Illinois cannot afford to let another legislative session end without making some movement toward pension reform. Madigan and Cullerton should begin negotiations immediately and finally bring this issue to a resolution.

It’s hard to disagree with that.

* From Finke

“As a lawyer-legislator, you can’t just say, ‘Oh, screw the Constitution, let’s just proceed without it.” Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago, on whether lawmakers should consider the chances that a pension bill is constitutional before approving it.

* Related…

* Kadner: A travesty of a mockery of a sham

* Klickna: Coalition plan is fair, effective, constitutional

* Nekritz: Time to do the right thing over the easy thing

* Morrison: We must rethink old ideas about retirement

* Editorial: The time for pension reform is at hand

* Potential impacts of proposed pension plans vary for McDonough County

- Posted by Rich Miller        


67 Comments
  1. - The Old Professor - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:04 am:

    Faculty at UIUC are not unionized (yet) and nobody is authorized to represent us in negotiations to shred our constitutionally-protected contractual rights. They didn’t ask for my consent, and they would not have gotten it. If you take away my money, give me power; identify one or two seats on the Board of Trustees for employees and retirees.


  2. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:05 am:

    ===Faculty at UIUC are not unionized ===

    That’s your problem.


  3. - wordslinger - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:07 am:

    Cullerton’s bringing the heat in support of his bill. It’s an interesting face-off with Madigan.


  4. - Abe the Babe - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:12 am:

    Im guessing Madigan will put savings adders onto the cullerton bill such that the unions no longer are on board. Send it back to the senate (along with the budget) and proclaim:

    “The house has finished its legislative business. adjourned.”

    Sometimes I miss the Emil/Madigan fight. it was terrible for the state but terribly interesting to watch too.


  5. - PublicServant - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:28 am:

    === ===Faculty at UIUC are not unionized ===
    That’s your problem. === ===

    A little bit flippant dontcha think, Rich? He’s a professor at the state’s flagship university. In order to become one, he needed to be near the top of his field. The University of Illinois, in spite of the state’s abandonment of higher education, still is recognized as one of the top public universities in the country, especially in engineering. It’s a great state economic asset. You don’t think those professors might rethink their affiliation with the U of I, if the state decimates the pension? There’s already been a massive brain drain underway in state employment for a while now. And you might want to ask HR around the state how their recruiting has been going regarding the filling of those highly technical, and knowledge-driven job openings. From my perspective, state employment offer/acceptences in those types of positions is non-existant. Losing the brains that attract the students to the state’s flagship university is foolish policy. The professor is right. The unions don’t speak for him, and passing unconstitutional bills won’t solve the debt problems of this state.


  6. - The Old Professor - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:29 am:

    Rich Miller wrote:

    ===Faculty at UIUC are not unionized ===

    That’s your problem.

    My reply: I’ve been working on it the last two years. This won’t help.


  7. - Shore - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:31 am:

    the tribune endorsed a democrat for president twice for the first time in their history. they’ve regularly endorsed jan schakowsky over joel pollak, jesse jackson jr despite the clouds looming over him and boatloads of madigan and cullerton water carriers in the suburbs who are fiscal liberals. Reminds me of the people up on the north shore that used to call mark kirk a radical christian right extremist.


  8. - Demoralized - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:38 am:

    ==passing unconstitutional bills won’t solve the debt problems of this state==

    Passing no bills also won’t help the debt problem of the state. Look, I’ve got a dog in this fight and I don’t want to lose anything. But I also recognize that something has to be done. The truth is we DO NOT KNOW what is or isn’t Constitutional until the state Supreme Court says so. As long as people continue to play those guys and gals in the black robe and thread the needle of Constitutionality absolutely nothing will get done. Pass something and let the Courts tell us something - anything. Until then we’ll get nothing but these academic discussions and hand wringing about Constitutionality.


  9. - walkinfool - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:41 am:

    The AFT is responsible and professional in negotiations and legislative efforts — more than other teachers’ advocates, IMHO.


  10. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:42 am:

    “The agreement shows that they now understand compromise is necessary and right.”

    Very well said. I agree, because the pension debt is so large that other approaches will be needed, such as ending some corporate tax breaks and reamortizing the debt. Now that the unions have agreed to compromise, I believe it puts them in a better position to lobby for some of these things.

    “The newspaper editorial boards have generally been so quick to dismiss the union effort that they haven’t realized what a major step this really was.”

    Some of these people don’t even want unions to exist, or they want to weaken them into political and economic impotence.

    I read a chilling story yesterday about the Bangladesh factory collapse that killed over 1,100 people. The building housed five garment factories. Because of the disaster, the government will now allow workers to unionize without the permission of business owners. It’s said that when workers tried to unionize before, they were fired and even beaten.


  11. - Reality Check - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:43 am:

    You don’t think those professors might rethink their affiliation with the U of I, if the state decimates the pension?

    Yes, of course they will, and should. The point is that the Cullerton bill hardly “decimates the pension”. It guarantees future funding, dedicates a revenue stream, and gives participants like The Old Professor a choice between reasonable options such as setting aside a little bit more from every check, opting out of health insurance in retirement or delaying the annual COLA by a couple of years. Is it what any single person or group would design to serve only its self interest? No - and that’s called compromise.


  12. - Wodford Wayne - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:45 am:

    Of the two plans now on the table, and each passed by 1/2 of the GA, the Senate plan is much better for the unions and their members. As the Chicago Tribune has pointed out, “The Senate plan is projected to save about a third of the House plan’s.”

    By backing the Senate plan the unions can show flexability. They can also save their members money and when it comes time to pay the rest of the money, which will need to be done at some time, they can say that they did their share and now someone else needs to step up to the plate and pay the rest. I wonder who will that be?


  13. - anotherretiree - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:54 am:

    I dont believe the salary cap is constitutional for those employees whose salary is already above it. Each year employees receive a statement showing what level their pension benefit has accrued to. If they resign that day, the benefit has already been earned. For SERS its years of service * .0167 * final avg salary. The salary cap is a dimminishment. The State has put it in writing. For employees who haven’t reached the cap it also may be unconstituitional. They were promised the rules under which their benefit would accrue.You can’t say to a bondholder “I know I signed to pay you interst for 30 years but I think I’ll cap it at 25″. We either have contract law or we don’t. The only solution that will work is Rep Fortner’s.


  14. - Rob Roy - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:02 am:

    I do not need a judge to tell me what is right or wrong or what is constitutional. I can read and I understand what I read. The language was put into the constitution just for the reason that we are now facing so state employees had a guarantee that there pensions would be funded. Mr. Madigan has been in office from 1971 until now, he knows exactly what is the right thing to do and it is not pass some bill and see if it passes the constitutional tests. Just put out a bill that is constitutional from the start. If he can not discern if it is or isn’t after all these years in office…I mean really. The pension system has been stolen from for many years, it’s time to pay the piper.


  15. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:04 am:

    ===I do not need a judge to tell me what is… constitutional.===

    As long as you live in America, you do.


  16. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:05 am:

    Since the Constitutionality issue is a point of contention, why hasn’t anyone asked our chief legal officer - the Attorney General - to weigh in with her legal interpretation of the proposals at hand?

    Don’t make it a campaign thing, either. No pushing her for her proposals or solutions. Just very simply: what is her legal interpretation and opinion of the two proposals at hand?

    She is in a unique position to lend some clarity on the issue for legislators and the public.


  17. - Six Degrees of Separation - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:10 am:

    @Rob Roy and others, Madigan knows his bill is on shaky constitutional ground, and the preamble is an acknowledged end-run around the pension clause where the “general welfare” of the state supposedly trumps the “subset of general welfare” of the pensioners and would-be pensioners. The arguments on both sides of the constitutional issues have been debated ad nauseum by many here, of all stripes and degrees of competency on the issues. Until a bill passes and gets tested by the court, I’m not sure there’s anything anyone can add at this point, even the detailed responders like RNUG.


  18. - Rob Roy - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:13 am:

    I disagree Rich. Judges are human and make mistakes just like the rest of us. I do not need another man or woman for that matter to explain what I already understand. They are suppose to be neutral but if that is true why would the politicians leave them out of the fixes put forward? We are a nation of laws not men well at one time we were. “Shall not be diminished” I get it do you? I do not need a judge to explain that to me.


  19. - Fred's Mustache - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:15 am:

    Rob Roy - Legal scholar of the century (Snark)


  20. - law abiding citizen - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:19 am:

    I thought Fortner’s plan also had a cap on pensionable salary. Freezing the pensionable salary at current income really hurts people in my situation. I am a high earner skilled professional (doctor) who plans to keep working for another 15 years. I agree that capping pensions will make it harder and harder to recruit and keep quality people in high salary positions. I have had many other excellent job offers which I have passed on mainly because of future expectations of a decent pension. Personally I will keep working for the state with Cullerton’s plan but I’ll leave if Madigan’s is found Constitutional.


  21. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:20 am:

    A separate post today notes that Speaker Madigan essentially elected the Chief Justice during his first run for the office.

    Something is definitely rotten in Denmark.


  22. - Rob Roy - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:20 am:

    That’s right just attack me not the issue Mr. Fred. Just because that was not my chosen profession doesn’t mean that I am capable of that job. I am sir a leader not a follower. No Snark intended.


  23. - dupage dan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:21 am:

    What makes the Senate plan more constitutional? By any description, it is a diminishment. So, how is it better? Because there is union support? Is that all it takes?

    I am not knocking the plan. I am a state employee and have skin in the game. I believe that all have to sacrifice here since we all have had a part in this, one way or the other. Face it, if you vote, you are involved. We have elected the folks who have brought this about. I am just curious how it can be said that the Senate plan is “more constitutional”. Is it like saying a woman is mostly pregnant?


  24. - Chris - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:22 am:

    “why hasn’t anyone asked our chief legal officer - the Attorney General - to weigh in with her legal interpretation of the proposals at hand”

    Because (1) she’s an executive branch officer, who you would be asking to speculate about how the judicial branch would rule, and that’s inappropriate, and (2) WHATEVER is passed, she would be called upon to defend before the Supreme Court–what if she says “I think the House plan is unconstitutional and here is why” and then the House plan is the one that is passed into Law? She’d have prejudiced her client.

    That’s simply not a reasonable position.

    Asking the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion is the only practical course, but I do not think they would agree to issue one (someone correct me, please??) until *after* the law is passed.


  25. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:22 am:

    ===Because there is union support? Is that all it takes?===

    Well, no, but the amicus briefs filed by the unions will be extremely important.


  26. - Chris - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:24 am:

    “I am just curious how it can be said that the Senate plan is “more constitutional”. ”

    Believe that that is merely shorthand way of saying “The Supreme Court is more likely to find this plan Consitutional than the other plan”.


  27. - Fred's Mustache - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:33 am:

    Rob,

    I actually agree with you that the diminishment clause poses a problem for both versions of the pension legislation. With that said, just to point to the Constitution and say, “that is what it says” is not a strong legal argument. The U.S. Constitution is just a handful of pages long, yet Constituional Law books are hundreds of pages long.

    I guess my point is, things are never as simple as they seem - especially when it comes to the law.


  28. - Arthur Andersen - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:40 am:

    Good tactical move by the IFT/AFT. As walkinfool noted above, they are the best.


  29. - wordslinger - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:45 am:

    Rob Roy, you might want to stick with cattle rustling.

    Last I checked, judges get to interpret Constitutions and rule on laws.


  30. - orlkon - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:53 am:

    The fact is that no “pension savings” will go toward bringing down the pension debt by appying those funds toward paying it down. Any “savings” will be spent on other programs and pensions will continue to be crippled.
    It ’s another shell game like lottery profits going into the education fund


  31. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:56 am:

    === Because (1) she’s an executive branch officer, who you would be asking to speculate about how the judicial branch would rule, and that’s inappropriate ===

    “Inappropriate” like the time she did this:
    “Madigan Issues Surprise Opinion on Senate Seat”
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/02/26/702086/-Did-Lisa-Madigan-read-my-dKos-Diary

    OR maybe this

    http://www.lisamadigan.org/Issues/item/2010-05–fighting-for-taxpayers-
    As Attorney General, Lisa Madigan has always stood up to Illinois’ powerbrokers on behalf of Illinois taxpayers. In 2004, former Governor Blagojevich planned to mortgage the Thompson Center, a State office building in downtown Chicago, saddling the taxpayers with years of debt for a short-term infusion of cash. In response, Attorney General Madigan issued an opinion finding that the transaction was unconstitutional and refused to allow the deal to proceed.

    It appears Attorney General Madigan feels it perfectly appropriate to issue such opinions, especially when they involved contentious items receiving a media attention. Those are just the first two of many more examples that popped up.

    She should feel right at home sharing her opinion on this issue. It doesn’t even need to be a formal written one as in the many other instances readily available.


  32. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:02 pm:

    I am in an IFT household so I will thank WIF and AA for the complement…..
    We have been quietly working and really appreciate the Senate President
    We and the CTU do have some resources.
    http://www.ilcampaign.org/top20/2009-2010


  33. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:04 pm:

    To Old Prog
    I would first let those so called law professors that Rich took to task a few weeks ago and then you can use a Union but leave out the “law” achool


  34. - wordslinger - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:07 pm:

    When was the last time any AG weighed in on the Constitutionality of any legislation under consideration, or any Supreme Court gave an “advisory” opinion on pending legislation.

    Separation of powers and all that.


  35. - U of I state employee - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:08 pm:

    dupage dan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 11:21 am:

    What makes the Senate plan more constitutional? By any description, it is a diminishment. So, how is it better? Because there is union support? Is that all it takes?

    It too maybe unconstitional, the unions just agreed not to sue. That doesn’t mean someone else can’t.

    PS. I think the Tier II pension as more to do with our brain drain because it doesn’t even meet SS standards, thus Federally illegal. That is trying to be addressed too. Noone is coming to IL anymore because of it when offered a job. At least at our U.


  36. - RNUG - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:21 pm:

    dupage dan @ 11:21 am:

    Guessing at the constitutionality gets down to language and sematics. As I see it, there are four (somewhat redundant and intertwined) hurdles any bill needs to pass:

    1) the pension clause

    2) contract law

    3) previous rulings by the IL SC

    4) the 1970 Con-Con transcripts and subsequent testimony that led to the various #3 above

    As I’ve said before, Madigan’s version of SB0001 is straight diminishment, which doesn’t pass any of the above tests.

    The Cullerton’s version of SB2404 is also diminishment, but at least it possibly passes the contract law test but, since there is no choice to pick the existing rules, I have to assume Cullerton (and Eric Madiar) believe either the funding guanantee and/or police powers will let the bill stand.

    Last week I handicapped both bill’s odds; I see nothing to change my mind on that opinion … IF the IL SC stays consistent with previous rulings.


  37. - Mouthy - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:31 pm:

    As a retiree the Madigan plan hurts worse than the Cullerton plan but is fairer, in respect to the differential between the average and top pension earners such as legislators. The unions are giving a gift to the high earning pensioners. A lot of the state’s unions have leadership that also wear the hat of Democratic activist. They were wearing the wrong hat in the backing of Cullerton’s plan.


  38. - Demoralized - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 12:59 pm:

    @Rob Roy:

    You have a right to your opinion but in the end your opinion doesn’t matter. If the Supreme Court says something is Constitutional then it is. End of story. You may not agree with it but you have to live with it.


  39. - The Old Professor - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:00 pm:

    Let me try to address the Republican readers of Capitol Fax. I have had a contract with UIUC and was explicitly recruited with the understanding that “Faculty salary is 11th in the Big Ten, but the pension is strong and protected by the Constitution”. (Back then, 11th was a joke.) Hundreds of faculty considering competing offers from other first-rate universities were reminded of this promise as part of the UIUC counteroffer. Since contracts are supposed to be binding, the difference between what we get and what we were promised should be construed as a new TAX (of maybe 10-30% eventually) which is levied only on retired state employees. Now how fair does it sound?


  40. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:05 pm:

    ===should be construed as a new TAX (of maybe 10-30% eventually) ===

    More appropriately a “service fee.”


  41. - PublicServant - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:09 pm:

    Professor, I appreciate and agree with your comments, but on this board, we’re way past discussing whether any of the bills being considered are fair to the state employees. We’ve already been cast as villians by the right, and this blog is more about what will pass politically, and how we’re failing to be reasonable and compromise. Oh, also, that we really ought to compromise since no one, execpt apparently Madigan, knows how the Illinois Supreme Court will rule. I think that pretty much sums it up, although I’m sure I’ll be corrected if I’m wrong.


  42. - The Old Professor - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:15 pm:

    The battle between Madigan and Cullerton is a lot like King Kong vs Godzilla, with my promised pension playing the role of Downtown Tokyo


  43. - RNUG - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:20 pm:

    The Old Professor @ 1:15 pm:

    Our pension is the opening act.

    Wait until they get down to spending the “savings” instead of putting it in the pension funds.


  44. - Ghost - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:32 pm:

    Six, technically the preamble is an attempt to trigger a police powers exception to the constitution. To clarify, madigans preamble acknowledges that the law inhernetly is unconstitutional, but it seeks to invoke and document a police powers exception to override the consitution (which in theory is a consitutional disregard for the consitution :))

    The problem is that for Madigan to succedd he has to show a narowly tailored law. It also raises some interesting questions about the the process for constitutionaly ammending the stat consitution. Madigan has created a defacto consitutional ammendment without actually seeking to ammend the consitution. There is a side argument that if the State wants to change pensions proeduraly it can not be done by law, it must be done by seekin to ammend the constitution itself. Imagine if we could bypass Federal constitutional povisions by meeting the standards for passing a law instead of the standards for changing the consitution. Arguably if changing a constitutional provision requries a higher standard then passing a law, we are circumventing the higher standard and rendering it meaningless, since we can bypass it with a law passed under a lower threshold.


  45. - dupage dan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:34 pm:

    @ U of I state employee,

    I appreciate your comments. Frankly, I think if the unions accept something that looks like Cullertons bill and it becomes law, we could likely see the retired state employees banding together into a class action as their interests (and soon to become mine) are not being considered by either bill.


  46. - dupage dan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:38 pm:

    RNUG - how do you arrive at that assumption? Oh, wait a minute, I remember. Psychology 101 class.

    The best predictor of future behavior is…past behavior. Nuff said.


  47. - RNUG - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:41 pm:

    dupage dan @ 1:34 pm:

    Wth the Cullerton bill, you could possibly get a split ruling that retirees are completely protected while employees are protected on beenfits earned to date but can have future terms changed. And portions of the bill would stand because of the multiple severability clauses in SB2404.

    Again, that would be a departure from past rulings, but less radical than the complete reversal other adverse (to the employees / retirees) rulings could require. Even though it would only save a little money, that might be a compromise ruling from the IL SC that considered both existing law and made some political accomodation.


  48. - anon for a reason - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 1:44 pm:

    Although they are viewing this from very different vantage points and have very different opinions/positions on how this should play out, I agree with both the Old Professor and Mouthy.
    No one is going to be happy. Many are bitter and are going to bite back any way they can. This is going to take years to resolve emotionally.


  49. - Norseman - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:03 pm:

    As much as I love to vent about this as every other state/teacher worker/retiree, this will not change the fact that the powers that be will pass something. This post is focused on the union effort to pass something more moderate.

    In keeping with this theme, I want to reiterate the need for the unions - who staked a lot on compromising to bring about 2424 - to work hard to support it and ensure Cullerton stays strong behind the bill. Otherwise, the unions reinforce a perception that they are now useless to their members.


  50. - Ghost - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:07 pm:

    On a side note. If the Supremes uphold this law, that technically opens the door to changing their pension as well using the ame tool/argument later on.


  51. - Cook County Commoner - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:11 pm:

    “This is going to take years to resolve emotionally.”

    Absolutely. no one is coming out a winner in this. And a group that probably will come out the worst is comprised of the out-of-work, under-employed and impoverished who really are paying the price in reduced opportunities, neighborhood violence, poor public schools and the slow motion masacre of minorities in Chicago’s south and west sides due to lack of resources in a mis-managed state.


  52. - PublicServant - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:26 pm:

    CCC, you’re absolutely right but the lack of resources has nothing to do with the pensions, it has to do with the structural revenue deficit the state has been running for 7 decades. The pensions were simply used as the bank, and as I’ve stated before, the bank doesn’t need reform if you borrow too much, your borrowing addiction, instead, is what needs reform.


  53. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:31 pm:

    Per 15 ILCS 205/4, the Attorney General absolutely can and should be asked for her professional opinion of this legislation.

    “The duties of the Attorney General shall be —
    Eighth - To give written opinions, when requested by either branch of the general assembly, or any committee thereof, upon constitutional or legal questions.”

    Glad we have our answer.


  54. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:41 pm:

    Even better, here is a 2009 press release from her office regarding a similar question of constitutionality (albeit U.S. instead of state) and pending legislation:

    http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/02/illinois_attorney_general_lisa.html
    Release from Madigan…..

    As the General Assembly considers bills to address the process for filling a vacancy in the U.S. Senate, the Attorney General has received inquiries specifically asking whether the legislature can constitutionally pass a law that changes the date of the next election for the U.S. Senate.

    The Attorney General is releasing the following statement:
    “It is my opinion that the legislature may pass a law allowing the people of Illinois to elect a U.S. senator to fill the seat vacated by President Barack Obama. Such a law would be consistent with the U.S. Constitution. The 17th Amendment expresses a clear preference for having the people of a state elect their U.S. senators. In keeping with the purpose of this amendment, the legislature may constitutionally change the current law to set an earlier date for the election to this U.S. senate seat. I am providing this opinion to offer guidance to the legislature as they consider this issue.”


  55. - Ruby - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:42 pm:

    There really are some fair and reasonable changes that could be made to SB2404:

    1. Drop the delay in compounded COLA. (choice B option 2 affecting Tier 1 Actives)

    2. Take current retirees out of the bill.

    3. Spread the impact of sacrifice equally to all who have benefited from state pension holidays.


  56. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:47 pm:

    Ruby, methinks you are unclear on the concept. The ball is going the other way. It’s not coming back your direction unless the Supremes strike down everything else.

    Try facing some reality here.


  57. - Ruby - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:55 pm:

    Unless I missed something, the Senate and the House still have competing bills. We do not know if either one will pass as is or modified.


  58. - Six Degrees of Separation - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 2:58 pm:

    Try facing some reality here.

    In other words,

    On your side:
    The law

    On the other side:
    Those who make the law.
    Those who enforce the law.
    The Suits in Chicago.

    Undecided:
    Those who interpret the law.


  59. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 3:05 pm:

    We have been taking a beating for years now with the MSM taking the side of the whole civic committee/ALEC attacks. on teachers.
    On the tweets on Richs feeds was something like “there are 500,000 current and 200,000 wow that many ”
    Yeah that many the few have been after the many for quite a while.
    Well the many got together with the Senate democrats to help with the serious financial problems and now we have to make sure we show who is behind this stuff
    And we need to keep mobilizing the many and that includes U of I


  60. - pensioner - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 3:39 pm:

    @ Ghost. Right you are.


  61. - martillo - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 7:46 pm:

    Thank you, this is a topic which is dear to my heart. Is there any way
    I can get in touch with you? My name’s Lucille Battles and I’d get into this more deeply.


  62. - Anonymous - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 8:17 pm:

    Kadner hit the nail on the head!!!!!!!!!!


  63. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 8:28 pm:

    U of I is a member or was a member of the civic club or one of its affiliates and joined with the likes of Northwestern and the University of Chicago and the banksters which have eagerly stabbed them and you OP in the back
    U of I trustees as were all our presidents ready to sell us out while our Union Coalition was in serious talks. But those of us in the Union got a seat in Springfield and avoided that backstabbing. Join with us grubby little universities and work to get funding and save our schools
    We can start by supporting a bill to end MAP grants for the UC and NU


  64. - lost in the weeds - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 9:25 pm:

    Alledged pension liability is $100 billion to get to 100 percent funded. Why does the state need to save $150 billion with cuts to pensions and increases of employee contributions? Why does the pension system need to be 100 % funded now for the next 30 years of pensions?


  65. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 9:41 pm:

    It doesn’t need to be 100% funded in 30 years 70 would be just fine for an entity like a state
    Cullerton/Union aims for 90 but 70 would be OK


  66. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 9:52 pm:

    BTW Its IFT lobby day tomorrow
    Watch out for Teachers


  67. - RNUG Fan - Tuesday, May 14, 13 @ 10:12 pm:

    I think RNUG is right on MAAG and is right about 2404 legality. I support it I support the healthcare choices that everyone would get even if MAAG is a win. But there is a possibility that it might not pass the courts because the diminishment is so strong BUT unlike Madigan 1 its not an insult to the constitution that requires martial law


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Madigan to tell members his side of working group talks
* Question of the day
* Madigan: Prepare for continuous session
* Spiraling out of control
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Madigan's actions show no fear of Rauner
* HRO launches new digital ads
* The Illinois Atlas of Austerity
* *** LIVE *** Session Coverage
* Happy Sunday!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Galaxy S7 edge security update for June is early if you’re in Spain
* HTC 10 bend test, Galaxy Note 6 focus comments & more – Pocketnow Daily Recap
* Halfbeak delayed again: Blass calls HTC smartwatch project a cluster
* Nexus shutterbugs may get Google Photos sweetheart deal
* Insiders say Huawei wants Samsung’s own 4G patents in cross-licensing deal
* ASUS Zenpad Z8 leaked as a small, mid-range Verizon tablet
* HTC One M9+ Prime Camera Edition exists — because the HTC One M9 Prime Camera Edition wasn’t enough

* Stephens, Coats among top prospect performers Sunday
* Quintana draws Harvey in Citi Field series opener
* Sale's effort goes for naught as Sox fall in KC
* Tough series for White Sox bullpen in KC
* Sale's effort goes for naught as Sox fall in KC
* Turf toe puts damper on A-Jax's big day on 'D'
* Royals 5, White Sox 4: Embarrassment complete

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Election-year politics dim hopes of Illinois bu.....
* Michael Madigan fearless as ever as Republicans.....
* No Progress Reported in Sunday Meeting of Legis.....
* Automatic voter registration measure delayed fo.....
* Illinois daily fantasy sports betting bill shelved..
* IL budget talks resume Sunday - OurQuadCities..
* Rauner Would Veto House Budget Plan ... All Of .....
* Budget hopes seem to rest with working groups -.....
* Lawmakers in Springfield With No Compromise in .....


* Medical pot advocates cheer Illinois governor's about-face
* Ex-fire chief gets jail time for stealing from department
* 15-year-old girl shot dead on Chicago's Lake Shore Drive
* State warns of toxic algae forming on Illinois lakes, rivers
* Illinois budget chief: 2nd year without deal 'devastating'
* 7-year-old Chicago girl dies in tractor accident
* Illinois budget negotiations appear to be going nowhere
* Drew Peterson's defense rests after calling 3 witnesses
* NBC's 'Red Nose Day Special' raises $30M for kids' charities
* Judge OKs copyright settlement over Vivian Maier photos

* Daily fantasy sports betting bill shelved amid lobbying accusation
* Rep. Butler: Should have been in session Saturday, too
* Madigan polling House members to determine support for Rauner's 'turnaround agenda'
* Butler: Should have been in session Saturday, too
* Automatic voter registration measure delayed for changes
* Election-year politics dim hopes of Illinois budget deal
* Madigan polling House members to determine support for Rauner's turnaround agenda
* Illinois legislature meets in rare Sunday session
* Medical marijuana advocates cheer Illinois governor's expansion of pilot program
* GOP accuses Dems of pulling plug on negotiations; state budget approval chances seem slim

* Women's work? Nonprofit CFO
* West Loop transformation
* Helping Exelon's at-risk nukes helps everybody
* Here's your chance to buy that empty prison
* Can millennials revive Walter E. Smithe?


* Man shot in West Pullman
* Man fatally shot in Gary
* Police: Man sets self, store on fire during Pilsen festival
* Austin man charged with robbing business 5 times
* Sheryl Swoopes investigation ongoing, but new allegations emerge
* Male fatally struck by train in Hammond
* Ben Zobrist sparks Cubs to 7-2 victory against Phillies
* 23-year-old man shot in Auburn Gresham
* Cubs finish off sixth sweep of season
* Rahm, Rauner continue feud over vetoed pension bill


* Reluctant heroes in Aurora surprised with Quilts of Valor
* Ivy Leaguers keep grip on Colombia economy as drug chaos spreads
* More than 700 migrants feared dead in 3 shipwrecks in Mediterranean
* Where shootings have occurred Memorial Day weekend in Chicago
* Shark attack feared in Southern California woman's injury
* 4 wounded in South Side shootings
* Mexican police mount hunt for kidnapped soccer star Alan Pulido
* Suspect arrested after Georgia deputy shot in the face
* 1 dead, 6 wounded in shooting at Houston auto shop; suspect killed
* Man sets himself on fire at festival, 2 officers injured


* Daily fantasy sports betting bill shelved amid lobbying accusation
* Rep. Butler: Should have been in session Saturday, too
* Madigan polling House members to determine support for Rauner's 'turnaround agenda'
* Butler: Should have been in session Saturday, too
* Automatic voter registration measure delayed for changes
* Election-year politics dim hopes of Illinois budget deal
* Illinois legislature meets in rare Sunday session
* Our View: CWLP should focus on stability, not minor rebate
* Bernard Schoenburg: Rauner stresses state's problems, but there is some good news
* Statehouse Insider: Do you believe in miracles? In a word, no


* First June game goal for Bunnies softball
* Spartans softball led by fresh face
* SJ-O boys keep strong year rolling
* Golfers advance in NCAAs despite rough day
* Danville High School Graduation 2016
* May 30 Bob Asmussen chat
* May 31 Bob Asmussen chat
* HS Baseball - 3A Regional Championship
* Casual Fridays
* Business listings, May 29, 2016


* Computer glitch at JFK Airport causes massive check-in lines
* Bernfield: Hot-hitting Zobrist brings critical leadership
* Sale's start goes to waste, Royals rally to beat Sox again
* Cubs sweep Phillies, improve to 20 games over .500
* Stanley Cup preview: Why Pens will win

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Senator Durbin Statement on TSA Security D......

* Defence sales: US Senate may vote to bring......

* Live From The Drive
* Biking The Drive This Morning
* The Claypool rule.
* “The high school win is a crack in the glass ceiling that keeps Unity caucus in power.”
* “As educators, rather than raising your voices Over the rustling of our chains, Take them off. Un-cuff us. Unencumbered by the lumbering weight Of poverty and privilege, Policy and ignorance.”
* Sunday Times.
* Job / Recruitment Fair On Friday, June 3rd
* BPN Announces First Concert In The Park
* BPN Announces 2016's First Concert In Buena Park Circle
* "Chicago's Best" To Film At La Ciudad On June 7th


* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller