Opposition emerges to Rauner AV
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* JB Pritzker…
“Bruce Rauner hijacked a commonsense gun safety bill that he could’ve signed into law to play politics. I disagree with repealing the ban on the death penalty, but we should be able to have that debate without derailing efforts to keep children and families safe from gun violence. Illinoisans need a governor who will put people over politics and work tirelessly to end the senseless violence in our communities. I will be that leader.”
* Chicago Tribune editorial…
Politicians up for election hunt everywhere for voter support, so very few proposals cause us to do spit takes. But Rauner’s bring-back-the-death-penalty cry comes close. The death penalty issue in Illinois was examined and debated for years in light of notorious incidents of wrongly convicted defendants sent to death row. In Illinois, the legitimate sentiment of many that certain heinous criminals should be put to death was weighed against the risk of errors, and the decision was made to end capital punishment.
Now comes Rauner, facing two political challenges: his governor’s race against Democrat J.B. Pritzker and his need to re-establish bona fides with disgruntled conservative Republicans. Maybe he hopes to attract some Democratic voters with elements of his hydra-headed rewrite, such as the waiting period for all firearms purchases. Meanwhile, the death penalty idea looks like a paean to conservatives. Rauner narrowly defeated a primary challenge from the right by Jeanne Ives, and he may never win those Republicans back on the issue of opposition to abortion, given his support for expanded abortion funding. So he’ll get tough on crime. That message will look good on a downstate billboard.
Rauner addresses the specter of executing an innocent person by proposing a higher standard of determining guilt in capital cases. A court would need to find the defendant guilty “beyond all doubt,” versus the standard determination of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said. Rauner’s proposal is a standard that’s been kicked around in the past and may have validity if the issue of juror certainty had been the narrow focus of the death penalty debate. But that’s not what ended the death penalty in Illinois. The crucial question was this: Could Illinois assure its citizens that the state would only execute the guilty?
The answer was no, and nothing has changed to make Rauner’s Monday announcement worthy of consideration. We hope the General Assembly will override his veto.
* And if you thought that was harsh, check out the Chicago Sun-Times editorial…
If some emotionally disturbed goof in Illinois buys an AR-15 rifle and turns around and shoots a lot of people, it’s on you, Gov. Bruce Rauner.
You had a chance to sign a bill creating a 72-hour “cooling off” period between the time a person buys a military-style assault weapon and when he or she can take it home. But on Monday you did your best to kill the bill.
We know, Governor. You didn’t technically kill the cooling off period. And when you campaign for reelection this summer among moderate suburban Republicans, you can say just that without strictly telling a lie.
But in your amendatory veto on Monday, you loaded up the bill with so many major new provisions that there is no way the Legislature will give it their seal of approval.
And you knew that. That was the game.
* Related…
* Political expert: Rauner’s proposal to reinstate death penalty harks back to law-and-order era: “I think in some ways it harks back to the ’60s and ’70s, when political leaders at both the federal and the state level were rushing to make more and more things capital crimes … and all of that was part of the whole law-and-order era,” Jackson said.
26 Comments  
|
Question of the day
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
In response to the governor’s proposal to bring back state executions, Illinois Senate President John J. Cullerton reminded everyone Monday that scandals, overturned convictions and other systematic problems were why lawmakers abolished the death penalty in Illinois.
“The death penalty should never be used as a political tool to advance one’s agenda. Doing so is in large part why we had so many problems and overturned convictions. That’s why we had bipartisan support to abolish capital punishment,” Cullerton said. “I’ve seen nothing from today’s announcement to suggest that lesson has been learned.”
* Part of a GOP Rep. Alan Skillicorn press release…
Illinois’ death penalty prohibition came about after serious corruption was revealed. That corruption has not been corrected.
* Illinois House Republican Leader Jim Durkin…
“As a former prosecutor, I believe the governor’s recommended changes strike the right balance to reduce senseless gun violence in Chicago and throughout the state. Allowing a prosecutor the option to seek the death penalty in the most horrific and brutal of crimes should be the law of Illinois and sends a message that we support those who wear the badge.”
* Chicago Fraternal Order of Police President Kevin Graham…
“I and the Fraternal Order of Police are grateful for Gov. Rauner’s support in imposing the death penalty in the murder of police officers. This is an added measure of safety for police officers because criminals will think twice about attacking officers when they know they could face the death penalty. This penalty is also a valuable tool for prosecutors.”
* The Question: Setting aside the constitutionality of the governor’s amendatory veto, would you support bringing back the death penalty for any crimes? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
web survey
103 Comments
|
It’s just a bill
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Actually, it’s not even a bill yet and it probably won’t ever be one because I don’t think anybody in the General Assembly is this politically suicidal, but one never knows I suppose…
Illinois homeowners, who already pay some of the nation’s highest property taxes, should pay about 40 percent more for the next decade to wipe out the state’s crippling pension debt, according to a trio of economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
The economists argue that paying off the state’s $129.1 billion in unfunded pension obligations cannot be done with revenue from new taxes such as a tax on marijuana sales or on financial transactions.
“In our view, Illinois’ best option is to impose a statewide residential property tax,” they wrote, in part because it would be fair: “Illinois residents who have benefited most from the past services of governmental employees are more likely to be homeowners, so it seems reasonable that they should pay a larger share of the costs.”
They are proposing a statewide tax of 1 percent of a home’s value. Under their plan, the tax bill on a $500,000 house would go from about $11,600 to $16,600, an increase of $5,000, paid each year for 10 years.
The economists—Thomas Haasl, Rick Mattoon and Thomas Walstrum—calculated that a property tax equal to 1 percent of a home’s value could plug the state’s pension gap in 10 years.
As some commenters have noted, this is a 30-year tax hike proposal, not ten.
* More bills…
* Campaign-finance reform bill stalls during big-money Illinois governor’s race
* Bill would help Swansea school damaged by mine subsidence
* Bush urges Wisconsin to reconsider Foxconn deal, asks Illinois agencies to protect against loss of water, flooding: SR 1600, which passed out of the Senate Environment Committee today, also asks Illinois agencies to take whatever actions possible to protect against the loss of water, potential flooding and other ecological impacts that might result from the Foxconn deal.
* Government union lobbying turns legislation against students: SB 2838 was meant to aid school districts – and students – by providing a means for schools to recruit substitute teachers. But government union lobbying transformed it into a pro-union, pro-strike bill that hinders educational opportunities for students during teacher strikes.
* Retired military leaders call for more child care, education funding
25 Comments
|
ISRA applauds Rauner AV
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
“While not everything we had hoped for, we applaud the Governor for taking a thoughtful first step in tackling the issue of violence that torments our state,” said Richard Pearson, Executive Director of the Illinois State Rifle Association. “The Governor understands it’s not law-abiding gun owners that terrorize our state with violence, criminals and those that should not have guns are the root of gun violence problems.”
* As noted below, Rauner has unveiled the formal language of his amendatory veto. Here’s his proposed death penalty language…
The trier of fact regarding the charge of death penalty murder shall resolve any doubt regarding identification or any element of the offense in favor of the defendant. A defendant shall not be found guilty of the offense of death penalty murder unless each and every element of the offense is established beyond any doubt. If the trial is by jury, before the trial commences and again before jury deliberations commence, the jury shall be instructed that the penalty for death penalty murder is death. […]
On appeal from a conviction of death penalty murder, review of the facts shall be de novo. In conducting its de novo review of the trial evidence, the appellate court shall resolve all doubt regarding identification and guilt in favor of the defendant. The appellate court shall conduct an independent review of the evidence without giving deference to the judgment of the trier of fact at trial.
* So, here’s something to keep in mind…
14 Comments
|
Home of the whopper
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Rauner at the Kemp Forum…
Gov. Rauner: All I said was ‘Let’s balance the budget.’ I proposed a balanced budget every year. They ignored it, passed an out of balanced budget that was billions of dollars in deficit, forcing me to veto it. I’m not gonna sign off on deficit spending that causes more debt on the people of Illinois and pushes more jobs out.
Charles Thomas: But is there a possibility that we could not have a budget by the end of this month?
Gov. Rauner: Madigan has indicated that his preference is to, you heard what he said in 2015. ‘Raise the income tax’ back in 2015. I was able to hold that off for two years, saved Illinois a lot of money by fighting against him on that, but he got it done over my veto. And then he said ‘We’ll go up from there.’ He wants more deficit spending so he can force another tax hike and take it to a constitutional referendum. The people of Illinois are protected by our constitution. We have a constitutionally protected flat income tax. It’s the one policy competitive advantage we have.
Whew. He sure packed a lot of unchalleged hooey into those two comments. Where to begin?
The governor’s first three budgets were not balanced. Period. He knocked the Senate’s “Grand Bargain” negotiations off the tracks more times than I could count, even though he was getting much of what he wanted. He didn’t sign the budget last year because it was funded with a tax increase that he said he opposed, even though they implemented the new tax rate he suggested. And then he used every dime of that new tax hike revenue to “precariously balance” his current budget proposal.
* And, for the umpteenth time, this is what Madigan said in 2015…
“Let me avoid creating a headline for tomorrow’s newspaper,” he joked, then proceeded to create one.
“A good place to begin, good place to begin would be the level we were at before the income tax expired,” Madigan said, referring to the 5 percent individual income tax rate and 7 percent corporate tax rate set in 2011 as part of a four-year temporary tax hike.
“And starting there, you can go in whatever direction you want to go,” Madigan said.
The governor also didn’t “save” any money by blocking a tax hike. Instead, he cost taxpayers over a billion dollars in interest on unpaid bills, almost forced some universities to go belly up, starved social service providers out of existence and kicked untold thousands of the most vulnerable Illinoisans to the curb.
* As far as Madigan wanting more deficit spending to create a need for another tax hike, that would require some mind-reading. However, Madigan has long tried to keep programs on starvation diets, pushed spending off, neglected pension payments, etc. for years (decades) until a tax hike became absolutely imperative.
Notice, though, that Gov. Rauner didn’t answer Charles’ question.
20 Comments
|
Working like a charm
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* That escalated fast…
Father Michael Pfleger, the outspoken pastor of Chicago’s Saint Sabina church, slammed Gov. Bruce Rauner’s proposal to reinstate the death penalty in Illinois on Monday, saying in a statement that “perhaps” the governor “should be charged with a hate crime.”
“While I remain against the death penalty for anyone, this announcement enforces the racist mentality that some lives are more valuable than others,” Pfleger said.
“If he had wanted it for everyone, I would have disagreed with the principle,” he continued, adding, “but when he puts police lives more valuable than the black and brown children dying everyday then perhaps Gov. Rauner should be charged with a hate crime!”
Rauner proposed the return of the death penalty for certain cases, specifically “for mass murderers and for those who kill law enforcement officers,” he said at a news conference Monday morning.
Rauner has very real problems with his GOP base. A good chunk of the governor’s hard-right base despises people like Fr. Pfleger and also loves cops and the death penalty. Rauner should therefore send the outspoken priest a thank you card for this political gift.
The governor also has a general election to win. I can’t find any recent polling here, but the death penalty remains popular across the country despite an overall drop in support.
* Gov. Quinn did essentially the same thing in reverse with the concealed carry bill…
Gov. Pat Quinn on Tuesday made sweeping changes to a bill that would allow concealed guns to be carried in public, writing in tougher regulations he deemed “common sense” amid staunch criticism from lawmakers who say they are poised to overturn his efforts when they return to Springfield next week.
Flanked by gun control advocates during a veto ceremony, Quinn argued the legislation lawmakers sent him would harm public safety by letting people carry as many guns as they wanted in places they shouldn’t be allowed.
* Whatever the case, Gov. Rauner’s AV and its underlying proposals aren’t going anywhere in this particularly format and everybody knows it. Essentially what happened here is that Rauner killed a popular assault weapons bill, staked out his political position at an Illinois State Police facility, gave himself cover for future gun-related vetoes and now moves on to the fall campaign.
25 Comments
|
* Labor Notes has an interesting op-ed by a co-worker of Mark Janus, who is the plaintiff in the US Supreme Court case about the constitutionality of mandatory fair share fees…
1. Without our union, Mr. Janus’s job would probably have been outsourced by now. A drastic provision in the state’s “last, best, and final offer” in 2016 would have given Governor Rauner the right to outsource and privatize state employees’ jobs without accountability. Our union is all that’s preventing critical public services from being privatized. […]
2. Mr. Janus has received $17,000 in union-negotiated raises. […]
3. The public—including the parents and kids Mr. Janus serves—has access to resources like childcare that our union has fought to defend. […]
4. Our union blocked the employer from doubling the cost of Mr. Janus’s health benefits. […]
5. We make sure Mr. Janus’s office is warm in the winter and cool in the summer… In the building where Mr. Janus and I work, the heating and cooling system is extremely old. Twice a year they bring in a computer from 1982 to switch from heat to air conditioning for the summer, and vice versa for the winter. So when the weather fluctuates, we work to get portable heating or cooling units deployed where they’re needed.
Go read the whole thing and tell us what you think.
* Related…
* ADDED: Meet the new head of Chicago labor: Ramirez himself frames it in sharper terms: “He’s as left as they come. He’s for all labor, not just a building trades guy.”
* Will the court break public-sector unions? Those for, against unions anxiously await U.S. Supreme Court ruling on if mandatory dues violate rights
* Washington’s public unions fight to retain influence in face of adverse court ruling
* Janus decision could bring change to California politics
62 Comments
|
* The governor’s AV outline…
* As the governor said today, Speaker Madigan doesn’t like to accept amendatory vetoes (I think he approved one under Blagojevich). So, I kinda doubt this AV will be approved. Instead, as the governor said, the GA could take up the AV as a new bill and then pass that.
* Reinstating the death penalty for mass murderers and cop killers appears to be designed to appeal to his party base and drive a wedge in the electorate. The governor’s proposal would increase the standard of proof to “guilty beyond all doubt.” One of the problems with reinstating the death penalty is that people start to ask “Well, what about (fill in the blank) murderers?” Rauner was asked this question today and said he could be in favor of expanding the death penalty to other topics, but refused to say what they might be, going so far as to say the question wasn’t serious. Also, for a guy who constantly complains about government incompetence and the need for judicial reform, giving that same state the power of life and death over individuals seems a bit contradictory.
* Handgun purchases already require a 72-hour waiting period. This bill expands that period to all guns. The underlying bill only applied to assault weapons. Because there’s such an intense disagreement over how to define assault weapons (and assault weapons themselves have been so politicized), this change does make some sense if you think the waiting period is useful.
* The firearm restraining order has been hotly opposed by groups like the Illinois State Rifle Association, which complains about the lack of due process for gun owners. We don’t yet have the governor’s actual language, so I’m not sure if he modeled his language on existing legislation. The governor said that property rights need to be constitutionally balanced with protecting lives.
* Not a single Democratic lawmaker was at the governor’s press conference today. When asked about this, the governor said his administration has had conversations with Democrats. He was also asked whether he had spoken to any members of the Black Caucus about the death penalty and he completely dodged the question, saying he believes the issue would be popular with the public.
…Adding… More from the governor’s Twitter feed because we don’t even have a press release yet, let alone actual language…
*** UPDATE 1 *** The governor’s press release is here. The headline is “Gov. Rauner proposes death penalty for mass murderers and killers of law enforcement officers,” so it’s pretty clear where he’s trying to go with his messaging.
…Adding… Tribune headline: “Rauner proposes reinstating Illinois death penalty in cases of mass killings, police slayings”…
Democratic state Rep. Jonathan Carroll of Northbrook said he expected the death penalty provision and changes on plea bargains to complicate things politically.
“He hijacked my bill and put politics ahead of policy,” Carroll said. He said he had not been consulted about the governor’s proposed changes.
“I think that it was very telling that there was not one Democrat there,” Carroll said of the news conference, which was held at an Illinois State Police facility in Chicago. “It would have been nice if, as the original sponsor, if I would have been invited to have conversations about this bill or even to the press conference today to talk about this bill.”
* Sun-Times headline: “Rauner pushes to reinstate death penalty for cop killers, mass murderers”…
In announcing his recommendations, Rauner stood alongside Republican lawmakers and law enforcement officials at the Illinois State Police headquarters in Chicago. […]
Madigan spokesman Steve Brown said he has yet to see the governor’s recommendations.
“First we want to make sure it complies with the Constitution, as we do with all amendatory vetoes,” Brown said. “And then we’ll go from there.”
But Brown criticized the governor’s “negotiations” on the package: “This is the governor’s negotiated gun safety program. I guess there’s no negotiations. It’s just absurd.”
*** UPDATE 2 *** Click here for the governor’s veto message.
39 Comments
|
IDOC statement debunked
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From last Wednesday…
A Peoria murder trial was delayed this week after the Illinois Department of Corrections said it was short of gas money.
* IDOC’s response…
While the Department acknowledges it is in desperate need of additional appropriation authority from the General Assembly, I want to make it clear that no offenders have missed scheduled court appearances because of a fuel shortage. The IDOC has no record of the offender who was named in the article being required to attend court on May 8. The Department will transport him, and all other offenders who have court appearances, on the dates they are scheduled.
* Chris Kaergard takes a closer look at the department’s statement and says IDOC is being “too cute by half”…
* Nobody missed a scheduled court appearance? That’s because IDOC asked for an extension. The trial didn’t go forward. So technically we suppose nobody has missed anything. Then again, we didn’t report that they did — just that the trial was delayed.
* There’s no record of Lacy being required to attend court May 8? On that date, that’s true. The email filed by the state said he was expected to testify on May 10 or May 11. That communique, incidentally, exists as part of the court file now — a piece of the public record. It shows that someone at IDOC — at the prison where Lacy is lodged — does indeed have a record that he was due to come to court.
What is undeniably true is that IDOC has asked for an extra $420 million in its budget in the current year to deal with additional costs, because it spent some cash to keep the plates spinning back when the state didn’t have a budget.
But at a hearing last month, a bipartisan group of state senators gave top corrections leaders there a tongue-lashing for downplaying the urgency of that need for that cash.
6 Comments
|
* Sports Illustrated…
The United States Supreme Court agreed on Monday to allow New Jersey’s bid for sports betting at its casinos and racetracks, effectively ending prohibition on a $100 billion industry and striking down restrictions on wagering outside of Nevada.
“The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make,” the Supreme Court announced. “Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own.”
The ruling could allow as many as 25 other states to seek similar allowances.
The case, Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, dealt with if the government had the right to “impermissibly commandeer the regulatory power of States.”
The opinion is here.
* Looks like our spring state legislative session might finally see an uptick in activity…
* American Gaming Association President Geoff Freeman…
“Today’s decision is a victory for the millions of Americans who seek to bet on sports in a safe and regulated manner. According to a Washington Post survey, a solid 55 percent of Americans believe it’s time to end the federal ban on sports betting. Today’s ruling makes it possible for states and sovereign tribal nations to give Americans what they want: an open, transparent, and responsible market for sports betting. Through smart, efficient regulation this new market will protect consumers, preserve the integrity of the games we love, empower law enforcement to fight illegal gambling, and generate new revenue for states, sporting bodies, broadcasters and many others. The AGA stands ready to work with all stakeholders – states, tribes, sports leagues, and law enforcement – to create a new regulatory environment that capitalizes on this opportunity to engage fans and boost local economies.”
…Adding… NCSL…
“NCSL applauds today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down PASPA as unconstitutional and violative of the 10th Amendment. NCSL supports every state’s right to regulate gaming and sports betting, including both legalization and prohibition, without unwarranted federal preemption and interference. This landmark ruling provides states another tool with which they can continue to craft smart, tailored policies during a time of congressional gridlock in Washington.”
37 Comments
|
* HB1468…
Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Defines “assault weapon”. Provides that a person commits the offense of unlawful sale or delivery of firearms when he or she knowingly delivers any assault weapon without withholding delivery of the assault weapon for at least 72 hours, including to a nonresident of the State while at a firearm showing or display recognized by the Department of State Police. Provides that a violation is a Class 4 felony. Effective immediately.
* Lots and lots of rumors last week that the governor will AV the bill today. I’ll update this post when I know more. Also, keep an eye on our live coverage post because there doesn’t seem to be an available live video feed…
Daily Public Schedule: Monday, May 14, 2018
What: Gov. Rauner takes action on House Bill 1468 and discusses public safety
Where: Illinois State Police Forensic Science Laboratory, 1941 W. Roosevelt Road, Chicago
Date: Monday, May 14, 2018
Time: 10:00 a.m.
*** UPDATE *** Rewrite to do right?…
11 Comments
|
* DGA…
At the Kemp Forum last Friday, Governor Bruce Rauner was given a golden opportunity to break his silence on President Donald Trump and show the people of Illinois that he would stand up for them. Instead, he praised Trump’s policies. Rauner was asked how the president was doing and said “I applaud” the Republicans’ middle-class tax hike and his regulatory policies.
CHARLES THOMAS: “But – because you haven’t gone very much, haven’t talked about it very much during your time in office. But, how’s Donald Trump doing?”
BRUCE RAUNER: “Um, so. The president is somebody that I work with. Just, I work with President Trump just as I did with President Obama. My job is to work with the White House and in Congress to make sure that the people of Illinois, the best interests of our state are represented in the actions coming in Washington. I applaud what the White House and Congress have done to cut taxes. The tax cut has led to more jobs, higher incomes, higher pay, and more economic opportunity and I applaud that, that was great progress. I also applaud the regulatory relief that the Trump administration is bringing. They’re cutting red tape, reducing regulations, encouraging free enterprise, and I applaud that. I think that’s a great step in the right direction. Some of the tactics being used in our trade negotiations – we’ll see whether they work, I’m not in a position to comment.”
Rauner’s been notably silent on Donald Trump’s presidency. He failed to stand up for the 42,000 Illinois DACA recipients facing deportation, never lifted a finger while the administration rolled back environmental protections, and refused to fight Republican attempts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act.
“Bruce Rauner’s gone from silently supportive of President Trump to openly embracing his policies,” said DGA Illinois Communications Director Sam Salustro. “Illinois families can be certain now that Rauner is never going to protect them from Donald Trump’s destructive politics.”
“Openly embracing” Trump’s policies? Seems like a stretch.
The DGA’s video clip is here. The full video is here.
* More from the forum…
Um, procurement reform wasn’t one of his original 44 points. And, apparently, it’s still broken.
* And one more bit from the forum…
Rauner blamed his nemesis House Speaker Michael Madigan for Illinois’ problems. And the governor called on every candidate for the House this year to pledge the following.
“We want every member of the General Assembly who is running for the House of Representatives — which controls the budget making process and the spending process — we’re asking them to sign a promise to you and all the people of Illinois. Sign a promise. Don’t just talk about it. Don’t pretend. Sign a promise right in front of a TV camera or in front of an editorial board,” Rauner said. “I promise to vote to put term limits on the ballot. … The second promise is I promise to vote for somebody, anybody, other than Mike Madigan to be Speaker after 35 years.”
*** UPDATE *** Pritzker campaign…
Trailing Donald Trump’s approval rating in Illinois, Bruce Rauner is applauding his partner in Washington and taking a page out of the Trump playbook with his trademark tactic of attacking the media.
At the Kemp Forum on Friday, Rauner responded to a question about Illinois’ image under his failed leadership with a Trumpian line: “Don’t get me started on the bias in the media.” Later, the failed governor applauded the failed president for passing a devastating tax bill and rolling back Obama-era consumer protections — after initially being wary of even saying Trump’s name.
“Donald Trump is more popular than Bruce Rauner in Illinois, so it’s no wonder this failed governor is applauding his friend in Washington and copying his divisive tactics,” said Pritzker campaign spokesman Jason Rubin.
The video clip is here.
19 Comments
|
* Bernie writes about the state GOP chairmanship fight…
[Greg Baise, president and CEO of the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association] last week called the GOP chairmanship fight a “sideshow,” and was critical of the third-party bid for governor being waged by state Sen. Sam McCann, R-Plainview. That’s because, he said, House Speaker Michael Madigan and Pritzker would have control of drawing new legislative maps after the 2020 Census if Rauner loses.
“If you want to be divisive … because you’re still [angry] about this or that, then you’re for Mike Madigan,” Baise said, “because frankly, this election means who’s going to write the map, and Mike Madigan and J.B. Pritzker will write a map that will push the Republican Party into oblivion.”
* Here’s Bob Winchester on the incumbent party chairman. The state party has declared Winchester the loser in a crucial congressional district and he may take that loss to court…
Schneider is “probably a decent person,” said Winchester, a former legislator who was later deputy governor to George Ryan and who has been on the state central committee for a quarter century. But, he said, Schneider “does everything the governor tells him to do, whether it’s right or wrong. I credit him with helping to move the Republican Party to the left. … It’s no longer the Republican Party. It’s the Rauner party.”
* However, Schneider’s challenger Mark Shaw said this to Bernie about Gov. Rauner…
“I intend to do everything I can to make sure he’s the next governor of the state of Illinois, whether I’m the state chairman or not,” Shaw said.
12 Comments
|
With him, around him, or through him
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
“Nothing’s more important for a governor than having a good budget because that allows you to manage the state to do your job.”
Let that recent quote from former Gov. Jim Edgar as reported by the State Journal-Register sink in for a bit.
“Nothing’s more important for a governor than having a good budget because that allows you to manage the state to do your job.”
The budget passed last year over Gov. Bruce Rauner’s veto was not a “good budget” because the governor’s budget office wasn’t directly involved. Legislators simply don’t have the expertise to pass a good budget without the governor’s help. The executive branch has experts who know what the agencies and programs need because they are involved with this issue every day.
And so the governor and his administration have been struggling ever since last July to implement a budget that it had almost nothing to do with. That’s insane. No one who is truly interested in governing would allow that to happen.
Whether the governor believes he will be reelected or not, it’s his job to get something done for the future of his state. And the very least he can do is provide some stability going forward by finally doing what every governor before him has done: negotiate and sign a workable budget.
I mean, seriously, we always make such a big deal out of state budgets, but this is a routine, mundane matter almost everywhere else.
House Speaker Michael Madigan told his caucus last week that he believes the governor wants an overtime session so he can blame the resulting gridlock on the Democrats. But Madigan told his House Democrats that he believes voters will blame both sides. This was taken by some of his members as a sign that Madigan finally realizes he needs to get something done one way or another. We’ll see. That assessment could be overly optimistic.
The budgeteers met via teleconference last week and not a word was said about the governor’s repeated demands for an “official” revenue estimate. Instead, they reportedly had a fairly productive discussion about various pension ideas. So, that’s a good sign. The revenue estimate demand was a giant red herring used for political and disruptive purposes.
The Democrats appear to have gamed out the end of the spring session if they can’t do a deal with the governor for whatever reason.
Money for the Quincy veterans home and cash-strapped prisons, universities, etc. will all be put into the appropriations bills to entice Republicans onto the legislation. Some of the Republicans who broke ranks last year may not vote for the legislation when it passes, but may vote for it during the override motion.
Some Republican top dogs have said privately that they believe rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans who voted for the vetoed budget last year feel betrayed because they were told that the budget they passed was balanced when it actually wasn’t. But in talking to those folks, that doesn’t appear to be the case. Many knew what they were getting into and, besides, what’s done is done and they want another budget now. Plus, some disaffected House Republicans are itching for one last fight with the governor before they retire.
House Republican Leader Jim Durkin has painstakingly put his caucus back together twice in the past year. The first time was after the budget override vote, which badly split his caucus. Members were essentially told if they voted for the education funding reform bill, all would be forgiven. And then another blow-up was threatened after Rep. Jeanne Ives nearly defeated Gov. Rauner in the GOP primary. Durkin has managed to keep things mostly cool and separated from caucus business since then.
It’s abundantly clear from his public and private remarks that Senate Republican Leader Bill Brady wants a negotiated budget deal. Durkin, meanwhile, has solidly allied himself with the governor, both in public and reportedly during the leaders’ meetings.
Durkin badly needs Rauner’s money to fund his campaigns against Speaker Madigan this fall. But this alliance can also help move things along if Rauner’s staunch ally Durkin eventually informs the governor that he needs to cut a deal for the good of the state or face yet another stinging defeat. That worked last year on the education funding reform bill.
Whatever happens, it’s long past time that the governor do whatever he can to put together a “good budget” for his state.
* Meanwhile, Treasurer Michael Frerichs had a warning for the governor and the General Assembly…
Speaking on WGN AM-720, Frerichs said the state’s already poor credit rating could drop even further to “junk” status, limiting the investment firms that could purchase state bonds and vastly increasing interest payments to lenders that can still buy Illinois debt.
“I’ve been warning not only is it a real possibility, it is going to happen if there is not a budget in place, I would say, by July 1st. By May 31st it’s possible, by July 1st it most definitely will be,” Frerichs said.
“We would be the first state in the country to have our general obligation bonds rated as junk. That is not a first that any state wants to have, should aspire to,” he said. […]
“We shouldn’t be messing around with this,” he said.
There was some talk last week of putting a parliamentary hold on the approp/budget bills until June 30th to pressure Gov. Rauner into signing them. That’s… not a good idea.
* Related…
* Rauner’s top priorities sidelined in final budget talks of his first term: Now, key Rauner ally House Republican Leader Jim Durkin said GOP lawmakers are “desperately looking to resolve whatever differences over the next three weeks and to leave town at the end of May with a negotiated balanced budget.”
14 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Biss endorses Pritzker
Monday, May 14, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
Today, JB Pritzker and Daniel Biss released the following statements on their commitment to defeating Bruce Rauner and electing Democrats up and down the ballot:
“Since the primary, JB Pritzker and I have had a series of productive discussions about the future of the State of Illinois,” said Senator Daniel Biss. “I’m thrilled with his relentless focus on a progressive income tax as the right way to fix our budget without burdening the middle class or the poor, and I’m pleased that he’s committed to fight for campaign finance reform so our political system is accountable to everyone. That’s why beyond my long-standing commitment to defeating failed governor Bruce Rauner, I am all in to elect JB Pritzker. This year I will be proudly campaigning for JB Pritzker, Juliana Stratton, and Democrats up and down the ticket.”
“This election isn’t just about beating Bruce Rauner. It’s about uniting Democrats across the state around a progressive agenda that will bring real change to Illinois,” said JB Pritzker. “Daniel Biss and I have a relationship rooted in the shared values that lead us both to fight for a progressive income tax, campaign finance reform, legalizing marijuana, and healthcare for all. I’m excited to have his support, and his help in fighting for those priorities. Democrats are united and we will win big in November so we can put Springfield back on the side of working families and move Illinois forward.”
*** UPDATE *** Rauner campaign…
Biss Spent Months Attacking Pritzker’s Corrupt Past
Today, Dan Biss endorsed JB Pritzker despite previously calling him “disqualified to serve as governor” and spending months highlighting Pritzker’s corrupt past.
Here are just a few examples of what Pritzker’s newest endorser thinks about the Democratic candidate for governor:
Chicago Maroon: “If we are concerned with the way state government has gone since 1983, if we think that the concentration of power is too great in the state of Illinois, if we think that the fabled political machine that has screwed so much stuff up over the course of these many decades, is too powerful, electing J.B. Pritzker governor is literally the worst thing we could possibly do.”
Biss Statement: “Today’s report proves that JB Pritzker is disqualified to serve as governor.”
WBBM: “If that phone call [with disgraced ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich] was your definition of public service, you’re doing it wrong.”
Chicago Tribune: “State Sen. Daniel Biss of Evanston said the conversation between Pritzker and Blagojevich represents ‘everything that’s wrong with the connection between money and power. For too long our broken system has allowed the wealthy to have unfettered access to the decision-makers in our government. That’s what breeds corruption.’”
Chicago Tribune: “‘It took J.B. Pritzker a week to get permission from Mike Madigan to even name him in talking about this sexual harassment cover-up,’ Biss said… But Pritzker did not answer a panelist’s question of whether Madigan should give up his party chairmanship, his speaker role or both. ‘He hasn’t gotten permission yet from Madigan to answer that question,’ said Biss in noting the dodge.”
State Journal-Register: “There’s a Pritzker-Madigan wing of the Democratic Party and there’s the progressive wing of the Democratic Party that I’m a part of.”
Tweet: Biss continues calling Pritzker, “Madigan’s candidate” after debate wraps up.
20 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|
