|
Enter your password to view comments
|
So long, farewell
Monday, Nov 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Legislative retirements are piling up…
Historically, big turnover in the House and Senate happens once a decade with the redrawing of legislative boundaries, a process that often puts incumbents in the minority party in a landscape with which they are not familiar or that may be unfriendly politically.
But this go-around, there is a sizable contingent of Democrats, who were in charge of the mapmaking, who have decided to call it quits. Some are seeking higher political office or lucrative job offers. Others have family commitments or simply have grown weary of the stress of an enduring state budget crisis that shows no signs of relenting.
The list compiled by the Sun-Times…
Sen. James Meeks (D)
Sen. Jeff Schoenberg (D)
Sen. Edward Maloney (D)
Sen. Susan Garrett (D)
Sen. David Koehler (D)
Sen. Larry Bomke (R)
Sen. John Millner (R)
Sen. Suzi Schmidt (R)
Rep. Joe Lyons (D)
Rep. Connie Howard (D)
Democratic Reps. Karen May and Lisa Dugan and Republican Reps. Jerry Mitchell, Dave Winters and Franco Coladipietro were not listed by the paper, but they’re also retiring.
Democratic Rep. Karen Yarbrough and Republican Sen. Chris Lauzen are running for county office.
Appointed Democratic Reps. Kimberly du Buclet and Dena Carli aren’t running, and neither is appointed Republican Sen. Tom Johnson. Reps. Ron Stephens, Tom Holbrook, Will Burns, Harry Osterman, Susana Mendoza and Dan Reitz have already resigned. Sens. Rickey Hendon, Brad Burzynski, Lou Viverito and Dale Risinger have resigned as well.
There are also some House members running for the Senate, so they’ll be giving up their seats, and GOP Sen. Ron Sandack is running for the House. Also, four GOP Senators have been paired off into districts by the new map, so two of them will be leaving.
* From Greg Hinz…
In a body whose members too often are inclined to keep their heads down and take orders, all three had clear, decisive agendas for change and didn’t mind breaking some china in the process.
Mr. Schoenberg, for instance, pushed stem cell research and specialized in financial matters as co-chairman of the Legislature’s fiscal unit.
Ms. Garrett drove the folks at Metra crazy with her constant gripes about how that agency operates. Time has proven her complaints to be pretty well-founded.
Mr. Meeks’ issue was education finance reform, and he was a real terror, challenging former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, busing loads of inner-city school kids up to the North Shore and the like.
Discuss.
49 Comments
|
* Crain’s ran an interesting story over the weekend about how House Speaker Madigan’s refusal to allow McPier to refinance bonds cost the authority half a billion dollars.
Several motives were offered. For instance, Madigan was at war with Rod Blagojevich…
But in response to questions from Crain’s, a spokesman for Mr. Madigan now says the speaker blocked refinancing to prevent the Blagojevich administration from cashing in on contracts for bond work, such as underwriting and legal services. He provided Crain’s an unsigned memorandum of understanding, dated August 2007, in which McPier agreed to allow the state to review and approve all fees and “structuring decisions” related to bond refinancing.
Asked about the financial impact of delayed refinancing, the spokesman says the “consequences were outweighed by (opposition to) becoming part of the Blagojevich fundraising machine.”
The war against Blagojevich was also a war against Blagojevich’s guy at McPier, Juan Ochoa…
“It was no secret that Madigan had a beef with Ochoa and wanted him gone,” says state Rep. Angelo “Skip” Saviano, an Elmwood Park Republican who sponsored refinancing bills in 2005, 2007 and 2009. “As long as Ochoa was there, Madigan wasn’t going to give McCormick Place anything.”
Madigan was taking out revenge when one of his guys was fired…
The guy was Jack Johnson, who had worked as a legislative analyst on Mr. Madigan’s staff in the mid-1980s before signing on as McPier’s chief of external relations in 1989. In September 2007, Mr. Ochoa, just eight months on the job, fired him.
Or, Madigan was fronting for some clients…
By holding up refinancing, the speaker also denied McCormick Place the money to build a new hotel. That bought time for clout-heavy developers Gerald Fogelson and Cleveland-based Forest City Enterprises Inc. to push a controversial land swap and hotel deal with McCormick Place on property just north of the convention center. Both were then clients of Mr. Madigan’s law firm, Madigan & Getzendanner, but the speaker denies any connection. […]
The internal documents show McPier officials enthusiastically supporting the project, with the notable exception of Messrs. Ochoa and [McPier Chairman John Gates].
* And here’s how it ended up…
As the recession raged in early 2010, the collapse of the real estate market scuttled the deal. That May, after Mr. Ochoa resigned, the General Assembly finally passed legislation that lowered McCormick Place’s debt payments, allocated funds to expand the existing Hyatt Regency McCormick Place and imposed wage restrictions and new work rules on union labor. The House sponsor was Speaker Michael Madigan.
The legislation reduced this year’s debt service by $96 million, but the damage had already been done at the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, known as McPier, the agency that runs McCormick Place. Denied refinancing for six years, McPier paid out as much as $300 million more in bond interest than it should have and was forced to tap state sales tax revenue to meet its obligations.
Mr. Madigan’s inaction also set off a chain of events that put Chicago’s $8-billion trade show industry — and the estimated 66,000 jobs it supports — at risk. Without revenues from the debt savings and a second hotel, McPier had to mark up its prices in the middle of the recession, driving away two trade shows. With McCormick Place in crisis in late 2009, other shows threatened to leave Chicago unless state lawmakers imposed restrictions on McPier unions.
Go read the whole thing.
38 Comments
|
Rakestraw responds to Walsh tirade
Monday, Nov 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Melissa Rakestraw, who was one of the people loudly berated by Congressman Joe Walsh a week ago at a constituent event, sent me an e-mail over the weekend…
You recently posted about Joe Walsh’s screaming tirade. Unfortunately this tirade occurred in my face. I am extremely displeased to see you publish Walsh’s press release about my “feelings” on the encounter as if he speaks for me. From Walsh’s release:
“The woman I had the heated exchange with was great and she appreciated how open and unusual these events are. I apologized to her for getting a bit to passionate and she smiled and didn’t mind at all.”
I am that woman and I did in fact mind. You can clearly see in the video that when he gets in my face and is yelling I say, “stop screaming at me, I’m not screaming at you.” I thought that was a clear indication and communication that I did mind. Of course anyone that would behave the way Mr. Walsh does, wouldn’t be concerned with my true feelings on the matter. Mr. Walsh had no respect whatsoever for my boundaries and my direct request to stop screaming at me. There was a reason that I had placed the bar stool between myself and Mr. Walsh before he even went on the tirade, I did not want him in my space.
I have no recollection whatsoever of Mr. Walsh apologizing to me. I know for a fact he never said, “I’m sorry.”
Several times throughout the day I smiled at him, usually because I thought that what he was saying was laughable. I’m really disappointed that because I conducted myself with dignity in the face of ignorance that I’m being seen as someone who tolerates being berated by a nonsensical fool. I had no intention of lowering myself to his level and responding with obnoxious behavior. At the end of the discussion he did approach me and thanked me for being there. I’m sure he appreciated having someone there to disagree with him so he could grandstand and put on a show for the camera. I just can’t believe that any journalist would take any statement of Walsh’s as if it had credibility.
She sounds ever so pleasant, no? And asking a duly elected congressman why he blew up at his constituents for a blog post about how the tea party is losing support in Illinois violates ethical canons? News to me.
* Ms. Rakestraw was on the Ed Schultz show recently and it’s obvious she has little in common with Congressman Walsh…
Schultz asked her if she was intimidated by the congressman, to which she replied, “No. Actually, I wasn’t. You know, the only thing that scares me about Joe Walsh is his anti-worker ideologies, and his total disregard for facts.”
Ms. Rakestraw went on to explain, once again, the reason you can’t simply replace the USPS with private carriers like UPS, zinging Walsh’s constitution-loving bona fides in the process.
“The Post Office, first of all, was established by the Constitution,” she said, adding “I know Joe claims to be a big fan of the Constitution. and because of our charter, we are obligated to serve all the citizens of the United States. and Fedex and UPS don’t do this. 25% of their deliveries are finished by the postal service.”
Not to be nitpicky, but since Rakestraw apparently considers herself an expert on the US Constitution, she might actually want to read it…
The Congress shall have power… To establish Post Offices and post Roads
The Constitution empowered Congress to establish Post Offices. Post Offices are not protected by the Constitution from closure. What Congress can establish, it can also disestablish. Also, the Postal Service predates the Constitution. Ben Franklin was appointed the nation’s first Postmaster General in 1775.
* Meanwhile, Walsh held another event on Saturday and tried to take it all in stride…
Forgoing a formal introduction, Republican Congressman Joe Walsh, 8th District, brought the room to order by addressing the proverbial 800-pound gorilla in it.
“Alright, please pay attention; I don’t want to lose my temper,” quipped Walsh, whose recent heated exchange with a constituent has gone viral on the web.
Walsh’s remarks drew laughs from the capacity crowd that had gathered Saturday in a small banquet room in the Village Inn in Huntley for a coffee-and-pie, meet-and-greet with the freshman legislator. Among those in attendance was Frank Briguglio, who, at age 80, was attending his first-ever political gathering.
“I came here because of the way (Walsh) talks,” the Huntley resident said. “He says it like it is.”
* Related…
* Joe Walsh Saves Christmas: As with most of Walsh’s statements, this one is short on facts and long on hyperbole. The Christmas Tree Promotion Board was not conceived by the Obama Administration, it was conceived by growers, who requested the tax to reverse the declining sales of pines and spruces. The Department of Agriculture approved the tax this week, comparing it the dairy industry’s “Got Milk” campaign. But when it appeared in the Federal Register, so many conservatives complained so vociferously that the administration decided to “delay implementation and revisit this action,” in the words of a spokesman.
* FreedomWorks picks Walsh over Hultgren in IL’s 14th CD
* Politicians Win If No Saturday Mail
30 Comments
|
Quinn tones down the hyper act
Monday, Nov 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
“I love this governor!” exclaimed a jubilant utility lobbyist a few weeks ago.
Why would a utility lobbyist express his undying love for our self-proclaimed consumer activist governor?
Simple.
The lobbyist was convinced that Gov. Pat Quinn’s over-the-top media antics had helped pass the so-called “smart grid” trailer bill by a huge margin and provided the extra oomph needed to override Quinn’s veto of the original bill.
That lobbyist was not alone. Several legislators, staff members and other longtime observers said basically the same thing. When the governor decided not to negotiate the bill’s details and slammed legislators who received utility campaign contributions as somehow criminal or at the very least sleazy, he created a nasty legislative backlash that helped the utilities hold their coalition together.
Yet Quinn appeared to revel in his alleged victories. He got his clock cleaned, but he fought the good fight, and that’s apparently what really mattered.
“I read somewhere that I enraged the General Assembly,” the governor said afterward about the ComEd bill imbroglio, including his unfounded and untrue allegations of “monkey business” during the House roll call. “Well, so what?”
But then, several days after the first week of the veto session ended, Quinn abruptly changed his tune. Gone was his public anger, replaced with a far more professional attitude. He stopped ripping the General Assembly and stopped holding media events.
As a consequence, the governor did much better during the second week of the veto session. He came very close to a deal on solving some serious budget problems, got a bill passed to his liking that addressed his veto of regional school superintendents’ salaries and a gambling bill he opposed petered out in the House.
If he’s learning, that would be a good thing.
No governor has ever had great relations with the General Assembly. Then-Senate Minority Leader Pate Philip would go days, even weeks, without returning fellow Republican Jim Thompson’s calls. Thompson got so fed up at one point that he stomped over to Philip’s office, banged on the door and pushed past Philip’s chief of staff when told he couldn’t come in. The difference between then and now is nobody held a press conference.
Gov. Jim Edgar left office with public approval ratings in the 70s, but he was not beloved by state legislators. After every Edgar budget speech, reporters would rush to Philip and wait for him to declare that Edgar’s proposals were dead on arrival (the wait rarely lasted longer than a few seconds). But Edgar never aired his grievances with Philip during a press conference.
As a former House Speaker, George Ryan had an amazingly effective relationship with the Legislature. Even so, he had problems that at times were severe enough to make him want to tear his hair out by the roots. But Ryan never fumed about his frustrations in public.
Fighting with the General Assembly is part and parcel of being governor. And veto sessions are, by their very design, overtly hostile to the governor. The governor is set up to lose.
Rod Blagojevich never really understood that. He thought that everyone, including Madigan, should bow down to him, and we all know where that led. It was starting to look as if Quinn had the same counterproductive personality trait as Blagojevich.
Quinn’s change in tactics for the second veto session was perhaps just in time to prevent the gambling expansion bill’s sponsors from rounding up more votes. His earlier antics and public tantrums were a major tactical component of the bill’s backers. When he calmed down, it was tougher to persuade members to go against Quinn’s wishes. The bill failed miserably, and Quinn’s hand was strengthened.
Quinn needs to stay calm, work hard behind the scenes, take names and, if necessary, plot a more subtle revenge. Whining to the media has never accomplished anything under the Dome.
* And Quinn kept this up over the weekend as well…
Gov. Pat Quinn passed on a chance to rub it in Saturday after legislators failed to adopt a revamped gambling expansion during the fall session.
The Democratic governor said lawmakers and Mayor Rahm Emanuel should work off the framework he has laid out to try to reach a compromise on a gambling package that can pass the General Assembly and enjoy public support.
* Others have also taken notice…
When we last saw Gov. Pat Quinn, he was lobbing grenades at the General Assembly, doing a pretty decent impression of his former running mate, Rod Blagojevich, minus the hair.
But sometime around when October turned into November, he went from the Angry Quinn to the Silent Quinn.
As lawmakers returned to action last Tuesday, Quinn’s press staff issued its obligatory public schedule for the governor. For the next three days, each one said the governor would be holding no public events.
Although we’re told he was in the Capitol building, Quinn never once stepped out of his second floor office to talk with the media about what was happening above him in the House and Senate chambers.
The abrupt change in public attitude happened the same day the Capitol Fax quoted that above-mentioned utility lobbyist expressing his love for the governor. I’m not taking credit, but it sure was a happy coincidence.
5 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|