Question of the day
Wednesday, Jun 2, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * With the official start of summer upon us, it’s time to recalibrate our campaign handicapping. * The Question: Predict the outcomes of the races for US Senate and governor and any other statewide races you care to comment on. No need to explain, but it would be nice. …Adding… Keep in mind, people, that the Green Party is on the ballot for all statewide races. Whitney got 10.4 percent last time around.
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Quotes, dings, goofs, slams and ignorance
Wednesday, Jun 2, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Campaign quote of the day goes to Scott Lee Cohen’s running mate Baxter Swilly…
No follow-up? That’s odd. Maybe Baxter could’ve addressed yet another story about how the campaign appears to be paying winos and junkies to pass petition sheets…
Go read the whole thing. My favorite part…
Yep. They’re close alright. They’ll have that wrapped up any day now. And NBC5’s blogger deserves all the credit for that bit of breaking news. * Best ding of the day…
Good one. * The runner-up award is for a piece on a new pro-Quinn website which attacks Bill Brady…
Oops. *** UPDATE *** From the governor’s campaign spokesperson…
[ *** End of Update *** ] * As subscribers know, the governor has his work cut out for him…
The Senate Dems aren’t so sure that Quinn can do it…
That would mean three recalcitrant Democrats. I think there’s really only two. But we’ll see. The governor also couldn’t resist jabbing the GA…
He could’ve done a lot better, too, but we probably won’t hear an admission of that. It would just be too far out of character. * And the Peoria paper whacks Quinn for not staying more often at the governor’s mansion…
Yeah, it was so “beautiful” that Mrs. Edgar demanded they move the heck outta there. Alas, nobody seems to remember that bit of history. * Related…
|
He disgraces whomever he touches
Wednesday, Jun 2, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Whatever…
WLS has respect for the legal process? Huh. Could’ve fooled me. They let an obvious criminal take over their airwaves every week and spew his nonsense, then fawned all over him on other programs. Until they lost their freaking minds over there, I would always gladly agree to appear on that station whenever they asked. I grew up listening to WLS. For a kid living in the country, the station seemed at times like my own personal lifeline to the outside world. I was actually giddy the first time I met Bob Sirott and John “Records” Landecker. I wanted so badly to be in radio back then so I could be like those two guys. Now, I’m embarrassed for them. * No sympathy…
Maybe they would’ve been better prepared if their client hadn’t been gallivanting all over the country with his clown show. * Half true…
It’s true that politics here is based on the Outfit structure. What’s not true is that, after leaving Congress, Rod Blagojevich was ever considered a front man for the bad guys. He was the bad guy. He barely spoke to anyone else in power. He tucked himself into a tight little coccoon of criminal sycophants and hatched his goofy plots. And, believe, me, the man had plenty of goofy plots. * The G continues to leak its trial strategy. No Rezko unless he’s absolutely needed…
* Roundup…
|
Digging a hole in the ocean
Wednesday, Jun 2, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Chicago editorial boards reacted harshly to the latest Mark Kirk controversy. Tribune…
This is the first time in Kirk’s long career that he has received the trifecta of newspaper slams on the same day. * MSNBC’s First Read asks a good question…
That’s bothered me as well. Why embellish a pretty darned stellar record? Why, as the Sun-Times editorial points out, constantly refer to “combat” service when you really just flew over the scene in a plane? Why say you were “deployed,” which is a term of art, when you actually weren’t? Why say you “served in Operation Iraqi Freedom” when, as the Sun-Times again points out, you served “during” the conflict? Greg Sargent follows up on that one…
* As the Tribune notes, Kirk has a hubris problem. Every politician has a hubris problem, and every politician tries to put the best spin on his or her past. But, in this country, fibbing about one’s military record has long been considered wholly dishonorable. As someone who has served with distinction and with honor, Kirk should know better. Is he overcompensating for something? Is this just a personality tick which is no big deal, or is there a deeper problem here? And was even last week’s explanation untrue? Maybe…
* Today, Kirk dug the hole deeper by sending out a press release touting a statement by his former commanding officer…
1) From what I’ve seen, nobody has ever claimed that Kirk didn’t earn or receive those awards except Mark Kirk, who claimed he alone received a different award. 2) There is no doubt that Kirk has embellished and exaggerated his record. Stop digging the hole and move on. …Adding… Ben Smith has one of the better analogies that I’ve seen on this topic…
* Related…
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |