Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Bost responds to “rant” ad
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Bost responds to “rant” ad

Tuesday, Sep 16, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the Bost campaign…

The Mike Bost for Congress campaign released its latest ad “Standing Up” today. In the 30 second spot, Bost highlights the reasons he’s running for Congress and why do-nothing politicians, like Bill Enyart and President Obama, have neglected Southern Illinois families.

“This ad reinforces that Mike Bost is a leader who isn’t afraid of straight talk,” said Bost Campaign spokesman Jim Forbes. “In Springfield he stood up against Pat Quinn and in Washington he’ll stand up against Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and other liberal Democrats.”

The ad highlights Bost’s famous stand against Chicago politicians on the floor of the State House and the frustration he feels over Obamacare, EPA regulations and the economy. It will air district-wide beginning today.

Actually, the ad doesn’t “highlight” the rant at all. It merely has Bost showing the ad (without audio) on a laptop screen for a second or two, before closing the computer.

Bost smiles gently, and is cool, calm and collected throughout the ad. So, all the screaming from the right the other day about how the Democratic ad would backfire may not have been accurate. If the rant was helpful, Bost’s campaign would’ve used the actual audio and video.

* Rate it

       

18 Comments
  1. - too obvious - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:26 am:

    Unwatchable. If Mike Bost isn’t throwing papers around during a tantrum what’s the point?


  2. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:29 am:

    Funny, Bost doesn’t seem angry. That other dude on the computer — now he was angry.

    Hilarious how he shuts the lid so quickly.

    Other than that, pretty straightforward with the usual talking points. C.


  3. - Norseman - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:32 am:

    === Bost smiles gently, and is cool, calm and collected throughout the ad. ===

    I think Bost should have warmed it up by saying he was fighting for his constituents then and will fight for his you in Washington.


  4. - VanillaMan - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:33 am:

    Pretty dull.
    His flashy self has already been over exposed.
    So, he is dull.

    C


  5. - A guy... - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:38 am:

    It’s a pass, but not a great one. If there’s local intel saying people have seen enough of the outburst, it’s a safe good ad.


  6. - John A Logan - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:43 am:

    I think it works. The ad does not have to have the audio to “highlight” the rant. Everyone gets the message and I think it is one that will work. I give it a B.


  7. - 115th truth - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:43 am:

    To bad that he has never truly fought for us down here.


  8. - DaveWall - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:47 am:

    The ad is ok, not bad but not great either. He could have done a lot better job and actually made the DCCC ad work for him. Not sure this quite does that.


  9. - Willie Stark - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 12:03 pm:

    There’s such an edge of anger/rage in his voice, even when he’s trying to speak calmly. It’s potent; it appeals to some, certainly. I just wonder, though, if anger is as salable an emotion as it used to be (2010 Tea Party freakout). People don’t need to be ramped up any more than they already are; they’re looking for respite, solutions, someone to be adult and reasonable. Even while being calm for a moment, this ad reinforces that he’s an angry man. “Mad,” “upset,” “angry,” “war” are his word choices.


  10. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 1:26 pm:

    It’s a “C-, D+”

    You pass the class, but really, what did you learn?

    Almost…almost…should have done nothing if you are going to be this Dopey.


  11. - John A Logan - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 2:06 pm:

    “this ad reinforces that he’s an angry man.”

    Maybe I am missing something, but how you would reach that conclusion?


  12. - the wonderboy - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 2:28 pm:

    John A Logan…He uses the words himself. He clearly says that he’s angry.

    I’d give the ad a D as it seems to miss the mark, but I’m sure it will appeal to some. I don’t think it appeals to independent or swing voters though. The strangest part for me is that he seems to feel justified in his rant, but felt the need to explain it through a response ad? It’s an odd approach and strikes me as inconsistent.


  13. - walker - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 2:41 pm:

    He doesn’t play the audio of the original rant, because the words were pretty over-the-top, and didn’t relate to Obamacare, or Nancy Pelosi, or taxes, or whatever he is trying to say his anger was about.

    The original rant was all for political show.


  14. - frustrated GOP - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 2:53 pm:

    yeah, could have been better. it answers but really doesn’t turn the democratic ad into a win for him, which should have been the goal of the response ad. oh well.


  15. - Willie Stark - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 2:58 pm:

    JAL: “Really made me mad”, “upsets me as well”, “I’m disappointed and even angry,” a significant fraction of the word choices in this spot reinforce exactly what the ad appears to be attempting to refute. Rage-o-holics will like it; solution-oriented swing voters and moderate women, probably not as much. Interesting, too, to go back to Obamacare when most of the national GOP is dropping it as a loser issue. Fine for the base, but you’ve gotta have them anyway, or your toast.


  16. - Mad County - Tuesday, Sep 16, 14 @ 11:42 pm:

    Bost: “What Quinn has done has made me mad” — that is the line he will probably repeat most often until election day. Quinn might be ahead a couple or within margin of error statewide but he’s getting smoked in Enyart’s district.


  17. - Another pundit - Wednesday, Sep 17, 14 @ 12:00 pm:

    I laugh at the comments on this blog. Those reading this might be interested, but on the street and the people who will be voting are who we should be listening to, not political people. They have already made their mind up by who writes their pay checks.


  18. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Sep 17, 14 @ 1:43 pm:

    –I laugh at the comments on this blog. Those reading this might be interested, but on the street and the people who will be voting are who we should be listening to, not political people. They have already made their mind up by who writes their pay checks.–

    I’ve made up my mind. I don’t find reading what you’ve written interesting at all.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Friends of the Parks responds to Bears’ lakefront stadium proposal
* It’s just a bill
* Judge rejects state motion to move LaSalle Veterans' Home COVID deaths lawsuit to Court of Claims
* Learn something new every day
* Protect Illinois Hospitality – Vote No On House Bill 5345
* Need something to read? Try these Illinois-related books
* Illinois Hospitals Are Driving Economic Activity Across Illinois: $117.7B Annually And 445K Jobs
* Today's quotables
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller