Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Illinois State Board of Elections bows to precedent, punts on Trump ballot status
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Illinois State Board of Elections bows to precedent, punts on Trump ballot status

Tuesday, Jan 30, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Tribune

* Background from Rick’s earlier story

A state elections hearing officer agreed with objectors that former President Donald Trump “engaged in insurrection” at the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, but said he believed it is up to the courts and not the State Board of Elections to decide whether to remove him from the March 19 Illinois primary ballot.

The nonbinding recommendation from Clark Erickson, a retired Republican judge from Kankakee County, comes ahead of the state election board’s meeting Tuesday to certify the names that will appear on the primary ballot. […]

Section 3 of the post-Civil War era amendment says those who have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution “as member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state,” shall not be able to serve in Congress or “hold any office, civil or military” if they have engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the Constitution.

Erickson said previous Illinois Supreme Court rulings bar the State Board of Elections from acting on candidate disqualifications based on constitutional analysis. Because of those rulings, he said, the board should reject the Trump ballot objection.

“It is impossible to imagine the Board deciding whether Candidate Trump is disqualified by Section 3 without the Board engaging in significant and sophisticated constitutional analysis,” Erickson wrote. “All in all, attempting to resolve a constitutional issue within the expedited schedule of an election board hearing is somewhat akin to scheduling a two-minute round between heavyweight boxers in a telephone booth.”

* From the 14th Amendment

Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

But there’s also Section 5

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Deep breaths, please.

       

22 Comments
  1. - Flyin'Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:31 am:

    Good call.

    Who needs the headaches. Plus, all those southern Illinoisan right-wingers who just knew “Pritzker would keep him off the ballot” can just eat it.

    Yes, I know, it wasn’t Pritzker’s call.


  2. - TJ - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:37 am:

    Meh. Seems like basically everybody with any semblance of authority is punting on the issue as they don’t want to be the ones to actually hold the insurrectionist accountable. Based on the explanation, it seems like the technically correct call, but I won’t be holding my breath that the state supreme court or general assembly or anyone else with autority witll do anything either.


  3. - Jerry - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:38 am:

    Those were tourists on January 6th. /s


  4. - Central Illinois Centrist - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:40 am:

    Slightly surprised


  5. - Lincoln Lad - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:50 am:

    Looking for the Supremes to take strong action to protect this country. Encouraging Republican governors to send national guardtroops to Texas to support Abbott in defying the government and a Supreme Court ruling sure looks like continuing action against the government and further leans into promoting insurrection to me. It’s continuing… it hasn’t even stopped.


  6. - New Day - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:50 am:

    Punt is the right move. Leave this to the US Supreme Court and ultimately the voters. Why give MAGAland another conspiracy target? They’ve got their hands full with Taylor Swift and Maauto (Travis Kelce).


  7. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:54 am:

    Yes, it’s not happening for obvious reasons. However, I was persuaded by Judge Luttig et al. that it would have been the correct decision to remove him. I laugh at the pundits who worry about how MAGAts would react. They’re going to react in the most unreasonable way regardless. MAGAts don’t give you credit when you respond in a manner to assuage their concerns.


  8. - TinyDancer(FKASue) - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 11:55 am:

    Hot potato.
    Good call.


  9. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:04 pm:

    It’d be nice if the US Supreme Court got around to hearing and ruling on this somewhat time-sensitive matter. And also the question around immunity that is further delaying accountability in the January 6th insurrection. The wheels of justice grind slowly, but also, justice delayed is something something.

    They will get to this presumably after they gut some more environmental regulations and other miscellaneous matters.

    Seriously, it really feels like all of our various institutions are broken.


  10. - JoanP - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:07 pm:

    Presumably the objectors will now take it to court.


  11. - TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:09 pm:

    –it seems like the technically correct call–

    It seems that way, if the citations are accurate.

    I’d like to see the cases being cited to arrive at this conclusion. Specifically.
    I read a few about judges and automatic retirement being on the ballot, but not much more.


  12. - ArchPundit - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:16 pm:

    === They’re going to react in the most unreasonable way regardless.

    Exactly. The other problem is the plain language reading of the amendment is clear. The BoE is probably right on the technical point, but this is the problem of writing an amendment and not spelling out the mechanism for enforcement (I understand what Rich pointed out, but that was not done for the Confederates who were banned from federal office back in the day).


  13. - Terry Salad - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:16 pm:

    I keep hearing from pundits that there is no way Trump will be kept off the ballot by the Supreme Court. But what I do not hear are arguments as why the SC will strike down the 14th Amendment challenge. Judge Luttig and others have made a solid argument. I hope the SC listens.


  14. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:17 pm:

    ===But what I do not hear are arguments as why the SC will strike down the 14th Amendment challenge===

    Section 5.


  15. - School Guy - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:22 pm:

    SCOTUS will hear arguments on the Colorado case (which in effect will represent all of the state cases) on February 8th. Nothing to see here until then. You can read both sides’ arguments here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-719.html


  16. - ArchPundit - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:29 pm:

    And to be clear, I do think that Rich is right about how the Court will avoid this. I just disagree with the Court.


  17. - Gravitas - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 12:36 pm:

    The Illinois State Board of Elections did not punt on this case, but followed the law. Electoral Boards in Illinois do not have the authority to decide constitutional issues, but must rely upon legal precedents established by the courts.


  18. - vern - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 1:11 pm:

    Gonna need a fact check on his claim that he “loves Illinois” lmao

    https://x.com/benszalinski/status/1752407427767517300?s=46&t=1zmJTUwTZY8aWTv_MrbeAA


  19. - New Day - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 1:30 pm:

    “But what I do not hear are arguments as why the SC will strike down the 14th Amendment challenge.”

    They are going to be looking for a way out. I know what Judge Luttig says and he’s probably right, but I think they should say that because he has not been adjudicated by a court to have participated in an insurrection they can’t kick him off the ballot. I want to see Trump spanked but the only way to do it properly and have any legitimacy is to do so at the ballot box. And even then, Trump doesn’t accept defeat so he’ll do what he did last time and lie. Still, let’s do this the right way.


  20. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 2:14 pm:

    === legitimacy is to do so at the ballot box ===

    Like the insurrectionists accepted in 2020?

    I pray for our country and our democracy that Biden wins. Even then, the only way we’re going to avoid a repeat of 2020 in 2024 is for Trump and his coconspirators to be thrown in prison.


  21. - Pundent - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 4:41 pm:

    =legitimacy is to do so at the ballot box=

    Some of those ballot boxes aren’t as legitimate as they were in 2020. The insurrectionists have had 4 years to perfect what they almost pulled off in a matter of weeks.


  22. - clec dcn - Tuesday, Jan 30, 24 @ 5:52 pm:

    Yes just wait for the court to decide. Personally I think it will be quite simple but could be surprising.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller