Must-see TV
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* These two guys really don’t like each other, so I may break my habit of skipping the Sunday “newsmaker” shows this weekend…
CNN’s “State of the Union” Govs. Rick Perry, R-Texas, and Pat Quinn, D-Ill.
Remember this quote?…
[Gov. Pat Quinn] joked about his time with Republican presidential candidate Texas Governor Rick Perry, with whom he roomed during a trip to Iraq two years ago.
“And I had to listen to his so-called philosophy for seven days. The harshest philosophy known to man,” Quinn said.
12 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Rep. Dwight Kay (R-Glen Carbon) won by a little over 300 votes last year against an unknown, underfunded Democratic opponent who had no leadership backing.
Yet, now, he wants to run for House Republican Leader. As you already know, HGOP Leader Tom Cross wants to run for attorney general in case Lisa Madigan doesn’t stand for reelection. Several House Republicans are interested.
This Kay campaign is highly unusual because chamber leaders often have to take some pretty bad votes to help a member out here and there or to follow through on a deal with the other leaders. So, you just don’t usually see people from swing districts running for the top job anywhere in the country. There’s just too much danger that they’d be a one-termer and that it would cost the caucus even more money to defend them because they are the leader.
* Anyway, Kay recently sent out a glossy brochure touting his candidacy. The piece was posted on Jack Roeser’s Champion News site.
Click here to read it.
Some of the ideas aren’t bad at all, some of them are retreads. It’s a good-looking piece, but I did notice some avoidable typos, which prolly ain’t a great thing.
…Adding… Just in case you missed it when you were looking at Kay’s brochure…
NEW IDEAS: Dwight Kay wants the House Repubicans to be a laboratory of creativity, known for their innovative solutions. […]
JOB CREATOR: With our state facing record unemployment, the House Repubican Caucus would be well-served by having their leader also have real-world business experience.
Emphasis added to point out that maybe I’m wrong. Apparently, he’s running for something besides the House Republican Leader post.
* From Rep. Kay’s brochure…
* The Question: Caption?
66 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Entirely missing the point
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I agree with Steve Chapman…
The headline on last Sunday’s Chicago Tribune was stark and arresting: “A thousand shootings.” That’s what Chicago experienced in the first six months of 2013. It works out to more than five a day.
So what crime issue got Gov. Pat Quinn worked up last week? The danger posed by Illinoisans holding state permits to carry concealed firearms. “My foremost duty as governor is to keep the people of Illinois safe,” he said in issuing an amendatory veto of a bill to legalize concealed carry in the last state without it. […]
Quinn responded: “Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed, this was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois.” But of those 70 shootings — or the 1,000-plus shootings that preceded them this year — it’s safe to wager that few if any involved legal weapons used by individuals legally entitled to own them. […]
Opponents, however, never tire of insisting that letting individuals tote firearms will unleash mass carnage. The Washington-based Violence Policy Center makes much of the fact that since 2007, by its count, 516 people have been killed by permit holders.
But a quarter of those were suicides, which are not a danger to public safety. Though the figure sounds high, it’s less than 90 a year — in a country with more than 50,000 homicides and suicides annually.
The number of licensees who make lethal misuse of their guns, likewise, is a microscopic percentage of the estimated 6 million people who are authorized to carry. The overwhelming majority behave in a responsible, lawful way. The people behind the epidemic of violent crime in Chicago, by contrast, don’t bother with permits and wouldn’t qualify for them.
For this group, the new law is irrelevant. Politicians who use the ongoing slaughter as a reason to oppose it only confirm that when it comes to government’s most important function, they haven’t got a clue.
Some people just hate guns and everything to do with guns, so anything that expands gun rights is viewed with hostility.
54 Comments
|
Nothing here yet
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* If this is “illegal,” then almost every politician in Illinois is going to prison.
The Sun-Times reports on yesterday’s House Mass Transit Committee hearings on the Metra weirdness…
Early in the nearly six-hour hearing, Joseph Gagliardo, the rail agency’s lawyer, told state Rep. Deb Mell (D-Chicago) and her fellow panel members about the request from Madigan’s office — a request the lawyer insisted was not political.
“Elected officials don’t lose their First Amendment rights to talk to people,” Gagliardo testified.
“Speaker Madigan inquired about a raise for an employee. It’s not inappropriate for an elected official to inquire about a wage increase for somebody. It’s not based on politics,” Gagliardo said.
Earlier this week, Metra Chairman Brad O’Halloran said [ex-CEO Alex Clifford] and his attorney had argued that if Clifford’s contract was not renewed, it would be in retaliation for Clifford reporting “alleged illegal conduct” to the Metra Board — supposedly political pressure involving hiring and contract awards. Before his exit, Clifford initially threatened a “whistleblower lawsuit” and was asking for more than the $718,000 package he got.
In a prepared statement released Thursday, Madigan said only that his office recommended Metra bosses give employee Patrick Ward a raise.
Madigan, who praised Ward’s academic and professional career in the statement, said he and Ward have worked together “on a variety of projects” over the past 15 years; his statement didn’t elaborate on those projects.
The discussion about the raise began with Ward contacting Madigan’s office in roughly March 2012, according to Madigan’s statement.
Ward, a Metra labor relations specialist since 2008, notified Madigan’s office that “in spite of being asked to assume expanded tasks with additional responsibilities in his position, his $57,000 salary had not increased in more than three years,” Madigan’s statement said,
“Given the information presented to my office, we forwarded a recommendation to Metra senior staff that Mr. Ward be considered for a salary adjustment. My office’s recommendation supplemented an endorsement which I understand he received from his supervisor, who concluded Mr. Ward was underpaid and that his job performance and education warranted a salary adjustment. ”
But Clifford ultimately rejected the recommendation, Madigan said. The House Speaker said he then withdrew his recommendation for the raise.
Ward is a 13th Ward guy. He asked for help and a letter was sent, then withdrawn. Ward eventually resigned.
* If anybody can tell me what the alleged crime is here, I’m all ears.
Yes, Madigan is powerful, but was Metra retaliated against for not giving his guy a raise? Nobody has once made that claim. And even if Madigan did retaliate, it’d be wrong, but likely not illegal.
I mean, seriously, writing a letter for a political supporter is now supposed to be some sort of scandal? Are you kidding me?
* Also, Rep. Mell still blames MJM for the failure of gay marriage and is Rod Blagojevich’s sister-in-law, so assigning that committee to the task of probing the Metra deal was an interesting move by the Speaker, since he undoubtedly knew his name would come up. Rep. Jack Franks had grabbed some headlines, but his committee wasn’t involved yesterday.
* Speaking of the Mell family, it appears that Rod Blagovjevich may have been right after all…
A felon convicted of bribing a public official says he and Ald. Richard Mell (33rd) were silent partners in the Joliet landfill that spurred a nasty family feud with Mell’s son-in-law, then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich, according to allegations in a lawsuit obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times.
Mell has long denied having any financial interest in the landfill, which sold for $17.7 million in 2008. But the lawsuit filed by Robert Pruim Sr. and his son, Robert Jr., in Will County Circuit Court, accuses the powerful alderman of helping create the business, taking a one-third ownership stake and then conspiring to defraud the Pruims out of nearly $3.7 million when the sale occurred. […]
The lawsuit claims Mell held meetings about the landfill deal in his aldermanic office and used his political connections to help a now-imprisoned distant relative, Frank Schmidt, become the face of the landfill business.
Because the landfill could accept construction debris from state construction projects, “neither Pruim Sr. (prior felony conviction for bribery) nor Mell (political figure and father-in-law of the governor) could be listed as ‘stated’ owners,” the court papers say. […]
Federal court documents show that Schmidt had more than $9 million in income in 2008 — the year of the sale. That same year, Mell reported a capital gain in excess of $5,000 from an “investment in F. Schmidt Corp.” on his aldermanic financial disclosure form. […]
Mell has long denied having any financial interest in the landfill deal, which was the genesis of a public dispute with the now-imprisoned Blagojevich. Blagojevich temporarily shut down the landfill in 2005, accusing Schmidt of accepting illegal waste and of promoting his ties to Mell as a way to get business.
An infuriated Mell lashed out, telling the Chicago Sun-Times at the time that a key Blagojevich adviser — the late Christopher G. Kelly — had been trading plum state government appointments for $50,000 campaign contributions. Mell later publicly apologized after Kelly threatened legal action.
Blagojevich was concerned that Mell had a hidden financial interest in the landfill. As governor, he launched a legislative assault on the landfill industry and pushed legislation that would specifically ban relatives of the governor from having any financial stake in landfills or receiving any “personal financial benefit” from waste-disposal operators.
34 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Today’s quote
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Aviva Bowen’s Facebook page…
Lemmegetthisstraight. And I’m not commenting on pro/con of Quinn’s move.
But when it comes to the promised compensation of our state legislators, we are focused urgently on the constitutionality of cutting it.
But when it comes to slashing the promised compensation of a half-million teachers, emergency responders, and public service workers with their life savings in a state pension system some say, “Meh. who knows. Let’s just do it and worry about constitutionality later.”
Aviva works for the Illinois Federation of Teachers, so she’s a bit biased, but I don’t disagree at all.
* Also, Attorney General Lisa Madigan announced within hours that she’d be looking into the constitutionality of the governor’s line-item veto. But AG Madigan has yet to publicly voice an opinion on any of the proposed pension reform plans.
That seems rather duplicitous. Madigan’s office has said that she won’t comment on an issue that could be litigated. But Quinn’s veto could very well be challenged in court.
I’m not sure I quite understand this, other than the fact that she may run for governor and wants to stay out of the pension fight.
*** UPDATE *** From the attorney general’s office…
Rich, regarding Aviva’s Facebook comment and your post, we have not publicly weighed in on the governor’s actions on the legislative pay. We simply said we were looking at issue based on questions brought to our office and raised by our lawyers.
As you noted, we have not publicly weighed in on the pension matter given the anticipated litigation once a reform measure is passed. We anticipate possibly litigation involving the governor’s actions as well, which explains why we have simply indicated we are doing a legal analysis.
42 Comments
|
Careful what you cheer
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My Sun-Times column…
Pretty much everybody is cheering Gov. Pat Quinn for vetoing state legislators’ salaries out of the Illinois budget this week.
Quinn vetoed lawmaker salaries because, he said, he was tired of waiting year after year for legislators to pass a comprehensive pension reform plan.
Probably the only state politicians despised more than Quinn himself these days are legislators, so nobody is weeping for legislators’ personal financial troubles. Quinn, down in the polls and desperate for any kind of “win,” knows this is a sure-fire way to appeal to the populist disgust with the no-can-do General Assembly.
But man, is this ever a dangerous stunt.
Not even Rod Blagojevich at his most insane ever attempted this maneuver. Blagojevich fought the General Assembly tooth and nail, even at one point firing the wife of House Speaker Madigan’s chief of staff.
Blagojevich kept the General Assembly in overtime sessions month after month, fought court battles over his powers to force them to bend to his will, but never had the chutzpah to veto their salaries out of the budget.
That should tell you how extreme this ploy is.
And if this action isn’t eventually repudiated, either by the courts or by the General Assembly, it’ll probably happen again.
Here’s a plausible scenario:
The Illinois Legislature, particularly the House, is pretty divided over abortion rights. So what would happen if a staunchly pro-life governor decided to veto legislative pay until they approved an anti-abortion bill? Maybe the Legislature would override him, but maybe hardcore pro-life forces could stop a veto override motion from reaching the required three-fifths supermajority until a bill was passed.
If you’re pro-life, just reverse the scenario.
This is nothing short of legislative blackmail.
OK, you may be saying, isn’t pension reform a dire emergency worth the risk?
Well, after years of skyrocketing by about a billion dollars a year, state pension payments will rise by about $200 million next year and the year after next. That’s still a lot of money, but nothing like it has been.
Even so, the state can’t afford what it’s paying now, let alone lots more down the road.
So, you’d be right to ask, what if this veto is the only way Quinn could get the General Assembly to act?
For all practical purposes, any bill passed now won’t take effect until July 1 of next year.
So why all the rush to pass a bill that won’t take effect for almost a year? The New York bond rating agencies are screaming for action. And Illinois, with the worst credit rating in the nation, is at their mercy. Getting a law on the books will calm things down.
But there’s something else. Quinn’s budget director recently submitted a list of pension reform “scenarios” to the special legislative committee tasked with coming up with a solution. Nobody knows how much those ideas will save because the actuaries haven’t finished studying them.
It would be just plain stupid to pass a pension-reform bill before anybody even knew what it would save, but Quinn went ahead and vetoed legislator salaries even though his own new plan hadn’t even been vetted.
That’s a bit harsh.
Also, the committee has its own set of pension-reform scenarios which have been sent to the actuaries. Meanwhile, everybody has to wait around and nobody is getting paid.
How productive.
Everybody is falling for Quinn’s dangerous little stunt because it looks so deliciously justifiable. Careful what you wish for.
73 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|