Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Doherty lawyer slams feds over job allegations
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Doherty lawyer slams feds over job allegations

Friday, May 21, 2021 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Jon Seidel

Former City Club President Jay Doherty asked a judge Thursday to toss parts of a bombshell indictment filed last fall charging him and members of former House Speaker Michael Madigan’s inner circle with bribery, calling the federal prosecution “shaky at best.”

The indictment alleged that Doherty, Madigan confidant Michael McClain, ex-ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore and onetime ComEd lobbyist John Hooker arranged for Madigan’s associates and allies to get jobs, contracts and money in order to influence Madigan. […]

Attorney Gabrielle Sansonetti wrote that one of the federal laws Doherty is accused of violating “prohibits any prosecution where the object of the bribe is a bona fide job in the usual course of business” and added that, “the indictment fails to evidence the grand jury’s consideration of this essential element.”

Without requiring such evidence, the attorney wrote, prosecutors are “free to indict any legislator who recommends any person for a job to any entity that will benefit or may have previously benefited from that legislator’s official action.”

Prosecutors “can easily secure evidence regarding the legitimacy of the job at issue,” Sansonetti wrote. Meanwhile, she added that Doherty “must wait until a jury trial to prove the legitimacy of the jobs.”

Thoughts?

       

12 Comments
  1. - qualified someone nobody sent - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 8:48 am:

    This ruling could have consequences through out the Political Patronage that still continues at every level of government in Illinois. County, City other municipal jobs handed out to the “connected” could now be considered bribery. Going through the motions to avoid Shakman hiring rules could prove to be a problem for a lot of current elected officials.


  2. - Cubs in '16 - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 8:50 am:

    “…the object of the bribe is a bona fide job in the usual course of business”

    The prosecution will have to prove that such a job was created or offered for the sole purpose of a quid pro quo. It’s tough to prove this intent unless the job wasn’t open to the general public or multiple applicants weren’t equally considered.


  3. - Ducky LaMoore - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 8:57 am:

    “The prosecution will have to prove that such a job was created or offered for the sole purpose of a quid pro quo.”

    Exactly. But also the prosecution would have to prove that Doherty knew the jobs were not legit. If he recommends people for jobs that aren’t legit, but he thinks they are legit, he is not liable. That is on ComEd.


  4. - Annonin' - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 8:58 am:

    Guessin’ the guys from the Trump Dept. of Justice might have met their match


  5. - Fat Fingers - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 9:18 am:

    It’s nice that Doherty’s lawyer is filing a motion. He’s doing something. But, it’s also likely that the federal judge will allow Doherty to defend himself in court. The charges are based on several sources.


  6. - Keyrock - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 9:23 am:

    Defense lawyers always file motions to dismiss. They usually lose. So don’t take this too seriously.

    Prosecutors can’t respond to the motion in the press. They can only respond through their court filings.

    Sometimes reporters ask former prosecutors or other lawyers for comments, so the motion’s legal and factual failings are discussed in the initial story.

    Seidel’s story explores some of the factual failings in Doherty’s argument. The response to the motion to dismiss will likely present the legal arguments later.


  7. - Donnie Elgin - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 9:50 am:

    =Guessin’ the guys from the Trump Dept. of Justice might have met their match=

    Most of the actual legal work/investigation/research is done by career DOJ lawyers not appointees .


  8. - Candy Dogood - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 11:55 am:

    ===“free to indict any legislator who recommends any person for a job to any entity that will benefit or may have previously benefited from that legislator’s official action.”===

    This really begs the question of why are they doing this in the first place?


  9. - Back to the Future - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 12:50 pm:

    I suspect this motion is going nowhere.
    Of course, I would feel very concerned for Mr. Doherty if he not guilty of the charges that have been alleged in the indictment.
    If he is guilty and wasting taxpayers money in having to pay federal investigators, federal attorneys and taking up the time of a federal judge rather than just pleading guilty to his crimes and showing some remorse then I would think any punishment would reflect his failure to acknowledge his wrong doing.


  10. - MOON - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 1:22 pm:

    BACK/FUTURE

    You have it a– backward. Its the Feds who are forever filing motions, etc. to run up the legal fees of the defendant. The Feds want to financially break the defendant so he will cooperate and cop a plea.


  11. - Back to the Future - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 2:08 pm:

    Moon,
    Of course, you may find a Department of Justice person who loses their way, but those folks are probably less than 1/10 of 1% (if that) of the investigators and attorneys. Of that tiny percentage the Justice Department and the Federal bench are not tolerant of that kind of behavior.
    The percentage of convictions used to run around 96%. Not sure what it is now, but I strongly suspect it still is around that number. That is quite a batting average.


  12. - Thomas Paine - Friday, May 21, 21 @ 10:03 pm:

    === Thoughts? ===

    My first thought is that the Feds are really blowing the lid off of the Consulting Industry. Has no one at the US Attorney’s Office read “The Dilbert Ptinciple”?

    My second thought was “When are they going to prosecute Ferro?”


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded
* Whatever happened, the city has a $40 million budget hole it didn't disclose until now
* Manar gives state agencies budget guidance: Cut, cut, cut
* Roundup: Ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis testifies in Madigan corruption trial
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller