Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rep. Halbrook says he now understands seniority, while his opponent claims his allies ‘tried to bully, persuade, and bribe me out of the race’
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rep. Halbrook says he now understands seniority, while his opponent claims his allies ‘tried to bully, persuade, and bribe me out of the race’

Monday, Dec 4, 2023 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Tom Kacich looks at the Republican primary shaping up between the father of the “Kick Chicago out of Illinois” campaign and an equally conservative opponent named Marsha Webb. The main issue so far is term limits

State Rep. Brad Halbrook, R-Shelbyville, who represented parts of Champaign County before the 2021 redistricting, is now running for a sixth term in the Illinois House, even though he said in a 2016 News-Gazette questionnaire that he would not serve more than five terms. Halbrook ran for and won races for state representative in 2012, 2016, 2018, 2020 and 2022. […]

“I looked at the current situation,” Halbrook said. State Sen. “Dan Caulkins was one of the founding members of the Illinois Freedom Caucus. There were five of us then. With him leaving, I looked at the tenure of the remaining House Republicans. We’re a rather youthful caucus. So in a world where seniority and experience matters, I just made the decision that I would stay in.” […]

Ironically, Caulkins, R-Decatur, is set to leave the Illinois House — and the Freedom Caucus — after next year’s election in order to honor his pledge to serve only three terms. […]

“There are only seven of us. I had anticipated that number to be much larger than it is today. For whatever reason, it’s not,” Halbrook said. “But if you look at the issues that have surfaced in the last year and a half, the Illinois Freedom Caucus has led on those issues.” […]

He said he now recognizes that seniority matters in the Legislature.

“You have to be in your third term to either get a chairmanship or a (minority-party) spokesperson position on committees,” he said. “I’m now a spokesperson on an appropriations committee. We’ve been able to ask hard questions of agency heads, although they’ve been able to stonewall and not respond. But at least we make them hear the questions.”

“I had anticipated that number to be much larger than it is today.”

Sigh.

* Anyway, his opponent Marsha Webb is quoted extensively in Tom’s story, so read the whole thing. But here’s her Facebook response

If you can be persuaded to break a term limit pledge to your constituents, what else can you be persuaded to break or change?

Who “persuaded” you to break your term limit pledge? Is it the same select few that tried to bully, persuade, and bribe me out of the race against you?

Who do you place your loyalty with? Your constituents or a caucus that you are a member of?

This sounds like Orwellian style double talk.

Folks, read the article for yourself and form your own opinions.

I am running to take your voices to the state house.

       

24 Comments
  1. - TheInvisibleMan - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 11:13 am:

    -He said he now recognizes that seniority matters in the Legislature.-

    “Now that it directly affects me, my opinion on this matter has changed.”

    For not really having a definable platform, this is the one thing the GOP is remarkably consistent on.


  2. - Excitable Boy - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 11:28 am:

    - He said he now recognizes that seniority matters in the Legislature. -

    Heck, it only took him 10 years to figure it out. Give him another five terms and he might recognize that legislating matters, too.


  3. - NIU Grad - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 11:33 am:

    “We’ve been able to ask hard questions of agency heads, although they’ve been able to stonewall and not respond.”

    Translation: We asked off-the-wall questions and we didn’t like the answers that we got.


  4. - Candy Dogood - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 11:57 am:

    Term limits are a terrible idea. Running on term limits is a terrible idea.

    He’s learned better, and that’s fine, but if he’s breaking a promises — if he’s been dishonest, he should spend some time apologizing to his constituents for it and maybe apologizing the the over all legislative body for his past outlandish positions.

    If he doesn’t want to take the time to explain why and how he was wrong, he probably deserves to lose in a primary for breaking a promise about term limits. The kind of promise he made in order to help win a primary. The kind of promise he made because people who don’t understand how legislatures govern really though the “Contract with America” that the GOP ran on — and subsequently ignored had some pretty bad bullet points in it.

    Lincoln would probably have some nice things to say about someone who is wiser today than he was yesterday and for the sake of a better argument that’s the Lincoln reference I am cherry picking.

    A primary opponent is welcome to run on him breaking a campaign promise, but in general I don’t think anyone who things term limits are a bad idea should criticize him for realizing it and admitting it. The voters of his district will decide if year 11 is an important year for him to serve, or if the job can be done by anyone with no experience and no seniority.


  5. - Stormsw7706 - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 11:58 am:

    Not a lick of difference between the two. Neither of them have or will accomplish anything of significance. Zero plus zero always equal zero


  6. - ArchPundit - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:02 pm:

    ===“There are only seven of us. I had anticipated that number to be much larger than it is today. For whatever reason, it’s not,” Halbrook said. “But if you look at the issues that have surfaced in the last year and a half, the Illinois Freedom Caucus has led on those issues.” […]

    This is the funniest thing I’ve read in a while. Just no idea why our little band of weirdos who refuse to actually get things done isn’t larger.


  7. - vern - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:05 pm:

    ” I had anticipated that number to be much larger than it is today. For whatever reason, it’s not”

    Wow, a rare moment of introspection. Well, not introspection exactly, but he came vaguely close to acknowledging political reality. The meat of the matter is within “for whatever reason.” Maybe in 5 more terms he’ll figure out why his ideology keeps losing elections.

    Then again, maybe not.


  8. - Lagartha's Shield - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:29 pm:

    He didn’t even live in his district for the first term he was in office, and you think this guy is going to be honest? It’s amazing how quickly R’s will change their tunes when something affects them personally. It’s like he’s saying, “The only immoral term limit is my term limit.”


  9. - Bruce( no not him) - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:32 pm:

    === I just made the decision that I would stay in.” […]===
    Translation… Where else can i get a job this good, with zero responsibilities and a pension? God Bless Illinois.”


  10. - Annon'in - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:33 pm:

    So it is OK for the Freedom Caucus whackjobs to lie about term limits — sort of the Shimkus tradition kept alive. Great news.


  11. - Pundent - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:41 pm:

    Holbrook has to run so he can finish what he never started.


  12. - TheInvisibleMan - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:51 pm:

    –I don’t think anyone who things term limits are a bad idea should criticize him for realizing it and admitting it.–

    He hasn’t changed his stance. He’s saying it shouldn’t apply to him. That’s why the example he is using, is himself.

    “I just made the decision that I would stay in.”

    In a few weeks, he will be back to complaining about career politicians.


  13. - Flapdoodle - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:52 pm:

    Some good, snarky comments here — well-deserved.

    It seems that Rep. Holbrook is demonstrating, probably unknowingly and certainly unwillingly, one of the few iron laws of politics: Where you stand depends on where you sit.


  14. - Rabid - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:55 pm:

    The only accomplishment is reelection. That’s what you run on


  15. - Lucky Pierre - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 12:55 pm:

    The party of Ed Burke and Mike Madigan hates the idea of term limits on legislators


  16. - Excitable Boy - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 1:20 pm:

    - The party of Ed Burke and Mike Madigan hates the idea of term limits on legislators -

    What on earth do Burke and Madigan have to do with this post?


  17. - Pundent - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 1:22 pm:

    =The party of Ed Burke and Mike Madigan hates the idea of term limits on legislators=

    Completely non-sensical. As someone who continually beats this drum you should be outraged that Holbrook is unwilling to uphold his pledge. But as usual you simply revert to making a silly partisan comment presumably to excuse the hypocrisy.


  18. - Lordy lordy - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 1:38 pm:

    Republican voters especially are sick and tired of do-nothing Republican politicians who don’t keep their promises (see e.g. Kevin McCarthy). Brad Halbrook will never be taken seriously (assuming he ever was) if he breaks his term limit pledge, which btw is a major pledge as far as pledges go. Hit the bricks Brad. Let’s give Ms. Webb a chance to see if she can do something more productive beyond pie in the sky pandering about splitting up the state. Hashtag fail.


  19. - JS Mill - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 1:56 pm:

    =The party of Ed Burke and Mike Madigan hates the idea of term limits on legislators=

    Sounds to me like someone was playing without a helmet on sunday. Better get that checked out.

    Like LP, Halbrook is an impossible to embarrass hypocrite. Brad, if you don’t know why your little cabral numbers so few, maybe work on that instead of your career as a politician. Food for thought if he ever has a real one.


  20. - Lurker - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 2:03 pm:

    @LP, this story is about a Republican going against his word and saying something that you oppose, and you revert to Madigan? Could you please stop trying to help and defend Republicans? You make us look even more inane then we have done a great job of in the last 10 years. Grrrr.


  21. - Joe Bidenopolous - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 2:39 pm:

    === I just made the decision that I would stay in.” […]===

    Typical Republican ignoring the fact that *voters* make that decision, not themselves


  22. - Demoralized - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 3:03 pm:

    Way to deflect @LP. Now perhaps address this particular post instead of your usual inane commentary. Do better for crying out loud.


  23. - Dotnonymous x - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 3:27 pm:

    Ironically, Caulkins…heh.


  24. - dem observer - Monday, Dec 4, 23 @ 11:30 pm:

    Brad Halbrook has helped to destroy his home county which is now without a water rescue team, an animal control dept being turned inside out, courthouse employees resigning left and right, County-owned farmland growing up in weeds, $3 million in ARPA sitting in the bank with no plan to spend it. Of course the Edgar Co Watchdogs have played a role in all this.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup (updated)
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Feds approve Medicaid coverage for state violence prevention pilot project
* Question of the day
* Bost and Bailey set aside feud as Illinois Republicans tout unity at RNC delegate breakfast
* State pre-pays $422 million in pension payments
* Dillard's gambit
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller