* Press release…
Today, following inaction from the Illinois General Assembly, Governor JB Pritzker is directing the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) to pause processing agreements for the Data Center Investment Program starting July 1. The Governor also outlined a comprehensive framework for Illinois to address the growing impact of data centers on energy affordability and reliability, water resources, and local communities.
“Illinois has an opportunity to continue leading in technological innovation and economic growth, but we also have a responsibility to protect working families and local communities as the data center industry rapidly expands,” said Governor JB Pritzker. “I am directing my administration to pause the processing of data center agreements while we continue working with the General Assembly and stakeholders on a comprehensive framework that protects affordability, safeguards our natural resources, and ensures responsible growth across Illinois. I look forward to continuing these conversations and getting this done the right way for Illinois working families and communities.”
As AI and data center development continue to expand at a rapid pace across the country, Illinois must ensure that working families are not left paying the price through higher utility bills, strained reliability, and increased pressure on local water resources. While Illinois remains committed to economic growth and technological innovation, the State must establish clear guardrails to ensure data center growth benefits communities and consumers alike.
As part of the Governor’s proposed budget, the administration pursued these reforms through the legislative process because Illinois needs a comprehensive, long-term framework for data center policy. As a result, the Governor is also calling on legislators, consumer advocates, labor organizations, environmental stakeholders, utilities, local governments, and industry leaders to work together during veto session to advance comprehensive reforms guided by principles outlined below.
Gov. Pritzker’s Framework on Data Center Policy to Protect Consumers and Lower Costs
1. Data Centers Should Pay Their Fair Share
Data centers use massive amounts of electricity, water, and other resources — sometimes as much as a mid-sized city. To keep up with the infrastructure demands of data centers and keep bills more affordable for Illinois families, data center companies can direct more of their own financial resources toward their growth. Illinois legislation should:
• Create a rate class for data centers and establish data center electricity rates.
• Assign the costs that data centers impose on the electric grid to the new data center rate class, including distribution, generation, and transmission, where possible; assign to data centers the costs that they impose on water systems.
• Set energy and water efficiency requirements for data centers using established standards to help keep costs low and protect the environment.
• Ensure all utilities in the state are equipped to fairly manage and allocate the cost of data centers’ demand.
2. State Tax Incentives Should Be Paused
As the demand to develop data centers is increasing at a rapid pace, pausing state incentives for data centers is necessary to understand whether these incentives are driving development that is insensitive to consumer costs and environmental impact.
3. Energy Reliability Must Prioritize Illinois Working Families and Businesses
Data centers should temporarily go dark when the grid is strained to ensure reliable electric service for Illinoisans. Legislation should direct utilities to assign data centers interruptible electric service based on how much of their own clean energy they self-supply. Data centers that don’t supply their own clean energy could have their electric service interrupted when the grid is strained so Illinoisans’ lights stay on.
4. Data Centers Should Support the Development of New Clean Energy
Data centers should generate or pay for their own clean energy resources, so Illinoisans don’t foot the bill for their consumption.
Data centers’ massive energy use strains supply and has driven up bills. In PJM, the electric grid that serves 67 million people across 13 states including Illinois, demand from data centers has already raised costs by $13 billion, and data center demand could raise costs another $37 billion in Illinois alone in coming years.
• Establish a framework for data centers to generate or pay for their own new clean energy resources that allows participants to receive timely service and financial consideration for their contributions to Illinois’ clean energy goals.
5. Illinois Must Protect Its Water Resources
Data centers can use massive amounts of water — up to 5 million gallons a day, as much as a medium-sized town. Every data center should be required to use efficient systems that minimize water usage. We also need to monitor, manage, and plan for this water use as a state to protect one of our most precious resources.
• Require data centers to acquire comprehensive water permits that account for, regulate, and disclose their water usage and impact on water quality.
• Require data centers’ water use to be sustainable and not deplete our water resources, including incentivizing water reuse.
6. Illinois Must Maintain Strong Clean Air Protections
Air pollution from data centers’ power generation could cause up to $20 billion in public health burden nationwide by 2030, with those impacts highly concentrated in a few communities. Illinois needs safeguards on data centers’ generators, paired with affordable clean energy solutions, so every Illinoisan can breathe clean air and enjoy a healthy climate.
• Preserve strong clean air standards for data centers’ generators.
• Account for cumulative impacts in permits in environmental justice communities.
7. Communities Deserve Transparency and a Meaningful Voice
Illinoisans have a right to know what’s happening in their communities, including how much water, electricity, and other resources data centers will use. We must ensure tech companies operate a transparent process with opportunities for community members to voice their concerns and opinions.
• Ban nondisclosure agreements between data centers and local governments.
• Require data centers to regularly report their energy and water use.
• Require data centers to post public notice when applying for permits.
• Require data centers to enter into community benefits agreements with the communities where they locate, through a process with a clearly defined scope and timeline.
Existing incentive agreements under the Data Center Investment Program, including those entered into with DCEO before July 1, 2026, will be honored.
* We’re gonna do one “pro” and one “con” press release. Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition…
The Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition applauds the Governor’s response to legislative inaction that advances a framework of commonsense data center protections for consumers and our environment. The coalition introduced the POWER Act because it offers the solutions Illinoisans – and this moment – are demanding. Consumers cannot afford more delays. Now is the time to begin negotiations on policies that will stop rising utility bills, protect our water, and end backroom development deals, and we look forward to working with the Governor, legislators, and stakeholders to get this done in the Fall veto session.
* IBEW…
The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers is calling on Governor JB Pritzker to reverse course after his announcement directing the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity to pause processing agreements under the Data Center Investment Program beginning July 1, 2026.
The IBEW strongly supports responsible growth, consumer protections, energy reliability, clean energy development, water conservation, and community transparency. But those goals should be achieved through legislation, stakeholder engagement, and honest policy discussions — not by a unilateral executive action that freezes a statutory program approved by the Illinois General Assembly and signed into law by Governor Pritzker himself.
No governor — Democrat or Republican — is a king. The Data Center Investment Program was created by statute. It has never been repealed. If the Governor believes the law should be changed, he should work with the General Assembly to change it. He should not direct an agency to stop administering a program simply because the Legislature did not pass his preferred proposal.
In 2019, Governor Pritzker stood with legislators, business leaders, labor leaders, trade groups, and data center businesses to celebrate this very program. At that time, he said data centers were “as critical a part of our infrastructure as our roads, trains and schools” and praised the incentive as a way to welcome “a surge of economic development, labor income, and good union jobs to Illinois.” The Governor’s own press release also stated that data center investments would “fuel new construction and create good paying jobs across the state.”
Those facts have not changed.
Data centers continue to mean billions of dollars in private investment, thousands of construction jobs, permanent operations and maintenance jobs, expanded tax base for local communities, and work opportunities for highly trained union electricians. Illinois should not walk away from that economic opportunity or send a message to investors that the rules can change overnight by executive order.
The Governor’s latest statement suggests that data centers are responsible for higher utility bills, energy reliability concerns, water impacts, and community concerns. Those issues deserve serious discussion, but they do not justify stopping a job-creating program that already includes safeguards.
The existing Data Center Investment Program is not a blank check. To qualify, projects must make major capital investments in Illinois, create jobs, comply with responsible bidder requirements when seeking construction-related exemptions, and meet program standards. For projects in underserved areas, the program includes a construction employment tax credit tied to wages paid to construction workers — directly supporting working families in communities that need investment most.
Emphasis was in the original.
25 Comments
|
* Text from Sen. Mark Walker (D-Arlington Heights)…
Kevin Warren called to let me know they’re going to Indiana, (not specifically Hammond)
Warren of course is the President/CEO of the Chicago Bears.
Another top legislative source said Warren told him, “We’re moving forward with the Indiana plan.” When asked what that meant, Warren said, “We’re going to focus on Hammond.”
Comments are reopened.
…Adding… The Bears…
STATEMENT FROM CHICAGO BEARS CHAIRMAN GEORGE H. MCCASKEY AND PRESIDENT & CEO KEVIN WARREN
Yesterday, the Chicago Bears Board of Directors met and voted to advance our stadium development project in Hammond, Indiana, with the exact site to be selected. We believe a world-class stadium project in Hammond will transform the region, connecting Northwest Indiana to the South Side of Chicago through the Loop and across neighborhoods and suburbs stretching north of the city. It will bring Chicagoland together and deliver new opportunities to its residents and businesses.
…Adding… House Speaker Chris Welch…
“In April, the House passed an economic development package that was the product of extensive negotiation with the Bears and other stakeholders. That bipartisan legislation reflected our belief that we can incentivize statewide development and provide property tax relief for working people.
“While Indiana is willing to raise taxes and promise $1 billion in taxpayer funds, Illinois has focused on the needs of working families who want relief at the gas pump, at the store, and on their insurance bills—not taxpayer-funded stadiums.
“Illinois remains open to ongoing efforts to secure the Bears in Illinois. However, it will take time to get it right.”
…Adding… I asked the Senate’s top Bears negotiator Sen. Bill Cunningham if Warren had called him. Cunningham’s response…
Yes, heard from Warren this morning. He said they’d be putting out a statement about moving forward with Indiana. Also said he looked forward to further discussion with me.
I’d point out, the statement they released today is not fundamentally different from the statement they issued February 19th after the Indiana bill passed.
Emphasis added.
…Adding… Mayor Brandon Johnson’s office…
Over the last several years the Bears have stated their intentions in multiple jurisdictions, today’s announcement is not surprising.
It’s also not surprising that Bears officials have stated this vote does not mean a move to Hammond is a done deal.
Without a final site selection, until we see shovels in the ground in Hammond, the City will continue to engage in discussions grounded in the interests of our residents.
…Adding… Gov. JB Pritzker Spox…
“The Bears have built a storied legacy in Illinois for over 100 years but have spent the last six years, and especially the last few months, shifting their position on a stadium location. That has hindered their progress. Today appears to be another instance of that after Illinois leaders have been working with the Bears in good faith. Governor Pritzker has always been clear that he wants the Bears to stay in Illinois and still remains open to a sensible solution that protects taxpayers.”
…Adding… Senate President Don Harmon…
“The Chicago Bears have been saying for some time now that Hammond, Indiana is their main focus. Today’s statement isn’t fundamentally different than what the team said in February after Indiana voted to give the Chicago Bears more than a billion dollars in taxpayer money if they move to Indiana.
But that didn’t stop their conversations about a future here in Illinois, and it doesn’t appear that today’s statement will either.
We are ready and willing to re-engage with the Chicago Bears when they realize Illinois will always be the best place for them.”
…Adding… If he had a plan, he should’ve shared it during spring session early enough to make sure it could be considered. This special session talk will likely not go down well with many rank and file Dems unless their constituents demand they give the store away to the Bears…
…Adding… Sun-Times…
The Bears’ announcement tips the scales significantly toward Hammond but falls well short of a final decision. A source cautioned that Friday’s announcement didn’t eliminate Arlington Heights from consideration, were the state to find a way to give the Bears property tax certainty on the 326-acre plot they own. It’s unclear whether waiting until the Senate and House reconvene this fall would be too late.
This basically confirms what Sen. Cunningham said.
…Adding… Rep. Kam Buckner…
This morning, Kevin Warren called to let me know Bears would be releasing a statement regarding Hammond. He ended the conversation by committing to continue discussions around their pursuit of a new stadium in Illinois.
After reading the statement, it’s worth noting that it is actually less definitive than the one the Bears issued earlier this year. In February, the Bears specifically referenced conducting due diligence on a site near Wolf Lake in Hammond, signaling that they had identified a particular location they were evaluating. Today’s statement, by contrast, says only that the project would be in Hammond, with the exact site still to be selected.
That’s not a criticism. It’s simply an acknowledgment that the Bears’ own language leaves additional flexibility and does not represent a final decision. The carefully crafted statement also uses words that describe a process that is continuing, rather than reaching a conclusion.
In April, the Illinois House advanced HB 910, legislation that established a critical economic development framework for projects across the state, including tools that could have supported the Bears’ pursuit of a new stadium. Illinois has continued to engage in good faith efforts to create pathways for transformative development and job creation.
What’s equally important is what wasn’t said. Neither the statement nor my conversation with Kevin suggested that Illinois is off the table. In fact, our discussion was forward-looking and centered on continuing conversations. If a final decision had truly been made, I wouldn’t expect the focus to be on what comes next.
There will be plenty of time to debate how this process has unfolded. I’m less interested in relitigating the past than I am in focusing on the future. What I took away from today’s conversation is that the door remains open. So does ours.
If the Bears are prepared to continue the conversation, as they confirmed to me today, there remains a viable path forward in Illinois, whether in Arlington Heights or in Chicago. We stand ready to have those conversations and continue working toward a solution that keeps the Chicago Bears in Illinois.
Emphasis added.
…Adding… GOP gubernatorial candidate Darren Bailey and Lt. Gov. candidate Aaron Del Mar…
“After 100 years, the Chicago Bears won’t be in Illinois – and it’s all because JB Pritzker and his disastrous agenda forced the heart and soul of Chicagoland to abandon its identity, its fans, and its state for more competitive waters. For years, Pritzker and the Democrats bled Illinois residents dry with higher costs and even higher taxes, but bankrupted our state with corrupt pet projects. Now, Pritzker has nothing left to offer residents or one of the biggest drivers of tourism in our state, losing in 8 years what Illinois spent the past 100 years trying to keep. It’s a sad day in Illinois, and we only have JB Pritzker to blame.”
…Adding… House Minority Leader Tony McCombie…
“The Chicago Bears choosing Indiana over Illinois should be a wake-up call, and Governor Pritzker owns this failure. The loss of one of our state’s most iconic franchises is a significant blow to our economy, our reputation, and future investment.
“Families and employers have been leaving Illinois in search of greater opportunity. Now it appears the Bears may be doing the same.
“After years of one-party control, this is both a failure of leadership and an embarrassment for our state. Illinois taxpayers are left paying the price while jobs, investment, and economic growth cross our borders.”
…Adding… Senate Minority Leader John Curran…
“We have heard from the Indiana Governor that his State moves at the speed of business. Gov. Pritzker needs to understand that failing to produce a serious proposal after three years to keep the Chicago Bears in Illinois isn’t good faith negotiation - it’s dysfunction. It’s time for Gov. Pritzker to Bear Down, address the infighting in the Democratic legislative caucuses and bring Republicans substantially into the process to help produce a bipartisan plan that protects taxpayers, grows our economy and keeps the Chicago Bears in Illinois for generations to come.”
…Adding… The Illinois Republican Party…
Today, Illinois families and Bears fans across the state saw the consequences of inept, failed Democrat leadership as the Chicago Bears announced they are moving forward with a move to Indiana after 100 years in Illinois.
“Once again, JB Pritzker and Brandon Johnson failed Illinois,” said ILGOP Chairman Bob Grogan. “The Chicago Bears are an integral part of our state, its identity and its culture. Now, after 100 years representing our state, they join thousands of families fleeing for greener pastures. Illinois families now have to ask – what have JB Pritzker and Brandon Johnson actually done for us?”
…Adding… JB for Governor spox…
“A private citizen like Darren Bailey can say as he pleases, as he has no authority over anything. He has no plan and has no new ideas. He’s perfectly willing to raise taxes on all Illinoisans to build a stadium for a nine-billion-dollar sports franchise – even praising Indiana for passing a bill to raise $1 billion in sales taxes on working people and suggesting spending lifesaving COVID relief funds on this. What’s clear is that Darren Bailey’s ignorance would be a disaster for Illinois.
141 Comments
|
* Press release…
U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) released the following statement on Interim U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois Andrew Boutros:
“Andrew Boutros’s time as Interim U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois has been riddled with chaos, deep internal dysfunction, and alleged misconduct. He must resign, and there must be an open, transparent, and nonpartisan search to nominate the next U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.”
* Tribune…
The demand is the latest fallout from the collapse of the “Broadview Six” case, which fell apart on the eve of trial last month over stunning accusations of misconduct by federal prosecutors in the grand jury and an attempt to hide it from the judge presiding over the case.
The senators’ statement also comes as Boutros fights a different controversy that drew national attention last week after it was revealed his office is leading a criminal investigation into a Chicago-based nonprofit that partially funded legal fees for E. Jean Carroll, the magazine columnist who successfully sued President Donald Trump for sexual assault and defamation. In a carefully worded statement, Boutros said last week reports of any investigation targeting Carroll were “categorically false.”
As the scandal has widened, morale within the already-beleaguered U.S. attorney’s office has gone into free fall. Several prosecutors who played a role in the Broadview Six case have hired attorneys, judges have signaled possible hearings and speculation is running rampant about who might face consequences. […]
In his first year in office, Boutros has been forced to deal with multiple crises under the new Trump administration, including a hiring freeze, federal budget cuts, a lengthy government shutdown and a mass exodus of experienced prosecutors from the office.
Gee, I wonder what could have possibly caused experienced prosecutors to leave en masse?
* Sun-Times…
Then-Attorney General Pam Bondi temporarily appointed Boutros to his job in April 2025. But when that appointment expired last summer, Chicago’s federal judges chose Boutros to serve on a more permanent basis. […]
The Illinois senators join Democratic Senate nominee Juliana Stratton and 9th Congressional District candidate Daniel Biss in calling for Boutros to resign following the dismissal of charges against the remaining members of the “Broadview Six” last month.
Stratton, Illinois’ lieutenant governor and a Democratic Senate nominee, last week told the Sun-Times Boutros had undermined the credibility of his office and should resign or be fired.
…Adding… The Tribune’s Jason Meisner…
5 Comments
|
* Sun-Times…
A source close to the Bears said the General Assembly is “clearly calling the Bears’ bluff” and daring them to move to Indiana. […]
“The fact that they’ve been trying to get a stadium for three years, they pass a bill in the House, we wait weeks and weeks and weeks for the Senate to tell us what they think they’re going to do and then, the Senate files a bill at 11 o’clock at night? It wasn’t serious. They’re checking a box.”
* Tribune…
The [1988] Sox vote was met with great urgency as a governor, legislative leaders and a Chicago mayor all united to save the team. But the Bears appeared largely to be a political afterthought, with the House and Senate failing to agree on vastly different stadium plans. Gov. JB Pritzker acknowledged he had not even read the Senate’s last-ditch proposal, and said he doubts that the Hammond offer could ever come to fruition due to environmental site concerns. […]
Senate President Don Harmon, of Oak Park, told reporters that “the question I don’t think is ‘How this came together last night?’ but that we did anything at all” about the Bears.
“There was an enormous undercurrent in our caucus to not do anything,” he said. “People are worried about neighbors being thrown off of food stamps, people not being able to keep up with inflation because their wages aren’t coming up, losing their healthcare because the hospitals and healthcare providers that serve them are being undercut by Washington. There was no appetite at all to provide public dollars to a $10 billion sports franchise.” […]
But even Welch admitted later that “as the (Bears) conversations have continued, as legislation passed the House, as legislation passed the Senate (Monday morning), more and more it comes up at the kitchen table. People are saying, ‘Hey, Speaker Welch, don’t let the Bears leave, but don’t give them any money.’”
Senate President Harmon and Senate sponsor Bill Cunningham also used that line about “don’t let the Bears leave, but don’t give them any money” this week.
Thoughts?
…Adding… The Bears have been telling their lobbyists for weeks that this isn’t happening. And “recent” is a relative term, which the mayor should define. If it was this past weekend, that’s one thing. If it was April, that’s quite another…
60 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|