Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - More budget analysis - Taxpayers Federation, Chamber, Governor’s office (Use all caps in password)
Wednesday, Mar 7, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
Enter your password to view comments |
Question of the day
Wednesday, Mar 7, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller Lots of people hate cigarette smoke. Quite a few hate smokers. But I’m wondering what you think of this bill…
Too far? Not far enough? Slippery slope to banning smoking in the home? Why or why not?
|
Budget roundup
Wednesday, Mar 7, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Daily Herald starts off our coverage of the governor’s budget proposal…
* It looks like the Tribune either broke the traditional embargo or did what I did and got a budget book through back channels. Their story is the most complete in the mainstream media…
Actually, the budget book I have estimates the annual cost by Fiscal Year 2011 (which starts in three years) to be between $3.2 and $4 billion a year. Anyway, as I told you yesterday the budget offers up $1.5 billion for schools in the first year, but as the Tribune correctly notes…
* Copley has more details on smaller aspects of the governor’s education plan…
* Back to the Daily Herald story, which points out that the governor will not propose any direct property tax relief today…
* Senate President Jones supports the gross receipts tax, but Sen. James Meeks says that his SB 750, which includes an income tax increase and property tax relief, is still on the table…
* And Sneed claims the governor is prepared to play some hardball…
* You can watch the budget address on the General Assembly’s website, or you can tune into your local public television station, which should be carrying it live. I’ll be on PBS starting at noon to help with the lead-in and wrap-up coverage.
|
Adams is in deep, deep denial
Wednesday, Mar 7, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller This argument by DHS chief Carol Adams makes no sense on so many levels…
How much of a “waste” of taxpayers’ money would that be? The guy made over 80 large a year. Let’s say making her drive herself “wasted” 10 percent of her salary. Unless she’s making $800K a year, then the taxpayers come out on top. Also, if making her drive herself is a waste, then why isn’t paying somebody $84,000 a year to drive part-time a waste? Shouldn’t that person be working on real projects instead of donning his little chauffer’s hat? If she’s telling the truth, then there’s been a problem over there for a while now…
More from the Sun-Times…
That would be true if each legislator had an $84,000 driver. It would also be true if legislators had high-paid staff driving them around all the time. I see plenty of legislators driving themselves around Springfield or walking.
The bus is warming up. Adams has reassigned her chief of staff to special projects in the wake of publicity over a lawsuit alleging that her chief ordered her own driver to have sex with her in a shared Springfield hotel room.
|
Morning Shorts
Wednesday, Mar 7, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson * Why did the test scores rise in Illinois?
* Daley defends Chicago schools ISAT gains * House’s latest electric rate freeze unlikely to clear Senate
* Deregulation law: A tale of two states * CUB spokesman & Rep. Bradley to meet with Herrin Chamber * Editorial: Legislature must act on spike in electric rates * AG Madigan subpoenas Ameren on heating ads * Illinois House votes to roll back electric rates * Michael Sneed: tidbits on Blagojevich, Daley, Reilly * Cindy Richards: Making Illinois a safe state again * Springfield’s image really is improving * Cook Co. Circuit Court associate judgeships named; 31 added to the bench
* Trustees may hold public discussion for ‘clarity’ over Illiniwek * Potential mailing list stokes hot Dist. 214 race * Streamwood trustee challenges may be just the beginning * Aurora alderman drops out of race * “Vote early vote often” phrase tossed around a lot in Chicago
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |