SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x2 - Audio posted - Rutherford could speak today *** Attorney says complaint to be filed today

Monday, Feb 10, 2014

* The treasurer’s office says they haven’t seen anything yet, and pointed out that the attorney didn’t even know in what court she was filing the charges, but say they’re ready to rebut and refute. They’d better be

Attorney Christine Svenson, who represents a former employee of the treasurer’s office, and was on with Bruce and Dan Monday morning, says the allegations lay out the employee being forced to do political work on state time as well as sexual harassment.

Svenson detailed points in which she says her client was allegedly harassed by Rutherford, including an incident at an overnight retreat at Rutherford’s home in 2011.

Svenson told Bruce and Dan, “Mr. Rutherford entered my client’s bedroom and grabbed at his genital area. My client immediately forced him off of him, gathered his belongings and left. He went to go talk to the chief of staff about it, and the chief of staff said quote…’at least we have job security’…unquote, and that it had happened to him as well.”

Svenson says complaints are also being filed against Rutherford’s chief of staff.

Oy.

This story has been going around for a bit, and at least some people have said that it appeared to change over time. So, let’s all reserve judgement on this for a while.

Also, in my opinion, Svenson ought to be doing her talking in court from now on.

*** UPDATE *** Sun-Times

“Obviously the allegations are false. If there is a lawsuit filed today then the Treasurer will respond,” his spokeswoman Mary Frances Bragiel said. “He’ll possibly have a media avail if something is filed today.”

That’ll probably be the wildest presser since the Jack Ryan death march.

*** UPDATE 2 *** The full audio has now been posted

- Posted by Rich Miller        


69 Comments
  1. - Commonsense in Illinois - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:13 am:

    >

    Agreed. Unfortunately she’s already put a more salacious charge out there, and of course a civil suit doesn’t require beyond reasonable doubt…just preponderance of the evidence.


  2. - Not Rich - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:13 am:

    This Republican primary is going to get very interesting real quick. It isn’t going to be your typical boring rich white guy fight anymore..


  3. - Nonplussed - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:14 am:

    Rich: If his attorney says the complaint will be filed today, then under what rule of journalistic ethics are you still avoiding releasing the person’s name? The accuser has not asked to remain anonymous. Rutherford hasn’t asked it either. He has said that he is prevented from doing so.


  4. - Walter Mitty - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:16 am:

    Rich, I like you have kept it under wraps. We knew it would be soon for a name… Today, we will know. Today, lives change forever. Nothing good is coming for many.


  5. - Demoralized - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:17 am:

    This is either one of the most slanderous episodes in Illinois politics or the end of Dan Rutherford’s political career.


  6. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:18 am:

    The miscalculation by the Rutherford Crew or even Rutherford himself on that Friday, and what was going to “hit” probably puts this all out there more than if it rolled out and responded to.

    Rutherford can talk at the end of business today.

    Will he? “Can” he? And, can he?

    Agree with Rich, enough with the “trial in the public eye”, how about, as warrented, like the filing, and maybe a statement, and then let the courts sort it out.

    You get the “rollout” Ms. Svenson, then anything after, well, then it looks like Bad Form.


  7. - anonymoose - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:20 am:

    Never a fan of harassment claims where allegations are held back (from 2011???? really)….to be used like a trump card. If it was bad in 2011, it should have been brought out in 2011 - not 2014.


  8. - Frank - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:20 am:

    The fact that she’s making extra-judicial statements before even filing suit indicates to me that she is more motivated by politics than properly representing her client. That said, this is devestating to Rutherford. Particularly if there is more than one complaintant.


  9. - Snucka - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:21 am:

    So is the accuser going to remain anonymous even after the suit is filed? Is that allowed legally?


  10. - Siriusly - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:22 am:

    All the media engagement she is doing really hurts her credibility here. The delayed lawsuit also. I find it totally odd that this person has another government job already too.


  11. - CicrcularFiringSquad - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:23 am:

    The non Mitt Rauner lawyer has been on every Blagoof-AM show for the past week….probably why the complaint has taken so long. Hard to write stuff down when you are talkin’ to Dan, Kassamoron, Roe and any other else who will answer the phone.


  12. - O RLY - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:25 am:

    At first I wasn’t buying it, but this is really starting to look more like a political hit than a serious complaint.


  13. - Formerly Known As... - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:25 am:

    Ouch.

    That’s a bit more than crude comments or pin-ups on the cubicle walk.

    Quite a bit more.


  14. - Samurai - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:30 am:

    ==All the media engagement she is doing really hurts her credibility here. The delayed lawsuit also==

    It was Rutherford who initiated the media involvement one Friday morning. Svenson than responded. Also, a week or two to prepare a well stated Complaint for a lawsuit is not uncommon at all, particularly with the multiple allegations we can expect later today.


  15. - x ace - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:30 am:

    Say it in Court - Attorney protected ?

    Say it on the Radio - Attorney vulnerable ?

    Strange tactics ?


  16. - Rahm'sMiddleFinger - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:31 am:

    IS that the fat lady I hear in the background?


  17. - John A Logan - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:33 am:

    To quote Bill on the day Rod Blagojevich was arrested, “Uh Oh.”


  18. - Cassandra - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:33 am:

    I have no opinion on the allegations yet, but I am wondering why on earth an ambitious politician would be having retreats at his own house. Why not have a retreat at a state park or something. It’s just clunky, as, I fear, is Rutherford. Not ready for prime time. Keeping a wall between personal and official life is critical when you are seeking higher office, and if he doesn’t get that after all this time in politics, he needs to go back to politics school.


  19. - Red Ranger - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:35 am:

    If I were Ms. Svenson’s client, I would be outraged by her media tour. It reminds me a bit of Drew Peterson’s attorney. Is she more interested in the case or becoming a media talking head? Right now, she is not doing her client any favors.


  20. - Wensicia - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:35 am:

    If the identity of the accuser must be protected after this is filed in court, then the judge should bar Ms Svenson from speaking about the details to the press, though it’s pretty much too late.


  21. - Formerly Known As... - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:35 am:

    This is just the tip of the iceberg.

    Multiple press conferences surely to come from both sides, with repeated questions at every campaign stop, all while a train wreck slowly and painfully stretches out for weeks.


  22. - AFSCME Steward - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:37 am:

    So this happened in 2011, but was never an issue until now ? At first I didn’t quite know how to react to this story. Now it is beginning to look a little fishy.


  23. - Leave a Light on George - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:38 am:

    IF this stuff about grabbing genitals and other sexual harassment is true then when the victim chooses to address it is their choice. So what if it is timed poorly for the perpetrator. I think engaging the media is smart. Makes sure the complaint/lawsuit doesn’t fade from the public’s eye.


  24. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:38 am:

    Still with the accuser anonymity when his attorney is putting words in the mouth of Rutherford’s chief of staff?

    I understand sort of deeming Rutherford fair game for anonymous accusations after his presser and that he is a public official and candidate, but this report anonymously accuses Kyle Ham by his title of something when he is not an elected official or candidate.


  25. - Mokenavince - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:39 am:

    Any way you look at it it’s bad news for Rutherford. This is a case where he’s guilty until he proves he’s innocent.
    The public will only read the headlines and
    this should sink his campaign.
    He’s lost the Tea Party vote.


  26. - Survivor - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:41 am:

    Rich:
    Most of the news organizations routinely do not publish the names of those who say they have been raped, either when the rape is reported or when the victim testifies at a public trial. This person is reporting a sexual assault. He did not choose to go public; Rutherford made these charges public. I hope you continue to withhold the name.


  27. - IbendahlLuvsJBT - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:42 am:

    Rich, why do you keep deleting my comments? I’ve played by your rules. What gives?


  28. - Samurai - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:42 am:

    ==
    So this happened in 2011, but was never an issue until now ? At first I didn’t quite know how to react to this story. Now it is beginning to look a little fishy==

    It was never a publicized issue heading to court until now.


  29. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:47 am:

    2011? And you don’t say anything until the month before the primary? Aw geez.


  30. - Living in Machiaville - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:49 am:

    Anyone dreaming that the Rutherford campaign can withstand this is living in the land of denial and I ain’t talkin’ Egypt.


  31. - Wensicia - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:51 am:

    ==2011? And you don’t say anything until the month before the primary? Aw geez.==

    While trying to arrange a $300,000 payoff to keep silent.


  32. - Tom Joad - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:54 am:

    The Plaintiff did say something before last week He said it to the person whose job is to handle employee issues. That is the job of the Chief of Staff. But, it appears, he did nothing. That is why he is going to be sued too.


  33. - Commonsense in Illinois - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 10:55 am:

    It will be interesting to see if Ms. Svenson files today…she’s already got the news hit/value. No reason to hurry now. The “victim” can remain anonymous while Mr. Rutherford fights off accusations in the court of public opinion.


  34. - DuPage - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:02 am:

    This is going to get real UGLY! “An overnight retreat at his house.”

    I have never seen “attend overnight retreats at someone’s house” to be part of a job description for a public employee.
    What people do on their own time is their own business, but staying overnight at the bosses house could easily cause misunderstandings.
    If his boss had been a female, would he go stay overnight at her house? What if it had been a female boss that entered the room? This is going to turn into “he said, he said.” It will probably inspire an episode of “the good wife”, seen nationwide and around the world. More fame for Illinois politics.

    Timing is everything and right before an election makes it look very suspicious. Even if this is totally phony claim, there is no time for Rutherford to refute before the election.

    What is Bruce thinking right now? One down, two to go?


  35. - 4 percent - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:02 am:

    Most insiders around Springfield know the person’s name so its not much of a secret. But I’ll give credit to Rich and the media for treating it seriously.

    However, the fact that (1) it allegedly occurred in 2011 and (2) the person sought a $300,000 payoff make it look opportunistic at best and a shakedown at the worst.


  36. - Leave a Light on George - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:03 am:

    Tom Joad glad to see somebody gets it.


  37. - Levois - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:07 am:

    I don’t know Rutherford as well as many of you might. These allegations are troubling, but I have many questions at least about the timing. They’re out now, but still shouldn’t they have come out long ago before an election?


  38. - Walter Mitty - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:07 am:

    Tom Joad… Spot on…This is bad… Just having a retreat in your own home is really enough with a claim like this… If true, as Mr. Burns say’s “Revenge is a dish best served cold.” That is why it came out when it did…Because this person felt violated…. And worse, nobody helped. This person is going to be very public soon…


  39. - A guy... - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:12 am:

    Time to move on from “He said, he said” to “He did, he proved”. We’ve seen the movie clips now, time to let the movie roll for either of their sakes. Someone has done someone wrong here. Let the court and the judge figure it out from here under oath.


  40. - Samurai - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:25 am:

    What about a retreat at Rauner’s ranch(s)?

    To the fact that [the sexual harassment] allegedly occurred in 2011. Was that the first time? Were there other alleged acts? True, if one isolated act in 2011, it seems suspicious. But, these claims sometimes have a series of acts over time that eventually cause the victim to say enough.


  41. - IbendahlLuvsJBT - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:27 am:

    Svenson said her client expected other employees would be at this retreat, but he ended up the only employee there. Implied is that this was a rouse by Rutherford to get the employee alone. This doesn’t pass the smell test. Who goes on a company retreat without discussing it with their coworkers before the event? No one, that’s who.


  42. - Angry Republican - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:43 am:

    All of the comments that are defending Rutherford sound a lot like the Catholic bishops defending priests. At least a few commenters understand that an allegation of sexual harassment is treated differently than other allegations, especially when it involves a person of authority. It is in everybody’s best interest to wait until all the facts are in before crucifying either party.

    Rutherford is innocent until proven guilty, but his campaign for governor is surely finished.


  43. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:44 am:

    I would be beyond careful after the “Friday Fiasco”.

    Please “think” what you are going to say, how you are going to say it, and have very critical people peppering Rutherford and/or others who will be facing the media.

    Rutherford Crew; you are not going to make it “better”, all you can do is try to not make it worse. I say this becuase after the Dopey presser y’all had last time, trying to “get ahead of this” has left the station.

    I have a sinking feeling a presser is not going to go well. BTW, Rutherford Crew, expect a question or 9 about where your OWN investigation stands.

    Maybe just a “release” and not a presser might best.


  44. - wordslinger - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:46 am:

    Nothing says credibility and pursuit of justice like an appearance on the “Bruce and Dan” show.

    Somebody grabs at my Testicular Virility, they’re picking their chiclets off the floor.

    No lawsuits. No complaints. No going back to work. No motormouth sleazy lawyer. No victim here.


  45. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:48 am:

    What? It’s a “staff retreat,” but when you get there you’re the only person there? And you stay anyway? I don’t mean to blame the victim here, but that just seems like a very odd choice.


  46. - IbendahlLuvsJBT - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:48 am:

    What will Proft ask at this evening’s gubernatorial debate? Will the complaints be filed before the debate begins?


  47. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:51 am:

    Hey, wait a minute. Did Christine just publicly name another “victim” by saying that the Treasurer’s chief of staff said the same thing happened to him?


  48. - Formerly Known As... - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 11:52 am:

    === but still shouldn’t they have come out long ago before an election ===

    === these claims sometimes have a series of acts over time that eventually cause the victim to say enough ===

    Also remember that they were reportedly good friends beforehand. Mr. Rutherford even attended the accuser’s wedding.

    You may forgive things you wouldn’t normally forgive when you have long history with someone.

    But things can get really ugly when you feel a friend has turned on you or is taking advantage of you. The closer you are, the angrier and uglier it can get.

    Meanwhile, the cycle of anger and mistrust feeds on itself within both parties. Soon enough, you have fireworks.

    Sometimes those fireworks blow off a hand or a leg in the process


  49. - olddog - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:02 pm:

    What Survivor said at 10:41 a.m.

    I’m not thrilled by the way the ex-employee’s lawyer is behaving here, and there are too many inconsistencies to sort out. But until (unless?) a complaint is filed in a court of law, no matter whether it’s civil or criminal, the journalistic ethics are clear. I think three points in the SPJ Code of Ethics apply here:

    – Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
    – Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
    — Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.

    The SPJ Code isn’t binding on everyone, but it’s widely considered the best statement of ethical standards. When (if?) a legal complaint is filed, the complainant’s name will be a matter of public record and a process for sorting out what may (or may not) have happened will get under way.

    Until (unless?) that happens, no matter how fishy the circumstances are and what the obvious political repercussions will be, the ex-employee’s name is nobody’s business.


  50. - IbendahlLuvsJBT - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:02 pm:

    Yes, Soccermom, that’s exactly what Chris did. It’s a terrible violation of ethical behavior to name victims as collateral damage of your own gain.


  51. - x ace - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:06 pm:

    Lawyer’s website intersting:

    www.svensonlawoffices.com

    Indicates Employer focused representation

    Lot of blank areas - coming soons

    Has Article from Republican Attorneys Assoc. says political activist

    Has Article that says promotes business with a Fashion show and sometimes ” sets clients up on dates”

    Gotta call this a Full Service Law Office


  52. - overcooked - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:28 pm:

    So Dan Rutherford spends eight years on the chicken dinner circuit, trying to get elected staewide, and in the first year in office he jeopardizes his political life with a destructive act that has him labeled as a sexual predator when he wants to run for governor. I can’t believe that. It does not add up.


  53. - Palm Tree - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:31 pm:

    Svenson used his first name? She used his real first name!

    Let’s see, his first name is Ed, and he made $97,000 at the Treasurer’s Office. I don’t think he’s anonymous anymore, Christine.


  54. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:38 pm:

    Not to mention — it’s kind of a serious allegation to say that the chief of staff in a State office blew off a report of sexual harassment.


  55. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:40 pm:

    And there’s a 300-day statute of limitations on sexual harassment claims.


  56. - Chicago Publius - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:41 pm:

    The facts reported so far don’t support an allegation of sexual harassment. If the boss makes a pass at you, and you rebuff him, and you are not later subject to negative decisions regarding employment (e.g., lack of promoting, discharge, no raise, etc.) as a result of rebuffing him, there will be no liability for sexual harassment. There could be another kind of civil rights violation called “hostile environment” — but that would require continuing advances on the part of the boss for a date, sexual favors, etc. In any event, the facts that are alleged by the complainant’s lawyer don’t support the claim of “sexual harassment.”


  57. - Will Caskey - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:46 pm:

    On the one hand, why would someone fabricate something like this when his name will inevitably be all over the headlines in approximately now?

    On the other hand, why would Rutherford do something like this then run for governor?

    A dilemma only Illinois Republicans can answer.


  58. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:48 pm:

    ===And there’s a 300-day statute of limitations on sexual harassment claims.===

    Is this why the attorney is filing as a 1st Amendment case?

    Not an attorney, but as - Soccermom - raises the question, is that the lean the attorney is going?

    The more this goes today, I might want to think twice before rolling out Rutherford, the “Special Invesigator”(?), any legal counsel, flacks …

    I might lean towards a crafted relesase and leavie it there until the dust settles after the filing…


  59. - BYE DR....... - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:53 pm:

    @Chicago Publius…….

    Maybe by the “legal definition”, but if you have ever been in a situation where your boss wants sexual favors from you then its harassment especially if it happens after you said NO and made it clear.

    Being on a list of 13 with termination the result of the refusal is very serious. More people will be coming out with this, they all wait for the first to do it and others follow.

    DR is toast, put a fork in him.


  60. - Rich Miller - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:55 pm:

    ===and you are not later subject to negative decisions regarding employment===

    Except he is apparently claiming just that.


  61. - girllawyer - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 12:59 pm:

    A “300 day statute of limitations on sexual harassment claims” filed with whom? There is no crime of “sexual harassment” in Illinois and I’ve never heard of a 300 day S of L on anything filed in court - civil or criminal. Is this with some state agency?


  62. - Irish - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 1:06 pm:

    Willing to wait until all the “facts” are in and will reserve judgement until then.

    However, a couple of things I would like to know that aren’t going to be part of the court process.

    What was the initial contact between Mr. Rauner or a representative and Ms. Svenson?
    How soon after, or during, the $3500.00 “job” did Ms. Svenson become interested in the employee’s case?
    What was the reason the employee dropped his request for monetary relief? (His request to be paid off instead of bringing the charge himself makes me wonder how violated he felt.)
    Has any money or favor moved between Mr. Rauner or a schill, and the accuser?

    If the employee has a legitimate complaint then by all means follow it to the end. But I wonder about a three year old complaint that went from a complaint, to a shakedown, to being a player in a very rich, unethical, person’s campaign against the accused, promulgated by a pretentious attorney who used to be an employee of the unethical, very rich, candidate.

    Like Gibbs says “I don’t believe in coincidences.”


  63. - anonymous - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 1:10 pm:

    The employee goes on a re-treat to find out that he was the treat. How awful. Its like the story of Hansel and Gretel.


  64. - Nearly Normal - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 2:00 pm:

    Sun Times has suit–
    http://www.suntimes.com/25506138-761/former-state-employee-alleges-illinois-treasurer-dan-rutherford-sexually-harasssed-him.html


  65. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 2:05 pm:

    I hope, at the very least, the chief of staff sues for defamation. This guy plotted for years till he thought the moment just right, lines up another job and tries to shakeout as much taxpayer money as he can on exit. The recorder gets the employee they deserve


  66. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 2:10 pm:

    Nearly Normal, thanks for that. Quite the catch..I see


  67. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 2:11 pm:

    Nearly Normal, thanks for that. Quite the catch…eh


  68. - State worker - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 2:24 pm:

    I’m a Dem and still think this doesn’t pass the smell test. Also as a Union rep for many years I’ve always been suspect of anyone that claims harassment long after it started. In Illinois we have too many avenues to go to if our supervisor won’t respond to our complaint. I’m not buying this.


  69. - steve schnorf - Monday, Feb 10, 14 @ 5:28 pm:

    so how many of the “List of 13″ were terminated?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* House not yet in agreement with Senate
* Rauner unveils his stopgap plan
* SDems leak K-12 funding plan
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Fourth-gen Panasonic Toughpad FZ-G1 tab is sturdier and faster than ever, as pricey as always
* Facebook Promises That Location Data is 'Only One of the Factors' in Friend Suggestions
* British startup Wileyfox unveils fresh trio of inexpensive Cyanogen OS phones
* Red OnePlus 3 possibly coming soon to an e-store near you, at least in China
* Google Maps Satellite View Gains High Definition Landsat 8 Imagery
* Huawei Honor 8 stops by Tenaa with dual rear camera, 4GB RAM in tow
* Korea FTC Investigating Apple Over Unfair Mobile Carrier Contracts

* Hawkins among top prospect performers Monday
* 2016 Draft: Signing and bonus tracker
* Hit in 57 games, win $5.6 million
* Less than 3 days left to cast your All-Star vote
* Melky remains among Top 15 in AL OF voting
* Upcoming games to influence Sox decisions
* Hawkins on MLB Pipeline's Prospect Team of the Week

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Jim Nowlan: Rauner's Plan B emerging - Champaig.....
* Illinois leaders work on partial-year budget pl.....
* RAUNER rolls out new stop gap plan – CPS accoun.....
* RAUNER rolls out new stop gap plan – CPS accoun.....
* Springfield Dems set to try again to help CPS..
* Did Rauner-style change work for Scott Walker i.....
* Investors punish state for no budget – Herald &.....
* Morning Spin: Madigan’s elected Chicago school .....
* Morning Spin: Madigan's elected Chicago school .....


* Beagle-rescue group sues U of I over research-animal data
* Illinois medical marijuana director resigns
* Rauner: Democrats are agreed on partial-year budget plan
* Off-duty Cook County deputy sheriff shoots, injures 2
* Activists push for stricter laws in wake of Hastert case
* $2B in Illinois road projects threatened by stalemate
* Economic woes cause drop in number of Illinois boaters
* Rauner signs ID law making Illinois comply with federal law
* Illinois police sue town, claim body cameras record nonstop
* Study: Rotting trees caused mysterious holes in huge dunes

* Rauner says agreement near on stopgap budget, but not school funding
* Senate Democrats to propose $750M education funding increase
* Rauner says no bailout for Chicago schools as part of budget agreement
* Illinois women hit hard by state budget impasse
* Stalemate threatens $2B in road projects
* Economic woes cause drop in number of boaters
* Chicago school money seen as potential deal-killer
* Chicago school money seen as potential state budget deal-killer
* Survey: Nearly 1 million human service clients affected by budget impasse
* Illinois lawmakers to reconvene Wednesday as budget deadline nears

* Springfield Dems set to try again to help CPS
* Northwest Indiana casinos generated $1.4 billion for local governments
* New group hopes to counter Friends of the Parks after Lucas fiasco
* Lawyers benefit from Brexit, while recruiters hurt
* Brexit billables: Good for lawyers, bad for headhunters


* Police: Man stabbed to death in Back of the Yards
* Obama guidance, press schedule June 28, 2016. Defense Sec. Carter
* Police: Man tried to lure girl to car on North Side
* Police: 3 teens robbed Woodstock gas station with BB gun
* Man shot in Austin
* Man wounded in Portage Park drive-by shooting
* Police: 4 dead, 9 wounded in Chicago shootings Monday
* Man dies after being struck by train in Hobart
* Police: Man killed, woman injured in Englewood drive-by shooting
* Woman wounded in Fuller Park shooting


* Volkswagen reaches $14.7B emissions settlement
* Pat Summitt, winningest coach in D1 history, has died at 64
* LINDA C. BLACK HOROSCOPES for 6/28/16
* Omarr's daily astrological forecast, For release 06/28/16 for 06/28/16
* Donald Trump has promised millions to charity, but records don't support claim
* 1st hearing in fight over Orlando nightclub shooting 911 calls is today
* Michelle Obama to announce nearly $100 million for education in Morocco
* Source: Ikea to halt sale of deadly dressers, offer refunds to millions
* 24 great spots for fried chicken in Chicago
* Morning Spin: Madigan's elected Chicago school board bill puts Cullerton in tough place


* Kathleen Parker: Brexit, meet Trexit
* Their View: Rauner should sign life insurance bill
* Rauner says agreement near on stopgap budget, but not school funding
* Senate Democrats to propose $750M education funding increase
* Rauner says no bailout for Chicago schools as part of budget agreement
* David M. Gerlach: College students are collateral damage in Illinois politics
* Illinois women hit hard by state budget impasse
* Stalemate threatens $2B in road projects
* Economic woes cause drop in number of boaters
* Chicago school money seen as potential deal-killer


* Life Remembered: Neurosurgeon thrived on challenges
* Temps down, travel up
* If you build a great fireworks show, they will come
* Medicare should cover hearing aids
* Danville glows with Dick Van Dyke
* Jim Nowlan: Rauner's Plan B emerging
* Maintain check on the executive
* Clinton plant key to power needs
* Adaptability a hallmark of 50-year career
* Top 50 College Football Teams of 2016: No. 37, Nebraska


* Retired pope thanks reigning pope for his focus on mercy
* Dawn Patrol: Historic night for Kris Bryant
* Historic night for Bryant lifts Arrieta to 12th win
* The Latest: Kyrgios grabs early advantage against Stepanek
* Mane latest player to join Liverpool from Southampton

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Illinois to get $17 million for HIV assist......

* Mark Kirk: A man without a party? - STLtod......
* Mutiny Ahead for Trump Train as Republican......

* “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
* Maryville Clears Finance Committee, Final Council Vote Could Happen Wednesday
* Uptown PlayStreet Summer Schedule
* If Trump wins, it’s our own fault
* U.S. House GOP leadership rolls out tax reform plan
* Democrat Party Platform Calls For Prosecuting Global Warming Skeptics
* New York limits opioid prescriptions to 7 days
* Thomas More Society: Supreme Court views vital protection as "unnecessary"
* Conservative member of British Parliament celebrates #BREXIT
* Governor, Local Mayors Urge Passage of Stopgap Budget and Education Funding


* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller